that chappie said the better analogy for schenck would be if he was somebody who stood, you know, in a nondestructive way during, intermission and pointed out to people that the exits were blocked. yeah, in other words, he was trying to protect their safety. oh yeah. now that now sorry. no, no, he was he was brilliant. and pointing that out, i honestly that by the end of his life holmes would have loved to gone back and, stopped himself from writing that line because even by the time of his death it was already being used by everyone as an excuse to silence others. now, if we can proceed from our least favorite lines to what our positive models would be for a robust interpretation, the first amendment, when you were saying least favorite book, you would for holmes to take with him to the civil war was hobbes, leviathan. i was thinking, well, i suspect the first choice might have been john stuart mills. liberty 859. because you talk a lot about the million harm principle i, i infer that you at least if correctly and implied that would be a mode for enforcing the first amendment consis

that chappie said the better analogy for schenck would be if he was somebody who stood, you know, in a nondestructive way during, intermission and pointed out to people that the exits were blocked. yeah, in other words, he was trying to protect their safety. oh yeah. now that now sorry. no, no, he was he was brilliant. and pointing that out, i honestly that by the end of his life holmes would have loved to gone back and, stopped himself from writing that line because even by the time of his death it was already being used by everyone as an excuse to silence others. now, if we can proceed from our least favorite lines to what our positive models would be for a robust interpretation, the first amendment, when you were saying least favorite book, you would for holmes to take with him to the civil war was hobbes, leviathan. i was thinking, well, i suspect the first choice might have been john stuart mills. liberty 859. because you talk a lot about the million harm principle i, i infer that you at least if correctly and implied that would be a mode for enforcing the first amendment consis

that chappie said the better analogy for schenck would be if he was somebody who stood, you know, in nondestructive way during, intermission and pointed out to people that the exits were blocked. yeah, in other words, he was trying to protect their safety. oh yeah. now that now sorry. no, no, he was he was brilliant. and pointing that out, i honestly that by the end of his life holmes would have loved to gone back and, stopped himself from writing that line because even by the time of his death it was already being used by everyone as an excuse to silence others. now, if we can proceed from our least favorite lines to what our positive models would be for a robust interpretation, the first amendment, when you were saying least favorite book, you would for holmes to take with him to the civil war was hobbes, leviathan. i was thinking, well, i suspect the first choice might have been john stuart mills. liberty 859. because you talk a lot about the million harm principle i, i infer that you at least if correctly and implied that would be a mode for enforcing the first amendment consiste