0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great restaurant. it would be a great shame if something happened to it. on the contrary, we were talking about abortion, death penalty, or firearms. matters that are cultural issues around which there are deep partisan divides. of course, it would be fair to predict a conservative leading in the supreme court to rule a certain way. frankly, we have years of data suggesting that. the issues at play, they affect republican candidates and their opponents. these are not standard issues. these are complex issues from constitutional interpretat
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and neil, on supreme court nights we go straight to you because you are the supreme court practitioner, here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump lawyers filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump that the supreme court doesn't take them. they take very few cases a year, about 60. but i suspect that this is one case that the court can't pass up. and indeed, both sides are basically saying to the court, to the supreme court, take this case, we hear this case. i very much suspect that they will. i think they can order a briefing to occur really quickly, and oral argument to take place in a matter of a few weeks. >> andrew weissmann, what stands out to you in the trump petition to the supreme court? >> two things, one is that as a matter of being a lawyer and in the same field that neal is an, the amount that we have become a northward to just how poorly argued and reasoned and the sort of gall that the brief represent
and neil, on supreme court nights we go straight to you because you are the supreme court practitioner, here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump lawyers filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump that the supreme court doesn't take them. they take very few cases a year, about 60. but i suspect that this is one case...
0
0.0
Jan 9, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the court too will grant circ. suppose that you're worried that there might be 5 votes to affirm the colorado supreme court and you don't want the supreme court to be the one who decides nationwide whether trump is going to be on the ballot or not. maybe you don't grant circ. maybe you let colorado have its way and case for another case, wait toe see if there's conflit and the court -- that would be the traditional way the supreme court would exercise its circ power to see if there's conflict on this issue. minnesota has rejected the argument. first amendment grounds not fourth amendment grounds. we
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the...
27
27
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives. shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. so the rules for federal elections shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. and so the republicans say this says the legislature thereof doesn't say state court. so therefore, it only means state legislatures. now, those of you with legal training know that or those of you who've dabbled in this know that sometimes texts have to be understood with reference to context. a rule that says, you know, no vehicles in the park doesn't exclude babies, strollers. you know, so
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado supreme court got it right. there have only been two courts in this nation that have grappled with the decision, did donald trump engage in an insurrection? both of those courts were right here in colorado, and both of them said yes, he did. i also do not believe that there should be some loophole in the constitution for a president who decides to engage in rebellion. when we say no person is above the law, we should mean it. it shouldn't be an interpretation that no person is above the law except donald trump when he tries to ste
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, at the supreme court, 6-3.ng they're going to definitely rule one way or the other because of politics. that's just not how the court operates. i'd say one other thing about what lisa and andrew were saying a moment ago about the question presented at the court. i guess i disagree a little with my colleagues. it's very rare for the supreme court to rewrite the questions that the petitioner, that is the person asking the supreme court to hear the case, rare that the court will actually do that. in my hundreds of cases at the court, it's only happened a few times. it's not surprising to me the court heard what it generally does, taking the question as the way the petitioner here, donald trump, framed it out to be. i don't think that tells us very much about all the questions that the court has really focused on. i think they're just at this point focused on all of the above, on everything, and they didn't want to do anything further and take something off the table from their consideration. >> lisa, up a question
, at the supreme court, 6-3.ng they're going to definitely rule one way or the other because of politics. that's just not how the court operates. i'd say one other thing about what lisa and andrew were saying a moment ago about the question presented at the court. i guess i disagree a little with my colleagues. it's very rare for the supreme court to rewrite the questions that the petitioner, that is the person asking the supreme court to hear the case, rare that the court will actually do...
0
0.0
Jan 31, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis of section three of the 14th amendment, which bars anyone from holding federal office if they have betrayed an oath to uphold the constitution. today, the board of elections in illinois decided that they don't have the authority to ban donald trump from the ballot. they follow the advice of a retired republican judge on that point. and that judges report to the board of election, the judge said the evidence presented at the hearing on january 26 2024 proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that president trump
supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted. whatever anyone thinks of that decision, you can't say they rushed in early. what do you think as someone who is really one of the foremost experts at the intersection of elections and the courts about how early they've had to come in here? or do you think that's not such a big concern because people won't remember it by november and people can focus on the choice they have to make? >> i think it was imperative they get involved early, and here's why. if you're a voter in colorado or maine or one of these other states, say you're
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted....
0
0.0
Jan 14, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.nd i think they are just beginning to get attention. >> one question i think is raised by this -- i'm sorry, deeper question than if congress can change rules of precedent. of course, if the rules of precedentre common-law rules, it may be that congress can change the rules of precedent and create these structures. of course, they are limited. they cannot create special rules forf cases, but i don't think it is clear if you agree that precedent rules or common-law rules that come from the structure of the conot necessarily mean congresss disabled from getting involved. >> they were c in 1787. did they get baked into article three in 1788 so that they are no longer common-law rules but now constitutional ones? >> i don't think so. there were hearsay rules, all sorts of rules and rules of evidence, and i'm not sure they were baked in. they had the unusual power, i think, to create them, but i don't think we would think they are baked in because, of course, the common law can change. i ce
supreme court.nd i think they are just beginning to get attention. >> one question i think is raised by this -- i'm sorry, deeper question than if congress can change rules of precedent. of course, if the rules of precedentre common-law rules, it may be that congress can change the rules of precedent and create these structures. of course, they are limited. they cannot create special rules forf cases, but i don't think it is clear if you agree that precedent rules or common-law rules that...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never speak about politics. and i will not today speak about the politics of this decision. at the supreme court of the united states. i will say this, the supreme court does not want to decide this case. and it will likely look for every legitimate way possible, legitimate way possible, to avoid deciding whether the former president is disqualified from the presidency. having studied the disqualification clause myself for three years now, there are very, very few, if any, off-ramps that would allow the supreme court to avoid a decision in
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
agreement with the colorado supreme court. deadline is supposed to be the 5th. that's tomorrow. they start sending out ballots later in the month, and ballots can be sent to colorado voters in mid-february. colorado conducts its elections entirely by mail. there are early deadlines. i think it's reasonable to assume that donald trump's name is going to be on these ballots, at least when they get printed, probably when they get sent out. i don't think it's reasonable to expect the supreme court to take this up and act on the case in the incredibly condensed time line. >> the state deadline to certify the ballot, january 20th. to military and overseas ballots. february 12th, first day ballots can be sent to other colorado voters. that's coming up very very fast, and the printing does take some time. garrett haake, thank you very much. >>> joining us now, msnbc legal analyst, lisa rubin, so you watched the court. what is your expectation of when and if they will take this up? >> katy, i think they will take this up, and the decis
agreement with the colorado supreme court. deadline is supposed to be the 5th. that's tomorrow. they start sending out ballots later in the month, and ballots can be sent to colorado voters in mid-february. colorado conducts its elections entirely by mail. there are early deadlines. i think it's reasonable to assume that donald trump's name is going to be on these ballots, at least when they get printed, probably when they get sent out. i don't think it's reasonable to expect the supreme court...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
go ahead. >> the constitution is the supreme law of the land. if the supreme court decides that trump is constitutionally unable to run for president, all the other procedural niceties don't matter. like if the constitution steps in, then it overcomes any other concern that might arise. >> they could conceivably say, okay, i know you have a printing deadline, but we're in the on your schedule. so you can maybe change that or maybe reprint at huge cost, by the way, to the state. but you're not entirely convinced that the supreme court is going to say he's off the ballot. why? >> i mean lots of reasons. broadly speaks there's three ways this can play out. one is the court could say, all right. he's off the ballot. he committed an insurrection. the constitution says if you do that, you're out. i don't think that's likely. i mean there's a 6-3 republican supermajority. the court, i think, is likely to be cautious about a case of this magnitude, and there's actually real reasons that one could disagree with the colorado supreme court's decision. >> l
go ahead. >> the constitution is the supreme law of the land. if the supreme court decides that trump is constitutionally unable to run for president, all the other procedural niceties don't matter. like if the constitution steps in, then it overcomes any other concern that might arise. >> they could conceivably say, okay, i know you have a printing deadline, but we're in the on your schedule. so you can maybe change that or maybe reprint at huge cost, by the way, to the state. but...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court to try to appeal the decision made by the colorado supreme court to remove him from its 2024 ballot for engaging in insurrection. let's get right to cnn's paula reed who is here with me. paula, i know you have a big stack of papers that you just printed out, but what can you tell us about this appeal? >> two weeks ago, the colorado supreme court removed trump from the ballot. that decision is on hold, because previously, the republican party of colorado appealed this decision to the supreme court. >> the colorado supreme court? >> to the united states supreme court. so the colorado decision is on hold. he's expected to appear on the primary ballot. we need clarity for all 50 states about this issue. >> because it's been popping up elsewhere, maine, maybe oregon. >> new hampshire, minnesota, michigan. and while most states opted to keep him on the ballot, they left the door open to relitigate this. so the supreme court is under a lot of pressure. trump has filed his appeal officially. they're asking the court, did the colorado supreme court err in ordering trump excluded
supreme court to try to appeal the decision made by the colorado supreme court to remove him from its 2024 ballot for engaging in insurrection. let's get right to cnn's paula reed who is here with me. paula, i know you have a big stack of papers that you just printed out, but what can you tell us about this appeal? >> two weeks ago, the colorado supreme court removed trump from the ballot. that decision is on hold, because previously, the republican party of colorado appealed this...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on that should reverse on what the supreme court of colorado has done.t they say could happen is if trump wins election obviously, that the -- that the congress by a two-thirds vote could essentially cure the problem and allow him to take office if this ruling is ore turned. >> a very lengthy document that the trump submitted to the u.s. supreme court. 34 pages. i've gone through it myself. etch, stay with us. we're also joined by cnn's kaitlan collins. you helped break this story for us here at cnn. walk us through what the trump team's thinking is all about right now? >> well, we knew they were going to appeal this decision. i mean, it was an explosive ruling from the colorado supreme court saying that trump was ineligible to be on the ballot. they have been working on this appeal for quite some time. they are coming right up until when they believe the dead lipowhich was tomorrow to actually file this. the other part of this is that in the middle of writing this appeal they were hit with the maine ruling from the secretary of state there, not from the
on that should reverse on what the supreme court of colorado has done.t they say could happen is if trump wins election obviously, that the -- that the congress by a two-thirds vote could essentially cure the problem and allow him to take office if this ruling is ore turned. >> a very lengthy document that the trump submitted to the u.s. supreme court. 34 pages. i've gone through it myself. etch, stay with us. we're also joined by cnn's kaitlan collins. you helped break this story for us...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. >> and, paul, how might this issue affect other questions that could go before the supremeential immunity and impeachment double jeopardy? >> so, the issue of whether section 3 applies to the president, whether january six was an insurrection, those are hard questions. there's only been one successful removal of an official from office under section three since at the civil war, just one. lots of open questions. the immunity issue before the court now, ultimately before the supreme court now, going to the d. c. circuit, that is an easy case for the courts to decide. this is a more difficult case. in part, because it's the most important election law case since bush v. gore, which was a judicial embarrassment. so, jonathan, if this case is a 60 vote for trump, if it's the conservatives against the liberals, then it will be viewed as just another power play by the hard right. it will further erode the course of legitimacy, but the conservative justices don't seem to care about that anymore than they care about -- we've seen that as the congressman asset, and in the abortion a
supreme court. >> and, paul, how might this issue affect other questions that could go before the supremeential immunity and impeachment double jeopardy? >> so, the issue of whether section 3 applies to the president, whether january six was an insurrection, those are hard questions. there's only been one successful removal of an official from office under section three since at the civil war, just one. lots of open questions. the immunity issue before the court now, ultimately...
161
161
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 161
favorite 0
quote 2
supreme court.ple like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has expressed concern to his lawyers, to his allies about this going to the supreme court. he believes that it is possible that some of these supreme court justices will rule against him so as not to seem, quote, unquote, pro-trump, that he believes that could even be people who -- who were appointed by him in the first place. that's something he has expressed. however, again, when i talk to his legal team, when i talk to his advisers, they do ex princess confidence when it comes to whether or not donald trump will be on the ballo
supreme court.ple like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has expressed...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i predict the supreme court is going to overturn the colorado supreme court. notwithstanding that, that may go down easier if people believe that trump is absolutely going to face trial in federal election interference case from which the disqualification arguments essentially emanate in the first place. >> i should note, there's one more wrinkle, those oral arguments are happening next week, we're expecting i think all of us in the general consensus is an expeditious ruling from that three judge panel and then an appeal to the supreme court which also may be pending. that's another parallel track that might be happening at that same point as well. scott, your thoughts on the grant today? >> lisa, you've got to believe. you've got to have faith in the supreme court. i think it's good that they have, taking this decision up. the immunity argument, if trump luzon loses it the d.c. circuit that's to the supreme court as well and it's good to hear that they're doing this on a -- basis but the political process continues. i do think that the strict constructionist,
i predict the supreme court is going to overturn the colorado supreme court. notwithstanding that, that may go down easier if people believe that trump is absolutely going to face trial in federal election interference case from which the disqualification arguments essentially emanate in the first place. >> i should note, there's one more wrinkle, those oral arguments are happening next week, we're expecting i think all of us in the general consensus is an expeditious ruling from that...
1
1.0
Jan 26, 2024
01/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
judicial council , and then the supreme judicial council in 1371 and 1378. introducing mr. najarzadeh regarding the implementation of the registration organization, you would see me. first of all, in response to dr. keshavarz, i would like to say that the legislative records that you mentioned are all the legislative records of our normal legislature, even if these normal laws of ours indicate that these duties are assigned to the head of the judiciary or any other institution. it will not create an obstacle on the way of this path if our legislator comes again and approves another law and tells this organization or any other organization to another institution. be transferred so the situation you described is that it does not create an obstacle in the way of our parliament, the parliament can take another decision and join any organization it wants. but back to my discussion. in my opinion, the main principle called the focus of the judiciary on judicial affairs is a fundamental principle in defining and organizing the jurisdiction and powers of the judicia
judicial council , and then the supreme judicial council in 1371 and 1378. introducing mr. najarzadeh regarding the implementation of the registration organization, you would see me. first of all, in response to dr. keshavarz, i would like to say that the legislative records that you mentioned are all the legislative records of our normal legislature, even if these normal laws of ours indicate that these duties are assigned to the head of the judiciary or any other institution. it will not...
1
1.0
Jan 10, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
iryna, well, look, even before today's court decision, the chairman of the supreme court of ukraine, spoke a lot about what should be discussed at today's court, about the fact that the previous decision of the previous head of the supreme court is his own opinion, it should not be like that, that is, he motivated buckets even before the decision. he motivated the decision, why it should be adopted , in this way he put pressure on the decision of the judges, in the end we know the result, the decision was made as it was made, the lviv judge finally got what he was trying to get, reinstatement , payment of 4 million salary, which he lost mrs. irina, i have a question for you, please tell me whether there will be an appeal against today's decision. of such a court, and does the chair under the judge of the supreme court, stanislav kravchenko, not at all wobble , since he openly pressed for the decision, for the adoption of today's decision? well , first of all, it became known literally in front of eter that the supreme court made a statement that they will appeal, and they will not im
iryna, well, look, even before today's court decision, the chairman of the supreme court of ukraine, spoke a lot about what should be discussed at today's court, about the fact that the previous decision of the previous head of the supreme court is his own opinion, it should not be like that, that is, he motivated buckets even before the decision. he motivated the decision, why it should be adopted , in this way he put pressure on the decision of the judges, in the end we know the result, the...
0
0.0
Jan 10, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you rightly said that yesterday's interview with the head of the supreme court, well , it's a shame,hame from the point of view of his vision, the head of the supreme court could not even allow himself to formulate that it was the decision of the princes, because it was the decision of the plenum '. court, in this way he devalued all his colleagues who made a decision after the notification, the official notification of the sbu, to take and remove from their positions lviv, that is, it was not knyazev's decision, when, for example, stefanchuk says that there are no votes in the verkhovna rada to ban moscow priests, he is simply beating the trust of the verkhovna rada, thus the head of the supreme court is his own. . , with his statements, he essentially attacked the image of the supreme court on colleagues who made a completely normal and adequate decision, and in principle, maybe the supreme court is the supreme council. justice should consider such cases, well, because you can't just make such a statement on the eve of the court. moreover, i have a question as to how the chairman o
you rightly said that yesterday's interview with the head of the supreme court, well , it's a shame,hame from the point of view of his vision, the head of the supreme court could not even allow himself to formulate that it was the decision of the princes, because it was the decision of the plenum '. court, in this way he devalued all his colleagues who made a decision after the notification, the official notification of the sbu, to take and remove from their positions lviv, that is, it was not...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has said no. since the unfortunate chinese exclusion act cases, immigration is a purely federal enterprise and states are ousted. we all knew once aliens entered the country, entered a state, aliens have enormous impact. immigrants have enormous impacts on states. what can states do to try to help ensure an orderly process at the border? it is a constitutional issue that could impact this political fight we have on our hands. host: kathleen is in dayton, ohio. kathleen, you are on c-span. caller: thank you. john yoo said earlier when the interview started that you and other u.s. officials avoid taking responsibility and i want to ask him one quick question, a longer question. how did he go about the gore decision and should that decision have ended up in the supreme court? my next question is this, are we at the doj the office a response ability report vista getting into the office of legal counsel maranda concerning issues related to the cia and its enhanced interrogation techniques on suspected
the supreme court has said no. since the unfortunate chinese exclusion act cases, immigration is a purely federal enterprise and states are ousted. we all knew once aliens entered the country, entered a state, aliens have enormous impact. immigrants have enormous impacts on states. what can states do to try to help ensure an orderly process at the border? it is a constitutional issue that could impact this political fight we have on our hands. host: kathleen is in dayton, ohio. kathleen, you...
0
0.0
Jan 2, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has said no. since the unfortunate chinese exclusion act cases, immigration is a purely federal enterprise and states are ousted. we all knew once aliens entered the country, entered a state, aliens have enormous impact. immigrants have enormous impacts on states. what can states do to try to help ensure an orderly process at the border? it is a constitutional issue that could impact this political fight we have on our hands. host: kathleen is in dayton, ohio. kathleen, you are on c-span. caller: thank you. john yoo said earlier when the interview started that you and other u.s. officials avoid taking responsibility and i want to ask him one quick question, a longer question. how did he go about the gore decision and should that decision have ended up in the supreme court? my next question is this, are we at the doj the office a response ability report vista getting into the office of legal counsel maranda concerning issues related to the cia and its enhanced interrogation techniques on suspected
the supreme court has said no. since the unfortunate chinese exclusion act cases, immigration is a purely federal enterprise and states are ousted. we all knew once aliens entered the country, entered a state, aliens have enormous impact. immigrants have enormous impacts on states. what can states do to try to help ensure an orderly process at the border? it is a constitutional issue that could impact this political fight we have on our hands. host: kathleen is in dayton, ohio. kathleen, you...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
government appeal against with the supreme court has set? they cannot a- eal supreme court has set?against _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the supreme . appeal against what the supreme court has said, but, if they chose to, they could ignore the ruling which would bring a constitutional crisis to israel. because let's say there was another decision that the government made to appoint someone who had no experience in a position or even had previous criminal behaviour in this position, for example, the finance ministry post. i'm giving you that example because it is actually a real example of when the supreme court said, no, this person, it is an unreasonable nomination, to put this person in this position when he has been convicted for, example, tax evasion. so in other words, they can ignore it, but it is unlikely during this war time that the judicial review is now shelved for a long time. thank ou ve now shelved for a long time. thank you v
government appeal against with the supreme court has set? they cannot a- eal supreme court has set?against _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the supreme . appeal against what the supreme court has said, but, if they chose to, they could ignore the ruling which would bring a constitutional crisis to israel. because let's say there was another decision that...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
not just the supreme court. not just the more high-profile matters but every single day what it's like on the front lines of justice. thank you so much, abby. >> thank you, laura. >> thank you. well, donald trump going to the supreme court. but what took him so long? tonight on "laura coates live." now, this is the case we've all been watching and waiting for. some might call it the big kahuna. donald trump asking the united states supreme court, the highest court in all the land, to overturn the colorado state supreme court ruling that took him off of the ballot under the 14th amendment's insurrectionist clause. now, team trump says, one, he's not an insurrectionist. they say what happened at the capitol on january 6th, the crowds breaking into the capitol, forcing lawmakers to literally run for their lives, threatening to hang the vice president of the united states, wasn't even an insurrection. quote, the colorado supreme court erred in how it described president trump's role in the events of january 6th, 202
not just the supreme court. not just the more high-profile matters but every single day what it's like on the front lines of justice. thank you so much, abby. >> thank you, laura. >> thank you. well, donald trump going to the supreme court. but what took him so long? tonight on "laura coates live." now, this is the case we've all been watching and waiting for. some might call it the big kahuna. donald trump asking the united states supreme court, the highest court in all...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. what is alleged of the president's official responsibility. there's really nothing in this pleading, which is just a reply to jack smith's pleading filed earlier this week that sheds light on that question beyond what we have heard already. >> to tim's point about the fact we have heard this before. one of the people we have heard it from is donald trump on the trail. that is not an accident. >> can you say the question one more time? >> i was saying that of the people we have heard these arguments from before, is donald trump himself. we have heard it on the trail from donald trump. him trying to make this argument against presidential immunity. >> that's right. it's an important sort of drum beat for him to keep hitting because saying he's being persecuted and he's the victim of a politically tainted prosecution, which is alleged in this new pleading. that he is a victim is incredibly valuable to him as he campaigns and tells his supporters that democrats in control of the departmen
supreme court. what is alleged of the president's official responsibility. there's really nothing in this pleading, which is just a reply to jack smith's pleading filed earlier this week that sheds light on that question beyond what we have heard already. >> to tim's point about the fact we have heard this before. one of the people we have heard it from is donald trump on the trail. that is not an accident. >> can you say the question one more time? >> i was saying that of the...
0
0.0
Jan 18, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. donald trump warning the justices they would unleash what he is calling chaos and bedlam if they allow colorado to remove him from the state's ballot. our justice correspondent jessica snider has details for us. jessica, give us the latest. >> reporter: wolf, the former president's legal team they're laying this out broadly. they're saying the colorado supreme court simply got it wrong when they court ruled to take donald trump off the ballot there, and they're asking now the supreme court to rule in their favor or else they're warning as you said that it will unleash chaos. so on the first page of this 50-page filing this is what trump's legal team is writing. they're saying the court should put a swift and decisive ends to these ballot disqualification efforts which threaten to disenfranchise tens of millions of americans and promise to unleash chaos and bedlam if other state courts and state officials follow colorado's lead and exclude the likely republican presidential nominee fro
supreme court. donald trump warning the justices they would unleash what he is calling chaos and bedlam if they allow colorado to remove him from the state's ballot. our justice correspondent jessica snider has details for us. jessica, give us the latest. >> reporter: wolf, the former president's legal team they're laying this out broadly. they're saying the colorado supreme court simply got it wrong when they court ruled to take donald trump off the ballot there, and they're asking now...
2
2.0
Jan 22, 2024
01/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
agenda for the upcoming meeting of the supreme state council. a wave of reserves has completely covered europe. in estonia , teachers took to the streets. in germany, railway workers. mass degradation in latvian schools. it turned out that the students were average. they don’t like classes and don’t even know how to read. plus or minus snow or rain? we will find out in the issue whether the weather forecasters will be pleased with the forecasts for this week. integration plans were discussed today at the palace of independence; alexander lukashenko held a meeting with state secretary of the union state dmitry mezentsev. minsk and moscow has long been building its cooperation within the framework of this unique association of sovereign countries. belarus and russia are not only... which is of particular importance against the backdrop of a difficult global situation and strong sanctions pressure and brings tangible benefits. a serious, principled conversation is planned ahead. right now minsk and moscow are preparing for the supreme state council
agenda for the upcoming meeting of the supreme state council. a wave of reserves has completely covered europe. in estonia , teachers took to the streets. in germany, railway workers. mass degradation in latvian schools. it turned out that the students were average. they don’t like classes and don’t even know how to read. plus or minus snow or rain? we will find out in the issue whether the weather forecasters will be pleased with the forecasts for this week. integration plans were...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was a supreme -- who is very different. but it's that trial court idea here that, look, he should not be removed because there had not been a finding, a conviction, a criminal charge of insurrection, that the actual language of the constitution does not contemplate a president being someone who could be removed this way. does that hold any weight for? you >> it really doesn't. the trial court actually held an exhaustive process. there was a five-day trial. there were 15 witnesses. there were thousands of pages of documents. there were hours of video. it was extensive argument from top lawyers on all side. there was a great deal of process. and this idea of not having a conviction is really a red herring over 150 years. courts have, eight occasions, most of them after the civil war, one of them last year, hello held people disqualified under the 14th amendment, and not a single one was convicted of we've been charged with the insurrection. it's a separate thing. this is a qualification. it's not a criminal punishment. it has
it was a supreme -- who is very different. but it's that trial court idea here that, look, he should not be removed because there had not been a finding, a conviction, a criminal charge of insurrection, that the actual language of the constitution does not contemplate a president being someone who could be removed this way. does that hold any weight for? you >> it really doesn't. the trial court actually held an exhaustive process. there was a five-day trial. there were 15 witnesses....
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
how does the supreme court handle this? becomes a partisan decision, the legitimacy of the supreme court is in trouble. i'm hoping john roberts is going to work super hard to make this 9-0 or 7-2 and at least not have a legitimacy freefall. amna: the trump campaign say in a statement, we welcome a fair hearing at the supreme court. they argue this is a bad-faith election interfering voter suppressing argument to remove him from the ballot and at the end they say we are confident the fair-minded supreme court will unanimously affirm the rights of president trump, allowing him to stay on the ballot. >> the one phrase you left out in your summation in the election interfering, democrat backed and and biden led 14th amendment infusing decision. i focus on that because that is untrue. these challenges are being brought by republicans in those states challenging trump's ability to be on the republican primary ballot. this has nothing to do with democrats. democrats are surely cheering what's happening, but they are not the drivin
how does the supreme court handle this? becomes a partisan decision, the legitimacy of the supreme court is in trouble. i'm hoping john roberts is going to work super hard to make this 9-0 or 7-2 and at least not have a legitimacy freefall. amna: the trump campaign say in a statement, we welcome a fair hearing at the supreme court. they argue this is a bad-faith election interfering voter suppressing argument to remove him from the ballot and at the end they say we are confident the fair-minded...
1
1.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court may interpret it differently. i think that since there is no court verdict against trump, no guilty verdict against trump about his participation in the rebellion against the united states, then the supreme court will most likely say that, well, since there is no conviction, then it cannot be said that he participated in the rebellion against the united states. so, he, he can take. participation in the elections, although i would be happy if he did not participate in the elections . tell me, please, how much in general in the united states such decisions can be based, in particular, on the personalities of the judges of the supreme court, because well, i will just remind you that a certain part of them was appointed during the term of office of donald trump, we in ukraine are used to believing that you know who the judge was appointed for, that he will be in... in any way fence off where he can afford it, i hope that this tradition is already slowly changing in our country, but can something like this even exist i
the supreme court may interpret it differently. i think that since there is no court verdict against trump, no guilty verdict against trump about his participation in the rebellion against the united states, then the supreme court will most likely say that, well, since there is no conviction, then it cannot be said that he participated in the rebellion against the united states. so, he, he can take. participation in the elections, although i would be happy if he did not participate in the...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to what extent, in principle, can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed, for the first time in history, a candidate for the office of the president of the united states will not be allowed. to participate in the election campaign? look i'd be happy if it was , like you just said, but i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court is on trump's side in this case, unfortunately, well, the thing is because whatever the ideological views, the ideological beliefs of the supreme court justices, they are still judges, and they follow the law, the fact is that ... trump's exclusion from the election, according to the third part of the 14th amendment to the constitution of the united states, since trump has not been found guilty by any court of law of sedition against the united states, it is subject to the interpretation of specific officials, such as in the state of maine, the secretary of state, which is responsible for conducting elections. or particular court, the supreme court of the
to what extent, in principle, can the supreme court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will become sensational and indeed, for the first time in history, a candidate for the office of the president of the united states will not be allowed. to participate in the election campaign? look i'd be happy if it was , like you just said, but i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court is on trump's side in this case, unfortunately, well, the thing...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they, the supreme court took the case.case which means that a ballot in colorado will have trump's name on it, for the moment. and then, obviously -- >> and it's not a political decision by the secretary of state, as a result of the supreme court taking this case, the colorado decision is on hold. >> exactly. and the secretary of state is following the law, which is that she was told that, you know, this is what you have to do, and that the decision is on hold. so, she has to follow the current law. and then, obviously, will decide on february 8th. we will have the oral argument. i would expect a decision very soon. >> the primary is on march 5th. >> and there are other primaries even before that. there is overseas voting. there's the ballots that go out. this will be quite complicated, assuming that colorado's decision is affirmed and it will be very complicated to figure out not just in colorado but in the other states how to deal with the various challenges. >> colorado's decision is affirmed, donald trump is ineligible
they, the supreme court took the case.case which means that a ballot in colorado will have trump's name on it, for the moment. and then, obviously -- >> and it's not a political decision by the secretary of state, as a result of the supreme court taking this case, the colorado decision is on hold. >> exactly. and the secretary of state is following the law, which is that she was told that, you know, this is what you have to do, and that the decision is on hold. so, she has to follow...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court -- say it makes it to the supreme court. they may or may not take it. they very often refuse to consider, cert denied, refuse to consider trump's request for relief on democracy-related issues. if that happens and it's wrapped up -- i don't think it can go march 5th, but it can go in march. there's room for one or two others. the other case that is scheduled, and it is also an election interference allegation is alvin bragg, the manhattan d.a. he claims trump interfered in the 2016 election. i expect that to go as well. >> norm, shah, happy new year. >>> coming up i'll speak with colorado secretary of state jena griswold. >>> up next, vladimir putin ushering in the new year with deadly attacks and a vow to grow even stronger in 2024. we'll look ahead to an extremely busy political year here in the united states as we count down the days to the iowa caucuses. the e days to ththe iowa cauauc. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ of the new year brought more death and destruction as russian forces launched a fresh wave of attacks across the country. cn
court -- say it makes it to the supreme court. they may or may not take it. they very often refuse to consider, cert denied, refuse to consider trump's request for relief on democracy-related issues. if that happens and it's wrapped up -- i don't think it can go march 5th, but it can go in march. there's room for one or two others. the other case that is scheduled, and it is also an election interference allegation is alvin bragg, the manhattan d.a. he claims trump interfered in the 2016...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it shows that the supreme for a listen to the public and the public also gave the supreme court the kind of confidence it to face it. then you know, i'm a young even levine, the justice minister in their age in the. busy efforts to reform the, the judiciary in his room is quite interesting. um, what about the political reaction today that as well as expect a new code, the party power and is rose. they're very upset and they're saying that this is something that can not happen in the time of war. this should be near unity as the minister of justice itself. and you have a blessed the attack, the supreme court again and linking it to the war. again, saying that this is not the time, and the on the other hand, the many guns who is now in the bows, the most popular, the politician. he's saying that we should respect the supreme court in its decision. but he also said the good know winners and losers and the kind of an attempt to show the unity and to show that the important thing now, is the war in gaza? are there really no winners and losers for what? what, what's the main for that in yahoo
it shows that the supreme for a listen to the public and the public also gave the supreme court the kind of confidence it to face it. then you know, i'm a young even levine, the justice minister in their age in the. busy efforts to reform the, the judiciary in his room is quite interesting. um, what about the political reaction today that as well as expect a new code, the party power and is rose. they're very upset and they're saying that this is something that can not happen in the time of...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado supreme court stated trump did engage in insurrection.is responsible for many of the actions on january 6 and because of his engagement in insurrection, he is disqualified from the colorado ballot. but the court added a caveat that if an appeal was filed, i was to place him on the ballot. you know, donald trump, his name is very likely to be printed on the ballots, just given the timeline. if the court were to order that he is not a qualified candidate, well, we have scenarios under colorado law similar to that that of played out in the past and we would not count the votes for him if he was a disqualified candidate. >> so that could possibly mean that he would be on the ballot this time. say ballots were cast and votes were cast in favor of donald trump. let's use a hypothetical that the court comes back and says this person was not eligible to be on the ballot in the first place. that means those votes in favor of him would no longer be counted in light of colorado law? >> a similar situation happened actually during the 2020 presidenti
the colorado supreme court stated trump did engage in insurrection.is responsible for many of the actions on january 6 and because of his engagement in insurrection, he is disqualified from the colorado ballot. but the court added a caveat that if an appeal was filed, i was to place him on the ballot. you know, donald trump, his name is very likely to be printed on the ballots, just given the timeline. if the court were to order that he is not a qualified candidate, well, we have scenarios...
0
0.0
Jan 22, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and a majority of americans agreed, but then a year and a half ago the supreme court, this supreme courte an extreme decision overturning rowe with their dobbs decision, stripping away a constitutional right from the american people which had never been done before, a fundamental right ripped away , a right vital to a country founded on the idea of freedom. i said on that day that rowe was overturned the health and lives of the women of this nation would now be at risk and that has unfortunately proven to be true. they've been at risk, made them at risk, put them at risk. are turned away from emergency rooms, forced to travel hundreds of miles to get basic health care in another state that may have a different rule, forced to go to court to plead for help. thanks to the mothers of two in texas, a mother of two in texas, who was pregnant with her third child, from her doctor she received the news no one wants to hear. the life of the child and her own life were at risk. she continued her pregnancy. instead of being able care from her doctor, she was blocked by the state of texas attorney
and a majority of americans agreed, but then a year and a half ago the supreme court, this supreme courte an extreme decision overturning rowe with their dobbs decision, stripping away a constitutional right from the american people which had never been done before, a fundamental right ripped away , a right vital to a country founded on the idea of freedom. i said on that day that rowe was overturned the health and lives of the women of this nation would now be at risk and that has...
1
1.0
Jan 11, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
thus , with such statements, the head of the supreme court , in fact, attacked the image of the supremert, his colleagues, who made a completely normal and adequate decision. and in principle, perhaps vrp - this is the supreme council of justice, should be considered. such cases, well, because you can't just make such a statement on the eve of the court, moreover, i have a question as to how the chairman of the supreme court got access to zmi right before the court session, that is, his interview was released just before, and it happened on mind ua , where there was a rather warm and complimentary interview of the head of the servant of the people party , olena shulyak, well, some questions arise, because... that ms. olena shulyak represents the servant of the people, there was a petition to the president's office and citizens demanded it for more than a year therefore cancel his ukrainian citizenship, and here is the question, please, the judge's interview appeared on mind ua, and shulyak appeared on my andua, and there is no position of the president's office, what is going on? well,
thus , with such statements, the head of the supreme court , in fact, attacked the image of the supremert, his colleagues, who made a completely normal and adequate decision. and in principle, perhaps vrp - this is the supreme council of justice, should be considered. such cases, well, because you can't just make such a statement on the eve of the court, moreover, i have a question as to how the chairman of the supreme court got access to zmi right before the court session, that is, his...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is fairly aggressive, especially for the supreme court. how quickly do you think we could have a decision? >> yeah, erica, i think sean is right, that this is a court that is clearly trying to move quickly. you know, february 8th argument says to me that the justices are looking at that march 5th primary date and intending to issue a decision before that date. now, you know, will that mean that every colorado voter will know before they cast their primary ballot what the supreme court has ruled? no, but i think from the court's perspective having this matter settled one way or the other before the colorado primary will also help to provide some stability for the rest of the country, erica, not just as we enter primary season but toward the general election as well. >> the secretary of state from maine when she issued her decision specifically cited colorado. is this decision ultimately that the supreme court will issue, what will it mean for every state in the union? >> yeah, i mean, erica, i have to think that the justices from across the
it is fairly aggressive, especially for the supreme court. how quickly do you think we could have a decision? >> yeah, erica, i think sean is right, that this is a court that is clearly trying to move quickly. you know, february 8th argument says to me that the justices are looking at that march 5th primary date and intending to issue a decision before that date. now, you know, will that mean that every colorado voter will know before they cast their primary ballot what the supreme court...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
." >>> with what is being called extraordinary speed, the supreme court has now agreed to decide the unprecedented question, can donald trump be barred from holding office again? it is not hype bole to say tonight that this case could alter the 2024 election, and it may not be the last case the supreme court takes up this year that could. oral arguments are scheduled now for february 8th on the colorado supreme court's decision to remove trump from the state's ballot, claiming he had engaged in an insurrection. the colorado court ruled that disqualifies him according to the 14th amendment of the constitution. for now, trump is still on the ballot. that is pending the appeals process. colorado's primary, i should note, is set for super tuesday on march 5th, but ballots go out quite soon. the trump campaign responded to this news, saying that it welcomes a fair hearing at the supreme court. and in iowa just a short time later, the former president also used that same word, fair, as he appeared to send a message to those justices, three of whom he appointed. >> all i want is fair. i fou
." >>> with what is being called extraordinary speed, the supreme court has now agreed to decide the unprecedented question, can donald trump be barred from holding office again? it is not hype bole to say tonight that this case could alter the 2024 election, and it may not be the last case the supreme court takes up this year that could. oral arguments are scheduled now for february 8th on the colorado supreme court's decision to remove trump from the state's ballot, claiming he...
25
25
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 1
it the supreme court the justices don't like it. the father probably not gonna say anything about it or do anything about it. >> that interesting perspective. you know, you're probably right, lawrence, thanks so much for that. kristie, i'd like to stay with me, we're going to talk about donald trump's other fights, including the questions about his immunity, that will come up later on this hour. right now, the final push is on four gop candidates in iowa, with just nine days until the caucuses. it is a mad dash to try to catch up to donald trump. most of the republican field spread across the hawkeye state today, making their cases to voters. let's go to nbc's aly vitaly joining us from indianola, iowa. i hope i said that one right. ali, i know you've been out with nikki haley today. how are things going for her and iowa? >> alex, you're right to pay this as a race of every other republican trying to catch up to donald trump. i think the reality here on the ground, for people like the former south carolina governor, who just left th
it the supreme court the justices don't like it. the father probably not gonna say anything about it or do anything about it. >> that interesting perspective. you know, you're probably right, lawrence, thanks so much for that. kristie, i'd like to stay with me, we're going to talk about donald trump's other fights, including the questions about his immunity, that will come up later on this hour. right now, the final push is on four gop candidates in iowa, with just nine days until the...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court takes action.mp's lawyers argue the 14th amendment statute does not apply to the presidency, slammed the ruling that, quote, if allowed to stand, he said, will mark the first time in the history of the united states the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major party presidential candidate, end quote. in a separate statement, the trump campaign quote, "democrats are obsessively violating the american voters' constitutional right to vote for the candidate of their choice. this is un-american, unconstitutional act of election interference that cannot stand." that's from the trump campaign. the supreme court hasn't announced whether it'll accept the case. joining us now, conservative attorney george conway, and andrew weissmann, host of "prosecuting donald trump." good morning to you both. andrew, let me start with you. this appeal up to the supreme court, where does this go from here? do you suspect the supreme court will hear any of this? >> i do think that they will
supreme court takes action.mp's lawyers argue the 14th amendment statute does not apply to the presidency, slammed the ruling that, quote, if allowed to stand, he said, will mark the first time in the history of the united states the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major party presidential candidate, end quote. in a separate statement, the trump campaign quote, "democrats are obsessively violating the american voters' constitutional right to vote for the...
1
1.0
Jan 31, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
good day well, let's get started. news about the former, about the former head of the supreme court ofine, knyazev, so they paid hryvnias for him, of course, even these 18 million hryvnias , knyazev's lawyer declared in court that he was unable to pay, so we suspect that someone took the bail for him, and now it is important to understand and find out who and actually for what kind of services... oh, i don't know, the relationship with mr. knyazym agreed to make a deposit to him, but a lot of facts that coincided are alarming, in particular, the fact that on the same day today , when someone miraculously paid for it this pledge, the supreme council of justice also had and is now directly considering the question of stopping the consideration of disciplinary proceedings against the prince, as a result of which everyone expected his own dismissal in... from the position of judge, because i will remind, then he was dismissed from the position of the head of the supreme court , but according to the legislation he remained a judge of the supreme court, and actually without a decision of the
good day well, let's get started. news about the former, about the former head of the supreme court ofine, knyazev, so they paid hryvnias for him, of course, even these 18 million hryvnias , knyazev's lawyer declared in court that he was unable to pay, so we suspect that someone took the bail for him, and now it is important to understand and find out who and actually for what kind of services... oh, i don't know, the relationship with mr. knyazym agreed to make a deposit to him, but a lot of...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it just underscores how important it is for the supreme court, and if the supreme court doesn't do it ethics rules on the supreme court so that it is not just up to clarence thomas to make this decision himself. >> i want to turn to your other labor's of the day, of the oversight committee. on the democrats on the committee issued a report today titled white house for sale, our princes prime ministers and premiers paid of president trump. there's been a lot of reporting on this today, of china being the biggest payer of donald trump. over $5 million. and as i understand this report, this covers only two years of the trump presidency. >> that's right, lawrence. but finally after a full year the oversight committee of the house of representatives has discovered corruption of foreign influence peddling by a president of the united states. it's been a yearlong investigation. whether republicans just hadn't realized is that it's not joe biden, it was donald trump. donald trump who received over nearly $8 million, and yes, just the first two years of his four year presidency, from 20 foreig
it just underscores how important it is for the supreme court, and if the supreme court doesn't do it ethics rules on the supreme court so that it is not just up to clarence thomas to make this decision himself. >> i want to turn to your other labor's of the day, of the oversight committee. on the democrats on the committee issued a report today titled white house for sale, our princes prime ministers and premiers paid of president trump. there's been a lot of reporting on this today, of...
0
0.0
Jan 12, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
under federal governance, the supreme court does not reach into. issues there, that i am sure donald trump will raise and i'll be interested in, as to whether this was procedurally done correctly. there are lots of, as judge luttig says, off-ramps. -- and officer, are ones that could lead to further fact finding by the colorado trial judge. if the court says, the standard of proof was wrong, or you need to follow the definition of insurrection, that could go back to the trial court for their findings. it's not clear exactly how the supreme court will do this to get an off ramp that gets this completely done with and gone for all persons. >> professor, can you help the supreme court to find a word officer in section three and the word insurrection? >> no, they will have to decide that for themselves. there is no precedent really. david blight pointed out, bush v. gore is pretty close, but there is no precedent for a presidential candidate being disqualified from office for reasons like this. so, there is no existing definition in the jurisprudence t
under federal governance, the supreme court does not reach into. issues there, that i am sure donald trump will raise and i'll be interested in, as to whether this was procedurally done correctly. there are lots of, as judge luttig says, off-ramps. -- and officer, are ones that could lead to further fact finding by the colorado trial judge. if the court says, the standard of proof was wrong, or you need to follow the definition of insurrection, that could go back to the trial court for their...
2
2.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
and there have been times when this supreme court has ruled against trump, and more than once.he supreme court, let's say, ruled against trump during trump's appeal of the election results of '20. he ruled against trump when trump wouldn't release, say, his tax returns, and several other times. that is, when there is a law, then judges, whatever their ideological beliefs may be, whoever appoints them, they are still judges, and they are simply guided by the law, when it is clear. there is no law in some cases, they can be guided by their beliefs, their feelings, how to interpret certain things, but when there is a clear law, then i think that at least the vast majority of judges of the supreme court will be guided by the current, effective law. well, there is also the question of public trust, you remember that once the supreme court of the united states decided the hill. a fundamental decision for the future of the country in the case of gore v. bush, when the vice president of the united states, albert gore , tried to deny the victory of george w. bush the youngest in the ele
and there have been times when this supreme court has ruled against trump, and more than once.he supreme court, let's say, ruled against trump during trump's appeal of the election results of '20. he ruled against trump when trump wouldn't release, say, his tax returns, and several other times. that is, when there is a law, then judges, whatever their ideological beliefs may be, whoever appoints them, they are still judges, and they are simply guided by the law, when it is clear. there is no...
0
0.0
Jan 21, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and so i go back to jill's point about the supreme court, where i have hope that the supreme court doesn'tt i believe that the supreme court justices are so obsessed with their own power, that they will -- seven of them, will eventually understand that trump is the biggest threat to the supreme court's own continued power. aledo, thomas, there bought, what can men do a bout such reckless hate? but the other seven of them, i do believe that they want to keep their jobs, and that they understand that trump is the biggest threat to that. >> let me ask you, jill, about the supreme court and this important case that could up and jack smith's election interference case. that is fisher versus the united states, which has to do with the socks act. break down the case for us here, how much of it is a threat to the january 6th case and if so, why? >> i actually think that it is a very weak argument. what it is is the sarbanes oxley, which was passed after enron, and has won part, it says, that you cannot destroy documents, because as we know, in that case, people were shredding documents like crazy
and so i go back to jill's point about the supreme court, where i have hope that the supreme court doesn'tt i believe that the supreme court justices are so obsessed with their own power, that they will -- seven of them, will eventually understand that trump is the biggest threat to the supreme court's own continued power. aledo, thomas, there bought, what can men do a bout such reckless hate? but the other seven of them, i do believe that they want to keep their jobs, and that they understand...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court that is. and the fact that oregon is now looking at a similar challenge, it tells you what the problem is for the former president. they're going to be fighting these types of battles in state after state unless the supreme court steps in and decides once and for all what really is the law here. does the 14th amendment apply to the status, the candidate as president, which is one of the things that trump mentions in his brief today. he says the 14th amendment does not apply to the office of the presidency. so we anticipate that a similar argument as you saw today in this maine decision we'll see a similar argument in the case of colorado and we expect that because there have been some states that have decided in the opposite direction that the supreme court will try to settle this once and for all because you have some states that have gone in the opposite direction saying that these 14th amendment challenges don't really stand any ground. so we expect that the supreme court will have to make
supreme court that is. and the fact that oregon is now looking at a similar challenge, it tells you what the problem is for the former president. they're going to be fighting these types of battles in state after state unless the supreme court steps in and decides once and for all what really is the law here. does the 14th amendment apply to the status, the candidate as president, which is one of the things that trump mentions in his brief today. he says the 14th amendment does not apply to the...