0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sarbanes. yielding three minutes. mr. sarbanes: thank you very much, congressman mfume, and i want to thank you for organizing this special tribute to the six hard-working men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on march 26. they got up that morning, early in the morning, because they were out there in the middle of the night on this shift, not knowing, obviously, what was going to happen and their families could have no inkling of what was going to happen on that tragic day. but they were just out there doing their job. and i want to thank you in particular, because in every setting now, every public statement you've made, you've led with concern and focus on those six workers that were lost. they were husbands, they were dads, brothers, friends, and our deepest condolences go out to their families who are feeling that incredibly profound loss. this is also a tribute to the first responders who sprung into action, and as a result, were able to save other lives on the day of that collapse. and they con
sarbanes. yielding three minutes. mr. sarbanes: thank you very much, congressman mfume, and i want to thank you for organizing this special tribute to the six hard-working men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on march 26. they got up that morning, early in the morning, because they were out there in the middle of the night on this shift, not knowing, obviously, what was going to happen and their families could have no inkling of what was going to happen on that tragic...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> this is under or star -- sarbanes ox toly. jack smith is trying to say trump and all of januaryth9 is somehow under -- january 6th is somehow under the ambit of star gains ox -- sarbanes-oxley. it doesn't make any sense to the six conservative justices on the supreme court who read sarbanes-oxley as a financial law. and jack smith's to contortion of it, much like alvin bragg's con dogger of the laws -- contortion of the laws here in new york, is all an attempt to get trump. i see it being -- i don't see is trump being charged under this, but there are two more aspects of this case that smith can charge on. stuartout okay. it does not have the appearance of fairness. >> it's not fair at all. stuart: not fair, that's what it looks like. thank, todd. >>> coming up, you need copper for the green revolution. it's used to make ev batteries, wind turbines, power lines. there's a huge copper deposit in alaska, but biden says, no, it cannot be touched. you can't even build a road to get to it. this is entirely political. biden wants to
. >> this is under or star -- sarbanes ox toly. jack smith is trying to say trump and all of januaryth9 is somehow under -- january 6th is somehow under the ambit of star gains ox -- sarbanes-oxley. it doesn't make any sense to the six conservative justices on the supreme court who read sarbanes-oxley as a financial law. and jack smith's to contortion of it, much like alvin bragg's con dogger of the laws -- contortion of the laws here in new york, is all an attempt to get trump. i see it...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
congressman sarbanes, andy harris, congressman antonio, congressman glenn ivey and myself. i might, before i talk about the state's effort and what we're really dealing with when we think of this collapse, it's more than just concrete and bricks and steel falling in the ocean. it's interrupted supply chains >> c-span's washington journal, our live forum to discuss the latest issues in government, politics, and public policy, from washington and across the country. thursday morning, axios's sam talks about the effort from house leadership to pass legislation reauthorizing the foreign intelligence surveillance act. then, we discussed the arizona abortion ban, usaid to israel and ukraine. and wyoming republican congresswoman harriet. c-span's washington journal, join the conversation live at 7:00 eastern thursday morning on c-span, c-span now, or online at c-span.org. >> tonight, president biden and first lady jill biden host a state dinner honoring the japanese prime minister. watch guest arrival live beginning at 5:00 p.m. eastern on c-span live, c-span.org. at 11:00 p.m. ea
congressman sarbanes, andy harris, congressman antonio, congressman glenn ivey and myself. i might, before i talk about the state's effort and what we're really dealing with when we think of this collapse, it's more than just concrete and bricks and steel falling in the ocean. it's interrupted supply chains >> c-span's washington journal, our live forum to discuss the latest issues in government, politics, and public policy, from washington and across the country. thursday morning,...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sarbanes. yielding three minutes. mr. sarbanes: thank you very much, congressman mfume, and i want to thank you for organizing this special tribute to the six hard-working men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on march 26. they got up that morning, early in the morning, because they were out there in the middle of the night on this shift, not knowing, obviously, what was going to happen and their families could have no inkling of what was going to happen on that tragic day. but they were just out there doing their job. and i want to thank you in particular, because in every setting now, every public statement you've made, you've led with concern and focus on those six workers that were lost. they were husbands, they were dads, brothers, friends, and our deepest condolences go out to their families who are feeling that incredibly profound loss. this is also a tribute to the first responders who sprung into action, and as a result, were able to save other lives on the day of that collapse. and they con
sarbanes. yielding three minutes. mr. sarbanes: thank you very much, congressman mfume, and i want to thank you for organizing this special tribute to the six hard-working men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on march 26. they got up that morning, early in the morning, because they were out there in the middle of the night on this shift, not knowing, obviously, what was going to happen and their families could have no inkling of what was going to happen on that tragic...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
at sarban university in france , a student sit-in was attacked by security forces and a number of protesters were arrested. the universities of valencia, spain, british columbia and ottawa, canada were also the scene of anti-zionist demonstrations by students. in the capital of greece, students of this country protested in front of the zionist embassy. they did student demonstrations reached pakistan, mauritania and lebanon. tunisian students also went on strike in the capital of this country in support of palestine. the expansion of the anti-zionist student movement in france, hundreds of pro-palestinian students. by gathering in front of the organizing committee of the olympic games , the protestors declared their opposition to the participation of the zionist regime in these competitions . today, tuesday, the last day of april, a large number of french universities, including dijon, lyon, granville, saint-etienne, strasbourg, rennes and manton, closed classes and set up. express our opposition to the participation of israeli regime athletes in the paris olympics. this regime massacred a n
at sarban university in france , a student sit-in was attacked by security forces and a number of protesters were arrested. the universities of valencia, spain, british columbia and ottawa, canada were also the scene of anti-zionist demonstrations by students. in the capital of greece, students of this country protested in front of the zionist embassy. they did student demonstrations reached pakistan, mauritania and lebanon. tunisian students also went on strike in the capital of this country...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
at the sarban university of france, the student protest was met with the attack of the security forces and the arrest of a number of protestors. the universities of valencia, spain, british columbia and ottawa, canada were also the scene of anti-zionist demonstrations by students. in the greek capital, the students of this country demonstrated in front of the zionist embassy . student demonstrations to pakistan. mauritania and lebanon also arrived. tunisian students also went on strike in the capital of this country in support of palestine. the expansion of the anti-zionist student movement in france today, hundreds of pro-palestinian students gathered in front of the olympic games organizing committee and declared their opposition to the presence of the zionist regime in these competitions. the disbelievers chanted that genocide is not an olympic discipline. today is tuesday. on the last day of april, a large number of french universities, including dijon, lyon, grenoble, saint-etienne, strasbourg, rennes and manton, closed classes and based on demonstrations against the movement anti
at the sarban university of france, the student protest was met with the attack of the security forces and the arrest of a number of protestors. the universities of valencia, spain, british columbia and ottawa, canada were also the scene of anti-zionist demonstrations by students. in the greek capital, the students of this country demonstrated in front of the zionist embassy . student demonstrations to pakistan. mauritania and lebanon also arrived. tunisian students also went on strike in the...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
part of sarbanes oxley in the wake of enron. and defendants like mr. your fish and others have argued that this law wasn't meant to apply to people who had police officers at the capitol. and this was meant to apply to people who potentially tamper with evidence. now the district court, when this challenge was made agreed. but the appellate court actually sided with the government and they're broad interpretation of the law. so now all eyes on the supreme court and shan a lot of these defendants have been charged with other things, beating up police officers, breaking and entering into the capital and so on. so it doesn't blow up. >> all of these cases, but it is an important aspect of it. it is. i also certainly don't think it would blow up the charges against trump in particular, because this aspect of it is also covered for him by the actual type of false documents with the fake electors scheme and such. i don't think ultimately even if the supreme court were to reverse on this aspect of it, it's going to affect him that much. i mean, frankly, i don
part of sarbanes oxley in the wake of enron. and defendants like mr. your fish and others have argued that this law wasn't meant to apply to people who had police officers at the capitol. and this was meant to apply to people who potentially tamper with evidence. now the district court, when this challenge was made agreed. but the appellate court actually sided with the government and they're broad interpretation of the law. so now all eyes on the supreme court and shan a lot of these...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this law was passed in 2002 in the wake of enron as part of sarbanes oxley. and it covers people who obstct or interfere with it an official proceeding. and there's a catch-all provision in there that this defendant, mr. fisher, argues, has been too broadly applied and should not include folks who participated in january 6. he argues that this is for people who engage in witness tampering or evidence tampering not folks who, for example, allegedly attack police officers. so at the district court level, he won. they agreed this was misapplied, but the court of appeals went the other way, which is how we found ourselves at the supreme court, but we likely won't get this decision until mid to late june right. it's always wait till middle-age june with the supreme court. what kind of ruling potentially mean for trump though? >> so initially a lot of folks said, oh, this could have an impact on the trump case. but if you really drilled down even the alleged conduct here for this specific charge for trump as compared to the folks who were on the cow capitol hill, i
this law was passed in 2002 in the wake of enron as part of sarbanes oxley. and it covers people who obstct or interfere with it an official proceeding. and there's a catch-all provision in there that this defendant, mr. fisher, argues, has been too broadly applied and should not include folks who participated in january 6. he argues that this is for people who engage in witness tampering or evidence tampering not folks who, for example, allegedly attack police officers. so at the district...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people may have heard of sarbanes oxley many years ago that put in this crime of obstructing an official proceeding, obstruct influencing, or corruptly, obstructing are influencing an official proceeding of congress. now the question is, was that intended just to apply to people like accountants and white-collar criminal? when ols who behaved in a self-serving are corrupt manner or candidate based on what the language of the statute says be applied to people who stormed the capitol on january 6. they were also obstructing an official proceeding. and so the supreme court is going to be looking at number one, what did congress mean when it passed this law? and two, what is the history of these prosecutions for? i'm to official proceeding actually made the decision of the supreme court could directly impacts a lot trump, obviously as well. our it guys. thank you very, very much. just ahead, an inside look at how this unprecedented drought will play out. a former new york judge is standing by live. we'll discuss introducing mandel whole body deodorant for pits, privates and beyond. i'm dr. s
people may have heard of sarbanes oxley many years ago that put in this crime of obstructing an official proceeding, obstruct influencing, or corruptly, obstructing are influencing an official proceeding of congress. now the question is, was that intended just to apply to people like accountants and white-collar criminal? when ols who behaved in a self-serving are corrupt manner or candidate based on what the language of the statute says be applied to people who stormed the capitol on january...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
course, at the heart of this case is a federal law that was passed in the wake of enron as part of sarbanes oxley, and it has to do with interfering with an official proceeding. and the question here that's been raised by mr.. mr. fisher, who has been charged under this law is whether this law was intended to apply to something like january 6 and assaulting a police officer or if it was meant to focus more on things like tampering evidence in an official investigation. now so far the liberal justices, they seem very skeptical united and they're skepticism of this argument. and i believe we're still questioning as i was listening before, i think that they have wrapped it is unclear exactly how this is going to go. >> the lower courts are divided on this, so yeah, exactly. >> so at the district court level, they agreed with mr. fisher. but when it went up to the court of appeals, the court of appeals sided with the government there, even though they had different reasoning. so of course it ends up at the supreme court, the final word bird a lot of questions about how this could impact former
course, at the heart of this case is a federal law that was passed in the wake of enron as part of sarbanes oxley, and it has to do with interfering with an official proceeding. and the question here that's been raised by mr.. mr. fisher, who has been charged under this law is whether this law was intended to apply to something like january 6 and assaulting a police officer or if it was meant to focus more on things like tampering evidence in an official investigation. now so far the liberal...
58
58
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 1
and specifically these charges dismissed, arguing that this law was passed after enron and sarbanes-oxley, and it was supposed to be focused on witness tampering and anything that impacts an official proceeding there. so they're saying this is not the kind of case that this was meant to apply two. now we'll be watching this very closely. like i said, this could potentially impact former president trump's case. now the special counsel says, even if mr. fisher wins here, the trump case remains intact. a lot of smart legal minds, agree with that. we have to see exactly how this case shakes out. of course, there are also oral arguments next thursday on whether former president trump has presidential immunity that could shield him from some or all of his federal election subversion case. but john, i think the biggest thing we're looking at right now before we even get to the issues before the court is justice clarence thomas. he was not at arguments yesterday and the lease transparent branch of government gave no x well, nation for that, usually they'll least say why someone's not on the bench
and specifically these charges dismissed, arguing that this law was passed after enron and sarbanes-oxley, and it was supposed to be focused on witness tampering and anything that impacts an official proceeding there. so they're saying this is not the kind of case that this was meant to apply two. now we'll be watching this very closely. like i said, this could potentially impact former president trump's case. now the special counsel says, even if mr. fisher wins here, the trump case remains...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
go under sarbanes-oxley. folks have maybe heard that. that old piece of legislation. now the question is, when you obstruct influence or impede an official proceeding, what does that mean? now initially the law was used to go after accountants and other people who obstruct proceedings through what are called curves corrupt means lying, deceit, fraud, trickery. the question is can that be applied to a violent act like january 6? now, it's still an obstruction of an official proceeding, but maybe not in the way that the law was originally written. those supreme court is going to be looking into number one, what was congress thinking at the time? and number two, what are the words? the statute actually say a few corruptly impede a proceeding, whether you're breaking down a window or whether you're an accountant filing papers in a bad way, can you still be convicted? and so it's really this legal lipstick twisting are trying to parse language, right? yeah. >> could this potentially pull the thread on? the jack smith case? do you think that it's trump won? it also could ca
go under sarbanes-oxley. folks have maybe heard that. that old piece of legislation. now the question is, when you obstruct influence or impede an official proceeding, what does that mean? now initially the law was used to go after accountants and other people who obstruct proceedings through what are called curves corrupt means lying, deceit, fraud, trickery. the question is can that be applied to a violent act like january 6? now, it's still an obstruction of an official proceeding, but maybe...