27
27
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives. shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. so the rules for federal elections shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. and so the republicans say this says the legislature thereof doesn't say state court. so therefore, it only means state legislatures. now, those of you with legal training know that or those of you who've dabbled in this know that sometimes texts have to be understood with reference to context. a rule that says, you know, no vehicles in the park doesn't exclude babies, strollers. you know, so
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
neal, on supreme court nights, we got to tell you, because you're the supreme court practitioner here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump team filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump at the supreme court. they take very few cases a year. about 60. but i suspect that this is one case that the court can't pass up. indeed, both sides are basically saying to the court, take this case, hear this case. i very much expect that they will. i think that they can order a briefing to occur quickly, and allow oral argument to kick place in a matter of a few weeks. >> andrew weissmann, what stands out to you in the trump petition to the supreme court? >> two things, one is that as a matter of being a lawyer and being in the same field, the amount that we have become to just how poorly argued and recent the sort of gall that the brief represents, it's really, i think, shocking, when there are some legitimate arguments. i am n
neal, on supreme court nights, we got to tell you, because you're the supreme court practitioner here. let's go to the threshold question. the trump team filed a petition for the supreme court to hear the case. will the supreme court grant that petition and hear the case? >> almost certainly, yes. lawrence, we've seen many times, other cases involving trump at the supreme court. they take very few cases a year. about 60. but i suspect that this is one case that the court can't pass up....
0
0.0
Jan 14, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.nd i think they are just beginning to get attention. >> one question i think is raised by this -- i'm sorry, deeper question than if congress can change rules of precedent. of course, if the rules of precedentre common-law rules, it may be that congress can change the rules of precedent and create these structures. of course, they are limited. they cannot create special rules forf cases, but i don't think it is clear if you agree that precedent rules or common-law rules that come from the structure of the conot necessarily mean congresss disabled from getting involved. >> they were c in 1787. did they get baked into article three in 1788 so that they are no longer common-law rules but now constitutional ones? >> i don't think so. there were hearsay rules, all sorts of rules and rules of evidence, and i'm not sure they were baked in. they had the unusual power, i think, to create them, but i don't think we would think they are baked in because, of course, the common law can change. i ce
supreme court.nd i think they are just beginning to get attention. >> one question i think is raised by this -- i'm sorry, deeper question than if congress can change rules of precedent. of course, if the rules of precedentre common-law rules, it may be that congress can change the rules of precedent and create these structures. of course, they are limited. they cannot create special rules forf cases, but i don't think it is clear if you agree that precedent rules or common-law rules that...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great restaurant. it would be a great shame if something happened to it. on the contrary, we were talking about abortion, death penalty, or firearms. matters that are cultural issues around which there are deep partisan divides. of course, it would be fair to predict a conservative leading in the supreme court to rule a certain way. frankly, we have years of data suggesting that. the issues at play, they affect republican candidates and their opponents. these are not standard issues. these are complex issues from constitutional interpretat
supreme court nominee. other republicans, including people in donald trump's administration, who wanted him to pull the nomination of brett kavanaugh. he didn't know the guy. donald trump, decided to stay and fight. he got the guy on the bench. here, you have his lawyer. very naked on fox. i'm sure that brett kavanaugh watches it. i'm sure the justice watches it. saying that you probably like your job. donald trump, he fought for you. we will see what you do. >> that is a great...
0
0.0
Jan 31, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the united states supreme court. neal katyal, will join us tonight, has argued 50 cases, to the united states supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a decision of a supreme court of colorado to ban donald trump from the presidential ballot in colorado, on the basis of section three of the 14th amendment, which bars anyone from holding federal office if they have betrayed an oath to uphold the constitution. today, the board of elections in illinois decided that they don't have the authority to ban donald trump from the ballot. they follow the advice of a retired republican judge on that point. and that judges report to the board of election, the judge said the evidence presented at
to the united states supreme court. neal katyal, will join us tonight, has argued 50 cases, to the united states supreme court, 50. that means, as i just said, neal katyal has written more supreme court briefs than i have read. and so, i am more than eager to hear neal katyal's assessment of the briefs, that have been submitted so far, in the case of donald j trump versus norma anderson -- that is the name of the case, the supreme court will hear next thursday. with donald trump appealing a...
0
0.0
Jan 9, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the court too will grant circ. suppose that you're worried that there might be 5 votes to affirm the colorado supreme court and you don't want the supreme court to be the one who decides nationwide whether trump is going to be on the ballot or not. maybe you don't grant circ. maybe you let colorado have its way and case for another case, wait toe see if there's conflit and the court -- that would be the traditional way the supreme court would exercise its circ power to see if there's conflict on this issue. minnesota has rejected the argument. first amendment grounds not fourth amendment grounds. we
supreme court is blessing this interpretation of the 14th amendment and the supreme court that would disqualify donald trump, not just in colorado but throughout the entire country. i have a hard time seeing chief justice roberts leading the supreme court. 50 to 30 points in early primary states. presidential electoral politics. if your call was the court saying that the state of florida's courts were using inconsistent standards in how counting ballots county to county. i think that the the...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. >> well, we will soon see.very much for joining us tonight. coming up, the economic news lately is so good, even fox can't help questioning what they see. that is next. that is next and if you have cut rate car insurance, this could leave you all bent out of shape. no...ahhh! so, get allstate and be better protected from mayhem... yeah...like me. uh, someone! that's broken to pal... hahaha. automated voice: please insert your parking ticket. are you still struggling with your bra? it's time for you to try knix. makers of the world's comfiest wireless bras. for revolutionary support without underwires, and sizes up to a g-cup, find your new favorite bra today at knix.com sometimes your work shirt needs to be for more than just work. like when it needs to be a big soft shoulder to cry on. which is why downy does more to make clothes softer, fresher, and better. downy. breathe life into your laundry. sometimes jonah wrestles with falling asleep... ...so he takes zzzquil. the world's #1 sleep aid brand. and wakes u
supreme court. >> well, we will soon see.very much for joining us tonight. coming up, the economic news lately is so good, even fox can't help questioning what they see. that is next. that is next and if you have cut rate car insurance, this could leave you all bent out of shape. no...ahhh! so, get allstate and be better protected from mayhem... yeah...like me. uh, someone! that's broken to pal... hahaha. automated voice: please insert your parking ticket. are you still struggling with...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado supreme court got it right. there have only been two courts in this nation that have grappled with the decision, did donald trump engage in an insurrection? both of those courts were right here in colorado, and both of them said yes, he did. i also do not believe that there should be some loophole in the constitution for a president who decides to engage in rebellion. when we say no person is above the law, we should mean it. it shouldn't be an interpretation that no person is above the law except donald trump when he tries to ste
supreme court says. of course, i will follow whatever order is in place throughout the election. >> you have said and obviously it's clear from what you said there the court made the right decision. many trump critics warn this risks turning trump into a martyr and tearing the country apart. what do you say to people like that, who certainly don't like donald trump and may agree with you on some issues of whether or not he's an insurrectionist? >> i do believe that the colorado...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court, and the supreme court said no.nted from the denial of jack smith's effort to go straight to the court, we don't know there were any nor who they were. but by february 8th, we could have a decision in that case from the d.c. circuit and the supreme court could also have told us by then what they intend to do on the immunity argument. we could be substantially more advanced in terms of whether or not former president trump will face trial and on what time frame with respect to the case before judge tanya chutkan. >> your friend neal called this winnable. >> i never disagree with him, especially when it comes to the supreme court. so, he has pulled many, many rabbits out of the hat. i think that it is definitely winnable. i do think that everyone should be cautioned that, in order to win this case, that people who are defending the colorado supreme court decision have to win on a whole range of issues. there are many off-ramps for the supreme court if they are trying to duck this issue to send it back and say in vario
court, and the supreme court said no.nted from the denial of jack smith's effort to go straight to the court, we don't know there were any nor who they were. but by february 8th, we could have a decision in that case from the d.c. circuit and the supreme court could also have told us by then what they intend to do on the immunity argument. we could be substantially more advanced in terms of whether or not former president trump will face trial and on what time frame with respect to the case...
0
0.0
Jan 18, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. donald trump warning the justices they would unleash what he is calling chaos and bedlam if they allow colorado to remove him from the state's ballot. our justice correspondent jessica snider has details for us. jessica, give us the latest. >> reporter: wolf, the former president's legal team they're laying this out broadly. they're saying the colorado supreme court simply got it wrong when they court ruled to take donald trump off the ballot there, and they're asking now the supreme court to rule in their favor or else they're warning as you said that it will unleash chaos. so on the first page of this 50-page filing this is what trump's legal team is writing. they're saying the court should put a swift and decisive ends to these ballot disqualification efforts which threaten to disenfranchise tens of millions of americans and promise to unleash chaos and bedlam if other state courts and state officials follow colorado's lead and exclude the likely republican presidential nominee fro
supreme court. donald trump warning the justices they would unleash what he is calling chaos and bedlam if they allow colorado to remove him from the state's ballot. our justice correspondent jessica snider has details for us. jessica, give us the latest. >> reporter: wolf, the former president's legal team they're laying this out broadly. they're saying the colorado supreme court simply got it wrong when they court ruled to take donald trump off the ballot there, and they're asking now...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
off ramp for the supreme court, particularly a supreme court that might not want to deal with the factswhether or not former president trump has engaged in or participated in an insurrection. >> that leads me to a lot of questions. one, i'll ask you this, if it gets to the general election and the supreme court is weighing this, would they feel more comfortable in the general election saying that the republican candidate is not qualified? that seems to be even higher stakes. >> it is higher stakes but at the same time, at that point when we're talking about a general election, that person is much closer to quote, unquote, holding the office, which is language that's used in section 3 of the 14th amendment. the question of whether or not a primary is when a state can trigger the 14th amendment is a grounds on which at least one state supreme court has taken a pass at this, saying it's premature at this point. it's just a primary. the primary process is one that has to be controlled in that state, in that case it was minnesota. the party controls the primaries, not the state apparatus, an
off ramp for the supreme court, particularly a supreme court that might not want to deal with the factswhether or not former president trump has engaged in or participated in an insurrection. >> that leads me to a lot of questions. one, i'll ask you this, if it gets to the general election and the supreme court is weighing this, would they feel more comfortable in the general election saying that the republican candidate is not qualified? that seems to be even higher stakes. >> it...
1
1.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court may interpret it differently. i think that since there is no court verdict against trump, no guilty verdict against trump about his participation in the rebellion against the united states, then the supreme court will most likely say that, well, since there is no conviction, then it cannot be said that he participated in the rebellion against the united states. so, he, he can take. participation in the elections, although i would be happy if he did not participate in the elections . tell me, please, how much in general in the united states such decisions can be based, in particular, on the personalities of the judges of the supreme court, because well, i will just remind you that a certain part of them was appointed during the term of office of donald trump, we in ukraine are used to believing that you know who the judge was appointed for, that he will be in... in any way fence off where he can afford it, i hope that this tradition is already slowly changing in our country, but can something like this even exist i
the supreme court may interpret it differently. i think that since there is no court verdict against trump, no guilty verdict against trump about his participation in the rebellion against the united states, then the supreme court will most likely say that, well, since there is no conviction, then it cannot be said that he participated in the rebellion against the united states. so, he, he can take. participation in the elections, although i would be happy if he did not participate in the...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court has ruled against trump, and more than once, this supreme court, let's say, has ruled against him. trump during trump's challenge to the results of the 20th election, he ruled against trump when trump did not want to provide, say, his tax returns, and several more times, that is, when there is a law, then the judges, who would be their ideological belief, whoever appointed them, they are still judges, and they are simply guided by the law, when there is no clear law in some cases, then they can be guided. your beliefs with their own feelings, how these or other things should be interpreted, but when there is clearly a law, then i think that at least the vast majority of judges of the supreme court will be guided by the valid, valid law. well, there is also a question about public trust , you remember that the supreme court of the united states once passed mr. igor, an absolutely fundamental decision for the future of the country in the gore v. bush case, when the vice president of the united states, albert gore, tried to object the victory of george bush jr. in the elections f
court has ruled against trump, and more than once, this supreme court, let's say, has ruled against him. trump during trump's challenge to the results of the 20th election, he ruled against trump when trump did not want to provide, say, his tax returns, and several more times, that is, when there is a law, then the judges, who would be their ideological belief, whoever appointed them, they are still judges, and they are simply guided by the law, when there is no clear law in some cases, then...
161
161
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 161
favorite 0
quote 2
supreme court.ple like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has expressed concern to his lawyers, to his allies about this going to the supreme court. he believes that it is possible that some of these supreme court justices will rule against him so as not to seem, quote, unquote, pro-trump, that he believes that could even be people who -- who were appointed by him in the first place. that's something he has expressed. however, again, when i talk to his legal team, when i talk to his advisers, they do ex princess confidence when it comes to whether or not donald trump will be on the ballo
supreme court.ple like kavanaugh who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place, he'll step up. >> reporter: so she has been getting a lot of backlash for that, and obviously indicated there was some sort of quid pro quo because trump had appointed kavanaugh and gone through that process that kavanaugh would step up for him. she has since defended those comments, but i will also tell you when it comes to the former president himself, he has expressed...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted. whatever anyone thinks of that decision, you can't say they rushed in early. what do you think as someone who is really one of the foremost experts at the intersection of elections and the courts about how early they've had to come in here? or do you think that's not such a big concern because people won't remember it by november and people can focus on the choice they have to make? >> i think it was imperative they get involved early, and here's why. if you're a voter in colorado or maine or one of these other states, say you're
it's now reached the supreme court. they obviously, as renato explained, don't think they can duck it. i'm curious what you think, as an election law expert, whether it was unavoidable or not, the court getting dragged in earlier. what i said was not rhetoric, the opening of some political novel. it is true that tonight the court is getting involved before any votes have been cast. bush v. gore was controversial and was unavoidable and was after all the votes were cast, counted, some recounted....
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never speak about politics. and i will not today speak about the politics of this decision. at the supreme court of the united states. i will say this, the supreme court does not want to decide this case. and it will likely look for every legitimate way possible, legitimate way possible, to avoid deciding whether the former president is disqualified from the presidency. having studied the disqualification clause myself for three years now, there are very, very few, if any, off-ramps that would allow the supreme court to avoid a decision in
but there is the supreme court. and they have other concerns, they should only have traditional concerns. they're gonna have other concerns, including the politics of this and how it's gonna play out. donald trump and his people have been sending coded messages via cable television about supreme court justices who owe him because he put them on the supreme court. how do all these pressures come to bear on how the supreme court is going to decide this? >> well, as you know, ali, i never...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i predict the supreme court is going to overturn the colorado supreme court. notwithstanding that, that may go down easier if people believe that trump is absolutely going to face trial in federal election interference case from which the disqualification arguments essentially emanate in the first place. >> i should note, there's one more wrinkle, those oral arguments are happening next week, we're expecting i think all of us in the general consensus is an expeditious ruling from that three judge panel and then an appeal to the supreme court which also may be pending. that's another parallel track that might be happening at that same point as well. scott, your thoughts on the grant today? >> lisa, you've got to believe. you've got to have faith in the supreme court. i think it's good that they have, taking this decision up. the immunity argument, if trump luzon loses it the d.c. circuit that's to the supreme court as well and it's good to hear that they're doing this on a -- basis but the political process continues. i do think that the strict constructionist,
i predict the supreme court is going to overturn the colorado supreme court. notwithstanding that, that may go down easier if people believe that trump is absolutely going to face trial in federal election interference case from which the disqualification arguments essentially emanate in the first place. >> i should note, there's one more wrinkle, those oral arguments are happening next week, we're expecting i think all of us in the general consensus is an expeditious ruling from that...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court takes action.mp's lawyers argue the 14th amendment statute does not apply to the presidency, slammed the ruling that, quote, if allowed to stand, he said, will mark the first time in the history of the united states the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major party presidential candidate, end quote. in a separate statement, the trump campaign quote, "democrats are obsessively violating the american voters' constitutional right to vote for the candidate of their choice. this is un-american, unconstitutional act of election interference that cannot stand." that's from the trump campaign. the supreme court hasn't announced whether it'll accept the case. joining us now, conservative attorney george conway, and andrew weissmann, host of "prosecuting donald trump." good morning to you both. andrew, let me start with you. this appeal up to the supreme court, where does this go from here? do you suspect the supreme court will hear any of this? >> i do think that they will
supreme court takes action.mp's lawyers argue the 14th amendment statute does not apply to the presidency, slammed the ruling that, quote, if allowed to stand, he said, will mark the first time in the history of the united states the judiciary has prevented voters from casting ballots for the leading major party presidential candidate, end quote. in a separate statement, the trump campaign quote, "democrats are obsessively violating the american voters' constitutional right to vote for the...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
not just the supreme court. not just the more high-profile matters but every single day what it's like on the front lines of justice. thank you so much, abby. >> thank you, laura. >> thank you. well, donald trump going to the supreme court. but what took him so long? tonight on "laura coates live." now, this is the case we've all been watching and waiting for. some might call it the big kahuna. donald trump asking the united states supreme court, the highest court in all the land, to overturn the colorado state supreme court ruling that took him off of the ballot under the 14th amendment's insurrectionist clause. now, team trump says, one, he's not an insurrectionist. they say what happened at the capitol on january 6th, the crowds breaking into the capitol, forcing lawmakers to literally run for their lives, threatening to hang the vice president of the united states, wasn't even an insurrection. quote, the colorado supreme court erred in how it described president trump's role in the events of january 6th, 202
not just the supreme court. not just the more high-profile matters but every single day what it's like on the front lines of justice. thank you so much, abby. >> thank you, laura. >> thank you. well, donald trump going to the supreme court. but what took him so long? tonight on "laura coates live." now, this is the case we've all been watching and waiting for. some might call it the big kahuna. donald trump asking the united states supreme court, the highest court in all...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court. >> the colorado supreme court? >> to the united states supreme court. so the colorado decision is on hold. he's expected to appear on the primary ballot. we need clarity for all 50 states about this issue. >> because it's been popping up elsewhere, maine, maybe oregon. >> new hampshire, minnesota, michigan. and while most states opted to keep him on the ballot, they left the door open to relitigate this. so the supreme court is under a lot of pressure. trump has filed his appeal officially. they're asking the court, did the colorado supreme court err in ordering trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot? the republican party was a little more articulate. they want to know does section three apply to presidents. that's an important question, because even within colorado, the supreme court was split there because the word does not appear. we need clarity on that. the republican party of colorado asked another important question, which is okay, if this applies to presidents, who enforces it? is it the s
court. >> the colorado supreme court? >> to the united states supreme court. so the colorado decision is on hold. he's expected to appear on the primary ballot. we need clarity for all 50 states about this issue. >> because it's been popping up elsewhere, maine, maybe oregon. >> new hampshire, minnesota, michigan. and while most states opted to keep him on the ballot, they left the door open to relitigate this. so the supreme court is under a lot of pressure. trump has...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
disagree with the colorado supreme court decision. >> like what?reporter: i think the biggest problem is colorado has a process where you can challenge a candidate if you don't think they belong on the ballot. it has historically been used for minor things, things like of the school board candidate is running and they don't live in the place where they need to live in order to run for the school board. those are simple cases. it is a truncated process. it doesn't have the discovery and ability to call witnesses and other things you normally think of in a trial and i think it would be perfectly appropriate for the supreme court to say this process is not enough for such a monumental decision. a new constitutional issue, one that requires a great deal of fact-finding. so the court could say we are going to put this off, say, until his criminal trial is resolved and if he is convicted of trying to steal the 2020 election, then they can come back and revisit this question of whether he should be on the ballot. >> i want to play a little game called rea
disagree with the colorado supreme court decision. >> like what?reporter: i think the biggest problem is colorado has a process where you can challenge a candidate if you don't think they belong on the ballot. it has historically been used for minor things, things like of the school board candidate is running and they don't live in the place where they need to live in order to run for the school board. those are simple cases. it is a truncated process. it doesn't have the discovery and...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is fairly aggressive, especially for the supreme court. how quickly do you think we could have a decision? >> yeah, erica, i think sean is right, that this is a court that is clearly trying to move quickly. you know, february 8th argument says to me that the justices are looking at that march 5th primary date and intending to issue a decision before that date. now, you know, will that mean that every colorado voter will know before they cast their primary ballot what the supreme court has ruled? no, but i think from the court's perspective having this matter settled one way or the other before the colorado primary will also help to provide some stability for the rest of the country, erica, not just as we enter primary season but toward the general election as well. >> the secretary of state from maine when she issued her decision specifically cited colorado. is this decision ultimately that the supreme court will issue, what will it mean for every state in the union? >> yeah, i mean, erica, i have to think that the justices from across the
it is fairly aggressive, especially for the supreme court. how quickly do you think we could have a decision? >> yeah, erica, i think sean is right, that this is a court that is clearly trying to move quickly. you know, february 8th argument says to me that the justices are looking at that march 5th primary date and intending to issue a decision before that date. now, you know, will that mean that every colorado voter will know before they cast their primary ballot what the supreme court...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on that should reverse on what the supreme court of colorado has done.t they say could happen is if trump wins election obviously, that the -- that the congress by a two-thirds vote could essentially cure the problem and allow him to take office if this ruling is ore turned. >> a very lengthy document that the trump submitted to the u.s. supreme court. 34 pages. i've gone through it myself. etch, stay with us. we're also joined by cnn's kaitlan collins. you helped break this story for us here at cnn. walk us through what the trump team's thinking is all about right now? >> well, we knew they were going to appeal this decision. i mean, it was an explosive ruling from the colorado supreme court saying that trump was ineligible to be on the ballot. they have been working on this appeal for quite some time. they are coming right up until when they believe the dead lipowhich was tomorrow to actually file this. the other part of this is that in the middle of writing this appeal they were hit with the maine ruling from the secretary of state there, not from the
on that should reverse on what the supreme court of colorado has done.t they say could happen is if trump wins election obviously, that the -- that the congress by a two-thirds vote could essentially cure the problem and allow him to take office if this ruling is ore turned. >> a very lengthy document that the trump submitted to the u.s. supreme court. 34 pages. i've gone through it myself. etch, stay with us. we're also joined by cnn's kaitlan collins. you helped break this story for us...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court -- say it makes it to the supreme court. they may or may not take it. they very often refuse to consider, cert denied, refuse to consider trump's request for relief on democracy-related issues. if that happens and it's wrapped up -- i don't think it can go march 5th, but it can go in march. there's room for one or two others. the other case that is scheduled, and it is also an election interference allegation is alvin bragg, the manhattan d.a. he claims trump interfered in the 2016 election. i expect that to go as well. >> norm, shah, happy new year. >>> coming up i'll speak with colorado secretary of state jena griswold. >>> up next, vladimir putin ushering in the new year with deadly attacks and a vow to grow even stronger in 2024. we'll look ahead to an extremely busy political year here in the united states as we count down the days to the iowa caucuses. the e days to ththe iowa cauauc. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ of the new year brought more death and destruction as russian forces launched a fresh wave of attacks across the country. cn
court -- say it makes it to the supreme court. they may or may not take it. they very often refuse to consider, cert denied, refuse to consider trump's request for relief on democracy-related issues. if that happens and it's wrapped up -- i don't think it can go march 5th, but it can go in march. there's room for one or two others. the other case that is scheduled, and it is also an election interference allegation is alvin bragg, the manhattan d.a. he claims trump interfered in the 2016...
2
2.0
Jan 7, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will becomeensational and indeed for the first time in history a candidate for the position of president of the united states will not be allowed to participate in the pre-election campaign campaign? look, i'd be happy if it were, but as you just said, i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court in this case... holding trump, unfortunately, well, the fact is that whatever the ideological views, the ideological beliefs of the supreme court justices, they are still judges, and they follow the law. the point is that not allowing trump to run for office, under the third section of the 14th amendment to the united states constitution, because trump has not been found guilty by any court of law that he... he participated in rebellion against the united states, then it is subject to interpretation by specific officials, such as the maine secretary of state state, which is responsible for conducting elections, or a particular court, the supreme court of the state of colorado, which, in response to a
court of the united states support trump, or can it be that the decision of the supreme court will becomeensational and indeed for the first time in history a candidate for the position of president of the united states will not be allowed to participate in the pre-election campaign campaign? look, i'd be happy if it were, but as you just said, i'm not a lawyer, but i think the supreme court in this case... holding trump, unfortunately, well, the fact is that whatever the ideological views, the...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but now the supreme court is wasting no time taking up this case.ally could lead to some clarity not just for your state but for others around the country. how are you feeling about the fact the supreme court is saying yes to at least hearing it tonight? >> thanks for having me on, laura. it seems like you're going to have a fun show tonight. in my general reaction, i think it's a good thing that the supreme court decided to take this case so quickly. the american people deserve to know whether someone who has engaged in insurrection can run for the highest office in this country. and also as secretary of state of colorado, we would like to know the answer very quickly. we are a super tuesday state. our presidential primary is often starting. i certified the candidates today. so the quicker that the supreme court can act, it will just allow us to administer elections in the best way possible. >> but, of course, the supreme court, whether you like it or not, they're not on your timeline. that's the unfortunate reality if you're talking about planning
but now the supreme court is wasting no time taking up this case.ally could lead to some clarity not just for your state but for others around the country. how are you feeling about the fact the supreme court is saying yes to at least hearing it tonight? >> thanks for having me on, laura. it seems like you're going to have a fun show tonight. in my general reaction, i think it's a good thing that the supreme court decided to take this case so quickly. the american people deserve to know...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but sorry, supreme court justices, you are up. and marcus childress, tim parlatore, thank you both so much. look, no matter how this case actually ends up, and we don't know how it's going to -- we don't know what. all this is certainly perhaps not the way joe biden wants to. when so, how will it all play out in the race for the white house? i'm going to talk about it next. >> fatal legal blow or political adrenaline shot? while trump's 14th amendment appeal is going to have a very big consequences, both in the courtroom and, of course, on the campaign trail. going to talk about it all, former white house senior adviser now your hike nayerra haq and -- democratic strategist in particular, you don't want the assumption that you are winning only because trump is not on the ballot. you want to be able to say, i beat you, trump, fair and square, again. is this problematic politically for them to have all these removals? >> who is going to argue about the fair and square, if he does indeed win the electoral college and biden win the po
but sorry, supreme court justices, you are up. and marcus childress, tim parlatore, thank you both so much. look, no matter how this case actually ends up, and we don't know how it's going to -- we don't know what. all this is certainly perhaps not the way joe biden wants to. when so, how will it all play out in the race for the white house? i'm going to talk about it next. >> fatal legal blow or political adrenaline shot? while trump's 14th amendment appeal is going to have a very big...
25
25
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 1
court, it fast-tracks us straight to the supreme court. i think that's what the d.c. court of appeals will do. then, the question is, what will the supreme court do when this is before them? will they take it up quickly, or will they drag this out? i think the supreme court will take this up quickly, especially because they have this other issue that they're dealing with, that is disqualification from the ballot. i think the supreme court is going to find -- comes out donald trump's way. going to want to be able to not say they are tipping the scales one way or another, so, i think they will also take this issue of immunity, which is clearly a loser for donald trump, up quickly. >> okay, christian greenberg, we'll see if your predictions are correct, as they usually are. thank you so much. well, he has one job, in the world is watching him this weekend. that story is next. is next (music) have heart failure with unresolved symptoms? it may be time to see the bigger picture. heart failure and seemingly unrelated symptoms, like carpal tunnel
court, it fast-tracks us straight to the supreme court. i think that's what the d.c. court of appeals will do. then, the question is, what will the supreme court do when this is before them? will they take it up quickly, or will they drag this out? i think the supreme court will take this up quickly, especially because they have this other issue that they're dealing with, that is disqualification from the ballot. i think the supreme court is going to find -- comes out donald trump's way. going...
1
1.0
Jan 11, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
thus , with such statements, the head of the supreme court , in fact, attacked the image of the supremert, his colleagues, who made a completely normal and adequate decision. and in principle, perhaps vrp - this is the supreme council of justice, should be considered. such cases, well, because you can't just make such a statement on the eve of the court, moreover, i have a question as to how the chairman of the supreme court got access to zmi right before the court session, that is, his interview was released just before, and it happened on mind ua , where there was a rather warm and complimentary interview of the head of the servant of the people party , olena shulyak, well, some questions arise, because... that ms. olena shulyak represents the servant of the people, there was a petition to the president's office and citizens demanded it for more than a year therefore cancel his ukrainian citizenship, and here is the question, please, the judge's interview appeared on mind ua, and shulyak appeared on my andua, and there is no position of the president's office, what is going on? well,
thus , with such statements, the head of the supreme court , in fact, attacked the image of the supremert, his colleagues, who made a completely normal and adequate decision. and in principle, perhaps vrp - this is the supreme council of justice, should be considered. such cases, well, because you can't just make such a statement on the eve of the court, moreover, i have a question as to how the chairman of the supreme court got access to zmi right before the court session, that is, his...
0
0.0
Jan 5, 2024
01/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has an opportunity.can issue a narrow decision , they can issue a decision simply on the process in colorado or a very narrow interpretation of something, or they could issue a much broader decision that would have broader application. i expect given these other suits on the horizon and the main case that they will endeavor to issue a broader decision to give some guidance to these other states about ballot access. amna: when you look at these two states with the decision was made, they were made in different ways. the colorado decision was made by the state supreme court. in maine, it was the secretary of state who made the decision. also on the basis of the insurrection clause of the 14th amendment. is there a common standard or question being answered as each state weighs this same question? >> i think that really ties into your last question. ballot access issues are still -- so state specific. we have really different processes in each locale, towns, villages, things like that, to determine access.
the supreme court has an opportunity.can issue a narrow decision , they can issue a decision simply on the process in colorado or a very narrow interpretation of something, or they could issue a much broader decision that would have broader application. i expect given these other suits on the horizon and the main case that they will endeavor to issue a broader decision to give some guidance to these other states about ballot access. amna: when you look at these two states with the decision was...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they, the supreme court took the case.case which means that a ballot in colorado will have trump's name on it, for the moment. and then, obviously -- >> and it's not a political decision by the secretary of state, as a result of the supreme court taking this case, the colorado decision is on hold. >> exactly. and the secretary of state is following the law, which is that she was told that, you know, this is what you have to do, and that the decision is on hold. so, she has to follow the current law. and then, obviously, will decide on february 8th. we will have the oral argument. i would expect a decision very soon. >> the primary is on march 5th. >> and there are other primaries even before that. there is overseas voting. there's the ballots that go out. this will be quite complicated, assuming that colorado's decision is affirmed and it will be very complicated to figure out not just in colorado but in the other states how to deal with the various challenges. >> colorado's decision is affirmed, donald trump is ineligible
they, the supreme court took the case.case which means that a ballot in colorado will have trump's name on it, for the moment. and then, obviously -- >> and it's not a political decision by the secretary of state, as a result of the supreme court taking this case, the colorado decision is on hold. >> exactly. and the secretary of state is following the law, which is that she was told that, you know, this is what you have to do, and that the decision is on hold. so, she has to follow...
0
0.0
Jan 2, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court? >> reporter: the big question is, when is he going to take it to the supreme court? it has been two weeks since the colorado supreme court court issued their decision, and time is of the essence. it's unclear if we're going to see this appeal today. look, even if trump doesn't appeal this question to the supreme court, the republican party of colorado has appealed that decision from the colorado supreme court, removing trump. and their petition really lays out the key questions. the first question is, does section 3 of the 14th amendment apply to presidents? this is something where we saw a split even within the courts in the state of colorado. the next question they posed is, even if it applies to presidents, who enforces this? is it the states as we see now? each state kind of has a different procedure for enforcing ballot eligibility. or is there a role for congress? the republican party of colorado also asking if they have a first amendment right to list the candidate of their choosing. so it is expected that the supreme court will take up this issue from someone
supreme court? >> reporter: the big question is, when is he going to take it to the supreme court? it has been two weeks since the colorado supreme court court issued their decision, and time is of the essence. it's unclear if we're going to see this appeal today. look, even if trump doesn't appeal this question to the supreme court, the republican party of colorado has appealed that decision from the colorado supreme court, removing trump. and their petition really lays out the key...
0
0.0
Jan 12, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court asking to overturn the colorado supreme court's decision to ban donald trump for the presidential ballot. we will consider those cases tonight through the lens of law professor andrew weissmann's legal scholarship as well as the wisdom of three pulitzer prize-winning historians who are experts on the clauses of the constitution that donald trump is now clinging to, trying to redefine through the appeals process. the cases that are going to live the longest in a life of defendant trump are probably the civil cases he is facing. he's facing multiple lawsuits by capitol police officers for injuries they suffered on january six. the verdicts in that lawsuit could cost donald trump hundreds of millions of dollars for each injury. civil julian washington d. c. returned a verdict of 100 and $48 million against rudolph giuliani for the defamation of two election workers in georgia. how much would a jury in the same courthouse return in damages to police officers who were nearly beaten to death? the appeals process in civil cases like that can, in effect, be endless. because once defendant
court asking to overturn the colorado supreme court's decision to ban donald trump for the presidential ballot. we will consider those cases tonight through the lens of law professor andrew weissmann's legal scholarship as well as the wisdom of three pulitzer prize-winning historians who are experts on the clauses of the constitution that donald trump is now clinging to, trying to redefine through the appeals process. the cases that are going to live the longest in a life of defendant trump are...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court the weigh in after the maine secretary of state joined colorado supreme court saying that he should put that decision on hold until it works through the court, and that should give them a chance to weigh in, and the deadline for that is jan wafr and they have been asked to weigh in on this topic. the colorado supreme court was appealed by the gop party, and so they are deciding whether to take up that case, and insert themselves into what is a growing constitutional question. more states are trying to decide if they want to remove trump from the ballot, and oregon is expected to make the decision in a short time, and multiple states, they say, no, they will not. so this conflicting view is putting tremendous pressure to see how time is nof the essence here. >> and jamie raskins said that supreme court clarence thomas should excuse himself from a qualifying person to take up the issue. tell us about that? >> yes, jamie raskins, is saying that a clarence thomas who is married to jenny thomas, and is an active participant to try to urn over 22, and pushing the big lie, they s
supreme court the weigh in after the maine secretary of state joined colorado supreme court saying that he should put that decision on hold until it works through the court, and that should give them a chance to weigh in, and the deadline for that is jan wafr and they have been asked to weigh in on this topic. the colorado supreme court was appealed by the gop party, and so they are deciding whether to take up that case, and insert themselves into what is a growing constitutional question. more...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
many people say forget the supreme court. i get ta. but as a law professor, it's important to me that the supreme court sustain its authority as a critical element of our government and acting in wits that are not political. i would disagree with the decision to remove donald trump. if they do that, they should do that unanimously so people don't think it's a partisan judgment by just judges that don't like donald trump. and the same thing the other way around. if they decide to remove him, i hope -- i mean keep him, i hope all nine justices would say the is same thing so we can move beyond the question of whether this is a judgment by republican justices who are conservative justices to a judgment about this is a judgment by justice who is are applying the law about limiting their own authority absent congressional authorization through a statute. >> you have inspire d today's poll question at smerconish.com. i'm asking where is donald trump more vulnerable via constitution? we're putting it on the screen. where is former president tr
many people say forget the supreme court. i get ta. but as a law professor, it's important to me that the supreme court sustain its authority as a critical element of our government and acting in wits that are not political. i would disagree with the decision to remove donald trump. if they do that, they should do that unanimously so people don't think it's a partisan judgment by just judges that don't like donald trump. and the same thing the other way around. if they decide to remove him, i...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court will weigh in. we thought the supreme court would respond quickly with jack smith, special counsel file or costing those on the supreme court to make a decision on trump's claim of presidential immunity. the client to hear the request by special counsel. i think there is a belief amongst experts that the supreme court will weigh in, because it's such a significant issue. there are more than two dozen other challenges of other states similar to the challenge that we saw in maine and colorado, the reality is if the u.s. supreme court does not weigh in in a timely fashion, it may be the case that donald trump will not be on the ballot, at least in two states. >> our thanks to a reba marin joining us to answer all those legal questions. >> thank you. >> gold grandpa tickets, those are just some of the gifts u.s. senator bob menendez is accused of receiving from qatar and a alleged coconspirator, as part of a years-long corruption scheme. the other kitchens are part of a superseding indictment to make pu
supreme court will weigh in. we thought the supreme court would respond quickly with jack smith, special counsel file or costing those on the supreme court to make a decision on trump's claim of presidential immunity. the client to hear the request by special counsel. i think there is a belief amongst experts that the supreme court will weigh in, because it's such a significant issue. there are more than two dozen other challenges of other states similar to the challenge that we saw in maine...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. what is alleged of the president's official responsibility. there's really nothing in this pleading, which is just a reply to jack smith's pleading filed earlier this week that sheds light on that question beyond what we have heard already. >> to tim's point about the fact we have heard this before. one of the people we have heard it from is donald trump on the trail. that is not an accident. >> can you say the question one more time? >> i was saying that of the people we have heard these arguments from before, is donald trump himself. we have heard it on the trail from donald trump. him trying to make this argument against presidential immunity. >> that's right. it's an important sort of drum beat for him to keep hitting because saying he's being persecuted and he's the victim of a politically tainted prosecution, which is alleged in this new pleading. that he is a victim is incredibly valuable to him as he campaigns and tells his supporters that democrats in control of the departmen
supreme court. what is alleged of the president's official responsibility. there's really nothing in this pleading, which is just a reply to jack smith's pleading filed earlier this week that sheds light on that question beyond what we have heard already. >> to tim's point about the fact we have heard this before. one of the people we have heard it from is donald trump on the trail. that is not an accident. >> can you say the question one more time? >> i was saying that of the...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
how does the supreme court handle this? becomes a partisan decision, the legitimacy of the supreme court is in trouble. i'm hoping john roberts is going to work super hard to make this 9-0 or 7-2 and at least not have a legitimacy freefall. amna: the trump campaign say in a statement, we welcome a fair hearing at the supreme court. they argue this is a bad-faith election interfering voter suppressing argument to remove him from the ballot and at the end they say we are confident the fair-minded supreme court will unanimously affirm the rights of president trump, allowing him to stay on the ballot. >> the one phrase you left out in your summation in the election interfering, democrat backed and and biden led 14th amendment infusing decision. i focus on that because that is untrue. these challenges are being brought by republicans in those states challenging trump's ability to be on the republican primary ballot. this has nothing to do with democrats. democrats are surely cheering what's happening, but they are not the drivin
how does the supreme court handle this? becomes a partisan decision, the legitimacy of the supreme court is in trouble. i'm hoping john roberts is going to work super hard to make this 9-0 or 7-2 and at least not have a legitimacy freefall. amna: the trump campaign say in a statement, we welcome a fair hearing at the supreme court. they argue this is a bad-faith election interfering voter suppressing argument to remove him from the ballot and at the end they say we are confident the fair-minded...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what will the supreme court to? i don't think we're going to find that the presidency is not an office of the united states and the don trump did not take an oath to support the constitution. i don't think they will do that. i also don't think they're going to necessarily get into the substance of the fact finding in whether he engaged in an insurrection or whether he gave aid or comfort to anyone who did. i don't think they're going to seek to change the system, which really allows each state to have its own comprehensive election code, to determine who gets access to the ballot. i think what you're going to see from the supreme court is a very narrow holding. think back to bush versus gore. the words in the opinion that said our consideration is limited to the present circumstances. i think you will see something similar here, where the colorado and elections, a premier co-court will say it's just not equipped to handle the complex factual case about whether or not a candidate engaged in an insurrection. a very na
what will the supreme court to? i don't think we're going to find that the presidency is not an office of the united states and the don trump did not take an oath to support the constitution. i don't think they will do that. i also don't think they're going to necessarily get into the substance of the fact finding in whether he engaged in an insurrection or whether he gave aid or comfort to anyone who did. i don't think they're going to seek to change the system, which really allows each state...
0
0.0
Jan 3, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court that is. and the fact that oregon is now looking at a similar challenge, it tells you what the problem is for the former president. they're going to be fighting these types of battles in state after state unless the supreme court steps in and decides once and for all what really is the law here. does the 14th amendment apply to the status, the candidate as president, which is one of the things that trump mentions in his brief today. he says the 14th amendment does not apply to the office of the presidency. so we anticipate that a similar argument as you saw today in this maine decision we'll see a similar argument in the case of colorado and we expect that because there have been some states that have decided in the opposite direction that the supreme court will try to settle this once and for all because you have some states that have gone in the opposite direction saying that these 14th amendment challenges don't really stand any ground. so we expect that the supreme court will have to make
supreme court that is. and the fact that oregon is now looking at a similar challenge, it tells you what the problem is for the former president. they're going to be fighting these types of battles in state after state unless the supreme court steps in and decides once and for all what really is the law here. does the 14th amendment apply to the status, the candidate as president, which is one of the things that trump mentions in his brief today. he says the 14th amendment does not apply to the...
0
0.0
Jan 4, 2024
01/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, trump would be on the ballot until the supreme court acted in some way.oday, he is on the ballot. i will certify the ballots, basically telling the counties which candidates will be on so they can print the ballots. but our elections will go pretty quickly, overseas and military ballots actually go out this month. we have early voting, vote by mail in colorado. so, coloradans will be voting pretty soon. >> and the supreme court ruled in favor of the colorado supreme court, to remove trump from the ballot, but his name is still there, what happens then? >> colorado's elections take into account candidates who either drop out of a race when their name is already on the ballot, or otherwise unable to be voted on. so in that situation, if voters cast a ballot or a vote for someone who is disqualified, we would not be able to count those votes. i think it's underlines, how unprecedented this situation is. usually, when we have disqualifications arrive, it's not with the president. it's not with candidates running for president because usually candidates runnin
supreme court, trump would be on the ballot until the supreme court acted in some way.oday, he is on the ballot. i will certify the ballots, basically telling the counties which candidates will be on so they can print the ballots. but our elections will go pretty quickly, overseas and military ballots actually go out this month. we have early voting, vote by mail in colorado. so, coloradans will be voting pretty soon. >> and the supreme court ruled in favor of the colorado supreme court,...
1
1.0
Jan 10, 2024
01/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
iryna, well, look, even before today's court decision, the chairman of the supreme court of ukraine, spoke a lot about what should be discussed at today's court, about the fact that the previous decision of the previous head of the supreme court is his own opinion, it should not be like that, that is, he motivated buckets even before the decision. he motivated the decision, why it should be adopted , in this way he put pressure on the decision of the judges, in the end we know the result, the decision was made as it was made, the lviv judge finally got what he was trying to get, reinstatement , payment of 4 million salary, which he lost mrs. irina, i have a question for you, please tell me whether there will be an appeal against today's decision. of such a court, and does the chair under the judge of the supreme court, stanislav kravchenko, not at all wobble , since he openly pressed for the decision, for the adoption of today's decision? well , first of all, it became known literally in front of eter that the supreme court made a statement that they will appeal, and they will not im
iryna, well, look, even before today's court decision, the chairman of the supreme court of ukraine, spoke a lot about what should be discussed at today's court, about the fact that the previous decision of the previous head of the supreme court is his own opinion, it should not be like that, that is, he motivated buckets even before the decision. he motivated the decision, why it should be adopted , in this way he put pressure on the decision of the judges, in the end we know the result, the...
0
0.0
Jan 19, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to the united states supreme court. and today donald trump got a head start on his lawyers in appealing directly to the united states supreme court on social media, where he said, a president of elated states must have full immunity, without which would be impossible for him her to properly function, any mistake even if well intended would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at turn and. donald trump did not explain why no president has ever been prosecuted at the end of his term. the trump statement continued saying, even events that cross the line must fall under total immunity. of course, if presidents had total immunity, or thought they had total immunity, certainly the supreme court would have already thought they had total immunity and donald trump would not have to take an appeal all the way to the united states supreme court, asking the court to invent the concept of total immunity for presidents. non trump ended his statement saying all presidents must have complete and total presidentia
to the united states supreme court. and today donald trump got a head start on his lawyers in appealing directly to the united states supreme court on social media, where he said, a president of elated states must have full immunity, without which would be impossible for him her to properly function, any mistake even if well intended would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at turn and. donald trump did not explain why no president has ever been prosecuted at the end of...
0
0.0
Jan 6, 2024
01/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
especially when we have been talking about the supreme court the legitimacy of the supreme court, theation. are becoming more and more politicized? and then you hear something like this. >> that was a really appalling statement for any lawyer to make. and particularly, a lawyer involved in a contest like this. all federal judges are appointed by a president from one party or another. and we expect all of them to leave that political origin story at the door when they take the bench. they decide cases based on the law and the facts. and not on the president who got them there. so, i think that this is, in many ways, imputing the character of some of the supreme court justices. i hope they're deeply offended by her comments. they should be. in the real problem here is that trump and those around him continue to cast into disrepute all of our important democratic institutions. trump has attacked the fbi. he's attacked his successor, joe biden. he's attacked members of congress. he's attacked the courts. this, the supreme court where we leave our most important disputes to be decided to t
especially when we have been talking about the supreme court the legitimacy of the supreme court, theation. are becoming more and more politicized? and then you hear something like this. >> that was a really appalling statement for any lawyer to make. and particularly, a lawyer involved in a contest like this. all federal judges are appointed by a president from one party or another. and we expect all of them to leave that political origin story at the door when they take the bench. they...
0
0.0
Jan 2, 2024
01/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
well the next stop in our tour was the supreme court building. this is where they decide whether our laws follow the meaning of the constitution. uncle jim told me to notice the inscription over the entrance equal justice under law. he said that this pretty well sums up the purpose of the supreme court then he went on to explain what it meant. the supreme court is the judicial branch of the federal government here. the law itself is on trial. it is judged according to whether it violates our constitutional rights. the court is composed of nine justices who hold office for life members are nominated by the president, but their appointments must be confirmed by the senate. now you should have a good idea of how the constitution sets up the three main branches of our government. the legislature which is congress. the executive branch which is the president. and the judiciary which is the supreme court. the legislature is charged with making policies. that is it passes the laws. the executive is responsible for carrying out policies. and the judiciar
well the next stop in our tour was the supreme court building. this is where they decide whether our laws follow the meaning of the constitution. uncle jim told me to notice the inscription over the entrance equal justice under law. he said that this pretty well sums up the purpose of the supreme court then he went on to explain what it meant. the supreme court is the judicial branch of the federal government here. the law itself is on trial. it is judged according to whether it violates our...
0
0.0
Jan 1, 2024
01/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
government appeal against with the supreme court has set? they cannot a- eal supreme court has set?against _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the supreme . appeal against what the supreme court has said, but, if they chose to, they could ignore the ruling which would bring a constitutional crisis to israel. because let's say there was another decision that the government made to appoint someone who had no experience in a position or even had previous criminal behaviour in this position, for example, the finance ministry post. i'm giving you that example because it is actually a real example of when the supreme court said, no, this person, it is an unreasonable nomination, to put this person in this position when he has been convicted for, example, tax evasion. so in other words, they can ignore it, but it is unlikely during this war time that the judicial review is now shelved for a long time. thank ou ve now shelved for a long time. thank you v
government appeal against with the supreme court has set? they cannot a- eal supreme court has set?against _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the _ supreme court has set? they cannot appeal against what the supreme . appeal against what the supreme court has said, but, if they chose to, they could ignore the ruling which would bring a constitutional crisis to israel. because let's say there was another decision that...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. court decision to remove him from 2024 state primary ballot. what do you think that the supreme court will do. how quickly will they rule on this. >> i think they will reverse the colorado supreme court decision disqualifies former president trump from ballot. one thing that all parties in this case agree that supreme court needs to move fast, this election is coming up soon, ballots are about to be printed, supreme court does not have luxury of time, it can't take us usual months or years, the justices understand the gravity of this issue. of them deciding this case, i expect we'll hear in about a week or so they will take it, assuming they do, they will decide it quickly. elizabeth: supreme court does not want to be in the position of deciding an election, this push, how do you see it? we reported on how section 5 of 14 amendment says only congress can enact a law to do anything close to what they are doing. >> when we discussed this earlier, you put your finger on it that is import
supreme court. court decision to remove him from 2024 state primary ballot. what do you think that the supreme court will do. how quickly will they rule on this. >> i think they will reverse the colorado supreme court decision disqualifies former president trump from ballot. one thing that all parties in this case agree that supreme court needs to move fast, this election is coming up soon, ballots are about to be printed, supreme court does not have luxury of time, it can't take us usual...