0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
nino scalia, henry, brian lamb, pierce, owen and dill hatfield is fundamental to today's topic. otp transformation of telecom and, the us. and as a result, international telecom otp allowed these brilliant people in one way or another to partake of a reformed understanding of the technical, legal and media aspects of telecom. otp mantra many voices was in all of this. nina scalia on to be an associate justice of the supreme court henry goldberg to establish the signature telecom law firm carved into the flourish of new telecom businesses. and brian lamb founded, the groundbreaking major cable network c-span, for which he won the president medal of freedom. bersamin gained an even greater distinction in academia. still, hatfill continued to, operate as an agent of significant and government and went on to become a national and international telecom pioneer among. his achievements was designing and founding what today is still the largest satellite company in the world. besides these brilliant colleagues, tom achieved what he did otp because he was blessed an extraordinarily good
nino scalia, henry, brian lamb, pierce, owen and dill hatfield is fundamental to today's topic. otp transformation of telecom and, the us. and as a result, international telecom otp allowed these brilliant people in one way or another to partake of a reformed understanding of the technical, legal and media aspects of telecom. otp mantra many voices was in all of this. nina scalia on to be an associate justice of the supreme court henry goldberg to establish the signature telecom law firm carved...
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the first was to exclude what i call the "scalia trick."the scalia trick was to arrange for the owner of a private resort to invite justice scali on the free vacation, an then vacation on the theory that the free gifted by the owner of the resort whom he may never have met was a personal invitation. end as a personal invitation, it therefore ountspitality and needn't be disclosed. we believe took over 60, 60 of these free the judicial conference took a look at that and blew it to smithat would never fly in any circuit court or any district court in the victory for transparency there if you go back to my description , it involved communicating to the justices what it was that through these flotillas of front groupen not disclose who was really behind them. in one occasion, a brief was filed by an entity which is not even a reacorporate entity it it was the fictitious name under virginia corporate law for a separate corporate entity under which fictitious name thatorate entity had registered to do business. they didurt and to the other partie
the first was to exclude what i call the "scalia trick."the scalia trick was to arrange for the owner of a private resort to invite justice scali on the free vacation, an then vacation on the theory that the free gifted by the owner of the resort whom he may never have met was a personal invitation. end as a personal invitation, it therefore ountspitality and needn't be disclosed. we believe took over 60, 60 of these free the judicial conference took a look at that and blew it to...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the three big cases in the modern era before this were a case called heller which justice scalia read the second amendment broadly over a dissent by justice stevens for whom debra clerked and then the second. and my judge, stephen breyer, a second case called macdonald, where her justice, alito, again, a broad reading of the second amendment and a third one, just recently, a case called bruen thomas wrote for the court and now he's in descent. this is the first three big wins for the second measurement. this is the first time just being construed more narrowly. and so now actually, it's a ballgame yeah, debra, i mean, can you pick up on what aqeel was saying there because obviously there has been a broad interpretation of the second amendment coming from the high court in recent years. >> but my goodness having a law that bans domestic abusers from owning guns, that sounds like common sense to a lot of americans out there. and if they had gone, if the supreme court had gone the other way, i just can't imagine what the outcry would have been at what that would have been, something else
the three big cases in the modern era before this were a case called heller which justice scalia read the second amendment broadly over a dissent by justice stevens for whom debra clerked and then the second. and my judge, stephen breyer, a second case called macdonald, where her justice, alito, again, a broad reading of the second amendment and a third one, just recently, a case called bruen thomas wrote for the court and now he's in descent. this is the first three big wins for the second...
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
"athen all of a sudden justice scalia's dissent starts to look a little better. i tried to instill that in the same way in arguing these cases. you that is what y you try to say this case might look like it benefits the republicans in this case but there is a principal here. sometimes, that is really hard because it is some in the world that does not assent to the two parties the same way. democratic voters, for a lot of derstandable reasons, tended to aggregate themselves in urban areas. this creates a different dynamic in am republican voters who tended to evenly across the argosy of state. there is some of -- acrs geography of state. there are some of that you cannot get out of issue but you try to the degree that you can. to your question, linda, about the court's perspective and is it different due to the current composition of the court? i thinkhis. i think they are aware -- thank goodness for jt a least made it harder to write a story about the court that just used the shorth the presidential part in appointing the justice and that's all you need to know a
"athen all of a sudden justice scalia's dissent starts to look a little better. i tried to instill that in the same way in arguing these cases. you that is what y you try to say this case might look like it benefits the republicans in this case but there is a principal here. sometimes, that is really hard because it is some in the world that does not assent to the two parties the same way. democratic voters, for a lot of derstandable reasons, tended to aggregate themselves in urban areas....
0
0.0
Jun 29, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> you're right and the proof of that is the biggest fan of chevron was scalia. he was a ferocious opponent of justices putting their own ideas, often unstantiated ideas inpolicy. chevron was an effort to constrain judicial overreach. the fact that justice scalia would probably look at that decision and say this is insane. this is the antithesis of what i considered judicial humility shows you how far the conservative wing has moved away from justice an scalia who was considered very conservative. so justices get your hands off policy and let the agencies decide. that's way too moderate now for the court. >> i have like a second before i let you go but i want to know your call on the criminal immunity decision coming out on monday? >> i'm pretty worried. i think it means a lot that the court slow walked it into july. they usually end in june. i worry that some of the language in the fisher case opens the door for big claims about government overreach and the deep state and the fbi. i'm pretty worried. >> dahlia lithwick, thank you for making us smarter. i will le
. >> you're right and the proof of that is the biggest fan of chevron was scalia. he was a ferocious opponent of justices putting their own ideas, often unstantiated ideas inpolicy. chevron was an effort to constrain judicial overreach. the fact that justice scalia would probably look at that decision and say this is insane. this is the antithesis of what i considered judicial humility shows you how far the conservative wing has moved away from justice an scalia who was considered very...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
— former conservative justice scalia — who said, "what is it to you?"ts of the case weren't even looked at. having said that, anti—abortion activists are very likely to regroup and find another way to bring the case the supreme court. it's important to note that this ruling doesn't change anything, so these abortion pills are still illegal in the 1a states that have near—total abortion bans, and that's whether there is a ban through — a ban on the procedure or on the pills. we know that abortion is a very potent issue going into the presidential election. we've seen that the position that democrats have taken is pretty much in line with the public opinion, two years on since roe v wade was overturned. surveys and polls suggest that most americans do believe in abortion rights, they do believe in medicated abortion rights as well, broadly speaking. i think for republicans, they've probably dodged a slightly toxic issue, if the ruling had gone another way, given we are heading towards very tight presidential race. as nomia mentioned, thursday's ruling has
— former conservative justice scalia — who said, "what is it to you?"ts of the case weren't even looked at. having said that, anti—abortion activists are very likely to regroup and find another way to bring the case the supreme court. it's important to note that this ruling doesn't change anything, so these abortion pills are still illegal in the 1a states that have near—total abortion bans, and that's whether there is a ban through — a ban on the procedure or on the pills....
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
scalia, like you said, is six figures. that the right is willing to pay extra to get women and especially black people to tell them what they want to hear about women and black people. tell them that black people don't want to be able to have a fearless fund. they shouldn't be able to give -- i wanted if i had time to ask if he supported the fearless fund being not able to give grants out. i'm sure he does because that's what he's supposed to say. >> look, i looked at that chart today. i look at people like donalds and think, man, i made the wrong financial choices in my life. right? because there's money out there for these people, but always remember, and i want folks to remember this. they're getting something for their money. >> yes, they are. >> this isn't charity. they're getting rulings. they're getting opinions. they're getting the kind of return to not 1950s, but to the 1850s that they want for their funds. if we, the rest of us who are not making -- the other funny thing is you saw the liberals like sotomayor had
scalia, like you said, is six figures. that the right is willing to pay extra to get women and especially black people to tell them what they want to hear about women and black people. tell them that black people don't want to be able to have a fearless fund. they shouldn't be able to give -- i wanted if i had time to ask if he supported the fearless fund being not able to give grants out. i'm sure he does because that's what he's supposed to say. >> look, i looked at that chart today. i...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and the idea that we are adopting justice scalia's motive textualism itself needs to be historic fightnding fathers would have found the approach to reading statutes unbelievable because they did not have this hyper textualist approach but even if you apply justice scalia's method, this court seems to take a -- almost like an etch-a- sketch approach. they extend -- expand things when they want to. they are hyper literalist when they want to and not when it does not serve them. when you look at it, you have to ask the question, would anyone who wrote that law in the 1930s have found this decision plausible? as a historian, i have to say it does not make any sense because it is such a hyper literalist approach and even justice kelly a said we are not literalists. we are supposed to remember what the ordinary person on the street would have said. it is hard to imagine that anyone dealing with machine gun kelly and the st. valentine's day massacre, which is the reason why we have these laws would have said, yeah, yeah. this is not a machine gun because of a very technical parsing of what i
and the idea that we are adopting justice scalia's motive textualism itself needs to be historic fightnding fathers would have found the approach to reading statutes unbelievable because they did not have this hyper textualist approach but even if you apply justice scalia's method, this court seems to take a -- almost like an etch-a- sketch approach. they extend -- expand things when they want to. they are hyper literalist when they want to and not when it does not serve them. when you look at...
0
0.0
Jun 22, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think come around to the conclusion that justice scalia may well have been right? >> clarity here judge aileen cannon is it seems litigating that issue in her courthouse in florida y and not only is she lived at issue, she's inviting outside people to come in and add to the argument when it's well as it's well-documented his case has been determined to be the law of the land. and what we see is after that case, what the special counsel's office has done is they've changed the way they operate. so now they make sure that they oversee special counsel. so now it's no question. so why is the judge wasting time on figuring out an answer to something that's already been answered. >> so wondered so in that hearing, she was also quizzing the prosecutors about how much the attorney general was involved in the case. i mean, there is oversight in terms of the org chart. right? essentially, but there is one i think those questions, yet true. she why she because down on because gets to the question of whether or not jack smith really is an inferior officer of the united states,
i think come around to the conclusion that justice scalia may well have been right? >> clarity here judge aileen cannon is it seems litigating that issue in her courthouse in florida y and not only is she lived at issue, she's inviting outside people to come in and add to the argument when it's well as it's well-documented his case has been determined to be the law of the land. and what we see is after that case, what the special counsel's office has done is they've changed the way they...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the scalia trick was to arrange for the owner of a private resort to invite justice scalia on free vacationnd then she failed to disclose the vacation on the theory that the free vacation gifted by the owner whom he may never have met was a personal invitation and as a personal invitation to we believe he took over 60, 60 of these free arranged vacations. the judicial conference took a look at that and blew it to smithereens but they knew perfectly well that would never flight any circuit court or district court in the country. the second victory for transparency and integrity, if you go back to my description of how the court scheme worked it involves communicating to the justices what it was a billionaire interest once through the flotilla's. he would then not disclose who was really behind them. in a one occasion the brief was filed by an entity which is not even a real corporate entity. it was the fictitious name under virginia corporate law or a separate corporate entity under which the other corporate entity had registered to do business. they did not even disclosed to the court into
the scalia trick was to arrange for the owner of a private resort to invite justice scalia on free vacationnd then she failed to disclose the vacation on the theory that the free vacation gifted by the owner whom he may never have met was a personal invitation and as a personal invitation to we believe he took over 60, 60 of these free arranged vacations. the judicial conference took a look at that and blew it to smithereens but they knew perfectly well that would never flight any circuit court...
0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what is justice scalia doing? what is justice thomas doing? can they possibly oversee any single case that comes before them that has anything to do with conservatives or donald trump? shouldn't he be calling for them to recuse themselves if he's going to take his argument to a logical conclusion? it's in a logical argument. you can't have it that way in this country. we all prosecute each other when we get in trouble. >> she gets the last word. nobody is going anywhere. when we come back, trump rails against the verdict and republicans stick by him and later, there are still three other criminal cases against the former president. what role could the supreme court play when our nightcap continues? we have a lot more to cover. av. only purple's gel flex grid passes the raw egg test. no other mattress cradles your body and simultaneously supports your spine. memory foam doesn't come close. get your best sleep guaranteed. save up to $800 during our memorial day sale. visit purple.com or a store near you with absorbine pro, pain won't hold you ba
what is justice scalia doing? what is justice thomas doing? can they possibly oversee any single case that comes before them that has anything to do with conservatives or donald trump? shouldn't he be calling for them to recuse themselves if he's going to take his argument to a logical conclusion? it's in a logical argument. you can't have it that way in this country. we all prosecute each other when we get in trouble. >> she gets the last word. nobody is going anywhere. when we come...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
scalia on the world market is about 20%. more than 130 countries were interested in it.of them had their access blocked by sanctions, and export logistics were broken over their knees. thousands of eu farmers are left without affordable fertilizers. food production is a chain that falls apart as soon as one link is taken out of it. the shortage of fertilizers inflates prices for them, yields sag, food and animal feed become more expensive, because of this , prices for meat and dairy rise, and agricultural sector. manufacturers are leaving, most of them are now simply waiting for belarus to find access to the international market for its fertilizers in the same volume. lithuania tried to attract the attention of orderlies in this process when it banned the shipment of fertilizers from its ports, thereby depriving itself of money for transit and leaving its citizens who worked on cargo transshipment without work. belarus did not grieve for long. alexander lukashenko obtained for the country, in which the only sea and sea is minsk, access to the big water. the president hel
scalia on the world market is about 20%. more than 130 countries were interested in it.of them had their access blocked by sanctions, and export logistics were broken over their knees. thousands of eu farmers are left without affordable fertilizers. food production is a chain that falls apart as soon as one link is taken out of it. the shortage of fertilizers inflates prices for them, yields sag, food and animal feed become more expensive, because of this , prices for meat and dairy rise, and...
91
91
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
what is justice scalia doing? what is justice thomas doing? can they possibly oversee any single case that comes before them that has anything to do with conservatives or donald trump? shouldn't he be calling for them to recuse themselves if he is going to take his argument to its logical conclusion? it is an illogical argument. you can't have it that way in this country. democrats prosecute democrats, republicans prosecute republicans, and vice versa. we all prosecute each other when we get in trouble. >> katie made the best point, so she gets the last word. time for a commercial. nobody is going anywhere. when we come back, trump rails against averted and republicans stick by him. what it could mean for the election. >>> and later, there are still three other criminal cases against the former president. what role could the supreme court who katie was just referencing play? when our nightcap continues, we have a lot more to cover. are forever in bloom. welcome to beyond. the mercedes-maybach eqs suv. i have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis
what is justice scalia doing? what is justice thomas doing? can they possibly oversee any single case that comes before them that has anything to do with conservatives or donald trump? shouldn't he be calling for them to recuse themselves if he is going to take his argument to its logical conclusion? it is an illogical argument. you can't have it that way in this country. democrats prosecute democrats, republicans prosecute republicans, and vice versa. we all prosecute each other when we get in...
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they really mean one of his best was antonin scalia.calia would come and talk to him, you they waited until he died. i mean case they kind of just hinted at what would be necessary to stop desegregation laws. they waited. he died. n a series of cases thatmissouri versus jenkins basically. the court said to the extent that school segregation patterns just that's the district school district's we will no longer force themration pants to overcome residential segregation. andeason we have rapidly resegregated devastated. but the day after the opinion came7w(g down, he came back in the office. his jolly self, you know and. his attitude was, you know fight. soeople in the room, you got to pick up the fight. and i said, i'm. sure sure. i enjoyed that. took.
they really mean one of his best was antonin scalia.calia would come and talk to him, you they waited until he died. i mean case they kind of just hinted at what would be necessary to stop desegregation laws. they waited. he died. n a series of cases thatmissouri versus jenkins basically. the court said to the extent that school segregation patterns just that's the district school district's we will no longer force themration pants to overcome residential segregation. andeason we have rapidly...
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice scalia wrote the fairness of a process must be judged on the basis of wt permits to happen, not what it produces in the particular case. you'vemphasized many times reguri of the department of justice. and he said, and i think thi applies to the independent counsel system and can alyf presidents are routinely subject to investigation goingorrd. one thing is certain, however, it involves investigating and perhaps prosecung particular individual. can one imagine a less equitable manner of fulfilnghe responsible is possibility to precute? what would the reaction be if in an area not covered by the statute, the justice department posted a public notice invitin applicants to assist in an investigation and possible prosecution of a certain prominent person? does thinoinvite what justice jackson described as picking the man and insertin e -- and searching the law books or putting investigators to work to pins and effects on him? to be sure the investigation must relate to t aa criminal offense testified by the statute. nothg events it from being very broad. i paraphrase at the end becau
justice scalia wrote the fairness of a process must be judged on the basis of wt permits to happen, not what it produces in the particular case. you'vemphasized many times reguri of the department of justice. and he said, and i think thi applies to the independent counsel system and can alyf presidents are routinely subject to investigation goingorrd. one thing is certain, however, it involves investigating and perhaps prosecung particular individual. can one imagine a less equitable manner of...
0
0.0
Jun 27, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice scalia is one of the proponents we have to and reaching back in history is going to help us better be ior in which the laws should be shaped going f >> i'm soon going to turn to you andnd i hope you are thinking of knew that i want to key up one last issue i know we could spend of the time on. at a health conference about equity and end and the imperative to everyone in the country and jurisprudence right now that's directly of healthcare institutions and government programst to embrace policies that they that. it would also of course being naÏve to think that the both cases don't have a racial there's a direct attack on anything that characteristics to achieve equity. we talk about that? >> i don't even think we have to pu reproductive space but for the purposes of what you' think is about democracy within the it's the case that m. you wanted to vote. it. what is the state that broug the case that overturned roe v was mississippi. if we somehow thinkorm where we are today, then we are mistaken. the dog's decision was actually forestalled by a court opinion and in district court op
justice scalia is one of the proponents we have to and reaching back in history is going to help us better be ior in which the laws should be shaped going f >> i'm soon going to turn to you andnd i hope you are thinking of knew that i want to key up one last issue i know we could spend of the time on. at a health conference about equity and end and the imperative to everyone in the country and jurisprudence right now that's directly of healthcare institutions and government programst to...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this legal doctrine was summed up by justice cavanaugh using a doctrine articulated byjustice scalialaintiffs had no argument to make against that. basically the merits of the case weren't even looked at. having said that, anti—abortion activists are very likely to regroup and find another way to bring the case to the supreme court. it's important to know that this ruling doesn't change anything. these abortion pills are still illegal in the 14 states that have near total abortion bands. that's whether there is a ban through procedure on dues or pills. we know abortion is a potent issue going into the presidential election. we've seen the position that democrats have taken is pretty much in line with the public opinion two years old, since roe v wade was overturned. there's a poll to suggest that most americans do believe in abortion rights. they do believe in medicated abortion rights. broadly speaking for republicans they probably dodged a slightly toxic issue if the ruling had gone another way. and given that we're headed towards a tight presidential race. donald trump returned to
this legal doctrine was summed up by justice cavanaugh using a doctrine articulated byjustice scalialaintiffs had no argument to make against that. basically the merits of the case weren't even looked at. having said that, anti—abortion activists are very likely to regroup and find another way to bring the case to the supreme court. it's important to know that this ruling doesn't change anything. these abortion pills are still illegal in the 14 states that have near total abortion bands....
0
0.0
Jun 24, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they really mean one of his best friends on the court was, antonin scalia. scalia would come and talk to him, you know, but they waited until he died. i mean case they kind of just hinted at what would be necessary to stop desegregation laws. they waited. he died. but the nineties in a series of cases that culminate in missouri versus jenkins basically. the court said to the extent that school segregation patterns just reflect segregated neighborhoods, that's the district school district's fault. and so we will no longer force them to have integration pants to overcome residential segregation. and that's the main reason we have rapidly resegregated and justice marshall was devastated. but the day after the opinion came down, he came back in the office. his jolly self, you know, and. his attitude was, you know, each generation has to just pick up the fight. so you young people in the room, you got to pick up the fight. and i said, i'm. sure sure. i enjoyed that. he took. good evening. my name is chris nordyke and i had the distinct honors tonight of serving t
they really mean one of his best friends on the court was, antonin scalia. scalia would come and talk to him, you know, but they waited until he died. i mean case they kind of just hinted at what would be necessary to stop desegregation laws. they waited. he died. but the nineties in a series of cases that culminate in missouri versus jenkins basically. the court said to the extent that school segregation patterns just reflect segregated neighborhoods, that's the district school district's...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the decades and centuries onward but the originalism taken up just in recent decades not very old at scalia was one of the key proponents of this we ne to reach back in history and reaching back in history is to help us better be informed about the way in which be shaped going forward. alan: i'm soon and i hope you're thinking of your questions. but before we do that, i wan one last issue i know we co at a health conference, there is a lot of discussion about equity to achieve equitable health for everyone in the country. and yet there's a lot ofe right now that's affects the health care institutions and government prthat they think could help achieve that. it would also, of think the reproductive health cases don't element. but even setting that aside there's a direct on anything that is -- that hav certain characteristics associated with trying to achieve equity. can we talk about that? michele: let's. i don't think we have to p space but for purposes you're talking about which is reallyithin the space. and i think that great space to tease this out. it's a casee state of mississippi. my
the decades and centuries onward but the originalism taken up just in recent decades not very old at scalia was one of the key proponents of this we ne to reach back in history and reaching back in history is to help us better be informed about the way in which be shaped going forward. alan: i'm soon and i hope you're thinking of your questions. but before we do that, i wan one last issue i know we co at a health conference, there is a lot of discussion about equity to achieve equitable health...
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
like justice scalia said, i do not mean to suggest anything of the sword the present case, we are not talking about the present case. i'm talking about the future. another point, you talked about the criminal statute. it's very easy to characterize presidential actions as false or misleading under vague statutes. so, president lyndon johnson, statements about the vietnam war, say something is false. it turned out to be false that he says about the vietnam war. -- what he says about the vietnam war. 371 prosecution after he leaves office? >> i think not. this is an area that i do think merits some serious and nuanced consideration. statements that are made by a president to the public are not really coming within the realm of criminal statutes. they've never been prosecuted. i realize that the court can say what if they were? and then i think you get to what i would regard as a hard constitutional question. i would probably guide the court away from trying to resolve today, although i do think it is very different from our case and in distinguishable and important ways. but you are dea
like justice scalia said, i do not mean to suggest anything of the sword the present case, we are not talking about the present case. i'm talking about the future. another point, you talked about the criminal statute. it's very easy to characterize presidential actions as false or misleading under vague statutes. so, president lyndon johnson, statements about the vietnam war, say something is false. it turned out to be false that he says about the vietnam war. -- what he says about the vietnam...
0
0.0
Jun 27, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
come decades and centuries onward b that was taken up just in recent decades, no old at all, justice scaliaed to reach back in hi history is going to help us better be informbo way in which law should be shaped going forward. going to turn to you and i hope you're thinking of your qst. but before we do that, i want to tee up one last issue i know we could spend the rest of our time on. at a health conference, there dy and the imperative to achieve equitable in the country. and yet there's a lot legal jurisprudence right now that'sre stitutions and government programs to embrace policies that they think could help it would also, of course, be naive to think the reproductive heales don't have a racial element. but even setting that aside, atn anything that have certain characteristics associated with tryiak to about? michele: let's. i don't think we have to put aside the reproductive space but for purposes you're talking ich is really about democracy, democracy within the space. and i think that dobbs is actually a great space to tease this a case that comes out of the state ofdmother was fro
come decades and centuries onward b that was taken up just in recent decades, no old at all, justice scaliaed to reach back in hi history is going to help us better be informbo way in which law should be shaped going forward. going to turn to you and i hope you're thinking of your qst. but before we do that, i want to tee up one last issue i know we could spend the rest of our time on. at a health conference, there dy and the imperative to achieve equitable in the country. and yet there's a lot...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow here at aei. and it's my my pleasure to oment of the american dream lecture series, a component of aei american dream initiative. this series seeks to revitalize our nation's core institutions and inviting prominent writers, academics and thinkers to address some of the most significant political, cultural and social issues facing the united states. as we approac's founding, these lectures are an opportunity to ask how healthy are our national institutions and foundational principles? what threats do they face and what prospects for reform are available? last september, ember, we invited tonight's speaker to discuss anti-semitism in the united states. that was nearly a month before hamas's attack o israel and the ensuing pro-hamas anti-israel protests on campuses around the united states. i wish our invitation had not become so much more relevant. in january, the anti-defamation league reported more than 3000 anti-semitic incidents between october 7th and january 7th, an 361%. compared to the same
i think my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow here at aei. and it's my my pleasure to oment of the american dream lecture series, a component of aei american dream initiative. this series seeks to revitalize our nation's core institutions and inviting prominent writers, academics and thinkers to address some of the most significant political, cultural and social issues facing the united states. as we approac's founding, these lectures are an opportunity to ask how healthy are our...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. —— scalia.r way to bring the case to the supreme court. it's important to note this ruling does not change anything, so these abortion pills are still illegal in the 14 pills are still illegal in the 1a states that have near total abortion bands, and that's whether there is a band through, on the procedure or on the pills. —— ban. we know that abortion is a potent issue going into the election and we've seen the position the democrats have taken is pretty much in line with the public opinion, two years on since roe v wade was overturned. surveys and polls show most americans believe in abortion rights and believe in abortion rights and believe in abortion rights and believe in medicated abortion rights as well, broadly speaking. i think the republicans, they have probably dodged a slightly toxic issue. if the ruling had gone another way, given we are heading towards very tight presidential race. as nomia mentioned, thursday's ruling has no bearing in the 1a states — seen here — where medication
. —— scalia.r way to bring the case to the supreme court. it's important to note this ruling does not change anything, so these abortion pills are still illegal in the 14 pills are still illegal in the 1a states that have near total abortion bands, and that's whether there is a band through, on the procedure or on the pills. —— ban. we know that abortion is a potent issue going into the election and we've seen the position the democrats have taken is pretty much in line with the public...
0
0.0
Jun 24, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
until 2008, in a case called heller that wasstice scalia, ity militias tt rights. not the second amendment to protect the individual right t@ube the court said you can have pistols in your home for self-defense, but it's really expanded dramatically b i agree, there's a misunderstanding somehow and a mythology that the second amendment has this umbrella right that supersedes other interests and rights in the consti■rtution■y. it's just not true historically, and it's not true under the case law of the supreme court. host: henry in georgia on our line for republicans. good question? hi there, we'll try to get henry back next up, we'll hear from huntersville, north carolina, on our line for democrat caller: yes, good morning, than. my question is, if every current legal issue that the judges are handling is subject to aion tesy rulinging that was ruled on longí ago, and if it's never been ruled on befor w issues get added to the history and tradion lis for ruling? when does history that's my question. thank you. host: thanks for your call. guest: it's an excellent qu
until 2008, in a case called heller that wasstice scalia, ity militias tt rights. not the second amendment to protect the individual right t@ube the court said you can have pistols in your home for self-defense, but it's really expanded dramatically b i agree, there's a misunderstanding somehow and a mythology that the second amendment has this umbrella right that supersedes other interests and rights in the consti■rtution■y. it's just not true historically, and it's not true under the case...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
joining me now chris landau former law clerk to justices thomas and scalia and former ambassador to mexico. chris let's talk about the attack on the supreme court at the same time merrick garland is saying stop being mean to me and drying to delegitimize this institution of justice. >> welling laura, it's incredible how he is trying to blur the lines between legitimate criticism of the department of justice and, you know, threats and unacceptable forms of coercion. is he trying to make it seem like the department of justice is immune and imperspective yus to criticism. i mean, this is the most politicized department of justice in the united states history. i mean, this is the first time in history the department of justice is indicting the president's primary political opponent. the double standard has never been more brazen between whom they are prosecuting and what they're prosecuting for and what they're not prosecuting. and the fact that they are not even attempting, not even putting a fig leaf in an attempt to enforce fundamental laws like our border laws. we have never seen anything
joining me now chris landau former law clerk to justices thomas and scalia and former ambassador to mexico. chris let's talk about the attack on the supreme court at the same time merrick garland is saying stop being mean to me and drying to delegitimize this institution of justice. >> welling laura, it's incredible how he is trying to blur the lines between legitimate criticism of the department of justice and, you know, threats and unacceptable forms of coercion. is he trying to make it...
40
40
Jun 20, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 2
they blew up the scalia trick of recruiting resort owners to give them free vacations and pretendingrsonal hospitality. they just required more transparency through which the billionaires communicate through the justices. there's some real distress and concern among other judges, but the court itself, haven't seen is a peep. not out of even the ones appointed by the democratic presidents. >> i want to bring you back. now that the senator has hailed you all as fabulous, as we think you are, i feel like i can bring us in the same conversation. the business-friendly agenda is one piece of it. the other is the voter unfriendly piece of it. it played part of the interview with eric holder yesterday. the hostility, the anti-democratic pattern is also one that can be pretty well established at this point. >> yeah, so first of all, i want to point out that when we talk about gifts and we talk about disclosure, we have shifted a long way. the question is not just why haven't these gives me disclosed, but why are they accepting them. when andrew weissman was a federal prosecutor, i couldn't bu
they blew up the scalia trick of recruiting resort owners to give them free vacations and pretendingrsonal hospitality. they just required more transparency through which the billionaires communicate through the justices. there's some real distress and concern among other judges, but the court itself, haven't seen is a peep. not out of even the ones appointed by the democratic presidents. >> i want to bring you back. now that the senator has hailed you all as fabulous, as we think you...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
qualified people ever to be nominated to this was the vacancy created by the death of justice antonin scaliaa nominated merrick garland to fill the vacancy on march 16, 2016 but senator mitch mcconnell in his wisdom said there were no hearings or votes because nine nths before the new presidential term was too close and the people should decide. was only nine months to go. of course the people have decided one president obama was baelected to one of those genui bona fide constitutional naxfour-year terms as president blocked any ■? consideration of the nomination. the seat remains ■+ident obama . then trump immediately nominated neil gorsuch and other right wing conservative. and to demonstrate how arrogant wing has gotten about g roughshod over all principles and norms that might ination to dictionary the principleth■sthe co ruth bader ginsburg died on september 18, 2020 less than two mo general e when early voting had already e mcconnell literally laughed at thid by the president he had senate the senate proceeded to ram through amy coney barret nomination like a thief in the night. i don'
qualified people ever to be nominated to this was the vacancy created by the death of justice antonin scaliaa nominated merrick garland to fill the vacancy on march 16, 2016 but senator mitch mcconnell in his wisdom said there were no hearings or votes because nine nths before the new presidential term was too close and the people should decide. was only nine months to go. of course the people have decided one president obama was baelected to one of those genui bona fide constitutional...
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
scalia probably not the first time you've been asked about it, because we don't have too much time beforeook, you explain that he started writing hissummer of 20. in case you became president, the basis for a memoir. i guess you decided won't read memoosers. i think he didn't read nixon's six crises. but other than that, probably right. what period of time to the journals cover or what? c you tell about that the journals he kept and is that when he started keeping them or ar earlier journals. yeah. so he he was a keeper during throughout his life when he did keep and. basically starting ind 2010, he started almost daily journalsdays that he missed, but it was like you said andervif fuential memoir that he never get to write. bu, know, even after he lost with the rise of donald trump, i think he he intuited in some ways that he wa std. and so he kept keeping a journal and when he got to the didn't ky day. but know for the first few months hebo did. and then during the impeachment trial, he kept very regular journal. and it was really revealing to see functioned behind closed doors or how i
scalia probably not the first time you've been asked about it, because we don't have too much time beforeook, you explain that he started writing hissummer of 20. in case you became president, the basis for a memoir. i guess you decided won't read memoosers. i think he didn't read nixon's six crises. but other than that, probably right. what period of time to the journals cover or what? c you tell about that the journals he kept and is that when he started keeping them or ar earlier journals....
0
0.0
Jun 17, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
scalia probably not the first time you've been asked about it, time before questions.too i want to talkhe book,t he started writing his journals the summer of 2011. inase=yx you became president, the basis for a memoir. i gues decided won't read memoirs by losers. i think he didn't read nixon's six crises. but other than that, probably right. what cover or what? what can you tell about that the journals he kept and is that when he started keeping them or are there earlier journals. yeah. sporadic journal keeper during throughout his journals, he was very detailed about it and.■ basically starting in around 2010, he there some days that he and service of a future yai presidential memoir that he never t write. but then, you know, even after he lost with the rise of donald trump, i think he he intuited in some ways that he was seeing history unfold. and so he kept keeping a journal when he got to the senate, he didn't keep a journal every months he did. and then during the impeachment entries. and it was really revealing to behind closed doors or how it didn't function, frankly. and i thin
scalia probably not the first time you've been asked about it, time before questions.too i want to talkhe book,t he started writing his journals the summer of 2011. inase=yx you became president, the basis for a memoir. i gues decided won't read memoirs by losers. i think he didn't read nixon's six crises. but other than that, probably right. what cover or what? what can you tell about that the journals he kept and is that when he started keeping them or are there earlier journals. yeah....
0
0.0
Jun 7, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they learned the lesson when justice scalia died in the middle of a term in 2016 and they had to put a bunch of those cases on hold and set those issues aside for a few years because they lost their votes. they don't want that to happen again, and so that is another part of this tactic is getting this all done as quickly as possible while they've got the votes. they've got them right now, who knows how long it'll last, but they're going to get it done. >> speaking of supreme court justices immeshed in scandal, clarence thomas, tomorrow is the release of the justice's financial disclosure records, and i know because you tweeted this out. released a gifts the justices have received in the last two decades, and wow, the reported gifts for justice clarence thomas i don't know if you at home can see these numbers here, he's by far and away the person who has received the most gifts, an estimated $2.4 million in reported gifts, and the report estimates he received up to $4 million in gifts. mark, is there no -- and i mean we just move on? is that the idea here? >> look, rather than reitera
they learned the lesson when justice scalia died in the middle of a term in 2016 and they had to put a bunch of those cases on hold and set those issues aside for a few years because they lost their votes. they don't want that to happen again, and so that is another part of this tactic is getting this all done as quickly as possible while they've got the votes. they've got them right now, who knows how long it'll last, but they're going to get it done. >> speaking of supreme court...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think so thank my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow here at aei. and it's my my pleasure to welcome you all to the fifth installment of the american dream lecture series, a component of aei, american dream initiative. this series seeks to revitalize our nation's core institutions and values by inviting prominent writers, academics and thinkers to address some of the most significant political, cultural and social issues facing the united states. as we approach
i think so thank my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow here at aei. and it's my my pleasure to welcome you all to the fifth installment of the american dream lecture series, a component of aei, american dream initiative. this series seeks to revitalize our nation's core institutions and values by inviting prominent writers, academics and thinkers to address some of the most significant political, cultural and social issues facing the united states. as we approach
0
0.0
Jun 16, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow aei. and it's my my pleasure to welcome you all to the fifth the american dream lecture series, a co american dream initiative. thisev core institutions and values by invitinwriters, academics and thinkers to address some of the most and social issues facing the united states. as we approach the 250th anniversar founding, these lectures are an opportunity sk healthy are our national institutions and do they face and whatavailable? last speaker to discuss anti-semitism in the united states. that was nearly a month before hamas's attack onsrael and the ensuing pro-hamas anti-israel protests on campuse united states. i wish our invitatio relevant. in january, the an reported more than 3000 anti-semitic incidents 7th and january 7th, an increase of 36. compared to the same period the previous year and as we've seen, campus protests explode over thth encampments and building takeovers with the overt hatred expressed toward -- and the jewish state of israel. it's more importantunderstand the his
my name is christopher scalia. i'm a senior fellow aei. and it's my my pleasure to welcome you all to the fifth the american dream lecture series, a co american dream initiative. thisev core institutions and values by invitinwriters, academics and thinkers to address some of the most and social issues facing the united states. as we approach the 250th anniversar founding, these lectures are an opportunity sk healthy are our national institutions and do they face and whatavailable? last speaker...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
former justice scalia and justice law clerk and former ambassador to mexico and attorney extraordinaryris landau joins me now. chris, great to see you tonight. this is really quite something this group of hamas protesters takes over. they commandeer that hamilton hall at columbia. throw the whole campus into chaos. i think to myself, chris, imagine if they -- these were a bunch of maga, you know, supporting students if there are any columbia. imagine if they had taken over kind of the muslim student center or any center at columbia. what do you think alvin bragg would have done to them? >> laura, this is a real problem. and these soros d.a.s like alvin bragg are really undermining the rule of law in this country. the rule of law depends on having certain laws that people can understand, they can conform their to the law and laws are enforced even handily. what we're seeing right now is a massive under enforcement of the law. these people are obviously breaking the law by trespassing, by doing all kinds of other things that are clearly illegal and unlawful and the d.a.s aren't prosecuti
former justice scalia and justice law clerk and former ambassador to mexico and attorney extraordinaryris landau joins me now. chris, great to see you tonight. this is really quite something this group of hamas protesters takes over. they commandeer that hamilton hall at columbia. throw the whole campus into chaos. i think to myself, chris, imagine if they -- these were a bunch of maga, you know, supporting students if there are any columbia. imagine if they had taken over kind of the muslim...
0
0.0
Jun 29, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
has featured many well-known important speakers■f nea, former of the supreme court instance, anthony scalia in addition to your academic work and teaching, you've ao do political campaigns. you've been a speechwriter, writer and a campaign mager. and also you had a role in the white house for special programs, and you worked on the first lady's staff. you'ven an article calls and essays on some of these ladies. of your articles was wisdom to know the difference, the d another one a certain comfort. ford as first lady. now when you were chosenwhite hn the first lady'sd you for that? did they choose you and? what was your role? that's probably thecould possib. i came home from from school, hi school my senior year and my grandmother w recovering from surgery. i went to sit down with her j pe a few moments and she had on the televisio talk show. i'm going to be aging myself, but it was something called the÷ spring, 1971 was a woman by the she came on the screen and the television wasn't big enough for that personality. she fulofú5 vitality energy tance. the substance of her remarks was inating
has featured many well-known important speakers■f nea, former of the supreme court instance, anthony scalia in addition to your academic work and teaching, you've ao do political campaigns. you've been a speechwriter, writer and a campaign mager. and also you had a role in the white house for special programs, and you worked on the first lady's staff. you'ven an article calls and essays on some of these ladies. of your articles was wisdom to know the difference, the d another one a certain...
0
0.0
Jun 22, 2024
06/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that was justice scalia, devito guns right activist but he also said in that ruling that governmentsut restraint in place. do you think this opens the door that the court could be more open for the court? >> if you are a martian, you land and you say oh, the united states has decided not to have people who shoot into houses have a gun? it's astonishing to me that this is even a case. it shows how far we've gone. i'm a little disturbed by the larger precedents they're arguing over, the historical pattern? william: right, the gruen decision that thomas enshrined. >> there are a lot of prior decisions i don't like. so to say that the status quo has a preference seems to me like -- on stilts. would they have said that before the dobbs decision? there's been an historical pattern, a right to abortion. we're going with the historical pattern. it seems to me it's biasing the court to whatever is and that seems to me not the court's decision. that seems to be stepping beyond the bounds. william: preview 1900 the ideas of spousal abuse. the laws about this did not exist. this week we saw pres
that was justice scalia, devito guns right activist but he also said in that ruling that governmentsut restraint in place. do you think this opens the door that the court could be more open for the court? >> if you are a martian, you land and you say oh, the united states has decided not to have people who shoot into houses have a gun? it's astonishing to me that this is even a case. it shows how far we've gone. i'm a little disturbed by the larger precedents they're arguing over, the...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
more to the point is joe biden is destroying our publicly take us into the late great scalia. minutes we can set the foundation where it's going. >> i think it's even more fundamental than the one that stephesteven has just put forwa. i asked them, what do you think is the reason america such a free country? what is that in our constitution that makes us what we are? and i guarantee you the response i will get, and you will get this from almost any american click the woman he was talking to at the supermarket. the answer will be freedom of speech. freedom of the press. no unreasonable search and seizure. no quartering of troops and marveloamarvelous provisions ofl of rights. if you think a bill of rights is what sets us apart, you are crazy. every banana republic in the world has a bill of rights. every president for life has a bill of rights. the bill of rights of the formal evil empire the socialist republic was much better than ours. i mean it literally. it was much better we guarantee freedom of speech and of the press, big deal they guaranteed freedom of the street demons
more to the point is joe biden is destroying our publicly take us into the late great scalia. minutes we can set the foundation where it's going. >> i think it's even more fundamental than the one that stephesteven has just put forwa. i asked them, what do you think is the reason america such a free country? what is that in our constitution that makes us what we are? and i guarantee you the response i will get, and you will get this from almost any american click the woman he was talking...
0
0.0
Jun 5, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i even go back to the supreme court and ruth bader ginsburg who considered antonin scalia to be one of her closest friends. when people of different minds used to be able to have civil conversations. would you run for office right now? >> no, because i enjoy being on with you a lot more than running for office. >> correct answer. >> i think there's two ways, chris, to deal with this. one is, if you take a look at the political parties, they have lost power. now who gets elected has been turned over to a bunch of special interest groups, and we can plug that. we can put a finger in the dike. but the bigger problem is the issue of the character. the bigger issue of are we willing to stand up against what we see as unfair or injustice, are we willing to take the heat. that's why i have been saying on this show more than any other show that i appear on, it's going to take some sort of a spiritual impact on all of us to realize we can't hate that other person. we're all made in the image of the lord. and if you're going to just seek revenge and hate them, you're bringing down our culture. a
i even go back to the supreme court and ruth bader ginsburg who considered antonin scalia to be one of her closest friends. when people of different minds used to be able to have civil conversations. would you run for office right now? >> no, because i enjoy being on with you a lot more than running for office. >> correct answer. >> i think there's two ways, chris, to deal with this. one is, if you take a look at the political parties, they have lost power. now who gets...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here is what's different, justice kennedy, sotomayor, you go through it and name any justice, even scaliau never knew how they sounded but didn't sound exactly like republican politicians. alito talks to friendly news outlets like the wall street and sounds just like these people. >> he sounds like a fox news grandpa half of the time. >> yes, he does. >> there's that. i want to be clear, i'm not surprised by the republicans falling in line on this and acting like this is somehow connected to the substance of the court's ruling. that's their court. that court is a able to do all of the things that that republican minority in the senate cannot do with majoritarian politics. the court is with them. through the court, all things are possible. so they're going to protect that court at all costs. >> of course. >> what encourages me about this move from the democrats is that it's the first really clear sign from the democrats that they are trying to connect the fact of this court to the electoral process and to show. they know this law has no chance of being passed. but they're making clear to t
here is what's different, justice kennedy, sotomayor, you go through it and name any justice, even scaliau never knew how they sounded but didn't sound exactly like republican politicians. alito talks to friendly news outlets like the wall street and sounds just like these people. >> he sounds like a fox news grandpa half of the time. >> yes, he does. >> there's that. i want to be clear, i'm not surprised by the republicans falling in line on this and acting like this is...
0
0.0
Jun 10, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i will tell you that there is a supreme court decision, i believe scalia, that said that a case is brought, an indictment is brought and then a judge and jury, you know, finds a conviction and all of that legitimizes the action, right? because the results are saying, you know, that a jury found him guilty and it legitimizes regardless whether it was to be brought or not this is one of those instances where a case was cobbled together. i think it was bad on the facts and it was manipulated on the law, and now it has a layer of validity because of the jury verdict. that's why we have appellate courts, though. and the d.a. saying that he did his job is quite a stretch when he ran on the notion of prosecuting donald trump regardless of what the facts might be. they did that, now let's see what the court will do in response and then i have little faith that there will be much value by him appearing in front of congress. but we'll see. stranger things have happened. >> dana: they have. brett tollman, thank you. >> john: thanks, brett. >> dana: right now we are waiting for an update from
>> i will tell you that there is a supreme court decision, i believe scalia, that said that a case is brought, an indictment is brought and then a judge and jury, you know, finds a conviction and all of that legitimizes the action, right? because the results are saying, you know, that a jury found him guilty and it legitimizes regardless whether it was to be brought or not this is one of those instances where a case was cobbled together. i think it was bad on the facts and it was...
0
0.0
Jun 7, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they learned the lesson when justice scalia died in the middle of the term in 2016 and they had to putor a few years because they lost their votes. that is another part of this tactic is just getting this all done as quickly as possible while they have the votes. they have them now. who knows how long it will last but they will get it done. >> speaking of supreme court justices in scandal, tomorrow is the release of the financial records reports. wow, the reported gifts for justice clarence thomas. i don't know if you at home can see the numbers here. he is by far and away the person who has received the most gifts. an estimated $2.4 million in reported gifts and they estimate he received up to $4 million in gifts. mark, is there no? and, we just move on? >> rather than repeating how broken our system is, i want to point out the other numbers on the chart. the liberal and moderate justices are not participating in the same racket. some of these justices, like sutur, even kavanaugh. they only have a few hundred dollars worth of gifts they have received. they are trying to some degree to
they learned the lesson when justice scalia died in the middle of the term in 2016 and they had to putor a few years because they lost their votes. that is another part of this tactic is just getting this all done as quickly as possible while they have the votes. they have them now. who knows how long it will last but they will get it done. >> speaking of supreme court justices in scandal, tomorrow is the release of the financial records reports. wow, the reported gifts for justice...