0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which theyeviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and should be rejected. host: explain hypertechnical arguments. guest: there is a whole bunch of ways that trump's counsel is trying to win this case, all of which are for the most part highly counterintuitive and hypertechnical. they are the kind of things that make people dislike lawyers which doesn't by itself means they are wrong but it should make us suspicious of those kind of argument. they have the argument which was mentioned that the person who holds the highest office in the federal government is somehow not an officer of the united states, the kind of argument that only a hypertechnical lawye
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which theyeviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court as the justices voice deep skepticism. we'll bring you the latest details on the largest and. >>> also a damning special counsel report finds president biden willfully retained classified information after leaving the vice presidency, but will not, not face charges form the report laying out key differences between biden's cooperation with the instruction and trump's alleged obstruction of his own documents case. >>> welcome to our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer, you're in "the situation room." ♪ >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >>> we're following major legal developments affecting the two men likely heading toward a presidential rematch. paula reid has more on donald trump appearing to win over the supreme court. and a special counsel report of biden's handling of documents. this looks like a pretty good date across the country. absolutely, wolf. >> reporter: there was no drama, no outbursts. instead, it was trump's lawyer making nuanced legal arguments before justices who app
supreme court as the justices voice deep skepticism. we'll bring you the latest details on the largest and. >>> also a damning special counsel report finds president biden willfully retained classified information after leaving the vice presidency, but will not, not face charges form the report laying out key differences between biden's cooperation with the instruction and trump's alleged obstruction of his own documents case. >>> welcome to our viewers in the united states...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in jack smith's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals court, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now has done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor general and host of the podcast courtside with neal katyal. he is an msnbc legal analyst. and neal, i want to begin the way all lawyers begin when they get these notices from the supreme court that they're going to hear your case. they have the supreme court identified for the lawyers on both sides the question, and the only question, they want to hear addressed. and i want to give that question to the audience now. the question is whether, and if so to what extent, does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during
in jack smith's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals court, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now has done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.re is also his legislative legacy, the bills passed under the three presidents including the vast majority of trump's agenda, but towering over all of it and likely to last long beyond his tenure and his life is the work of the three justices whose nominations they put there. one of this, gorsuch happened because mcconnell denied president barack obama an opportunity to appoint his justice. the three justices apply the majority that overturned roe v. wade, that wildly unpopular decision. over turned affirmative action in college admissions and have a plan to bring billions in student debt relief to millions and we could go on and on. we cover all of this on the broadcast all of the type. and right now dealing with the slew of incredibly consequential cases involving atashes to a man who disagrees with many of mcconnell's long held foreign policy views. mcconnell even hinted at that distance between themselves and the maga movement at his announcement today. >> the trial works so hard t
supreme court.re is also his legislative legacy, the bills passed under the three presidents including the vast majority of trump's agenda, but towering over all of it and likely to last long beyond his tenure and his life is the work of the three justices whose nominations they put there. one of this, gorsuch happened because mcconnell denied president barack obama an opportunity to appoint his justice. the three justices apply the majority that overturned roe v. wade, that wildly unpopular...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court's never actually ruled on that. and if so, was donald trump acting within the scope of his job? i don't think there's a good argument here that trump was within the scope of his job, but this is an unknown question and unknown issue and i think that's exactly why the supreme court decided that they needed to take this. remember, by the way, two months ago, jack smith said to the supreme court, only you can decide this case. you, the supreme court and you alone have to resolve this. >> all right. elie honig. thank you so much. appreciate it. much more reaction to his big break can you news ahead in the next hour? our coverage continues now, in the situation room with one wolf blitzer, i'll see you soon claims major decision that certain further delay his federal election subversion trial tonight we're breaking down the massive impact of the high court's announcement. welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer, a urine the situation room the skis cnn, breaking news. >> let'
supreme court's never actually ruled on that. and if so, was donald trump acting within the scope of his job? i don't think there's a good argument here that trump was within the scope of his job, but this is an unknown question and unknown issue and i think that's exactly why the supreme court decided that they needed to take this. remember, by the way, two months ago, jack smith said to the supreme court, only you can decide this case. you, the supreme court and you alone have to resolve...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court. that's where he gave his famous day of infamy speech. that december 7th is a date which will live in infamy. and in fact, the justices adjourned early. so that they could go there and be there. and the soldiers were there as part of an expanded security perimeter. this was just one day after this devastating surprise attack in pearl harbor. but what you see is quite literally, the war, the quiet prison of the supreme court. and the second anecdote was the day after christmas, 1941, and winston churchill had made this dramatic surprise by his visit to was
he was working as an aide at the supreme court in library. and so the day after pearl harbor day on december 8th, 1941, he was doing what a library aide does dropping off books, picking up books. and all of a sudden the front door, he saw all of these u.s. army soldiers come with their weapons drawn and take positions at the windows and the roof all around the court. and the reason was because at noon that day fdr was going to be at the capitol, right across the street from the supreme court....
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and th'lot discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the and the four because there seem to the ones who are very quiet, you don't see in the news and then the ones who are constantly in the press or at least engage in sort of, say, rivalries. well, that's a very, very interesting point about the fdr justices. so we were talking about the number that he had appointed, you know, seven of the nine appointed and eight elevated to chief justice. and at the time that the roosevelt court really shape in the summer of 1941, many observers and predicted that the justices were going to march in lockstep. and again, they were you know, they were all very close to fdr or ha
and th'lot discussion among people who follow the supreme court and think about the supreme court about the different in that kind background compared to the background of today's justices. well, when you think about some of the cases we'll momentarily which become so strikingly contradict in ways you mentioned one it's it's interesting to wonder about what that experience brought as well their very large personality is of some of them i think it's interesting you put the four in the and the...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, over to you. but first, more on this stunning decision of the supreme court entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case? that's coming up next. up next. have you ever considered getting a walk-in tub? well, look no further. proudly made in tennessee, a safe step walk-in tub is the best in it's class. the ultra-low easy step helps keep you safe from having to climb over those high walled tubs, allowing you to age gracefully in the home you love. and now, back by popular demand, for a limited time, when you purchase your brand-new safe step walk-in tub, you'll receive a free shower package! yes! a free shower package, and if you call today, you'll also receive $1600 off. now you can enjoy the best of both worlds. the therapeutic benefits of a warm, soothing bath, that can help increase mobility, relieve pain, boost energy, and even improve sleep. or, if you prefer, you can take a refreshing shower all in one product! call now! type 2 diabetes? discover the ozemp
supreme court, over to you. but first, more on this stunning decision of the supreme court entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case? that's coming up next. up next. have you ever considered getting a walk-in tub? well, look no further. proudly made in tennessee, a safe step walk-in tub is the best in it's class. the ultra-low easy step helps keep you safe from having to climb over those high walled tubs, allowing you to age gracefully in the home you...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he's appealed to the supreme court. if he does that, they'll wait to see what the supreme court does. as i have said, sources close to the trump legal team said they would be surprised if the supreme court takes up this issue. >> what will happen, though, there will be a little time first. because the court will probably want to hear what jack smith says. you know, it's not that the court will immediately on february 12th give us an answer. what they'll do, as paula said, they'll hear from donald trump, presumably by february 12th so he can meet that deadline, and then typically what happens when the court is faced with this kind of petition or emergency action is ask the other side, what do you think? what do you think, jack smith? and presumably, jack smith is going to say no, stay out. you have a very sound forcefully written decision from the d.c. circuit. it hits all the key points of law. you do not have to intervene. but that process in and of itself is not going to take just a matter of hours or days. that could
he's appealed to the supreme court. if he does that, they'll wait to see what the supreme court does. as i have said, sources close to the trump legal team said they would be surprised if the supreme court takes up this issue. >> what will happen, though, there will be a little time first. because the court will probably want to hear what jack smith says. you know, it's not that the court will immediately on february 12th give us an answer. what they'll do, as paula said, they'll hear...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court? >> harris: leo terrell said something might be in the ruling that would communicate that for that not to happen for the 11 or more states. sandra has made it to her studio. "america reports" now. >> question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again is just say it, it sounds awfully national to me. so whatever means there are to enforce it would suggest that they have to be federal national means. >> no, your honor, because ultimately it's this court that's going to decide that question of federal constitutional eligibility and settle the issue for the nation. >> sandra: all right, so any moment now we are expecting to hear directly from the white house. its first reaction to the landmark oral arguments at the supreme court that we all just heard moments ago that could alter the course of the country. hello, welcome everyone, a lot at stake. i'm sandra smith in new york and yes, i did make it up to studio k. >> john: did you take the elevator
supreme court? >> harris: leo terrell said something might be in the ruling that would communicate that for that not to happen for the 11 or more states. sandra has made it to her studio. "america reports" now. >> question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again is just say it, it sounds awfully national to me. so whatever means there are to enforce it would suggest that they have to be federal national means. >> no, your...
0
0.0
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock and say you have three months from today to prepare for trial and i will set up ryle -- a trial date in may. if the supreme court waits late into the summer, it could be in july we get a decision postconvention, then we will not have a trial before the election. host: the georgia case and what we saw last week in georgia, what does that mean for the timing on when or if that case comes to trial? guest: that is the one case we don't have a tentative trial date set. it has already been scrambled little bit because the situation there in essence, the district attorney, had a romantic relationship with
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to be prevented. i think you should be kept off the ballot. if people want to vote for him, they can write it in. host: so to listen closely today? sounds like you did? caller: i listened a little bit. host: ok, because of your civil war reference, that was brought up in today's case? caller: yeah, that has been talked about a lot in the last few weeks. host: thank you. joseph in pennsylvania. hi, joseph. >> you are on. go! host: [laughs] joseph, someone is prompting you. it's your turn. caller: my question is, say that he loses the ballot can he go back to colorado saying tha
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, over to you. first, more on this stunning decision by the supreme court to entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case, that is coming up next. more than just work. like when it needs to be a big soft shoulder to cry on. which is why downy does more to make clothes softer, fresher, and better. downy. breathe life into your laundry. i'm starting to think this was a bad idea. what! we could find a better gift on etsy's new gift mode. oh! can i see that? ♪ happy birthday... ♪ it's a people cake! don't panic. gift easy with gift mode, new on etsy. one in five children worldwide are faced with the reality of living without food, no family dinners, no special treats, not enough energy to play. all around the world, hunger is affecting children's physical and mental health. toddlers are suffering from acute malnutrition, which stunts their growth. kids are forced to drop out of school so they can help support their families. conflict, inflation and climate have ignit
supreme court, over to you. first, more on this stunning decision by the supreme court to entertain donald trump's immunity claims. which justices wanted to hear this case, that is coming up next. more than just work. like when it needs to be a big soft shoulder to cry on. which is why downy does more to make clothes softer, fresher, and better. downy. breathe life into your laundry. i'm starting to think this was a bad idea. what! we could find a better gift on etsy's new gift mode. oh! can i...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has spoken. kristen, i'm sure there with be comments and i'm sure you'll get there. >> this was an unanimous decision from this panel on the federal appeals court. there's been speculation one of the reasons it took so long it there was internal dissent. we're not seeing that as we pore through the ruling. i understand you have got some information now about the scheduling here? >> reporter: that's right. going through this with help from our extraordinary team, we now see that the court of appeals is trying to make up for some of the time they lost in the month it took them to issue the decision, setting a very aggressive schedule for sending this back down to the trial court. this case, again, the traditional next step would be asking the full circuit and then going to the supreme court. that can take quite a bit of time even if the courts don't weigh in to get answers and we know part of the trump strategy is delay. here, this case is expected to go back down to the trial court unless the supr
the supreme court has spoken. kristen, i'm sure there with be comments and i'm sure you'll get there. >> this was an unanimous decision from this panel on the federal appeals court. there's been speculation one of the reasons it took so long it there was internal dissent. we're not seeing that as we pore through the ruling. i understand you have got some information now about the scheduling here? >> reporter: that's right. going through this with help from our extraordinary team, we...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.nd i used to teach a lot at american universities. you mentioned marbury, the notion that the court is trying to find maybe some kind of political moment. it seems to be that part of the problem, why there is such a discussion off-ramp, is because of where the court is at this particular moment in american history. because of the decline of public thinking in the supreme court, and how this supreme court actually doesn't have as much capitalism might have had in prior moments. how do you view it as part of the story? >> i don't know how you restore the credibility or legitimacy of the supreme court. we are going to intervene and stop the manual counting of ballots in the first time in american history because there might not be the exact same interpretive rules being used in one county or another. thereby handing the presidency to george w. bush. in a case where a state supreme is now through excruciating and prolonged fact-finding, there is a candidate disqualified by section three of
supreme court.nd i used to teach a lot at american universities. you mentioned marbury, the notion that the court is trying to find maybe some kind of political moment. it seems to be that part of the problem, why there is such a discussion off-ramp, is because of where the court is at this particular moment in american history. because of the decline of public thinking in the supreme court, and how this supreme court actually doesn't have as much capitalism might have had in prior moments. how...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court declined to do that. of course the case went to the appeals court where they rendered a unanimous skating decision, rejecting trump's argument that he had absolute presidential immunity then after the supreme court received a request to pause that decision, they took two weeks before releasing the fact that they are going to hear arguments in late april, which means we probably won't get a decision until late june, and we would need at least two months before that trial starts. so jake, this makes it unlikely, though not impossible that jack smith will be able to bring that case. and while this has been a bad day, it could be a bad week for for jack smith because on friday i'll be down in florida or judge overseeing the other federal prosecution, the mar-a-lago classified documents case, which has penciled in for late may. >> she he is expected to weigh in on scheduling and it is widely expected that that case will also be delayed. again, unclear if he'll be able to bring either one of these cases before
the supreme court declined to do that. of course the case went to the appeals court where they rendered a unanimous skating decision, rejecting trump's argument that he had absolute presidential immunity then after the supreme court received a request to pause that decision, they took two weeks before releasing the fact that they are going to hear arguments in late april, which means we probably won't get a decision until late june, and we would need at least two months before that trial...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court appellate court. by merely deciding to do this, though, the court has essentially upended the attempt to hold donald trump accountable for his actions to subvert democracy. in fact, the court may have ended that attempt entirely. this decision is also certain to reshape the 2024 presidential race, and it will likely play a determinative role in its outcome. as much as the significance of this ruling is already apparent, the full consequences here hinge on the timing. in it the supreme court said it would hear oral arguments in the case the week of april 22 nd. now, april 22nd is not close to today, and we'll get into exactly why exactly the court didn't choose a date a lot sooner than that, but april 22nd also on its face sort of seems pretty far from the november election. it's not. because when you start crunching the numbers and looking at how a trial could actually time out after the supreme court makes its decision here, the window in which trump could face trial, the window of that happening bef
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court appellate court. by merely deciding to do this, though, the court has essentially upended the attempt to hold donald trump accountable for his actions to subvert democracy. in fact, the court may have ended that attempt entirely. this decision is also certain to reshape the 2024 presidential race, and it will likely play a determinative role in its outcome. as much as the significance of this ruling is already apparent, the full...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
all eyes are now turning to the supreme court. also, that republican effort to impeach the homeland security secretary over the border, just went down in flames. they failing spectacularly in the house this evening, it is a major investment for the house speaker, but really for the house gop. also tonight we are tracking, this is for the first time, ever the -- has been held responsible for her actions related to her own sons murderous rampage. what it could mean for the future of school shootings in america. i am kaitlan collins, and this is the source. the answer, if you are, wondering is no. the president can order seal team six to assassinate his political opponent with absolute immunity from prosecution in the future. remember the striking hypothetical that was post-just one month ago to trump's attorney by a panel judges, that attorney that went on and actually tried to defend, even hypothetically. well today, the dc circuit court of appeals took a sledgehammer not to just that, but who really all of donald trump's -- the fo
all eyes are now turning to the supreme court. also, that republican effort to impeach the homeland security secretary over the border, just went down in flames. they failing spectacularly in the house this evening, it is a major investment for the house speaker, but really for the house gop. also tonight we are tracking, this is for the first time, ever the -- has been held responsible for her actions related to her own sons murderous rampage. what it could mean for the future of school...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court is a supreme court. john roberts has the opinion and of the supreme court and the american public's my in his hands. and he values so supreme court, he is the chief justice. that is his job. >> if very interesting to hear you say that congressman steve cohen, thank you very much for joining us. >> you're welcome, abby. nice to be with you >> and next, the republican who is responsible for changing the architecture of that supreme court announces that he is taking a back venture role on the very same day that the court but he built steps into the spotlight, again, much more ahead on these side sunday >> van jones, it's home find out what is driving the divide in tennessee politics. >> there has been a very active 20 to 30 year effort to separate us. >> the whole story with anderson cooper sunday up on cnn liberty mutual customize my car insurance and i saved hundreds >> that's great. >> i know i've been telling everyone how many people did you tell only pay for what you need >> i know what, it's like to p
the supreme court is a supreme court. john roberts has the opinion and of the supreme court and the american public's my in his hands. and he values so supreme court, he is the chief justice. that is his job. >> if very interesting to hear you say that congressman steve cohen, thank you very much for joining us. >> you're welcome, abby. nice to be with you >> and next, the republican who is responsible for changing the architecture of that supreme court announces that he is...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case _ . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of— - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether - . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or- - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or not i court hears a case of whether or not to keep donald trump off the 2024 presidential ballot. the anti—war candidate planning to challenge vladimir putin is blocked from standing in russia's presidential election. boris nadezhdinjoins us live on today's programme. vote counting begins in the pakistan election after a campaign marred by violence. in the uk, the labour opposition ditches its multi—billion pound green policy on the day the eu releases another worrying climate report. and it's at it again — volcano in iceland erupts for the third time since december. welcome to the show. we start in washington, where the us supreme court is hearing a case, that could potentially stop donald trump running in the 2024 presidential el
stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case _ . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of— - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether - . stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or- - stakes in the us as the supreme court hears a case of whether or not i court hears a case of whether or not to keep donald trump off the 2024 presidential ballot. the anti—war candidate planning to...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court
today, the supreme court hour. today, the supreme court
17
17
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 17
favorite 0
quote 2
to the supreme court. if they are willing to take the case, then they can decide whether this gets stayed any longer. you have until one week to do that, to say that you're going to file for a stay in the supreme court. so our eyes should really be there. one thing that's tlerg is the court said, if you want to come back to the d.c. circuit, because sometimes what a person can do, they have 45 days to ask the same court to rehear the case or have all the judges rehear it. basically the decision says no, that's not going to happen. we are not issuing a stay at the d.c. circuit level, and they have technical language on that. i also think that's a clue as to why this may have taken a little bit longer than we all anticipated. it seems pretty clear behind the scenes that there was discussions amongst all the judges about the stay issue, whether the d.c. circuit would be willing to enter a stay if donald trump came back to them and not the supreme court, and basically that got shut down. he has one avenue whic
to the supreme court. if they are willing to take the case, then they can decide whether this gets stayed any longer. you have until one week to do that, to say that you're going to file for a stay in the supreme court. so our eyes should really be there. one thing that's tlerg is the court said, if you want to come back to the d.c. circuit, because sometimes what a person can do, they have 45 days to ask the same court to rehear the case or have all the judges rehear it. basically the decision...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that is the essence of this supreme court. and every single democrat who is not onboard for expanding the supreme court and reducing the power of these republican theocrats in robes is in some way complicit in today's failure. >> excellent numerical factual context. michael, your thoughts. >> i want to pick up on -- on something that both neil and andrew pointed out, and it really goes to the heart of what my friend elie just laid out, and that is donald trump has basically said as president you can't come after me. now that i'm done with my presidency, you can't come after me. and the court is now in the position to say, yeah, let's sort of stretch this out a little bit longer. and the reason why the time line is very problematic is the court knows that election voting begins immediately after labor day. in some states as early as the last two weeks of august. so the idea that you're going to delay even addressing this issue possibly to the end of the term, june, tells you that there is no way in hell you're going to get this
that is the essence of this supreme court. and every single democrat who is not onboard for expanding the supreme court and reducing the power of these republican theocrats in robes is in some way complicit in today's failure. >> excellent numerical factual context. michael, your thoughts. >> i want to pick up on -- on something that both neil and andrew pointed out, and it really goes to the heart of what my friend elie just laid out, and that is donald trump has basically said as...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court. >> i believe that the supreme court is not going to overturn it and find the blanket immunity that the former president is asking for. >> okay. i just wanted to make sure that's what you were saying. you know trump well. you worked for him. you represented him. there's kind of like a special class for all the attorneys who worked for donald trump. i think just based on covering them for so long. i wonder how you think he read this today, the fact that he lost, that they rejected his arguments, that they referred to him as citizen trump. i mean, how would you predict he's responding to this tonight? >> i mean, i think that he's probably taking it more personally, particularly the parts about citizen trump. i think that he's probably more concentrating on that. but you know, ultimately one would hope that his lawyers -- and he has some very good lawyers on this particular issue to try to refocus it on just the legal aspects, have john sauer go this is the standard, this is what we need
the supreme court. >> i believe that the supreme court is not going to overturn it and find the blanket immunity that the former president is asking for. >> okay. i just wanted to make sure that's what you were saying. you know trump well. you worked for him. you represented him. there's kind of like a special class for all the attorneys who worked for donald trump. i think just based on covering them for so long. i wonder how you think he read this today, the fact that he lost,...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court to weigh in. >> why do you say that? >> well, the argument is airtight, it's bulletproof. it's not in conflict with the decision of any other circuit. it establishes a principle based on widely agreed upon ideas about the separation of powers and the proposition that crimes committed by anyone, including a president when in office, especially the crime of trying to deprive the voters of the ability to replace you with someone else, those crimes must result in trial and either an acquittal or a conviction. they can't simply go into the ash can of history. there's nothing the supreme court of the united states could add to that. if there were a gap in the reasoning of the opinion, if it left important issues unanswered, if it was ambiguous, if it was over the top in some way, if it didn't take seriously all of trump's arguments, then maybe there would be reason for the supreme court to weigh in. now, the only reason to weigh in would be delay. everyone knows that in this case, justice delayed could well be justice denied.
supreme court to weigh in. >> why do you say that? >> well, the argument is airtight, it's bulletproof. it's not in conflict with the decision of any other circuit. it establishes a principle based on widely agreed upon ideas about the separation of powers and the proposition that crimes committed by anyone, including a president when in office, especially the crime of trying to deprive the voters of the ability to replace you with someone else, those crimes must result in trial and...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.and the moment that i said to myself i've seen enough was when elena kagan point-blank asked jason murray, her former clerk, why is it that you think that one state should be able to decide the presidential election for all states? that was the moment in which i knew that this argument was going exactly where we thought it was. everyone is just searching for something to hang their hat on interpretively or otherwise to get to that place. one thing i also found interesting in looking ahead in terms of what's coming down the pike, this is a court that heard argument today about the 14th amendment and trump's qualification for office while it knows that on monday or before former president trump will ask them to stay a d.c. circuit's ruling so that he can appeal their decision with respect to his immunity from prosecution. and that seemed to be very much on the justices' minds today, in particular justice kavanaugh searching to understand are there other ways in which barring impeachment,
supreme court.and the moment that i said to myself i've seen enough was when elena kagan point-blank asked jason murray, her former clerk, why is it that you think that one state should be able to decide the presidential election for all states? that was the moment in which i knew that this argument was going exactly where we thought it was. everyone is just searching for something to hang their hat on interpretively or otherwise to get to that place. one thing i also found interesting in...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of colorado. of the lawyers trying to keep trump off the ballot offered this argument for why it is not legally sound. >> the constitution tells us over and over that the presidency is an office and that the person who holds it swears an oath of office before assuming the execution of his office. and the plain meaning of an officer is just one who holds an office. so we think the text here is very clear that the history supports it and certainly the core purpose of the provision supports that reading as well. >> notice the wording there. the text, the history, it was drafted carefully. you see how he referred to the plain meaning of the language of the constitution. likely a direct appeal to the so-called originalist not on the state supreme court of colorado before whom he was arguing, but on the supreme court of the united states who tend to take the view or at least say they take the view that the constitution should be interpreted only as it was understood at the time of their founding, origin
supreme court of colorado. of the lawyers trying to keep trump off the ballot offered this argument for why it is not legally sound. >> the constitution tells us over and over that the presidency is an office and that the person who holds it swears an oath of office before assuming the execution of his office. and the plain meaning of an officer is just one who holds an office. so we think the text here is very clear that the history supports it and certainly the core purpose of the...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
eaking news from te supreme court.y with us things have gotten better recently, but too many businesses like mine are still getting broken into. it's time our police officers have access to 21st century tools to prevent and solve more crimes. allow public safety cameras that other bay area police departments have to discourage crime, catch criminals, and increase prosecutions. prop e is a smart step our city can take right now to keep san francisco moving in the right direction. please join me in voting yes on prop e. >>> we're back with the breaking news that the supreme court has agreed to entertain donald trump's argument that he is absolutely immune from prosecution for his attempt to undermine the 2020 election. the edition triggers a number of deeply-concerning constitutional questions, and more fundamentally, questions of timing. who better to discuss those weighty issues with than constitutional scholar and maryland congressman jamie raskin, our friend. congressman raskin, i want to get your reaction to this de
eaking news from te supreme court.y with us things have gotten better recently, but too many businesses like mine are still getting broken into. it's time our police officers have access to 21st century tools to prevent and solve more crimes. allow public safety cameras that other bay area police departments have to discourage crime, catch criminals, and increase prosecutions. prop e is a smart step our city can take right now to keep san francisco moving in the right direction. please join me...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now this is the second time the supreme court has rejected jack smith's request because supreme court to just step in and decide this question of immunity once and for all, so that he could move forward with this prosecution. he asked them months ago to weigh in on this issue, not to wait for this to go through the appeals process so that he could bring this case to trial swiftly, saying that it was in the public interest for this case to be tried and decided soon the supreme court declined to do that. of course, the case went to the appeals court where they rendered a unanimous scaling decision, rejecting trump's argument that he had absolute presidential immunity then after the supreme court received a request to pause that decision, they took two weeks before releasing the fact that they are going to hear arguments in late april between because we probably won't get a decision until late june, and we would need at least two months before that trial starts. so jake, this makes it unlikely, though not impossible that jack smith will be able to bring that case. and while this has been
now this is the second time the supreme court has rejected jack smith's request because supreme court to just step in and decide this question of immunity once and for all, so that he could move forward with this prosecution. he asked them months ago to weigh in on this issue, not to wait for this to go through the appeals process so that he could bring this case to trial swiftly, saying that it was in the public interest for this case to be tried and decided soon the supreme court declined to...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think it is a superhard thing to argue in the supreme. -- the supreme court.it is hard to argue in front of nine people who have their particular takes on something. at that time, our arguments have kind of expanded and the amount of time they take. >> yeah, what is going on there? >> we can talk about that. [laughter] but at that time the argument was compressed into one hour so it was usually half an hour both sides, sometimes it was 20/10/30. everybody was jumping in all the time. really one of the great talents of the people who argued at that time, i think it is less important now honestly, is being able to make your point in the first sentence or two, that there was, if you are the kind of person who did a bit of throat clearing before you got to the point, well, you are not going to get to the point. so that was a problem, yeah. >> so we talked a little bit -- >> you were there. >> i was. >> yeah, so you know. >> i disagree with justice marshall. i think the greatest job was to be a state sg. 331 people, you can't make them all happy. i can make the peo
i think it is a superhard thing to argue in the supreme. -- the supreme court.it is hard to argue in front of nine people who have their particular takes on something. at that time, our arguments have kind of expanded and the amount of time they take. >> yeah, what is going on there? >> we can talk about that. [laughter] but at that time the argument was compressed into one hour so it was usually half an hour both sides, sometimes it was 20/10/30. everybody was jumping in all the...
179
179
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 179
favorite 0
quote 1
just keeping the steps of the supreme court. ♪ >> tonight we will let you know the supreme court argumentwe will be taking in your calls. who will follow that up i the oriole argument in its entirety at 8:30. we will have all of atere on c-span. later this afternoon, interviewed by -- we will have live coverage at 3:15 p.m. on c-span. >> c-span has your unfiltered view of government provided by these television companies and more, including cox. >> this is joe. >> when you are connected, you are not alone.
just keeping the steps of the supreme court. ♪ >> tonight we will let you know the supreme court argumentwe will be taking in your calls. who will follow that up i the oriole argument in its entirety at 8:30. we will have all of atere on c-span. later this afternoon, interviewed by -- we will have live coverage at 3:15 p.m. on c-span. >> c-span has your unfiltered view of government provided by these television companies and more, including cox. >> this is joe. >> when...
29
29
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 29
favorite 0
quote 2
this doesn't seem to be that supreme court. >> it does not. clear is that when judge chutkan gets the greenlight, and she will, i think there is just a remote, negligible chance that the supreme court could take this grant to stay and sit on it. judge chutkan is going to have this trial before the election. >> so in her saying august is interesting, because she is saying i will start this trial on august 15th, if i have to. she would rather started in july, she doesn't want to start at postelection. but it seems like she is not going to be concerned with one of the other things on donald trump's calendar. >> she has actually said that. she, in one of the pre trial proceedings, said you know what, what your extracurricular activities are is not my concern. you are a criminal defendant, and you will be treated by all criminal defendants. the fact that you are doing things that you think are important to, and may be important to others, is not the issue. again, the public has a right to a speedy trial on these charges. >> andrew weissmann, thank
this doesn't seem to be that supreme court. >> it does not. clear is that when judge chutkan gets the greenlight, and she will, i think there is just a remote, negligible chance that the supreme court could take this grant to stay and sit on it. judge chutkan is going to have this trial before the election. >> so in her saying august is interesting, because she is saying i will start this trial on august 15th, if i have to. she would rather started in july, she doesn't want to start...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for the supreme court. if they decide to take this case, jack smith told the court, if they decide to take the case that -- forced to file their appeals brief ten days after the supreme court agrees to take the case, and that jack smith should then be required to file his brief seven days thereafter, and that the trump lawyers could then be allowed to file a reply brief five days thereafter. that allows a total of three weeks for all of the briefs to be written, submitted to the court, after the day the supreme court agrees to take the case. if today is any indication of the speed of jack smith's team, they probably would not use all seven days to write the brief. so it could be a few days friday than three weeks. it can be done. it has been done. when the stakes for this high once before in 1974, when a criminal president was seeking the protection of the united states supreme court, the united states supreme court quickly and unanimously refused to protect the republican president of the united states. in
for the supreme court. if they decide to take this case, jack smith told the court, if they decide to take the case that -- forced to file their appeals brief ten days after the supreme court agrees to take the case, and that jack smith should then be required to file his brief seven days thereafter, and that the trump lawyers could then be allowed to file a reply brief five days thereafter. that allows a total of three weeks for all of the briefs to be written, submitted to the court, after...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, which to be clear in supreme court time is light speed. >> the they fast schedule by supreme court standard, but not an unreasonable schedule. >> it is expedited in supreme court land. the only time line by which they have to operate is really their own. >> and we'll show you what that looks like. trump appealed that case and two days later, january 5th, the court took it. two days. they said we'll take it and promptly scheduled those oral arguments that we covered. the headlines out of that hearing were very clear. the court likely to side with trump. so on a trump-friendly case when he wanted fast action they moved fast. this is a case where trump wants to move slowly because in that other case he has to get back on the ballot and in this case he just wants the trial to go away. the last time the supreme court had to weigh in on an actual presidential election that had occurred and just different on the ballot thing that's coming up was the very famous case in 2000 in bush v. gore. i told you we'll show you the evidence tonight and the court and the judges claim they used precede
, which to be clear in supreme court time is light speed. >> the they fast schedule by supreme court standard, but not an unreasonable schedule. >> it is expedited in supreme court land. the only time line by which they have to operate is really their own. >> and we'll show you what that looks like. trump appealed that case and two days later, january 5th, the court took it. two days. they said we'll take it and promptly scheduled those oral arguments that we covered. the...
131
131
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 1
supreme court. so you had some company out there because there were quite a few people waiting to see how this was going to go. >> quite a few people. this went a lot longer than we thought this would go. the justices, even the liberal justices highly pointed questions to the attorney representing the colorado voters, questioning in many ways why donald trump should be taken off the ballot. we thought maybe the oral arguments would go 90 minutes. clearly they went longer than 90 minutes. the chief argument from the trump attorneys, harris and the crew that's on the couch is that taking donald trump off the ballot strips him of his rights as a presidential candidate, plain and simple. the 14th amendment, section 3 bars those from holding federal office in the future who engaged in insurrection while an officer of the united states. the question is whether it specifically applies to the president and his conduct in office. now, voters in colorado sued, aiming to remove him from the ballot over his all
supreme court. so you had some company out there because there were quite a few people waiting to see how this was going to go. >> quite a few people. this went a lot longer than we thought this would go. the justices, even the liberal justices highly pointed questions to the attorney representing the colorado voters, questioning in many ways why donald trump should be taken off the ballot. we thought maybe the oral arguments would go 90 minutes. clearly they went longer than 90 minutes....
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court appears skeptical. what are the big take aways that you're hearing. >> i noticed that trend, too, chris, the word skeptical being the operative word here after the more than two hours of arguments before the supreme court. the justices did seem to have some very pointed questions about the colorado case here about whether the former president would be under the 14th amendment at all about the consequences of potentially leaving someone like him off the ballot here in the real world. and even on questions about whether or not what we saw on january 6th was an insurrection or not, a point of some contention from the attorneys arguing before the justices today. take a listen to a little bit of that slice of the discussion in court today. >> we are here because for the first time since the war of 1812, our nations capitol came under violent assault. for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power. by eng
supreme court appears skeptical. what are the big take aways that you're hearing. >> i noticed that trend, too, chris, the word skeptical being the operative word here after the more than two hours of arguments before the supreme court. the justices did seem to have some very pointed questions about the colorado case here about whether the former president would be under the 14th amendment at all about the consequences of potentially leaving someone like him off the ballot here in the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
deal or confidence in the supreme court. the vast majority don't have that much trust in the supreme court. 58% have just some or not at all to make the right decisions. >> that ain't good. you have to wonder if that's recent or has been brewing for a long time. something tells me it's more recent. harry, thank you for the numbers. appreciate that so much. >> appreciate you, laura. >>> listen live as the u.s. supreme court hears the case to remove former president donald trump from the ballot. our coverage is at 9:00 a.m. east. >>> a variation on a theme on capitol hill. talk about all of the -- what was the word? chaos. got a lot of lawmakers ticked off. will the meltdown hurt republicans? we have a panel here to talk to me. we'll be right back. so, you've got the power of xfinity at home. now take it outside with xfinity mobile. like speed? it's the fastest mobile service around... and right now, you can get a free line of our most popular unlimited plan. all on the most reliable 5g network nationwide. ditch the other guys
deal or confidence in the supreme court. the vast majority don't have that much trust in the supreme court. 58% have just some or not at all to make the right decisions. >> that ain't good. you have to wonder if that's recent or has been brewing for a long time. something tells me it's more recent. harry, thank you for the numbers. appreciate that so much. >> appreciate you, laura. >>> listen live as the u.s. supreme court hears the case to remove former president donald...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
are they going to take it to a full court or petition directly to the supreme court for the supreme court'sn't know. and i think it's kind of a toss-up as to whether the supreme court takes the case. and if they do take the case, all i will say is it's a much heavier lift than the colorado ballot case from president trump's side. >> really interesting. i'm glad you could come back for the special and get your very historically steeped perspective. thank you, robert. >> thanks. i was glad you were in the courtroom. it was a good day. >> interesting. it was very interesting, yes, sir. before we go, we've got to bring in andrew weissmann. we could learn a lot from all the people with experience. i did want to get your reaction to anything we just heard. >> i'm very interested on what's going to happen on monday, because that is the deadline by which, if donald trump does not indicate to the d.c. circuit that he is filing an appeal in the supreme court, the mandate, that is the green light essentially or the football is going to be handed off and back to judge chutkan. so the one area where i s
are they going to take it to a full court or petition directly to the supreme court for the supreme court'sn't know. and i think it's kind of a toss-up as to whether the supreme court takes the case. and if they do take the case, all i will say is it's a much heavier lift than the colorado ballot case from president trump's side. >> really interesting. i'm glad you could come back for the special and get your very historically steeped perspective. thank you, robert. >> thanks. i was...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a supreme court.nd if they get strofed in that way, that will be very good news for trump if they grant this stay if he loses the case. i think the ins cushional interest of the supreme court in resolving this question is something that trump has going for him. whether that's five votes for a stay, i don't know. but the point you make about the supreme court wanting to address a profoundly important issue is something that will push them towards taking this case. even though, this issue is pretty easy, i think. the idea that donald trump can commit any crime he wants and never be prosecuted for it is a crazy idea. it's an important question. that's something at least some of the justices are going to want to address. >> remind the audience, a stay means they will be able to delay having any trial until the supreme court has resolved the case, which could take months and months, depending on the calendar and their own prerogative. you're right, talk about the fundamental issue, whether a president whil
a supreme court.nd if they get strofed in that way, that will be very good news for trump if they grant this stay if he loses the case. i think the ins cushional interest of the supreme court in resolving this question is something that trump has going for him. whether that's five votes for a stay, i don't know. but the point you make about the supreme court wanting to address a profoundly important issue is something that will push them towards taking this case. even though, this issue is...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado supreme court, now we have the united states supreme court. the justices have all the ability in the world to clearly define what an insurrection is. but that does not, i would say, i would argue, allow them to pretend that section three of the 14th amendment does not exist. it is there to protect the country from insurrectionist taking office, it is there for the situation with donald trump. >> was there any concerns, you secretary, or is it any concern to you that colorado is the centrally alone among the states in the having -- insurrection and should be disqualified, sort of your colleague and has made that decision is not of importance, but there are been two dozen or so of these challenges rejected in these states and swing states. does it concern you that colorado is sort of -- >> know, because honestly, it is not a typical for states to have different candidates on the ballot. outside of this question about donald trump, this presidential primary will have a candidate who is not a natural born citizen on some ballots, and not on other
the colorado supreme court, now we have the united states supreme court. the justices have all the ability in the world to clearly define what an insurrection is. but that does not, i would say, i would argue, allow them to pretend that section three of the 14th amendment does not exist. it is there to protect the country from insurrectionist taking office, it is there for the situation with donald trump. >> was there any concerns, you secretary, or is it any concern to you that colorado...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
joan, you know the supreme court better than anybody. the question is, assuming that the trump team will appeal, which of course they are, what's the supreme court going to do? are they going to take the case? >> okay. first, they'll ask for jack smith's response, and i guarantee you his lawyers are vetting that response so they can drop it in early next week. then donald trump will have a chance to come back and respond to that response. you know, they could decide in just a matter of days or just maybe, you know, two weeks whether they're going to grant it or not grant it. but this is not an easy call. i'll tell you why. >> not an easy call to take it or the decision or both? >> both. first of all, in the end, even if the justices took it up, they would affirm this ruling because it's really solid. it takes advantage of precedents set, really counters the audacious claim that donald trump is making, is that he should be absolutely immune. but the issue is whether the supreme court itself feels like it needs to weigh in, and if there ar
joan, you know the supreme court better than anybody. the question is, assuming that the trump team will appeal, which of course they are, what's the supreme court going to do? are they going to take the case? >> okay. first, they'll ask for jack smith's response, and i guarantee you his lawyers are vetting that response so they can drop it in early next week. then donald trump will have a chance to come back and respond to that response. you know, they could decide in just a matter of...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court. you'll recall that special counsel jack smith had intended and requested that the supreme court be the initial ones to hear donald trump's appeal and bypass the appeals court. that did not happen. that is all but effectively slowed down this case. you said judge chutkan acknowledged the march 4th trial start date would be pushed back. we are looking at that anywhere from as late as april or may now beginning here. but when we're talking about what has actually been determined by the court here, ana, this is notable, not only just in this case, but also for future presidents who serve in the oval office. you'll recall that donald trump's attorney had made the case to the appeals court that a president can only be charged with crimes if he were to be then impeached and convicted by the u.s. congress. making the case that donald trump, that did not happen. when the senate voted to not convict him after the house voted to impeach him on those january 6th charges. now, donald trump over th
supreme court. you'll recall that special counsel jack smith had intended and requested that the supreme court be the initial ones to hear donald trump's appeal and bypass the appeals court. that did not happen. that is all but effectively slowed down this case. you said judge chutkan acknowledged the march 4th trial start date would be pushed back. we are looking at that anywhere from as late as april or may now beginning here. but when we're talking about what has actually been determined by...