did parusnikov take risks? maybe yes.he prospect did not correspond to any criteria with the ideas about official buildings, nor with criticism regarding the decisions of architectural ensembles in the belarusian capital. many architectural and art critics of the forties wrote that in minsk this formal constructivism still dominates and a new era of socialist architecture will not come. in the same style, parusnikov , together with the architect badanov, built an edition opposite the kgb. it clearly reads trends in english architecture, a characteristic tower, but with a clock. the building continued the theme set by the architects. fit organically into the overall ensemble. the gates of minsk on the station square, the unique building of the main post office, the courage of the decision. in the appearance of all the buildings, the architects managed to surprisingly harmoniously combine classics and modernity, stucco and baroque decor, sculptural compositions with symbols of the soviet era, but there was one more feature: