ternopil region is given to swiss oil workers from vitol, as well as to the french pharmaceutical holding sanafiland. components, they have already transferred them to other countries. of course, burying waste does not guarantee that the earth will be poisoned. chemical landfills are equipped according to special rules so that, god forbid, nothing gets into the soil and aquifers, serious expensive technologies are used. true, the question arises here, if companies want to do everything according to rules and spend a lot of money on equipment, is it more illogical to choose , let’s say, a more reliable country for this? if there is powerful production in these strong companies, yes, then you know, there is a lot of waste, they are choking on waste, now they have no energy, they do not have enough energy, they could make technology, separations, and so on, but now apparently it is not profitable to engage in these secondary technologies, it is easier to sell it to some, as they say, weak client who will take everything for money, at least, so, to persuade client to the necessary conditions, obviou

ternopil region is given to swiss oil workers from vitol, and also to the french pharmaceutical holding sanafit of the german basva and ivonik regions. chernovetskaya is taken away. the american companies, dow and dupont, are, in words , committed to recycling, they say they are all so environmentally friendly, but according to experts, each of the six concerns could save a lot of money by burying at least part of the production waste in the ground, and, of course, in not your own land. if we talk about the united states, they have long ago abandoned their production, especially those that brought a large number of harmful components, they are theirs. have already been transferred to other countries, of course , burying waste does not mean guaranteed to poison the earth, chemical sites are equipped according to special rules so that god forbid nothing gets into the soil and aquifers, serious expensive technologies are used, although the question arises here, if companies want to do everything according to the rules and spent thoroughly on equipment, is it more illogical to choose, let’s say, a