petlyura, about whom we will talk more now, initiated this idea, this decision to send a choir under the instruments of oleksandr koshyts to europe, which would through music, through song , opened ukraine to the world, proved to the world that ukrainians are not russians, ukrainians are an independent nation that has the right to an independent state. it's, it's very, very, sorry, important, what tina said because 100 years ago, ukraine was in a much worse state, because the majority of the world did not even understand that there was such a nation, much older than the muscovites, that is, the russians, and petliura simply understood this perfectly and found a way to reach hearts, and the fact that we are now known in the world , this is also simon's merit. and a bunch of choirs who simply developed some kind of, you know, this emotional aura and this cultural noosphere. which we can already rely on it, but look, you modestly remained silent, so i will clarify: wikipedia, writing about the chapel under the košice cannon, she writes: the republican chapel of košice and kirill stetsen

conductor of the seminary choir, simon petlyura, conductor and skripal, and he also liked to sing, hed mykola lysenko, then a separatist composer, this is... 1901 , and for this unauthorized performance, petliura was expelled from seminary, that is, petliura knew music, understood music and understood that music would make an impression on europeans, and he was also an art critic, journalist and editor himself for many years, that is, he understood what laws and information policy are, that every concert music critics come, who then write reviews, so this idea worked at a time when it was very difficult to get... the then official ukrainian diplomatic representation of any interview, any speech in the press, even an extremely interesting and telling episode , specifically from the history of this tour, the head of the ukrainian diplomatic mission in belgium did not let him in, but after the choir's concerts in brussels , he received permission to come to brussels, well, to the place of his destination, that is, the choir opened the door even to the official one. the diplomatic mission

he was the commandant of the city of kiev, simon petlyura fought with him, because there was a war forrainian state, then the bolshevik regime won victory, and as a symbol of this. it was stalin who erected a monument to chors, here in the center of our capital, our capital, the dismantled monument will be taken to the antonov aviation museum, the dismantlers dismantled the monument to the soviet leader, because what kind of figure, executioner, executioner of the ukrainian people nikolai shchors, a pedestal with him on a horse was installed on shevchenko boulevard back in 1954. decommunization was being prepared from the very morning; a special lift was working on site, with the help of which the structure was dismantled removed from the crossing, the sporuda was dismantled and tidied up, what do the people of kiev think about the demolition or removal, removal, let's listen , it would be very good if the horse was left and the person was removed, look, this monument was made in the image of the first president of ukraine kravchuk, you know yes ... he fought with the ukrainian army, i

petlyura near the building of the central council in 2009 , a memorial table was installed, where aent will be built on this site, to now the kyiv authorities did not dare to build it. i would also expect that each of these places of the ukrainian revolution that we marked, that we established, were marked with annotation boards, so that people would walk, see and know what happened here, in the end, it makes our us stronger, that it, from who does it depend on, is it kyiv? the government decides the issue of memorials, you understand that politicians, they are sensitive to public sentiments, that is, to a large extent, it should come to the awareness of kyivans and people that this is necessary, and under their influence, the government, of course will fulfill their and their wishes, society's social, provide society's expectations, and that's exactly what this book with those addresses is about, it was created in order to draw attention to these... specific premises, specific houses, and to create some interest in society , in kyiv citizenship, i think that we have invested our 5

petlyura remains one of the ambiguous figures, despite the fact that a huge number of books, articles, and documentaries have been written about petliura, until now this figure is perceived very ambiguously in society, and this, again, is the result of imperial and later soviet propaganda, sorry, here we have to add to what was said that the ukrainian element, the ukrainianness, was rendered comical, in a way that was not worthy, well, in such a way that you can only laugh with it, and what about dumplings, dumplings and anything like that, in this book, i read this book, most of it, and let me remind you that these are the kyiv addresses of the ukrainian revolution of the 17th-21st years, and... it turns out that every old building in the city center, in the center of kyiv, and not only in the center of kyiv, that is, all the old buildings, they is it related to the ukrainian revolution and the government of that time, what happened at the askold grave at the beginning of the century, at the beginning of the 20th century? necropolis on askold's grave - it was one of the oldest kyiv n

the construction of the monument to simon petlyura near the building of the central council in 2009 , memorial table was installed, where a monument will be built on this place, until now the kyiv authorities have not dared to build it. i would also expect that each of these places of the ukrainian revolution, which we marked, which we installed, were marked with annotation boards, so that people would walk, see and know what was here. in the end it makes us stronger, that it is, on whom it depends, it is the kyiv authorities that decide the issue regarding memorials, you understand that politicians, they are sensitive to public sentiments, that is, to a large extent, it should come to the awareness of the people of kyiv, to the people, that it is necessary, and under their influence, the government will naturally fulfill their wishes, society's public, provide public expectations, and that's it... the book with those addresses, it was created in order to draw attention to these specific premises, specific houses and create some kind of interest in society, in kyiv citizenship, i thin

ugh, despite the fact that a huge number of books, articles and documentaries have been written about petlyura , until now this figure is perceived in society very... ambiguously, and this again, these are the consequences of imperial and later soviet propaganda, sorry, here we have to add to what you said, that the ukrainian element, the ukrainianness, was comical, somehow inferior, well, such that you can only laugh with it, well, dumplings , dumplings and something similar, in this book, so i read this book. most of it, i will remind you that these are kyiv addresses of the ukrainian revolution of 17-21 years, and it turns out that every old building in the city center, in the center of kyiv, and not only in the center of kyiv, that is all old houses, they are connected with the ukrainian revolution and with the government of that time, which was at the beginning of the century at skoldov's grave, at the beginning of the 20th. century? necropolis on the oskoldova grave, it was one of the oldest kyiv necropolises, if i am not mistaken, it dates back to the 18th century, and it was one of the