from the conclusion of the public council of virtue.particular, unconfirmed sources of income for the acquisition by the candidate's estate of a house with an area of ​​380 m2 and a plot of land of 0.13 hectares under it, which are located in... in the village of stoyanka, kyiv-svyatoshinsky district, kyiv region. according to data from real estate sites, the market value of such houses is from uah 5 million. in the candidate's declaration , the value of the house was not indicated at all, and in her explanations she reported that the house and land were purchased for uah 1,862. the national anti-corruption bureau conducted an investigation into possible declaration of false information by judges. of the court by olga stupak and checked the compliance of the judge's income and wealth. detectives found many violations, but the judge was lucky. the constitutional court of ukraine annulled the article for unreliable declaration. regarding the elected judge of the grand chamber of the supreme court serhiy pogribny, there is also a negative

court, there is also a negative conclusion of the public council of virtue.s to his decision with signs of political influence on the illegal. construction on the odesa coast and about the transfer of the land of the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built in a very quick time in one sitting, 10 days after accepting the lawsuit, the judge also forbade filming in an open session, although the parties to the case did not object and thereby violated the principle of openness. last year, despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia, ukraine confidently continued its path to the european level. fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary to maintain candidate status for membership. in particular, on judicial reform in part conducting contests for judicial governance bodies. we spoke with the head of the dere foundation mykhailo jernakov and tried to sum up the results of the judicial reform in 2023. a lot was accepted, a lot was completed, i.e. those processes that started in the 21st year of the reboot of judicial governance bodies, the supreme

from the conclusion of the public council of virtue.ar, unconfirmed sources of income for the acquisition of a 380 m2 house and a land plot of 0.13 ha by the candidate's estate. below it, which are located in the village of stoyanka, kyiv-svyatoshyn district, kyiv region. according to data from real estate sites, the market value of such buildings is from uah 5 million. in the candidate's declaration , the value of the house is not indicated at all, but in in her explanations, she reported that the house and land were purchased for uah 1,862. the national anti-corruption bureau conducted an investigation into the fact of a possible false declaration. information by supreme court judge olga stupak and verified the compliance of the judge's income and assets. detectives found many violations, but the judge was lucky. the constitutional court of ukraine annulled the article for unreliable declaration. there is also a negative conclusion of the public council regarding serhiy pogribny, who was elected to the position of judge of the grand c

arguments and justifications of iryna yedamenko, neither the public council of virtue, nor members ofication commission were not considered sufficiently convincing, to recognize the judge of the pokrovsky district court of the dnipropetrovsk region yadamenko iryna vitalivna as unfit for the position she holds. now the final decision on the judge's dismissal from office must be made by the supreme council of justice. today i have everything, it was judicial control and i am tetyana shostrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to tell about an unscrupulous judge, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on your screens. see you in exactly one week. good bye. 6:00 p.m. in ukraine, for your attention , a news release on the spresso tv channel, in the studio of iryna koval, i greet all viewers, and we begin with the situation in sumy oblast, one person died there. a person through an enemy attack. a 52-year-old woman received injuries from which she died in the hospital. a russian missile hit a two-story residential building in the isma

neither the public council of virtue nor the members of the higher qualification commission found theuments and justifications of iryna yedamenko sufficiently convincing. recognize the judge of the pokrovsky district court of the dnipropetrovsk region, iryna vitalivna menko, as unfit for the position she holds. now the final decision on the dismissal of the judge must be made. council of justice. today i have everything. it was judicial control and i, tatiana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to tell about an unscrupulous judge, write to me on facebook or to the email address you see on your screens. see you in exactly one week. good bye. there are discounts on paracetamol darnytsia 10% in the pharmacies of travel bam and oskad. there are discounts on deflu, 20% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. tired of heavy and bulky forks, then the compact and powerful strongg saw from unpack tv is just for you. now you can cut trees with ease. and shrubs, the strong saw is so convenient to use for carpentry work as well, it is an ideal tool f

from the conclusion of the public council of virtue.articular, unconfirmed sources of income for the acquisition by the candidate's estate of a house with an area of ​​380 m2 and a plot of land of 0.13 hectares under it, which are located in the village of stoyanka, kyiv-osvitoshyn district , kyiv region. according to the data of the real estate sites, the market. such houses are from 5 million hryvnias. in the candidate's declaration , the value of the house is not indicated at all, but in in her explanations, she reported that the house and land were purchased for uah 1,862. the national anti-corruption bureau conducted an investigation into the possible declaration of false information by a judge.

pogribnogo is also negative conclusion of the public council of virtue. it refers to his decision with signs of political influence regarding illegal construction on the odesa coast, and the transfer of land to the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built very quickly in one sitting, 10 days after accepting the lawsuit. also, the judge forbade filming at an open session, although the parties to the case did not object, thereby violating the open principle. last year, despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia, ukraine confidently continued path to the european union, fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary to maintain the status of a candidate for membership. in particular , we spoke with the head of the foundation, mykhailo zhernakov, about the judicial reform in terms of conducting competitions for judicial governance bodies and tried to sum up the results of the judicial reform in 2023. little was accepted, or little was completed, that is , those processes that had already begun in the 21st year of the reboot of the bodies of ju

court, there is also a negative conclusion of the public council of virtue. it, in particular, talks about his decision with signs of political influence. legal construction on the odesa coast and about the transfer of the land of the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built in a very quick time in one sitting, 10 days after accepting the lawsuit, the judge also forbade filming in an open session, although the parties to the case did not object and thereby violated the principle of openness. last year, despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia, ukraine confidently continued its way to europe. who of the union fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary to maintain the status of a candidate for membership. in particular, about the judicial reform in the part of holding tenders for bodies judicial governance. we spoke with the head of the deyure foundation mykhailo jernakov and tried to sum up the results of the judicial reform in 2023. a lot was accepted, a lot was completed, i.e. those processes that started in the 21st year of the reboot

opinion of the public council of virtue.icular, it refers to his decision with signs of political influence regarding illegal construction on the odesa coast and the transfer of land to the kyiv zoo, which the judge allowed to be built very quickly in one sitting. 10 days after the claim is accepted. also, the judge forbade filming at an open session, even though the party. cases were not contested and thus violated the principle of openness. last year ukraine despite the large-scale war unleashed by russia confidently continued its path to the european union, fulfilled two of the seven recommendations necessary to maintain the status of a candidate for membership. in particular, about the judicial reform in the part of conducting competitions for the bodies of judicial governance. we spoke with the head of the dere foundation, mykhailo jernakov, and tried to sum up the results. in 2023, whether little was adopted or little was completed, that is, those processes that had already begun in 2021 of the reboot of the bodies of