six of them new hampshire, delaware, south dakota north dakota omaha and nevada.sk the question i'm not an expert in state finance how bad is this deal. for low tax states. and effort in a still reduce the number of uninsured in the state. it's just a ntquestion. so, as you can guess, i'm an incrementalist about this. i think it's worth looking at the proposal on the table. had questions about it and then i will stop. there is a reference in the proposal the overall cap on spending. i didn't know how to read that i hope it comes out a discussion. were fetalking about federal ca on federal contributions in the matching form to state spending on this population and the states, i think that raises concerns for some of us who like the current structure of the program understanding it can be approved a lot of things wrong with it. what is the overall cap. for the states looking to market the proposal understand there would be an overall cap on federal spending stop and if there is, what are the implications for that. ultimately we are talking about the risk of healthca