had a famous story, when he played rachmanin’s third concerto, played, success incredible, the hallce, angry, and his wife tells him that you, seryozha, look, he says, that’s it, i’m done, i blurred the climax, she says, well, the audience, look what ’s going on, with listener, says, no , what difference does it make, the architectonics have been torn off, but this is an internal thing, you know, the climax is complex, in this sense cinema, since it is an art that develops... musical form, in my opinion, here we are with andrei torkovsky they always argued about this, because he was an architect, and i there was a musician, he studied in architecture, and i in time requires a sense of time, i studied at the conservatory, and i said, time is very important for development, and he said scaling, sculpture in time. in many ways they are asked by the documentary footage , selected, as far as i understand, by pelishan, but how did you find each other, how did the idea come about, but i didn’t know , they told me, i didn’t know, they told me pelishan is a talented guy, i’m generally a rude