oona: no, i don't think so. although it is true that nonbinding agreements have become quite a bit more common -- but i would not say that security council resolutions fall into that category. i would say that what we are seeing is a rise of many different modes of trying to encourage states to abide by international law. nonbinding agreements are actually growing significantly. there are thousands of them every year being concluded by states, more so than binding agreements. security council resolutions don't fall into that category. what we are seeing -- this is one place where you have a strong argument. the united states pulled itself out as a central player in enforcing international law, and yet it is not always prepared to do that itself. gaza has been the case where rightfully there has been significant criticism of the united states for failing to hold its partners to the same principles and aims that it would hold other states of the world, most notably russia. so yeah. i think that is a long conversat