but antitrust law expert rebecca haw allensworth told me why she thinks that might not be the case.e temperature of things right now, you know? we know that this is what one judge thinks of a case against big tech. and i think it's likely to be kind of a sign of how other courts would view similar arguments. the biden administration has four other major monopolization suits currently pending against tech cases in america. and this case leaves breadcrumbs, i would call them, for those cases. some holdings on market definition, some things about barriers to entry, but i think while not precedential, would definitely be relevant to those cases. what does the goal of the regulators? do you see them trying to break up these massive tech companies? i think that's extremely unlikely, at least in this case. there is a monopolization case pending against meta for its acquisition of instagram back in 2012. that would be a different case where maybe a break—up might make sense. you spin off one company that kind of is its own property. google isn't like or at least the allegations in this case