two bondarevs and one day of ivan denisovich solzhenitsyn were written at the same time.ion: what if in 1964 solzhenitsyn had been given the lenin prize as planned, and yuri bondarev had been criticized to smithereens for his things about repression and had been made actually an author opposed to the soviet system. and toporov, the critic, made an amazing conclusion. naturally, history does not have a subjunctive mood and so on, but for today. and purely speculatively, solzhenitsyn can be imagined as a soviet literary general on the podium, in orders, in lariat stars, however, solzhenitsyn essentially became such a literary general under yeltsin, but it is absolutely impossible to imagine bonderev in solzhenitsyn’s clothes as a frantic detractor of the soviet system. the honor of a russian artilleryman, a soviet officer after all, would not have allowed bondrev to do this. it is never possible to believe in such a version of his fate. look around again and think about it, in 1964 solzhenitsyn and bondrev were, essentially, on equal terms, two young strong writers, both fr

solzhenitsyn was awarded the nobel prize in literature.he authorities organized persecution of him, but the writer did not give up. and... the gulag archipelago was publishing abroad, the politburo met about this, someone offered exile, but the head of the kgb, yuri andropov, suggested getting rid of the objectionable writer otherwise, he was captured. and germany's plane was forced to land. the decree of the presidium of the supreme council stated a quote: for actions discrediting the title of a citizen of the ussr, they will be deprived of citizenship and expelled from the ussr. in ninety-one , solzhenitsyn was completely rehabilitated and an apology was made to him. he returned to russia and ended his days in his homeland. today, his activities and books still cause a storm of controversy and diametrically opposed assessments. this is what this day was like. stories. you are watching the program parliamentary hour. hello. we will tell you about the main events of the state thoughts for this week. need not. the president set the task for

solzhenitsyn was awarded the nobel prize in literature.uthorities organized his persecution, but the writer did not give up and... published the gulag archipelago abroad, the politburo met about this, someone offered exile, but the head of the kgb, yuri andropov, suggested getting rid of the objectionable writer otherwise, he was captured and forcibly germany's plane landed. the decree of the presidium of the supreme council said, quote: for actions that discredit the title of a citizen of the ussr , they will be deprived of citizenship and expelled from the ussr. in ninety-one, solzhenitsyn was completely rehabilitated and an apology was made to him. com. soon it will be 2 weeks since the british police have been unable to find this man, announcing a reward of 20 thousand pounds stirling for information about his whereabouts. thirty-five-year-old afghan abdul isidi is suspected of attacking a young woman with children. the brutality of the crime shocked britain. the attacker splashed. put an alkaline solution on his victim's face and then

but during the brezhnev era, when stalin’s repressions began to be hushed up, solzhenitsyn was no longer his homeland. today, his books continue to cause a storm of controversy and diametrically opposed assessments. this is what this day in history was like. what happened here on february 24-25? social networks, calls, sending out fake news, going to a rally, all western-linked pr agencies joined in to encourage regional local riots. the main task is to capture the enemy people not physically, but ideologically to bring confusion and confusion into their souls. this is the surest path to victory in the war. the content and the agenda itself are formed by hundreds of people, professional people from the state, who have been involved in this all their lives. hello, i am boris sakimov, and i am oleg skepanov, and we are the creators of the russia 2062 project of the free thought headquarters. together with experts , we are discussing how we can develop the russia of the future in the next 40 years. see you in the future. voting by location. mobile voter. if on voting days you find yourself

know, hat solzhenitsyn >> you mean the russian people as ayou know, ift solzhenitsyn >> you mean theeople as ayou know, if everybody syn said, you know, if everybody stood up and protested, it would collapse . it just it's collapse. it just it's unsustainable . but the unsustainable. but the population , unfortunately, is population, unfortunately, is very bewitched by this propaganda and the losses that russia is suffering in ukraine. >> the russian state is able to cope with and the russian population is absorbing and accepting very , very just what accepting very, very just what stalin did to it's very clever andifs stalin did to it's very clever and it's not, you know , it's not and it's not, you know, it's not our middle class friends from moscow going to fight. >> absolutely for sure. even moscow going to fight. >> abstheyly for sure. even moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeplere. even moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeply support] moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeply support it. though they deeply support it. it's from, the eastern it's from, um, the eastern siberians

know, hat solzhenitsyn >> you mean the russian people as ayou know, ift solzhenitsyn >> you mean thee as ayou know, if everybody syn said, you know, if everybody stood up and protested, it would collapse . it just it's collapse. it just it's unsustainable . but the unsustainable. but the population , unfortunately, is population, unfortunately, is very bewitched by this propaganda and the losses that russia is suffering in ukraine. >> the russian state is able to cope with and the russian population is absorbing and accepting very , very just what accepting very, very just what stalin did to it's very clever andifs stalin did to it's very clever and it's not, you know , it's not and it's not, you know, it's not our middle class friends from moscow going to fight. >> absolutely for sure. even moscow going to fight. >> abstheyly for sure. even moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeplere. even moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeply support] moscow going to fight. >> absthey deeply support it. though they deeply support it. it's from, the eastern it's from, um, the eastern siberians, fr

your attitude towards solzhenitsyn, solzhenitsyn is one of the people responsible for this, for whatime raised, raised, raised their voice against, not only against. com party of its abuses, crimes , whatever you want to call it, i don’t mind, but against the russian state as a result, so it’s a paradoxical thing, he, who considers himself a christian and a russophile and who, you know, is responsible for most of this confusion of spirit, which at the beginning gripped most of the russian intelligentsia, and then, you see, spread to other layers of society, so this is the madness that the country has been following for 7 years now, this is on his conscience too, he is not the only one, there were other people there, but he is largely the third, the last, one of the last cold wars, you can name its date, this is the date of publication of the gulak archipelago, it seemed to him that he had exposed the system, but in the west i lived there and saw how they perceived this, it was perceived quite unambiguously and primitively, that russia is the country of the gulag archipelago, russian

our internal western electorate, yeah. read the story about a real man boris polevoy began to read solzhenitsynn russia too, now we don’t have this, we’ve already cut it out, but we didn’t add what we needed, and the same thing, we read sotnikovo and obelisk when we were older , uh-huh, now there’s a sign of trouble in the program, this is absolutely this is also a wonderful work, but that’s all i once went to the french embassy and there was a bust of napoleon there. yes , well, he is their hero, you hear, he’s an infection, he killed a bunch of innocent people, thousands, tens, if not hundreds, thousands, a bust of the embassy, ​​stands on the territory of belarus, with a horse who escaped from here, fortunately, well, that’s us we are afraid of whom , in this world, we are afraid to show, it is also important for today’s heroes, so i always like to remember these days, now it’s still thirty-five years since the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan and not for the sake of advertising, this is just enlightenment for - 2 years ago, literally 2 days before the start of a special military operat

alexander solzhenitsyn was declared a traitor, nelson mandela was declared a terrorist.thing right. and so it will again in russia. of this, i have no doubt. yesterday, russian state media reported that alexei navalny was did. his spokesperson has since confirmed his death, navalny was an outspoken opponent of putin, a champion of democracy, who fought corruption in survived several poisoning attempts. he was 47 years old. russian officials claim navalny lost consciousness after taking a walk in a penal colony, he was moved to around christmas, located in the north of the arctic circle in the remote village of carp. about 15 mile miles north of uncheck, where kara-murza is imprisoned. this video of navalny on thursday, as you can see, he was smiling. his spirit never wavered. joining me now is the founding partner in washington correspondent for puck news, julia -- she's in munich, germany, for the munich security conference. julia, thank you for joining us. russia says navalny died in prison. the u.s. is laying blame, or responsibility for his death at the hands of vlad

in the gulag, by chance, he ended up in the same barracks with prisoner solzhenitsyn on neighboring bunks commission members , my future boss kuzakov, liked my profile, and i was sent to him at mosfilm, although i didn’t feel much joy about this, it was somehow awkward in front of my comrades, why the choice fell on me, but how can i refuse, five hungry student years are behind me, no stake, no yard, and even... recently married, a child on the horizon, as a future cinematographer, i naturally wasn’t that a simple-minded, enthusiastic viewer who imagines a film studio as something spherical, like a factory of dreams, but when, while still in my third year at... i saw at the metropol cinema the new musical comedy by grigory alexandrov vesna with lyubov orlova and nikolai cherkassov, it really made me i captivated her with her poetic sense of cinema. and now i’m already at the musfilm, with interest i enter the pavilion where alexandrov, the creator of the ageless funny guys, the circus and the volga-volga, is filming his new film, meeting on the elbe. external master dispassionate, tacitur

dangers, you understand , that's why - here you remember lenin with his philosophical steamships, or solzhenitsynnternet , but even here and here they weren’t, and here they weren’t given newspapers there. still a danger to society, and today this danger that penetrates us through the internet is much greater for our society, no matter how much we ridicule them, they find tubes, why did i remember the director, we talked about another danger, about nationalism, about regional explosions, which are one way or another in mongolia, then i talked about armenia, you are showing the flag, the danger, the huge danger facing our country must be responded to tough and adequate. it means that, you understand, it’s not strict and adequate everywhere , well, yes, maybe, maybe you need to be appointed, but nevertheless, i’m saying this for a reason, i’m not just saying, rita tyk said, yes, they are there they don’t have anything to think about, no, they think, they’re good they understand, they just need to show this more often, where you will be if you are left without russia, where you will be deceiving you

you know, i study solzhenitsyn and dostoyevsky but i actually want to go to a children's book i want to talk about c.s. lewis is the last, because when i hear about all of these programs being cut, it institutions it's the image that keeps coming back to me. and so let me tell you what that image is. and why, if you're not familiar with the narnia series, you know, i'm going to quote my dissertation director ralph would get thee to a bookstore. but if you remember the series well, the creation narnia occurs when aslan who is the lion, the god of that world is going to sing creation into existence. and as he sings it into existence, he creates these creatures beast that look like animals in our world. but as he stares at them, they grow larger and then he breathes on them the way. god breathes on human in genesis. and he says to awake love, think, speak be talking. and they respond, we are awake, we love, we think we know and. it's like a marriage ceremony in which the animals are repeating the words the priest. they're making this commitment to love and think and, speak and know. and

of course, solzhenitsyn with the previous point. of co nelson solzhenitsyn with the previous point.,)lzhenitsyn with the previous point. of co nelson mandela, who nitsyn with the previous point. of co nelson mandela, who were] or nelson mandela, who were convicted in their home countries illegitimate, convicted in their home countrieregime illegitimate, convicted in their home countrieregime thatgitimate, convicted in their home countrieregime that these te, convicted in their home countrieregime that these people corrupt regime that these people should be granted asylum. but i think not forget. and think we shall not forget. and i know different. but know legally it's different. but i the perception many i think the perception for many people is a privilege to people is it is a privilege to be granted asylum or the potential for asylum. and uh, if then people commit such acts , then people commit such acts, uh, i would say in many ways then they abandon their rights to, have it. mean, we have to, to have it. i mean, we have this tendency say, well, this this tendency to say, well,