have stopped them from saying, "no , don't do this" or, for example, or even in the famous words of stizahdon't do it at all." i want to say that what really happened was, of course , the parliament tried to be the same, not to say that it was one-sided, but as much as the interaction. the so-called mr. raisi, so-called with the parliament we should have said, for example, you should look at the discussion of teacher ratings, this bill was left for 10-12 years, this law was left, but he agreed, he agreed , he said that you should bring it so-called and approve it, i will pay the so- called so-called he didn't have to give this, he had to earn income, he had to work , produce income. let me tell you, he was making money, look at the previous government , no more than 300,000 barrels, for example, but he reached one and a half million, well, this was not the same type of diplomatic interaction that he had, now mr. abdullahian, may god rest his soul, it is really him. the same attitude was used to argue with this country and that country.