0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
thnge supreme court who hasit created a king.f i've ever seen you this emotional. >> yell, it is so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left inc. the ruling gives theside president? >> a president like donald trum with a legal act, slap the label, hey, this is an official act. >> hurt a political opponent according to this court, it does not matter. >> you can shoot someone i andne middle of fifth avenue in new york and get away with it. we would hopefully not see him test that theory.na >> thete president can test thes to assassinate somebody. >> we don't know because this ping-pong back and forth. i don't know! >> jason: unfortunately, this lunacy isn't just contained to the media, just desoto tmayor dissent said the presidt can order seal team six tod assassinate a rival, organize a military coup, and take bribes with immunity. it is one thing with the mediaoi to engage in this brazen, eerie irresponsible fearmongering, itu is another sitting supreme court undermining the court's ruling by claiming without a shred of evi
thnge supreme court who hasit created a king.f i've ever seen you this emotional. >> yell, it is so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left inc. the ruling gives theside president? >> a president like donald trum with a legal act, slap the label, hey, this is an official act. >> hurt a political opponent according to this court, it does not matter. >> you can shoot someone i andne middle of fifth avenue in new york and get away with it. we would hopefully...
0
0.0
Jul 30, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let me focuses on his remarks about the supreme court.ear that the majority leader and our democratic colleagues don't like the constitution. they don't like the separation of powers. they don't like the independence of the judiciary, which is really the gold standard for courts worldwide based on the rule of law. what they want is a political branch of government, not one that calls balls and strikes, one that decides cases based on the law and the facts. he talks about how the supreme court's reputation has been tarnished. well, one reason why the supreme court's reputation has perhaps been tarnished in the media is because the majority leader stood in front of the supreme court and called out two justices by name and threatened them if they made a decision that he didn't like. he said they won't know what hit them. well, that kind of irresponsible rhetoric by the majority leader and others is perhaps responsible for people wondering, is the court an impartial institution? i would point out when the court was maybe constituted a little
let me focuses on his remarks about the supreme court.ear that the majority leader and our democratic colleagues don't like the constitution. they don't like the separation of powers. they don't like the independence of the judiciary, which is really the gold standard for courts worldwide based on the rule of law. what they want is a political branch of government, not one that calls balls and strikes, one that decides cases based on the law and the facts. he talks about how the supreme court's...
0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there's the supreme court.ut on our constitutional system, the highest above all of them, the highest of the high are the people. right? so we are the people who can be the highest of the high. and what we need to do is to vote in december. i'm sorry, we need to vote in november. we need to vote in november like the future of democracy is on the ballot because it is. we need to make sure we are all registered. we need to make sure our friends and families are registered and we need to cut away the could be webs and the -- cobwebs and the nonsense and all of the other things caught in people's brains and we need to tell them to vote for a democrat from the top of the ballot to the very, very bottom. i don't want to hear about it, i don't want to hear anything else about why this candidate or that candidate or this moderate republican or that sensible centrist. you need to vote for democracy. and that means voting from top of the ticket to the bottom, democratic. and that's why i love the work that jewish democra
there's the supreme court.ut on our constitutional system, the highest above all of them, the highest of the high are the people. right? so we are the people who can be the highest of the high. and what we need to do is to vote in december. i'm sorry, we need to vote in november. we need to vote in november like the future of democracy is on the ballot because it is. we need to make sure we are all registered. we need to make sure our friends and families are registered and we need to cut away...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
eastern time, to speak to the supreme court decision?g all day, we haven't heard from him. we want to see the president. president coming out, gives a very short but very forceful rebuke and, frankly, more of a political conversation than i expected at the white house. >> yeah. >> but he didn't take any questions. >> no. >> what do you make of that strategy from the white house, and what are your -- what is your reporting telling you that we can see from them in the coming days? i know we're coming up on fourth of july, but is there going to be a town hall? >> i have not heard a town hall. i don't think they're nervous enough, it seems, from the conversations we've had, to put him out there in a way we haven't seen before. a town hall, a "60 minutes" interview, a one-hour press conference, something like that. we have nato coming up soon, and, typically, there is a press conference with the american president. we'll see if they do that. last night was necessary. we heard all day from democrats, not just that they wanted to hear from the
eastern time, to speak to the supreme court decision?g all day, we haven't heard from him. we want to see the president. president coming out, gives a very short but very forceful rebuke and, frankly, more of a political conversation than i expected at the white house. >> yeah. >> but he didn't take any questions. >> no. >> what do you make of that strategy from the white house, and what are your -- what is your reporting telling you that we can see from them in the...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
uh quote uh with the supreme court ruling in mind. now the supreme court was still reading through the entire judgment. it's a link to the judgment, but it does have a statement that at least presumptive lee, a sitting president has the rights of immunity from prosecution. now the acts of which trump has been accused happened while he was still a sitting president. so the court is holding here that rick respectively, he is immune from prosecution for official x taken. while he was president said the quote is making an assumption to hear that the charges against trump were rooted in what was official x x that he carried out while he was president and is the full immune from prosecution. as i said, we're still going through the judgements, but these are both the highlights and that it's that split decision as to what's expected to do the appear that it's a $6.00 to $3.00 at 3 of the justices dissenting. we will hopefully here some of the dissenting judgements in the minutes to come. but as it stands at, the moment of donald trump has be
uh quote uh with the supreme court ruling in mind. now the supreme court was still reading through the entire judgment. it's a link to the judgment, but it does have a statement that at least presumptive lee, a sitting president has the rights of immunity from prosecution. now the acts of which trump has been accused happened while he was still a sitting president. so the court is holding here that rick respectively, he is immune from prosecution for official x taken. while he was president...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i agree with the supreme court's decision. i think the democrats are doing what do en they do not get their own way, and that is scream and yell and jump how. i cases in order to stop donald trump from being able to run for the presidency, and al believe they are the biggest danr to democracy, more than donald trump or the republicans are because of weaponizing the courts. host all right, george. let's talk to jennifer next in lexington, virginia, democrat. caller: yes ma'am. thank you for taking michael. i regret the decision handed down by the supreme court. i wish that they had not decided that way. i feel like the declaration of independence is now a paper basket article and i wish to encourage democra aall-americang at half staff, especially through the fourth of july and in standing with every declaration of independence, which i feel has been greatlyñv compromised if nt just done away with cotethank y. host: let's talk to vince in mount joy, pennsylvania, republican. good morning. caller: yes, morning. i would like to s
i agree with the supreme court's decision. i think the democrats are doing what do en they do not get their own way, and that is scream and yell and jump how. i cases in order to stop donald trump from being able to run for the presidency, and al believe they are the biggest danr to democracy, more than donald trump or the republicans are because of weaponizing the courts. host all right, george. let's talk to jennifer next in lexington, virginia, democrat. caller: yes ma'am. thank you for...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court sitting there.ean, if they decide that some of the conversations that donald trump had with hope hicks were part of his official duties? that conviction is going to be in trouble because one thing the supreme court says today is if there is an official act, even if it's not indicted itself, you cannot use that even as evidence in a case. now that's a very extreme and i'm actually surprised by how extreme that ruling is. but that's the ruling now. so trump is all for these cases or delayed there's no way any of the other ones happens before the election and it's going to cause him to renew his immunity motions in all four cases, and we should point out that a higher court in new york throughout the harvey weinstein conviction, not based on the belief that he was innocent, but based on the fact that the lower court judge allowed in evidence that higher court said, you're not allowed to do that, and you might have that here as well with the testimony that was given by stormy daniels there, right? that'
supreme court sitting there.ean, if they decide that some of the conversations that donald trump had with hope hicks were part of his official duties? that conviction is going to be in trouble because one thing the supreme court says today is if there is an official act, even if it's not indicted itself, you cannot use that even as evidence in a case. now that's a very extreme and i'm actually surprised by how extreme that ruling is. but that's the ruling now. so trump is all for these cases or...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
whatever is the truth on that, the supreme court said the supreme court has an official immunity in thatit back down without all the excitement we gotta go through this carefully and cautiously this is a big case for not only this president but future presidents that are going to start. ashley: it is interesting, the justice said it is a lack of factual analysis if you'd like done by the lower court when they were considering this. in other words, get your act together is what they're saying. >> that is exactly right. again when you look at the dissent he leads out the word i respectfully dissent which is almost always in these cases unless you're taking it very, very personally which obviously the three justices for the dissent, let's get beyond this let's concentrate on the good things about this country. the supreme court did the right thing here. i've always said this, politics and prosecution don't mix, we've got to get back to the core principle in terms of how we deal with these kinds of things. ashley: amen to that, thank you so much, i would have the last word to lydia hu. >> bi
whatever is the truth on that, the supreme court said the supreme court has an official immunity in thatit back down without all the excitement we gotta go through this carefully and cautiously this is a big case for not only this president but future presidents that are going to start. ashley: it is interesting, the justice said it is a lack of factual analysis if you'd like done by the lower court when they were considering this. in other words, get your act together is what they're saying....
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court to change it and make supreme court. they just hope that one of these days they'll get up there and the court will change its mind, do away with subsistence hunting and fishing rights for for those tribes. alaska, it's strange part of this political process that i was referencing earlier. absolutely. and speaking of the supreme and there's a question that came in about the 2020. mcgirt case. that's mcgirt v oklahoma and essentially the united supreme court determined that the eastern portion of oklahoma was never diminished pursuant oklahoma's the treaty rights of those particular, i think for purposes of jurisdiction. that's a land landmark case. but currently with the composition, the supreme court, what is. do you have any insight with respect to where we're going here? well. mcgirt case was really kind of a landmark case. the muskogee creek tribe prevailed, 5 to 4, 5 to 4 vote based upon principle, federal indian law that we understood very well. and that is, you know, reservation is established in it stays a reserva
supreme court to change it and make supreme court. they just hope that one of these days they'll get up there and the court will change its mind, do away with subsistence hunting and fishing rights for for those tribes. alaska, it's strange part of this political process that i was referencing earlier. absolutely. and speaking of the supreme and there's a question that came in about the 2020. mcgirt case. that's mcgirt v oklahoma and essentially the united supreme court determined that the...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the whole supreme court can't get together. they get together on one case and on the next case, they split. that should worry every democrat, independent or republican, in america, that nine justices cannot agree on the same law or the same thing. that is confusing to me. but the ruling, i agree with the ruling. if the president is in office, he should be able to do whatever. he's out, he is fair game. seems to me that the democrats and other people that don't like president trump, should just worry about the -- the people should rule on this. this shouldn't be justices doing it. this is american people, they should be the ones to pick who is going to run for president. host: robert, it was a 6-3 ruling, the three liberal justices, sticking together in their dissent to that ruling today. it is just a who led the dissent. a couple of sentences from th dissent, she wrote, today's decision to grant the former president's criminal immunity reshapes the institution of the presidency and make some moore curry of the principle that no
the whole supreme court can't get together. they get together on one case and on the next case, they split. that should worry every democrat, independent or republican, in america, that nine justices cannot agree on the same law or the same thing. that is confusing to me. but the ruling, i agree with the ruling. if the president is in office, he should be able to do whatever. he's out, he is fair game. seems to me that the democrats and other people that don't like president trump, should just...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but the supreme court's been in crisis. fdr, after he won in 1936 election and he tried to pack the supreme court, he tried to add justices to it, but he had his own party reigning them in. the problem today is the republican party is just celebrating. they have no desire to reign trump in. they want the supreme court to act in a hyperpartisan way and they're getting the goods. i use the word sad. we could get more, you know, deep wounded about it, but the reality was since they got those justices on, this has been a -- we've seen roe v. wade disappear. we have seen affirmative action disappear. we decided what they decided in the supreme court about chevron, gutting environmental laws. we're living in a time of revolution. it's a -- where the power of the presidency is gaining, and if trump wins, he could possibly, probably would have supreme court in his hip pocket, the senate in congress, and that is a frightening scenario. i don't know where one checks him at that point. >> there's that old saying, jim, don't get mad, g
but the supreme court's been in crisis. fdr, after he won in 1936 election and he tried to pack the supreme court, he tried to add justices to it, but he had his own party reigning them in. the problem today is the republican party is just celebrating. they have no desire to reign trump in. they want the supreme court to act in a hyperpartisan way and they're getting the goods. i use the word sad. we could get more, you know, deep wounded about it, but the reality was since they got those...
0
0.0
Jul 5, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives. shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. so the rules for federal elections shall be proscribed in each state by the legislature thereof. and so the republicans say this says the legislature thereof doesn't say state court. so therefore, it only means state legislatures. now, those of you with legal training know that or those of you who've dabbled in this know that sometimes texts have to be understood with reference to context. a rule that says, you know, no vehicles in the park doesn't exclude babies, strollers. you know, so
and they go to the state supreme court and they say this and the state supreme court agrees with them. so then the, losers, the republican committee brings it to the u.s. supreme court and they say, and i'm sorry, this story is long, but i think it's a helpful one for understand interpretation. and they say that state courts like the north supreme court have no business in federal elections. and the claim they make is based on the elections clause, which says the times places and manner of...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
including the supreme court.ign tool to try to energize your voters and say look, we're going to make some fundamental changes in some of these areas where you have no faith but have an enormous impact, i think it's a huge motivating factor. as i said, particularly among young voters. very quickly i want o'to amplify and uplift something maya has said. the fact he's talking at the lbj library about the civil rights act, let's think about that era of equity. right? the civil rights act, the voting rights act, the bilingual education act, title 1, head start, all of these areas of policy that affected me as a gen x-er that would have been the beneficiary of so much of that. my generation has grown up thinking that presidents could use the power of their office working with and sometimes steamrolling congress to get these things done because it mattered to who we are as a country. everything that you've seen with donald trump, with j.d. vance and project 2025 continues the backlash against so much of that. so when v
including the supreme court.ign tool to try to energize your voters and say look, we're going to make some fundamental changes in some of these areas where you have no faith but have an enormous impact, i think it's a huge motivating factor. as i said, particularly among young voters. very quickly i want o'to amplify and uplift something maya has said. the fact he's talking at the lbj library about the civil rights act, let's think about that era of equity. right? the civil rights act, the...
0
0.0
Jul 12, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court the supreme court legitimacy. since then we've seen documented cases of justices being wined and dined by billionaires. they are failing to recuse themselves in cases where their wives aren't oil their displaying instruction of flags as we have heard outside their houses. all with zero consequences but whether we like it or not the supreme court has just said is absolutely inte legitimate criss be called a corruption crisis for eight legitimacy crisis they all fit over half the country does not approve of the actions of the supreme court. that is not just mean approval oft their ruling. that is the approval of the job itself they are doing. november the supreme court tried to placate us by adopting a code of ethics but it is clear. mr. aaronson of justice violates one of their adopted ethics rules, who investigates that violation? >> is no provision in the code that provides for investigation of the justice they leave it up to themselves toea self-report. >> were the consequences and of a violation and who would e
court the supreme court legitimacy. since then we've seen documented cases of justices being wined and dined by billionaires. they are failing to recuse themselves in cases where their wives aren't oil their displaying instruction of flags as we have heard outside their houses. all with zero consequences but whether we like it or not the supreme court has just said is absolutely inte legitimate criss be called a corruption crisis for eight legitimacy crisis they all fit over half the country...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's supreme court has decreed him a king.on't know if i have ever seen you this emotional. >> yeah. it is. it's so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left thing the ruling gives the president? >> the president, like donald trump, can take a blatantly illegal act, slap the label, hey, this san official act. >> hurt a political opponent, according to this court, it doesn't matter. >> he could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue in new york and get away with it. we hopefully will not see him test that theory. >> the president can task them to assassinate somebody? >> we don't know because this thing ping-pongs back and forth, -- i don't think. jason jason unfortunately this lunacy isn't just contained to the media. justice sotomayor's dissent claims that the president can order seal team 6 to assassinate a rival. organize a military coup. and take bribes with immunity. it's one thing for the media to engage in this brazen irresponsible fear-mongering, it's another when a sitting supreme court justice is underminin
trump's supreme court has decreed him a king.on't know if i have ever seen you this emotional. >> yeah. it is. it's so scary. >> jason: what new powers does the left thing the ruling gives the president? >> the president, like donald trump, can take a blatantly illegal act, slap the label, hey, this san official act. >> hurt a political opponent, according to this court, it doesn't matter. >> he could shoot someone in the middle of fifth avenue in new york and get...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court refused to hear his case. and as ben and entered prison, were healthy, known as inmate 05 05635 he said he had no regrets i'm actually proud of what i did. >> our felt terrible if i didn't do it i don't mind going to person today kara scannell, cnn, danbury, connecticut and i said for us the, news continues to source with kaitlan. >> collins starts now say tomorrow straight from the source tonight, the supreme court giving donald trump a bigger when than even he expected, transforming the 20 hey, 24 race and the country forever with one liberal justice warning that this new ruling makes every president quote, a king above the law. >> what today's historic decision means for donald trump's criminal cases. i have new reporting and trump's attorney is also here to join me live. also, president by biden weighing in just a few moments ago i want to speech that was one watch just for much is how it was delivered. as for what was actually said coming after that disastrous debate performance that has loved democrats p
supreme court refused to hear his case. and as ben and entered prison, were healthy, known as inmate 05 05635 he said he had no regrets i'm actually proud of what i did. >> our felt terrible if i didn't do it i don't mind going to person today kara scannell, cnn, danbury, connecticut and i said for us the, news continues to source with kaitlan. >> collins starts now say tomorrow straight from the source tonight, the supreme court giving donald trump a bigger when than even he...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court delivering the long awaited ruling on donald trump's immunity. chief john roberts delivered the 6-3 decision saying the president has absolute immunity on official acts as president, but does not have immunity on private acts. this will likely head back to the lower courts where prosecutors will have to prove donald trump's actions were not made in an official capacity. elliot is back with me. elliot, thanks for staying here. i mean, trump calls it a big win for democracy, could you agree? >> it's a big win for the election strategy pushing the case back and one thing in the dissent that justices said and we don't have kings and don't want presidents sending hit squads to kill political opponents and things we see in other countries. that being said, the concept of presidential immunity is important because all presidents, republican, democrat, conservative and liberal, they make decisions that impact people's lives and make decisions that cause life and death in some cases and a president authorizes a drone strike or sends troops into war, all p
supreme court delivering the long awaited ruling on donald trump's immunity. chief john roberts delivered the 6-3 decision saying the president has absolute immunity on official acts as president, but does not have immunity on private acts. this will likely head back to the lower courts where prosecutors will have to prove donald trump's actions were not made in an official capacity. elliot is back with me. elliot, thanks for staying here. i mean, trump calls it a big win for democracy, could...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump and the supreme court.s is a tremendously unfortunate ruling and one as to which i was shocked. >> yeah, i think so many of us during our lifetimes have come to expect so much of the court because we saw the court deliver in circumstances that approved the court's integrity. the republican president richard nixon proved the supreme court's integrity, and now former republican president donald trump has disproved it. andrew, without the supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight as we are. >> yeah, we talked about it of air and in many ways this decision could have quietly -- the entire logic of the nixon tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court that anything that is within a very expensive view of the core functions or the take care clause of the constitution is completely and 100% absolutely immune. and then, even another official acts, there's a strong presumption with the court sets out a very difficult test to allow the governm
trump and the supreme court.s is a tremendously unfortunate ruling and one as to which i was shocked. >> yeah, i think so many of us during our lifetimes have come to expect so much of the court because we saw the court deliver in circumstances that approved the court's integrity. the republican president richard nixon proved the supreme court's integrity, and now former republican president donald trump has disproved it. andrew, without the supreme court decision in the nixon case, we...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
president, richard nixon, proved the supreme court's integrity. now the former republican president, donald trump, has disproved it. without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight as we are. >> look. we talked about this off air. in many ways this decision kind of quietly talks about the logic of this tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court that anything that is within a very expansive view of the core functions or the take care clause of the constitution is completely and 100% absolutely immune. even other official acts, there is a strong presumption where the court sets out a very difficult test to allow the government to go forward. but let me make sure people understand, with respect to that court function what the court said, it is absolutely immune, they say one of the things within that court function is the communications and directions of the president and the department of justice. they do say that when the president orders sham prosecutions, he can do
president, richard nixon, proved the supreme court's integrity. now the former republican president, donald trump, has disproved it. without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight as we are. >> look. we talked about this off air. in many ways this decision kind of quietly talks about the logic of this tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court that anything that is within a very expansive view of the core...
0
0.0
Jul 29, 2024
07/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so why does the supreme court stay out of that, just because they're the supreme court, we'll see whetheristory will allow it or not. >> all right. we got to go. but i just want to ask you right now, because it seems like public opinion and trust in the supreme court as an institution may be at an all time low. why is that dangerous for us as a society, as a democracy? >> well, the truth is, we need a court. and the constitution says there shall be a supreme court, but we need a court to settle issues where the country is divided on very major legal questions. not everything is a legal question. homelessness is not a legal question. it's a societal question. but we need a court that can finally decide these things to have that court not be respected by the people endangers the power of its rulings, and we want a court whose, authority is unquestioned if we trust its process right now, the trust of the process is pretty low. >> all right. we'll see what happens here. uc law, san francisco professor rory little, thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> up next, the days of a perfectly mani
so why does the supreme court stay out of that, just because they're the supreme court, we'll see whetheristory will allow it or not. >> all right. we got to go. but i just want to ask you right now, because it seems like public opinion and trust in the supreme court as an institution may be at an all time low. why is that dangerous for us as a society, as a democracy? >> well, the truth is, we need a court. and the constitution says there shall be a supreme court, but we need a...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump and the supreme court. so this is a tremendously unfortunate ruling. so many of us, during our lifetimes, have come to expect so much of the court because we saw the court deliver in circumstances that proved the court's integrity. the republican president, richard nixon proved the supreme court's integrity and now former republican president, donald trump, has disproved a. andrew, that, without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight, as we are. >> yeah, look, we talked about off air, in many ways, his decision, quietly pushes the entire logic of the nixon tapes case because you have this broad recognition by the supreme court that anything that is within a very expensive view of the court functions or the take care clause of the constitution is completely and 100% absolutely immune. and when even other official acts, there is a strong presumption when the court set out a very difficult test to allow it to go forward. let me just make sure people understand with respect to the core function when th
trump and the supreme court. so this is a tremendously unfortunate ruling. so many of us, during our lifetimes, have come to expect so much of the court because we saw the court deliver in circumstances that proved the court's integrity. the republican president, richard nixon proved the supreme court's integrity and now former republican president, donald trump, has disproved a. andrew, that, without that supreme court decision in the nixon case, we wouldn't be sitting here so stunned tonight,...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
circuit court of appeals in part because of his frustrations with the current supreme court. he says the court, quote, seem to hold in the low regard the principles to which he dedicated his life. it turned into something he could barely recognize. i would like to david tatel, he served for three decades on the federal bench. his new book, vision, and memoir of blindness and justice is out now. thank you so much for being here. i want to start picketing your reaction to this immunity ruling. what do you make of this decision, sir? >> in my book, i say in a chapter about the supreme court's is a ration of the voting rights act. at the end of the chapter, i say, quote, i fear for our democracy. today, i fear for it even more. i had exactly the same reaction reading this that john dean did. if this opinion had been issued in 1970, don't think president ford would've had to issue a pardon. it is not exactly clear what the parameters, limitations of this decision is, but to me the one thing that is clear, i think it's unlikely that any future former president could be held respons
circuit court of appeals in part because of his frustrations with the current supreme court. he says the court, quote, seem to hold in the low regard the principles to which he dedicated his life. it turned into something he could barely recognize. i would like to david tatel, he served for three decades on the federal bench. his new book, vision, and memoir of blindness and justice is out now. thank you so much for being here. i want to start picketing your reaction to this immunity ruling....
0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the historic us supreme court ruling on presidential immunity. welcome to by donald trump, but condemned by president joe biden. the judgment strengthens presidential power to much so say critics. what's the long term impact of this ruling? and it's timing. this is inside story, the hello and welcome to the program. i'm how much room there is, little united in the politics of the united states at present. the polarized division isn't calculated in a supreme court ruling on presidential immunity. a big win said donald trump a dangerous precedent, said president joe, by the judgment, will have profound and immediate political impact in the us, not least on the campaigning before november's presidential election, and which trump is seeking to replace bite. and the white house will be talking to our guest shortly about the supreme court decision and its legal and political implications. but 1st, this report from mike of some sharif, on a judgment, the chicken american politics of to months of indictments criminal cases and flaws . donald trump has re
of the historic us supreme court ruling on presidential immunity. welcome to by donald trump, but condemned by president joe biden. the judgment strengthens presidential power to much so say critics. what's the long term impact of this ruling? and it's timing. this is inside story, the hello and welcome to the program. i'm how much room there is, little united in the politics of the united states at present. the polarized division isn't calculated in a supreme court ruling on presidential...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court because for much of the past 70 years the, the ideological make up of the, of the 9 supreme court members. um that was more or less evenly divided with one or 2 justices acting as a swing vote. that seemed to be what was expected when it came to the make up of the supreme court after donald trump. busy became president, he filled 3 seats on that court. the balance shifted to a $63.00 majority. conservative. how has that changed the way the court works? and also the way that it is perceived? well, the way that it has has been perceived, it has been extremely negative. as everyone knows, the legitimacy of the court is very much at stake. not just because it is still lopsided in terms of appointments, but also because it will not take any action, ethically, to rule in the members of the court. and there are people who strongly believe that above just to just as a leader and just as thomas should not have been sitting on this opinion in light of the partisan expressions that they've engaged in. so the lot so i think most of the court, which really began with the failure to consider me
court because for much of the past 70 years the, the ideological make up of the, of the 9 supreme court members. um that was more or less evenly divided with one or 2 justices acting as a swing vote. that seemed to be what was expected when it came to the make up of the supreme court after donald trump. busy became president, he filled 3 seats on that court. the balance shifted to a $63.00 majority. conservative. how has that changed the way the court works? and also the way that it is...
0
0.0
Jul 30, 2024
07/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court.— supreme court.upreme court. given the political challenges ahead supreme court. given the - political challenges ahead and we've been speaking about how difficult it will be to pass and enact these, how do you view the challenges and what you do as an advocacy group? my view is you do as an advocacy group? h view is to you do as an advocacy group? m: view is to start you do as an advocacy group? m; view is to start small and these are big ticket items but i like to advocate for reforms that already exist elsewhere in the government. for example on the government. for example on the code of conduct, that already exists in the lower courts and is enforceable that a lower courtjudge, and there are 2300 in the federal system and only nine supreme court judges, so if one of those fails to hold up the ethical part of theirjob, you and i or anyone can file a complaint against thejudge and anyone can file a complaint against the judge and it will be adjudicated by a panel of their peers and there will be pu
court.— supreme court.upreme court. given the political challenges ahead supreme court. given the - political challenges ahead and we've been speaking about how difficult it will be to pass and enact these, how do you view the challenges and what you do as an advocacy group? my view is you do as an advocacy group? h view is to you do as an advocacy group? m: view is to start you do as an advocacy group? m; view is to start small and these are big ticket items but i like to advocate for...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
after the supreme court's immunity ruling, watch this. >> what you have here is the supreme court imposinginciple that we must have bold and decisive residents is more important than the principal we should have presidents to obey the law. >> almost a license to thug. you can do whatever you want ample supreme court will let you get away with it. >> if leaders can be immune from criminal acts while in office, it might be the end of our republic. >> what matters is the other guy wants to be a king and this court has said, "yes, you are the king, and we are the king's hand posed quote. together, the seven of us will roll this country. >> carley: a defense attorney, lexi, good morning to you. the democrat are reacting but what the supreme court decided yesterday is nuance. they decide that the president has absolute immunity when it comes to his constitutional authority, for prosecution for all official acts and no immunity for unofficial acts. so how do you feel about that break down when it comes to presidential powers? >> well, i'm not actually all surprised that is how it shook out. i don
after the supreme court's immunity ruling, watch this. >> what you have here is the supreme court imposinginciple that we must have bold and decisive residents is more important than the principal we should have presidents to obey the law. >> almost a license to thug. you can do whatever you want ample supreme court will let you get away with it. >> if leaders can be immune from criminal acts while in office, it might be the end of our republic. >> what matters is the...
0
0.0
Jul 25, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court reform. you know, i will keep working to ensure america remains strong, secure, and the leader of the free world. i'm the first president of this century to report to the american people that the united states is not at war anywhere in the world. we will keep rallying a coalition of proud nations to stop putin from taking over ukraine. doing more damage. we will keep nato stronger. i will make it more powerful and more united than any point in our history. i will keep doing it for our allies in the pacific. the common wisdom was china would surpass the united states when i came into office. that's not the case anymore. i will keep working to end the war in gaza. bring home all the hostages and bring peace and security to the middle east and end this war. we are also working around the clock to bring home americans being unjustly detained all around the world. you know, we have come so far since my inauguration. on that day i told you as i stood in that winter of peril and a winter of possibil
supreme court reform. you know, i will keep working to ensure america remains strong, secure, and the leader of the free world. i'm the first president of this century to report to the american people that the united states is not at war anywhere in the world. we will keep rallying a coalition of proud nations to stop putin from taking over ukraine. doing more damage. we will keep nato stronger. i will make it more powerful and more united than any point in our history. i will keep doing it for...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
one might say, okay, so the supreme court as well, supreme court has made this decision. the army must stop holding them up. do you expect me to actually stop issuing call up papers for the ocean orthodox community and what all the penalties for refusal? i think they will have to start the quarters after them to do this, but they will probably do it in smaller numbers and the army is also prepare just right now, taking over like about 60 to 70000 people because this is about the number of students to whom this old occurs and there might be much smaller numbers, at least in the beginning. and you have to see that multiple of those people now freed from all me. so these are really see, think the whole day, i'm learning colorado, they're all kind of a so called group out. you see books, the which p a schools where people seats who don't learn that much, but the alternatives don't want to get over to the army because of this year of the secularization as simulation and very have a number of flights from 9 to 10000 people. who might easier be drafted because the argument of th
one might say, okay, so the supreme court as well, supreme court has made this decision. the army must stop holding them up. do you expect me to actually stop issuing call up papers for the ocean orthodox community and what all the penalties for refusal? i think they will have to start the quarters after them to do this, but they will probably do it in smaller numbers and the army is also prepare just right now, taking over like about 60 to 70000 people because this is about the number of...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amy: the supreme court rules for the first time in u.s. history that presidents have brought immunity to prosecution stop really all that ends prospects donald trump could be tried before the november election on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election. the 63 decision by the court's conservative majority included the three justices appointed by trump. in a scathing dissent, justice sonia sotomayor said, "the president is now a king above the law." we will get response. and 64 years ago this week, patrice lumumba gave an historic speech to mark congo's independence from belgium. >> we shall eradicate and ensure for everyone the fitting this humidity -- humanity. amy: we will speak with vijay prashad, director of social research. he also recently visited were not intellectual noam chomsky in brazil. noam had a stroke last year. resilient president lula also stopped by. all of that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. the united states supreme court ruled monday
amy: the supreme court rules for the first time in u.s. history that presidents have brought immunity to prosecution stop really all that ends prospects donald trump could be tried before the november election on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election. the 63 decision by the court's conservative majority included the three justices appointed by trump. in a scathing dissent, justice sonia sotomayor said, "the president is now a king above the law." we will get response. and...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the former president responded saying the supreme court dismantled charges against me.dogs, oucountry should be focused on rightne■fdemocrats lr writing court enables the former president to weaken democracy by breaking the lawsuggesting political influene trumps all. cory booker posting no law.ing e lower court to determine when and whether the former president will go to trial. ♪>> c-span is funded by these companies and more -- bad♪ buckeye broadband supports c-span as a publicervice, along with these other television providers, even you a front row seat to democracy. >> an advisor to former president trump, steve bannon spoke before rproud to go to prison before calling himself a political prisoner. he was sentenced in october 2022 after being found guilty of from the house select committee. this is abt
the former president responded saying the supreme court dismantled charges against me.dogs, oucountry should be focused on rightne■fdemocrats lr writing court enables the former president to weaken democracy by breaking the lawsuggesting political influene trumps all. cory booker posting no law.ing e lower court to determine when and whether the former president will go to trial. ♪>> c-span is funded by these companies and more -- bad♪ buckeye broadband supports c-span as a...
0
0.0
Jul 4, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court flipped the constitution and turned it upside down. do we want a court to have a clarence thomas in every federal court across the country, every u.s. prosecutor and every district across the country is going to be from the federalist society? do we recognize what would happen to our country if we do that? and we're sitting here thinking the biggest threat i saw the other night at the debate was that trump was re-creating covid, re-creating the economy, re-creating climate, re-creating his tax cut without any pushback at all. he's shape shifting people's minds because we're not pushing pack. we can't do that for the next four months. we'll get destroyed. and so i hope members of congress step up. i hope this letter that people are talking about, i hope they send it and really let the white house know what's at stake here for their own personal careers but the potential, you know, for our own democracy here that we're also concerned about. >> former congressman tim ryan with an impassioned argument for the vice president going to the to
the supreme court flipped the constitution and turned it upside down. do we want a court to have a clarence thomas in every federal court across the country, every u.s. prosecutor and every district across the country is going to be from the federalist society? do we recognize what would happen to our country if we do that? and we're sitting here thinking the biggest threat i saw the other night at the debate was that trump was re-creating covid, re-creating the economy, re-creating climate,...
4
4.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 4
favorite 0
quote 3
i think the supreme court is anything but supreme.ony, you are talking about your family member that had dementia. i feel for you. you are in education. in lesser education was in a medical field i would stay in your lane and try not to make diagnosis by what you see on tv or what you hear from other people. it is not fair to him and fair to other people that have the disease. my question is did donald trump lose the 2020 election? guest: yes, he lost the 2020 election. i have a background in biological education. as to the dementia, i am referencing his age -- is paid which leaked the president's -- his aid that leaked the president's condition. host: are you saying they set his been diagnosed with dementia? guest: i said they said he has shown dementia behavior. given the president's availability between 10:00 and 4:00, giving his inability to maintain direct focus, giving his inability to maintain straight lines that are common in almost every single case of dementia we see in the public life, both in the public sphere as far as th
i think the supreme court is anything but supreme.ony, you are talking about your family member that had dementia. i feel for you. you are in education. in lesser education was in a medical field i would stay in your lane and try not to make diagnosis by what you see on tv or what you hear from other people. it is not fair to him and fair to other people that have the disease. my question is did donald trump lose the 2020 election? guest: yes, he lost the 2020 election. i have a background in...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he obeyed supreme court rules. his first one-on-one interview with ach with abc news, friday and confirming that hunter biden sat in on at least one meeting with the president and his top aides, in preparation for the speech, you saw last night, confirmation that she said, we'll see more family members around the white house because it say holiday week. larry: edward lawrence thank you. >> so, joining me now north dakota governor doug burgum, welcome back. we appreciate it. you know, this issue mr. biden's performance at debate was so bad, and last night, he read the teleprompter for 4 and a half minutes and shuffled away, u.s. military bases in europe are on high alert for possible terrorist threats, my question to you, is now mr. biden a national security risk because he looks so weak and if you will, almost ill, is he a security risk, sir? >> absolutely, he is a security risk. biden is for america and on multiple levels, one is as was just said, not just america that can't unsee what mae saw last thursday night.
he obeyed supreme court rules. his first one-on-one interview with ach with abc news, friday and confirming that hunter biden sat in on at least one meeting with the president and his top aides, in preparation for the speech, you saw last night, confirmation that she said, we'll see more family members around the white house because it say holiday week. larry: edward lawrence thank you. >> so, joining me now north dakota governor doug burgum, welcome back. we appreciate it. you know, this...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's what the supreme court said.ry: it is time to look at that stuff because it runs rampant, right? you can't keep using this as a weapon. it may be illegal, certainly it violates due process. certainly seems like it violates due process. i mean if judge cannon does rule on this it would be a good thing once and for all because you can't keep having special counsels, special counsels. it is crazy. >> they will go absolutely crazy if she actually goes through that direction. it will go through appellate process t will work its way up. when you really look at the jack smith issue we have to look at the joe biden issue. he is in charge of the doj he continually denies his involvement in various prosecutions related to donald trump but he is in charge. he sends those messages from the podium like yesterday, keep on pushing against donald trump. larry: i watched it. four 1/2 minutes off the teleprompter, then he shuffled his way out. wasn't much to me. thanks gentlemen. leo terrell. andrew cherkasky, thanks very much. co
that's what the supreme court said.ry: it is time to look at that stuff because it runs rampant, right? you can't keep using this as a weapon. it may be illegal, certainly it violates due process. certainly seems like it violates due process. i mean if judge cannon does rule on this it would be a good thing once and for all because you can't keep having special counsels, special counsels. it is crazy. >> they will go absolutely crazy if she actually goes through that direction. it will go...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court.rvard case will be the seventh case. patience, patience. none of these happened overnight. thanks for tolerating me through all of that. it's been a busy 40 years. nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid for twice as long as pepcid. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day. choose acid prevention. choose nexium. every day, more dog people, and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. they're quitting the kibble. and kicking the cans. and feeding their dogs dog food that's actually well, food. developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door. it's smarter, healthier pet food. get 50% off your first box at thefarmersdog.com/realfood my fear of recurrence could've held me back. but i'm staying focused. and doing more to prevent recurrence. verzenio is specifically for hr-positive, her2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer with a high chance of returning, as determ
supreme court.rvard case will be the seventh case. patience, patience. none of these happened overnight. thanks for tolerating me through all of that. it's been a busy 40 years. nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid for twice as long as pepcid. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day. choose acid prevention. choose nexium. every day, more dog people, and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. they're quitting the kibble. and kicking...
0
0.0
Jul 1, 2024
07/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he wants to add members to the supreme court. he wants to do other things to the supreme court. he does not believe in separation of powers. this is about separation of powers. which branch has the power to do what. that's the core of our republic. separation of powers. it goes back to the federalist papers. these justices in what i consider a brilliant decision helped protect the republic today and the american people should understand we are only at this point because biden, the attorney general, his outrageous unconstitutional choice for prosecutor and the democrat party -- i'm saying this because i believe it -- do not like the constitution, whether it's dei or crt or pulling our monuments down. this court had a job to do and they did it today. and they deserve our praise for doing it. >> sandra: mark levine, great to have you on the program and thank you for jumping on the phone with us. the white house and biden campaign today responding to the supreme court's landmark ruling. we're live at the white house with that for us. what do you hear? >> good afternoon. the biden ca
he wants to add members to the supreme court. he wants to do other things to the supreme court. he does not believe in separation of powers. this is about separation of powers. which branch has the power to do what. that's the core of our republic. separation of powers. it goes back to the federalist papers. these justices in what i consider a brilliant decision helped protect the republic today and the american people should understand we are only at this point because biden, the attorney...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
how much trust does the us public have in the supreme court right now? and how does that compare to the past? i, you know, i think right now people see the chords as a partisan court. they don't see it as an independent court. far too many people assume that because there is a conservative majority on the court that there will be conservative. i. j, a triumph of decision making and that is not how people used to see the court. so i think there isn't, there are an erosion of trust in the assumption of partisan polarized politics affecting this court. but i think again, you know, one of the big points that i think we need to remember is that the court cannot be forever out of stuff with the american electra, the, the united states. is that an a phenomenal period right now running up to these highly consequential elections. but if you look at the direction of travel amongst younger voters in the united states, amongst younger americans, they are more progressive. they care about things like climate change. they care about democracy, they care about rights.
how much trust does the us public have in the supreme court right now? and how does that compare to the past? i, you know, i think right now people see the chords as a partisan court. they don't see it as an independent court. far too many people assume that because there is a conservative majority on the court that there will be conservative. i. j, a triumph of decision making and that is not how people used to see the court. so i think there isn't, there are an erosion of trust in the...
0
0.0
Jul 3, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court historical society. i actually stand in this room with some frequency, but i'm usually face in that direction, so it's a nice change of pace actually to be looking at. now there i am asked to remind everyone, please turn off all cell phones, tablets, apple wa
the supreme court historical society. i actually stand in this room with some frequency, but i'm usually face in that direction, so it's a nice change of pace actually to be looking at. now there i am asked to remind everyone, please turn off all cell phones, tablets, apple wa
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's what we argued before the supreme court. the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw in 2020 with the fake slates of electors. but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you. thank you. >> that does not surprise me at all. thank you very much. well, and here with me now, a former federal prosecutor who was inside the supreme court today, shan wu, also cnn senior legal analyst and former dissent us attorney elie honig, as well as cnn senior law enforcement analysts and the former fbi deputy director andrew mccabe. great to have you all here. le let me start with you because on this new reporting tonight of how this decision here in washington has already extending and having its impact felt new york, you predicted thi
that's what we argued before the supreme court. the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw in 2020 with the fake slates of electors. but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with...
0
0.0
Jul 16, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
happens at the supreme court. >> anyway. it is a challenging time to be a judging, i would say. is there anything, i don't know if you have any former clerks, you are so younger, if you have any former clerks becoming court of appeal judges. whato would you say to him or her about how to be your self, don't be afraid to advocate for what you think is right but be a good colleague you can't be a one person show on a three person court or a 16 member court. ct. . what would the advice be? >>>> i don't think of them as tension with each other. you can be a good and strong judge and also be a good colleague and that is part of being a good and strong judge. i think people make different decisions and have different perspectives on my court anyway about something you write separately. i am a little bit of an institutionalist so i don't write separately or that often. i write distants when i need to write a descendent and i hope i write strong and powerful dissents and i view that as an important part of what i do. a really import
happens at the supreme court. >> anyway. it is a challenging time to be a judging, i would say. is there anything, i don't know if you have any former clerks, you are so younger, if you have any former clerks becoming court of appeal judges. whato would you say to him or her about how to be your self, don't be afraid to advocate for what you think is right but be a good colleague you can't be a one person show on a three person court or a 16 member court. ct. . what would the advice be?...
0
0.0
Jul 6, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court is the control conservative controlled supreme court is 100% involved in a massive powerrying to do is remake the rules on america democracy so that unelected, unaccountable judges hold all the power and the voters hold none, even in the immunity decision. and i know immunity, it is giving, creating the presidency as an office of king, giving extreme power to the executive, but think carefully about what the court actually did their peer they try to separate out the difference between artificial and official acts. they did not give guidance about what those acts may be. they did not give any guidance so that we, the people, might understand the difference between official and unofficial acts. they just said, yeah, there is probably a difference, but everything trump date was most likely official. but what does that mean? that means going forward, the only people who know whether or not a president is able to commit crimes is not the president, it is the supreme court. with the chevron case, as we saw, the only people that know what regulations we are allowed and not allow
supreme court is the control conservative controlled supreme court is 100% involved in a massive powerrying to do is remake the rules on america democracy so that unelected, unaccountable judges hold all the power and the voters hold none, even in the immunity decision. and i know immunity, it is giving, creating the presidency as an office of king, giving extreme power to the executive, but think carefully about what the court actually did their peer they try to separate out the difference...
0
0.0
Jul 7, 2024
07/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices.have nine unelected supreme court comef the supreme court come along and some decide they disagreethey are engaged in theses whery parsing finally -- just as thomas put pictures in his -- justice thom put his-n his opinion because he wanted to try to explain that in his expert opinion a bump stock is not a machine gun. un federal law. ofdical expertise, scientific expertise, of professionalism within agencies. alan: you mentioned the expertis i found interesting isa lot of the health sector' very nervous about as well not just on but uncertainty and timing. i wonder if any of you couldente courts in inserting themssve processes by which some of these decisions are made. >> it's believed if the chevron congre treupbaway that would introduce a lot more uncertainty for agencies and thein: the reag process by which a rule, througt lo as the agency followed the procedures and did its rulemaking, then because of ch deference, any permissible or reasonable construction of the statute or authority woul stand. what this does is basically opens up, becausef a second-guessing, the opportunite
justices.have nine unelected supreme court comef the supreme court come along and some decide they disagreethey are engaged in theses whery parsing finally -- just as thomas put pictures in his -- justice thom put his-n his opinion because he wanted to try to explain that in his expert opinion a bump stock is not a machine gun. un federal law. ofdical expertise, scientific expertise, of professionalism within agencies. alan: you mentioned the expertis i found interesting isa lot of the health...
0
0.0
Jul 13, 2024
07/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, they can add to the size of the supreme court. in addition to adding justices to me it is often proposed that justices be subjected to term limits, usually 18 years. there will always be nine justices on the supreme court, but the turnover would be regularized. the challenge is, it is not clear that could happen without the constitutional amendment. those are again subject to the supreme court's own review about the constitutionality of that statute. the expansion of the supreme court is a viable option. it is not clear whether or not it can be achieved politically. even if it could, whether it would complete the expansion. jeff, you made that point in the past as well. how do you know it goes from nine, 13, 127, whatever the case is. you know a lot about other places and how they work. if we were to just say, how are supreme court, what should it look like, whether composition, term limits, at the guidelines compared to best practices around the world, is that a fair question? point to it and say, here is how other countries do a
, they can add to the size of the supreme court. in addition to adding justices to me it is often proposed that justices be subjected to term limits, usually 18 years. there will always be nine justices on the supreme court, but the turnover would be regularized. the challenge is, it is not clear that could happen without the constitutional amendment. those are again subject to the supreme court's own review about the constitutionality of that statute. the expansion of the supreme court is a...
0
0.0
Jul 2, 2024
07/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's what we argued before the supreme court. the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw 2020 with the fake slates of electors, but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you. thank you. >> that does not surprise me at all. thank you very much. well, and here with me now, a former federal prosecutor who was inside the supreme court today, shan wu also cnn senior legal analyst and former assistant us attorney elie honig, as well i'll see you didn't senior law enforcement analysts and the former fbi deputy director andrew mccabe. great to have you all here. le let me start with you because on this new reporting tonight of how this decision here in washington has already extending and having its impact felt new york, you pr
that's what we argued before the supreme court. the supreme court has reserved that issue for determination by the district court. and we'll see how arguments fall in front of the district court. yeah. we've walked through those historical references here before. none of them compared to what we saw 2020 with the fake slates of electors, but will scharf great to have your reaction to this. thank you for joining us tonight. >> i would disagree with that, katelyn, but great to be with you....