is he merely paying deferred -- rwanda bill.- rolando bill.erely paying deferred -- rwanda bill. i think he is. it's deferred -- rwanda bill. i think he is- it's nearly _ deferred -- rwanda bill. i think he is. it's nearly 40 _ deferred -- rwanda bill. i think he is. it's nearly 40 years _ deferred -- rwanda bill. i think he is. it's nearly 40 years at - is. it's nearly 40 years at the prime minister lost a vote like this on the second reading of a government bill bear in mind, this was in an emergency bill, it was not in the king speech just a few weeks earlier. i think for rishi sunak it is obviously delightful to get the bill through but it's worth saying, this was a top priority bill for his government. nearly 40 of his mps declined to supported and many, many more both on the one nation side and also on the other side of the party, the more extreme right party failed to really buy into it. it is paying deferred. i think the party put a good face on a pm cues today but i think many mps will being dues be going back home and try to work out

that the uk has just agreed with rolando about sending asylum—seekers to rwanda for processing —— rwandan bolder, saying the european court ofjustice can't be involved and the involvement of the british courts must be severely limited. when it comes to the specific issue of deporting or sending to rwanda potential asylum—seekers — to set this in context, if you think about it, it's a week where the government was really hoping to hit home an advantage on being tough on immigration issues, to have a senior minister responsible for the issue resigning would not be a good look. and i should broaden this out that the problem is for rishi sunak, the prime minister, it's notjust people on the right on this issue like mr jenrick and suella braverman who have been rather unhappy that it doesn't go far enough — some would view the more moderate wing of the governing conservative party saying hang on a minute, maybe this legislation actually goes too far in the way that it disciplines human rights and makes britain look like not the country they would like it to look. so whichever way mr sunak loo

was that we don't believe as is currently— was that we don't believe as is currently draughted the billoles in it and those of the holes we would want in essence to plug _ the holes we would want in essence to plug -- — the holes we would want in essence to plug. —— take off to rolando. they— to plug. —— take off to rolando. they were — to plug. —— take off to rolando. they were told inprivate that there would _ they were told inprivate that there would be _ they were told inprivate that there would be amendments later on. it wasn't _ would be amendments later on. it wasn'tjust— would be amendments later on. it wasn'tjust the 38 would be amendments later on. it wasn't just the 38 that abstained, there's— wasn't just the 38 that abstained, there's a — wasn't just the 38 that abstained, there's a lot of people who voted for the _ there's a lot of people who voted for the bill— there's a lot of people who voted for the bill tonight taking the government on trust. so really that number— government on trust. so really that number is — government on trust. so really that number is a — governm