>> well, it took a while, but the issue of determining scot peterson's guilt was several issues. it was a case in which there wasn't a lot of physical evidence, but a lot of circumstantial evidence and it was like a puzzle. you know, you had to listen and pay close attention to the testimony and so many other things in respect to the recordings and what have you to form an opinion and then sit down with the rest of the jurors and deliberate on that to cover what makes sense, what the logic and the reasoning of whatever actions or statements or what have you were and come to a final decision and that's what we did. we worked very hard, very hard. it was stressful, but in the end i am of the firm belief that we made the right decision because we made the decision based on truth, based on fact. and there could only be one truth and fact. now when we look back at that, i think that's exactly how juries ought to proceed and it's a situation where scott is guilty until proven innocent. now before he was innocent until proven guilty. you know, the prosecution succeeded at that. now he's