0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after the resignation of the supreme courtdge roman ignatov on march 27 at his own request. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the supreme court of appeals is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian and three foreign judges. experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17. it has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial body. dependency and professionalism of judges and prosecutors consists of persons, ten are elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two are appointed by the president, two are elected by th
the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after the resignation of the supreme courtdge roman ignatov on march 27 at his own request. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the supreme court of appeals is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian and three foreign judges. experts in the field of law. foreign experts...
0
0.0
Jun 15, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after a member of the supreme court of appeals, judge roman ignatov of the kyiv court of appeals, voluntarily resigned on march 27. he hugged. held the post of chairman of the central committee of the people's republic of china. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the supreme court of ukraine is carried out by a competitive commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice is still working tirelessly composition out of 21 participants, the vrp currently has 17. it has a quorum and its selection. members continues. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial body. the independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors consists of persons, ten of whom are elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two are appointed by t
the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after a member of the supreme court of appeals, judge roman ignatov of the kyiv court of appeals, voluntarily resigned on march 27. he hugged. held the post of chairman of the central committee of the people's republic of china. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the supreme court of ukraine is carried out by a competitive commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
judge roman ignatov of the kyiv court of appeals is the judge of the supreme court of appeals according to the judicial quota. he held the position of the head of the vkk. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by the competition commission in composed of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. the supreme council of justice, renewed in 2022 as part of the judicial reform, still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17. it has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial body, the independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors, consists of ten persons elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two appointed by the president, two elected by the verkhovna rada, two more by the congress of lawyers, two delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors, an
judge roman ignatov of the kyiv court of appeals is the judge of the supreme court of appeals according to the judicial quota. he held the position of the head of the vkk. the competition is ongoing. the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by the competition commission in composed of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. the supreme council of justice, renewed in 2022 as part of...
0
0.0
Jun 8, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court meaning the full court of appeals in d.c.nd/or the united states supreme court. as a i said in the courtroom, this is an issue that legal scholars have said from day one is a case that has to go before the united states supreme court. the case of 1961, and this judge found earlier in this case cannot be reconciled with either the traditional notion of willfulness in the criminal law or the modern definition. there have been a number of cases just in the last few years that have fleshed this out and made clear that in this country we don't send anyone to prison if they believed that they were doing something that complied with the law. in other words, when justice alito and justice thomas said in 2019 where congress wants to require proof that a criminal defendant knew his conduct was illegal, it specified that the violation must be willful. in the context of this statute, a misdemeanor contempt of congress differs from every single other statute in our jurisprudence. the court found that willful, in 1961 the court found that
court meaning the full court of appeals in d.c.nd/or the united states supreme court. as a i said in the courtroom, this is an issue that legal scholars have said from day one is a case that has to go before the united states supreme court. the case of 1961, and this judge found earlier in this case cannot be reconciled with either the traditional notion of willfulness in the criminal law or the modern definition. there have been a number of cases just in the last few years that have fleshed...
0
0.0
Jun 20, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the trump administration went to the supreme court, asked them to intervene■ç before any court of appealsrt did that in order to allow the trump administration to execute one of the federal prisoners. here, the special counsel says, look, we know this case is going to get to the supreme court. why not just do it and they refused to do so. >> the last sort of context here, the fact about the world is that samuel alito and clarence thomas are conservatives. they would like to retire under a republican president. i think we all know that. there are 74 and 75, i believe, respectively it would be a big difference in their lives, personally if donald trump is elected. in the realist sense of what are you going to do with the last part of your golden years, that is something that is just clearly the case for both of those men. i'm not saying it affects their decisions. i'm just saying that is a thing that is out there in the world. that hangs over all of us. >> that is absolutely right. and in the recently secretly recorded between the alito's and the journalist, this is alito basically suggeste
the trump administration went to the supreme court, asked them to intervene■ç before any court of appealsrt did that in order to allow the trump administration to execute one of the federal prisoners. here, the special counsel says, look, we know this case is going to get to the supreme court. why not just do it and they refused to do so. >> the last sort of context here, the fact about the world is that samuel alito and clarence thomas are conservatives. they would like to retire...
0
0.0
Jun 20, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the trump administration went to the supreme court and asked them to intervene before the court of appeals weighed in and the supreme court did that to allow the trump administration to execute one of the prisoners. here the special counsel's as we know it will get to the supreme court, why not just do it? and they refused to do so. >> effect about the world is that samuel alito and clarence thomas are conservatives. they would like to retire under a republican president. they are 74 and 75 respectively and there would be a big difference in their lives, personally if donald trump was elected or not. in the realist sense of what are you going to do with the last part of your golden years, that is something that is clearly the case for both of those men. i'm not saying it affects their decision, i'm just saying that it is a thing out in the world that hangs over them. >> that is absolutely right and the recent secretly recorded conversation, mrs. alito suggested that once justice alito was off the court to get fly whatever flag she wanted . so it seems there are multiple benefits. where he
the trump administration went to the supreme court and asked them to intervene before the court of appeals weighed in and the supreme court did that to allow the trump administration to execute one of the prisoners. here the special counsel's as we know it will get to the supreme court, why not just do it? and they refused to do so. >> effect about the world is that samuel alito and clarence thomas are conservatives. they would like to retire under a republican president. they are 74 and...
0
0.0
Jun 29, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of appeal, the supreme court of cassation... about the extension the activities of the derzhkino councilitimate, in fact, this legal path was taken about a year ago, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the terzhkino council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members, andriy artem kolyubayev, who is... a business partner of andriy yermak , that is , such people, well yes, absolutely, well, if , in general, these people should have simply left in the 23rd year, and instead of them should have been at the transparent competition, they cannot do it twice, if there is such a big, big nuance, they cannot by law hold office twice and obviously it has become a problem for them or for people whose interests they represent... now the community has consolidated, i think it is the first time in recent years that very different productions, which were still there, i don't know, a few years ago, competed with each other , united in reaching a kind of fair social contract, which will make it possible to restore trust in the institution, and secondly, to promote the develop
of appeal, the supreme court of cassation... about the extension the activities of the derzhkino councilitimate, in fact, this legal path was taken about a year ago, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the terzhkino council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members, andriy artem kolyubayev, who is... a business partner of andriy yermak , that is , such people, well yes, absolutely, well, if , in general, these people should have simply left in the 23rd year, and...
0
0.0
Jun 29, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of appeal, the supreme court of cassation, and finally the supreme court of cassation, the supreme courtt the decision to extend the activities of the state cinema council . it is illegitimate, actually , this legal path took about a year, which we are now seeing at one of the meetings of the derzhkino council, where we saw we could to see yuriy gurbanov - this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business partner of andriy yermak, that is, such people, yes, absolutely , if in general, these people should have just left in the 23rd year. and instead of them , there should have been a transparent competition, they cannot be there twice , if there is such a big, big nuance, they cannot by law be in positions twice , and obviously this has become a problem for them or for the people whose interests they represent, now the community has consolidated, to me it seems that this is the first time in recent years that when very different productions, which i don't know yet, competed with each other a few years ago. united in reaching some kind of fair social contract, which w
of appeal, the supreme court of cassation, and finally the supreme court of cassation, the supreme courtt the decision to extend the activities of the state cinema council . it is illegitimate, actually , this legal path took about a year, which we are now seeing at one of the meetings of the derzhkino council, where we saw we could to see yuriy gurbanov - this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business partner of andriy yermak, that is, such people, yes, absolutely , if...
0
0.0
Jun 30, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the virginia court of appeals, respond did with its own opinion, essentially telling the supreme court to -- out that you don't have authority to tell us what to do. this the property claim we're sovereign over state property law. you don't have any authority. okay. so this presented a very direct challenge to the supreme authority. marshall was recused because his brother owned some property that was affected by the decision. so washington then was acting chief justice. okay, so what did he do? okay. first he put the case down for expedited argument, kind of, i guess the rocket docket or emergency docket of the day and then he doesn't assign the opinion himself. he assigns it to just a story. who writes probably his most famous supreme court opinion, rejecting the virginia court of appeals decision. okay. well, why why did he give it to story? why didn't he take it for himself? because if he had well, we'd all people would know him better, because he would have written this famous supreme court opinion. well, first of all, just the story had written the original opinion. so there was
the virginia court of appeals, respond did with its own opinion, essentially telling the supreme court to -- out that you don't have authority to tell us what to do. this the property claim we're sovereign over state property law. you don't have any authority. okay. so this presented a very direct challenge to the supreme authority. marshall was recused because his brother owned some property that was affected by the decision. so washington then was acting chief justice. okay, so what did he...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
appeals, doing trials, because that's most of supreme court justices did in this.uch. they would■k frequently write to each other. and marshall in washington wrote to eacher, hey, i have this difficult issue in this. what's your opinion or have this difficult issue? has it ever come before? and if so, what did you do? so if that kind of or excnge going on with respect to circuit opinions. one has to imagine that in person that also was going on with supreme court opinions. maybe we'll find some definite proof of that someday. i hope so. i'm let's comeo ki marshall co? like what is the marshall court and why do i say that? this is a john marshall bushrod washington collaboration. okay. first, you know what makes the marshall distinctive? one thing is that they all lived together in an session they all eight together drank cussed the cases over dinner together. right. and a lot of people believe that helps to explain how they achieved a high degree of consent to this and unanimity in decisions it was just and convivial and that lent itself to ironing out disagreement
appeals, doing trials, because that's most of supreme court justices did in this.uch. they would■k frequently write to each other. and marshall in washington wrote to eacher, hey, i have this difficult issue in this. what's your opinion or have this difficult issue? has it ever come before? and if so, what did you do? so if that kind of or excnge going on with respect to circuit opinions. one has to imagine that in person that also was going on with supreme court opinions. maybe we'll find...
0
0.0
Jun 25, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
circuit court of appeals which will get appealed to the supreme so maybe if we are lucky this time nextr or court actually tell us whether or not donald trump can be brought to trial but that is kind of like the ultimate delay tactic. vobviously they could. i don't think they will, but they.dou 6-3, republican vs. democrats that trump is immune from everything republican presidents and i don't think that the supretic presidents to think that theyt'. i don't thth do that. and of course, there's the third would be to say that of course donald trump is not immuneutione president is not above the law, we live in a country of laws. that is what the d.c. circuits says. that is the right, but i have very little confideurt supt will reach the right answer. host: collars, if you want to call and ask questions of our guest, (202) 748-8001 for republicans. (202) 748-8000 free democrats. (202) 748-8002. parallel to that, mr. the january 6 obstruction charges,and could that relate te former president as well? guest:hiteresting case legally. his ability to win that is truly just based on policy. the
circuit court of appeals which will get appealed to the supreme so maybe if we are lucky this time nextr or court actually tell us whether or not donald trump can be brought to trial but that is kind of like the ultimate delay tactic. vobviously they could. i don't think they will, but they.dou 6-3, republican vs. democrats that trump is immune from everything republican presidents and i don't think that the supretic presidents to think that theyt'. i don't thth do that. and of course, there's...
0
0.0
Jun 3, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is nothing prohibiting the supreme court from actually hearing an appeal now. legal team would have to request that the court hears such an appeal. it is, of course, nothing we've ever seen before but nothing is restricting it's because the supreme court has absolute jurisdiction over matters of national importance and in this is not a matter of national importance, what is? this is the presumptive republican candidates now moving forward towards a possible sentencing when he is trying to campaign for a november election. >> neil: let's switch to hunter biden in that case. the more i think of what hunter is facing now possibly if he's guilty of these charges, 20 plus years in jail at unlikely grant you. but it does bring you back to that the below is almost signed, sealed and delivered until the judge unattempted well, that won't change the world and it? >> it was an example i think of hunter being too greedy trying to get too much in a plea bargain. i really don't know why they are going to trial. hunter should settle this case and it probably would involve so
there is nothing prohibiting the supreme court from actually hearing an appeal now. legal team would have to request that the court hears such an appeal. it is, of course, nothing we've ever seen before but nothing is restricting it's because the supreme court has absolute jurisdiction over matters of national importance and in this is not a matter of national importance, what is? this is the presumptive republican candidates now moving forward towards a possible sentencing when he is trying to...
0
0.0
Jun 3, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 2
some have suggested you can appeal straight to the supreme court because of the special nature of this case. when it comes to the legal maze that you are still facing and the judge could decide to say hey, house arrest, or even jail. how do you face what that could look like? >> i'm okay with it. i saw one of my lawyers the other day on television saying oh no, you don't want to do that to the president. don't beg for anything. just the way it is. think of it. they have all my books. they went to -- four five years they sued me getting my tax returns, right? at the end of five years, they got them. the supreme court actually gave it to them. that was the end of it. that was it. they never found anything. >> rachel: some of your supporters have said well, the only way to stop this is mutually assured destruction. if you do it to us, we're going to do it to you. you said no my revenge is going to be success for america. you've just had this verdict. do you still feel the same? what's your thoughts on that? >> it's a really tough question in one way because these are bad people. these peo
some have suggested you can appeal straight to the supreme court because of the special nature of this case. when it comes to the legal maze that you are still facing and the judge could decide to say hey, house arrest, or even jail. how do you face what that could look like? >> i'm okay with it. i saw one of my lawyers the other day on television saying oh no, you don't want to do that to the president. don't beg for anything. just the way it is. think of it. they have all my books. they...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so the supreme court got lots of appeals up to it, and it's now resolving a case that involves federal prohibition on firearm possession for anyone who would have been subject to a domestic violence restraining order. now, that's not at issue in the hunter biden case, but it's another provision of federal firearms that prohibits gun possession if someone is an unlawful drug user or addict and the test for historical analogue comes into play in both situations. the federal government is urging the supreme court to rule. and this could happen as soon as tomorrow and i'll explain a little bit that the timing second boras. but the federal government is urging the supreme court to rule that when lower court judges and when the supreme court itself looks at a monitoring gun prohibition, and it's trying to compare it to some sort of historical tradition to look more broadly, to look at is this something that is aimed? dad people who would be dangerous to society? it doesn't have to be a complete match to something that might have existed back in the late 1700s, early 1800s. so this is a reall
so the supreme court got lots of appeals up to it, and it's now resolving a case that involves federal prohibition on firearm possession for anyone who would have been subject to a domestic violence restraining order. now, that's not at issue in the hunter biden case, but it's another provision of federal firearms that prohibits gun possession if someone is an unlawful drug user or addict and the test for historical analogue comes into play in both situations. the federal government is urging...
0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is called court of appeals. you need a federal constitutional issue or another reason to get to the supreme court. >> is the immunity issue that? is he was not president during the things he was alleged to have done. >> he was when he wrote the checks to reimburse michael cohen. but to the extent -- the immunity issue could potentially affect all of these cases. it's not likely to affect this case. and we don't know what the supreme court will say on that case which is pending and has to come out in the next few weeks. all i can tell you is that i don't think either side will get exactly what they want. i don't think federal prosecutors will say there's no such thing as presidential immunity and i don't think the trump slide will get a decision that everything a president does that he's immune from prosecution. the supreme court said, it is a decision for the ages. they have to decide what the contours are of presidential immunity. that has nothing to do with this conviction procedurally. it will be appeal direc
is called court of appeals. you need a federal constitutional issue or another reason to get to the supreme court. >> is the immunity issue that? is he was not president during the things he was alleged to have done. >> he was when he wrote the checks to reimburse michael cohen. but to the extent -- the immunity issue could potentially affect all of these cases. it's not likely to affect this case. and we don't know what the supreme court will say on that case which is pending and...
0
0.0
Jun 2, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
someone suggested you could appeal straight to the supreme court because of the special nature of this comes to the -- [inaudible] and a judge could decide to say, hey, house arrest or even jail. >> i'm okay with it. if i saw one of my lawyers the other dayen on television all in all, you don't want to do that to the -- you don't beg for anything. it's just the way it is. think of it. they have all my books, hay went to -- for five years they sued me getting my tax returns. at the end of five years, they got 'em. the supreme court actually gave it to them. that was the end of it. that was it. they never found anything. they hired the best accounting firms. i had a pure gold firm, they called it gold-rated firm, i don't know what it's supposed to be to. who knows? but with all this, for years you heard about -- rachel: never looked into the clinton foundation. >> and they never if went all the way with the. clinton foundation. they never went all the way with the clinton foundation which is sort of interesting, isn't it? so that could happen. i don't know that the public would with stan
someone suggested you could appeal straight to the supreme court because of the special nature of this comes to the -- [inaudible] and a judge could decide to say, hey, house arrest or even jail. >> i'm okay with it. if i saw one of my lawyers the other dayen on television all in all, you don't want to do that to the -- you don't beg for anything. it's just the way it is. think of it. they have all my books, hay went to -- for five years they sued me getting my tax returns. at the end of...
0
0.0
Jun 10, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
what that really means is there are many ways of characterizing this direct appeal to the supreme courtthe facts and what is taking place under the law to the court. in fact you can use multiple requests it says choosing the correct to obtain the desired relief is no longer necessary in the federal courts, different may be sought alternatively or cumulatively. the choice is not unimportant these subtle distinctions among the various have no effect on the relatively usefulness as vehicles for review. we are not seeking until lockard tory review at the federal level but in effect we are of the state courts activities. hello count before you finish on the estate side we have big questions at the supreme court needs to answer. the jurisdictional pre-requisite for application of the art writs act is simply it beat necessarily appropriate in aid to the jurisdiction of the issuing court the supreme court the company explain the power of the courts of appeals under the act quote the question of negative powers long been settled by this court presents a courts of appeals could at some stage of t
what that really means is there are many ways of characterizing this direct appeal to the supreme courtthe facts and what is taking place under the law to the court. in fact you can use multiple requests it says choosing the correct to obtain the desired relief is no longer necessary in the federal courts, different may be sought alternatively or cumulatively. the choice is not unimportant these subtle distinctions among the various have no effect on the relatively usefulness as vehicles for...
0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of appeals, then he may try the supreme court if he loses in the other courts.can anticipate, given what we have heard from him today, that he is likely to file an appeal, is that we head toward the presidential election, he is likely to be anointed the candidate at the rnc in july, and he has these appeals of various levels of the u.s. court system hanging in the background. so he could be appealing even when he is potentially in the white house. >> not could be, he will be filing an appeal immediately after the sentence, no question about that. yes, it will take him past the election. if he wins, he will be president while his appeal is before three quarts. -- courts. rajini: ryan, have you spoken to mr. trump or people close to him since the last 24 hours? >> thank you for having me. i haven't spoken with the president directly but i have spoken with the leadership of the campaign. rajini: what do they say? >> they expected this. this was a manhattan jury in the state of new york. they anticipated it. that is why you saw them have such a strong pr effort with
of appeals, then he may try the supreme court if he loses in the other courts.can anticipate, given what we have heard from him today, that he is likely to file an appeal, is that we head toward the presidential election, he is likely to be anointed the candidate at the rnc in july, and he has these appeals of various levels of the u.s. court system hanging in the background. so he could be appealing even when he is potentially in the white house. >> not could be, he will be filing an...
0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if that means we're going to the first department in new york court of appeals and spring court willright to the supreme court. we'll do whatever we can. there's no option we are slamming the door on. this has been a travesty of justice for over a year and a half. he said this before but it's worth just before we go this investigation was open. this grand jury was started. less than 2 months after president trump announced he's running for reelection. right after he announces running for election alvin bragg's prosecutors called the strict americans at hake we have the most incriminating evidence that you have from your case? and then they indicted shortly thereafter. that's a fact. >> and you didn't even know the charge, i don't even know if you until this day know what the real charge is. we'll never know. clear constitutional violation. todd blanche thank you. will be watching closely. here with reaction george washington university law professor and fox news contributor jonathan turley. a lot of what i brought up with todd are things that we have gone into great detail on. what w
if that means we're going to the first department in new york court of appeals and spring court willright to the supreme court. we'll do whatever we can. there's no option we are slamming the door on. this has been a travesty of justice for over a year and a half. he said this before but it's worth just before we go this investigation was open. this grand jury was started. less than 2 months after president trump announced he's running for reelection. right after he announces running for...
0
0.0
Jun 30, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court and ask them to intervene, to skip the rest of the appeals process and directly tick up this case. the justice is declined and that's what led us now on this process where we had multiple rounds of appeals that now we're heading into july 1 tomorrow when we're going to get this decision. so even if the supreme court does clear the way for this prosecution, it's not clear whether it can happen before the election. and if we set up this new appeals process it's virtually impossible. fred. all right. jeremy herb. thank you so much. all right. former president donald trump is feeling confident after boosts on, the campaign trail and in the court, trump feeling energized at a campaign stop on friday, despite his many lies at the debate, he feels boosted following president biden's week showing their trump also calling it a big win that the u.s. supreme court in a six to three decision said the justice department overstepped in charging january 6, capitol rioters with obstruction and in his florida class classified documents case judge aileen cannon is seeking more pretrial hearings, me
court and ask them to intervene, to skip the rest of the appeals process and directly tick up this case. the justice is declined and that's what led us now on this process where we had multiple rounds of appeals that now we're heading into july 1 tomorrow when we're going to get this decision. so even if the supreme court does clear the way for this prosecution, it's not clear whether it can happen before the election. and if we set up this new appeals process it's virtually impossible. fred....
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court has agreed to hear an appeal by santa clara based nvidia. the chipmaker wants to avert a possible class action lawsuit. the lawsuit, originally filed in 2018, accuses the company of violating u.s. law by falsely downplaying how much of its revenue growth came from crypto related purchases. the plaintiffs claim those emissions misled investors and analysts. the lawsuit was thrown out in 2021, but was revived by a san francisco based court of appeals. nvidia is urging the supreme court to take up its appeal, arguing that it would open the door to, quote, abusive and speculative litigation. the supreme court will hear the case in its next term, which begins in october. okay, olympian and super rad border shaun white has a grand new plan for gold medalist announced today he is starting the snow league in 2025, $1.5 million up for grabs, the largest prize money in sports history. now it starts next march, when 20 men and 16 women compete in five bracket style snowboard events. white is hoping that his new league can help organize what has been a
the supreme court has agreed to hear an appeal by santa clara based nvidia. the chipmaker wants to avert a possible class action lawsuit. the lawsuit, originally filed in 2018, accuses the company of violating u.s. law by falsely downplaying how much of its revenue growth came from crypto related purchases. the plaintiffs claim those emissions misled investors and analysts. the lawsuit was thrown out in 2021, but was revived by a san francisco based court of appeals. nvidia is urging the...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> well, there is a difference between a court of appeals judge and a supreme court justice.ould step in and handle the case. that's what happens. different for a supreme court justice. because there are nine justices and no substitutes if one recuses himself or herself. so as the supreme court itself has said in ethics guidelines, justices have a higher burden to sit. but i think that that imposes on them an even higher burden to avoid any situations that might require a recusal. >> i wanted to read from something you wrote here about the evolution of this particular court. you wrote it's one thing to follow rulings i believe were wrong when they resulted from a judicial process i respected. that is respect the process, disagree at times with the result. quote, it was quite another to be bound by the decisions of an institution i barely recognized. what did you mean by that regarding the shift in the supreme court? >> my concern about this court, this particular supreme court is that it all too frequently abandons the principles of judicial restraint i think are critical to
>> well, there is a difference between a court of appeals judge and a supreme court justice.ould step in and handle the case. that's what happens. different for a supreme court justice. because there are nine justices and no substitutes if one recuses himself or herself. so as the supreme court itself has said in ethics guidelines, justices have a higher burden to sit. but i think that that imposes on them an even higher burden to avoid any situations that might require a recusal....
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
maybthey served as judges formerly and we issue reports. ' single court of appeals nomination that'some out of ee past 20 years or so. host: the highest court of the land the supreme court what youhe do with the current composition? >> it is a real challenigupremet time in a very long away people's rights are their long-established rights as a real it doesn't represent t r o wellv everything from taking huge gifts from justice way does not demonstratetr■'■c impartiality h justice alito. the sort of decision they are eally like a severe legislating f bench. the way conservatives 10 or 15 years ago theñ, abortion drug te illustrative i think the bump stop band definitely is.ñb it's an agency decision wealth and the purvigency regulating firearms as las vegas. the provision to help is it reasonable interpretation of what theio law was. and yet the supreme court sweeps into the case to rewrite what said. it was on aer basis is a six -- three issued by the justices who say they are doing textualism now. that opinion on their behalf is not pretextual that's a good illustration of a nine --
maybthey served as judges formerly and we issue reports. ' single court of appeals nomination that'some out of ee past 20 years or so. host: the highest court of the land the supreme court what youhe do with the current composition? >> it is a real challenigupremet time in a very long away people's rights are their long-established rights as a real it doesn't represent t r o wellv everything from taking huge gifts from justice way does not demonstratetr■'■c impartiality h justice...
0
0.0
Jun 18, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
none of those things are here. the parties have not appealed this to the supreme court. it would have to go through several appeals before it got to the supreme court. for anyone out there and wondering, this is not a partisan issue. jack smith tried to get the supreme court to jump the line earlier when we had conversations about the presidential immunity decision and the supreme court declined. that's not how it functions. this is not even something that generally speaking would fall under the purview of the supreme court absent an appeal which brought up an issue that would sit before them. again, while he may want to play nice with donald trump so he can gain favor to become as vp, none of this is how government functions and for him to be a member of the house of representatives and saying this is an embarrassment to government and how democracy is supposed to work. >> charles coleman, taking us to school. jon, something you mentioned a moment ago, we saw the court's impact one overruled the bump stock ban mac but you wrote that was always the plan of donald trump i
none of those things are here. the parties have not appealed this to the supreme court. it would have to go through several appeals before it got to the supreme court. for anyone out there and wondering, this is not a partisan issue. jack smith tried to get the supreme court to jump the line earlier when we had conversations about the presidential immunity decision and the supreme court declined. that's not how it functions. this is not even something that generally speaking would fall under...
0
0.0
Jun 8, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this is used pretty heavily in front of the supreme court and in the courts of appeal.ct courts. it is unprecedented to give them time to argue in the district court. that usually involves the government coming in with a case between private parties. this is like judge aileen cannon going out on the streets, come on in, tell me what you think about this issue. these are nonparties, they do not have a stake in the outcome of this case. it is unusual. >> something that went below the radar, hearing that will be taking place in a couple of weeks. it deals with the motion to suppress. evidence that was seized as a result of the document sees.mar- a-lago. talk about why that motion is just as important to the one where trump is challenging jack smith. >> something that happens in critical cases that include the execution of a search warrant, they challenge the validity of the search. if the judge decides it was a bad search, the government is out of luck. that could be true here in regards to the search warrant. even to a lesser extent, the ability to use the lawyers notes.
this is used pretty heavily in front of the supreme court and in the courts of appeal.ct courts. it is unprecedented to give them time to argue in the district court. that usually involves the government coming in with a case between private parties. this is like judge aileen cannon going out on the streets, come on in, tell me what you think about this issue. these are nonparties, they do not have a stake in the outcome of this case. it is unusual. >> something that went below the radar,...
0
0.0
Jun 20, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court.of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's dismissal based on the letter. sbu on whether the judge has russian citizenship. we will remind you that bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received the passport of the russian federation back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine. and in 2012 at the age of 45 year he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already at the last court session, the representative of the sbu reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers. that lviv's russian citizenship exists, but now it is impossible to either prove or disprove information about the existence of citizenship. bohdan lviv still continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the aggressor country. the higher qualification commission of judges continues cleansing the judici
of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court.of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's dismissal based on the letter. sbu on whether the judge has russian citizenship. we will remind you that bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received the passport of the russian federation back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine. and in 2012 at the age of 45 year he renewed this document....
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court.legality of lviv's dismissal on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's citizenship.
of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv on the staff of the supreme court.legality of lviv's dismissal on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's citizenship.
0
0.0
Jun 22, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the sixth administrative court of appeal refused to reinstate former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv. states of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's release on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's russian citizenship. we will remind you, bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and at the age of 45 in 2012 , he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. already on the last one. at the second meeting, the representative of the security service of ukraine reported that the law enforcement officers established through the registers that russian citizenship of lviv exists, but now they can neither prove nor refute the information about the presence of citizenship is impossible. bohdan lviv still continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the country of the aggress
the sixth administrative court of appeal refused to reinstate former judge of the supreme court of ukraine bohdan lviv. states of the supreme court. the panel of judges confirmed the legality of lviv's release on the basis of a letter from the sbu about the judge's russian citizenship. we will remind you, bohdan lviv is probably a citizen of russia. according to the journalists of the scheme project, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine,...
0
0.0
Jun 20, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
circuit court of appeals rules and let's get this out of the way and the supreme court said no, no, norful ruling, the supreme court intervened anyways and that's why so many of us are just so upset about what happened because the supreme court is supposed to be apolitical. this does not look apolitical, and, yes, it looks like trump will not get absolute immunity, but he wins by losing, as lisa said, by delaying this matter, by delaying the trial until after the election when he can become president and then call it all off. i do think it's likely though that the supreme court will issue a ruling that will send the case back to judge chutkan for some fact-finding, to determine whether trump's conduct falls within his duties of office and whether there's immunity, and so that will mean that there is no trial before the election, but judge chutkan who is motivated to get this thing going, said she will cancel her vacation if necessary could hold this public hearing where a lot of the evidence will come out into the public of trump's involvement in and before january 6, so jack smith cou
circuit court of appeals rules and let's get this out of the way and the supreme court said no, no, norful ruling, the supreme court intervened anyways and that's why so many of us are just so upset about what happened because the supreme court is supposed to be apolitical. this does not look apolitical, and, yes, it looks like trump will not get absolute immunity, but he wins by losing, as lisa said, by delaying this matter, by delaying the trial until after the election when he can become...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that and possibly bring it back up to the supreme court, trying to seize on some of the concerns that were raised by the justice's about just how far this extends. they'll try to differentiate him from someone who has a protective order. argue that his use of illicit drugs alleged shoes, they would say is different. and so i would expect that they're going to continue to litigate that if they can afford it said decision today, joan biskupic compared to the other second amendment decision earlier the other day, the us supreme court had all these bumps stocks very different wealth, this, this case actually examine the second amendment right to bear arms. the bump-stock case had to do with a federal regulation against machine guns and whether bump stocks. which. can, act in a machine gun like way according to the federal government and according to the donald trump administration to expanded that machine gun prohibition to bump stocks. that was a regulatory question. it was very important one. and there the court split six to three to say that no, the way the federal prohibition dating b
that and possibly bring it back up to the supreme court, trying to seize on some of the concerns that were raised by the justice's about just how far this extends. they'll try to differentiate him from someone who has a protective order. argue that his use of illicit drugs alleged shoes, they would say is different. and so i would expect that they're going to continue to litigate that if they can afford it said decision today, joan biskupic compared to the other second amendment decision...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the highest state court in new york, every and then to the supreme court of the united states. somewhere in those 3 appeals. i think a court will find that the statute is unconstitutional for the reasons i've just given you. that will mean no one else will be prosecuted against it. however, charlotte, miss appeals take years because you get online. there are already 3 years of appeals ahead of him on the 1st level of appeal. so this is not going to be resolved before he runs for president. if he wins, it probably won't even be resolved. during his presidency, it won't be resolved until after his presidency is over. if the wednesday only gets 4 years and can't run again, you'll be private citizen trump. before this is finally resolved, i think in his favor. obviously we're waiting for the sentencing to take place. the trump campaign is suggested he can spend over a 100 hayes and follow us, but we know that in new york there is a limit of 20 years when it comes to this type of felony. but there is a chance that he could get off with a fine. how likely is that? i think it's very l
the highest state court in new york, every and then to the supreme court of the united states. somewhere in those 3 appeals. i think a court will find that the statute is unconstitutional for the reasons i've just given you. that will mean no one else will be prosecuted against it. however, charlotte, miss appeals take years because you get online. there are already 3 years of appeals ahead of him on the 1st level of appeal. so this is not going to be resolved before he runs for president. if...
0
0.0
Jun 21, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
appeals court denied his request to stay out of prison. he's been ordered to report by july 1st. while he appeals this conviction, this morning, today, he's asking the supreme court to step in and allow him to remain out of prison while he appeals. he's asking the supreme court for relief here. he doesn't get it before july 1st, steve bannon is going to have to report to federal prison. >> ken dilanian, katie phang and paul butler, thank you so very much. >>> coming up, how the biden administration is renewing its push to protect reproductive rights. we'll talk to health and human services secretary javier becerra about the nationwide effort. and why donald trump will get the last word at next week's presidential debate. you're watching "jose diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. a diaz-balart reports" on msnbc. everywhere. 4 out of 5 gynecologists would recommend whole body deodorant, which gives you 72 hour odor protection from your pits to your- (sfx: deoderant being sprayed) secret whole body deodorant. (man) every time i needed a new phone, (i had to switch carriers...d) (roommate)
appeals court denied his request to stay out of prison. he's been ordered to report by july 1st. while he appeals this conviction, this morning, today, he's asking the supreme court to step in and allow him to remain out of prison while he appeals. he's asking the supreme court for relief here. he doesn't get it before july 1st, steve bannon is going to have to report to federal prison. >> ken dilanian, katie phang and paul butler, thank you so very much. >>> coming up, how the...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that court of appeals is the most radically right-wing pro-trump court in the land.he supreme court threw it out today. unanimously because the plaintiffs lacked standing and it was too ridiculous even for this court. make no mistake. republicans may have lost this battle but they're still fighting the war. they want to ban the abortion pill and will try to bring a similar suit and will do so given the opportunity. they don't want to stop there. senate republicans locked up ellen enshrining protection for infant true fertilization only adapt to the southern baptist convention, the largest protestant denomination in the country and a huge source of the republican grassroots voted to condemn the procedure of ivf. the republican party and the grassroots of the party truly believe in this. they are not going to stop. their crusade against reproductive rights until they either win or are definitively defeated politically. joining me as legal correspondent lisa rubin. let's start with the decision today which was not surprising. they kicked it on what is called standing gr
that court of appeals is the most radically right-wing pro-trump court in the land.he supreme court threw it out today. unanimously because the plaintiffs lacked standing and it was too ridiculous even for this court. make no mistake. republicans may have lost this battle but they're still fighting the war. they want to ban the abortion pill and will try to bring a similar suit and will do so given the opportunity. they don't want to stop there. senate republicans locked up ellen enshrining...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
remember also steve bannon has filed an emergency appeal with the supreme court to keep him out of jail while appeals are pending. the filing was due today from the government in response to that. it is not only the cases that we know about that they are trying to get off the calendar and decks but the emergency appeal from steve bannon dealing with that in the middle of all this as we wait for the first opinion. >> dana: want to bring in the rest of the legal team. former assistant u.s. attorney and constitutional law foreign e attorney jonathan turley. the u.s. surgeon general versus the state of missouri and it has to do with social media censorship and whether the federal government pressured to censor speech. that's a significant case. >> three different cases that are all social media cases and what it essentially comes down to is whether you treat the big social media platforms as if they were arms of the government or are they free, private actors. if they are arms of the government they are limited by first amendment restrictions just like the government is. and if they are pri
remember also steve bannon has filed an emergency appeal with the supreme court to keep him out of jail while appeals are pending. the filing was due today from the government in response to that. it is not only the cases that we know about that they are trying to get off the calendar and decks but the emergency appeal from steve bannon dealing with that in the middle of all this as we wait for the first opinion. >> dana: want to bring in the rest of the legal team. former assistant u.s....
0
0.0
Jun 7, 2024
06/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
meaning the full court of appeals in dc and or the united states supreme court as i said in the courtroom, this is an issue that legal scholars have said from day one is a case that has to go before the united states supreme court so again, we just underscored mean is this something that the supreme court would have any reason to take up there's a few issues that are kind of spiraling on this and we saw just a couple of weeks ago, a couple of months at this point, peter navarro had a similar request of the supreme court and the supreme court did not take up is there are a couple of interesting questions that are at play here. >> first is kind of generally the idea of how congress and subpoena and require former white house officials are white house aides to testify before congress. that's something that over the years has been kind of battled back-and-forth between the white house and congress. and has not resulted in prosecution's, although there have been times that people have been held in contempt of congress not jailed for it steve bannon's case as the dc circuit, the appellate court
meaning the full court of appeals in dc and or the united states supreme court as i said in the courtroom, this is an issue that legal scholars have said from day one is a case that has to go before the united states supreme court so again, we just underscored mean is this something that the supreme court would have any reason to take up there's a few issues that are kind of spiraling on this and we saw just a couple of weeks ago, a couple of months at this point, peter navarro had a similar...
0
0.0
Jun 1, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there's a possibility, of course, that his team, donald trump's team, can appeal to the supreme courten that this is a novel issue that a president has never been convicted, we can see if the supreme court will take this up prior to exhausting all of the appellate process in new york or which, sol is right, it will take months and months for that to happen. if there is an issue during the sentencing on july 11th, that would restrict his freedoms in any way restrict his ability to campaign, is that an issue that the supreme court would see as a something they should review on an immediate basis, we have no idea because we've never seen this before. neil: okay. >> we have really no idea with what the process will be because we've never seen this before. neil: i understand that. but you didn't quite answer my question, remember a ca. sol, can he vote in this election? all the points you both eloquently mentioned, this is a first. i believe the first time we have a presidential candidate who can't go ahead and vote for himself. it is the weird to me, but maybe that isn't the case. is it t
there's a possibility, of course, that his team, donald trump's team, can appeal to the supreme courten that this is a novel issue that a president has never been convicted, we can see if the supreme court will take this up prior to exhausting all of the appellate process in new york or which, sol is right, it will take months and months for that to happen. if there is an issue during the sentencing on july 11th, that would restrict his freedoms in any way restrict his ability to campaign, is...
0
0.0
Jun 14, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the decision was mostly upheld by the court of appeals. in the land. the supreme court threw it out today because plaintiffs lacked standing and the entire ruse was too ridiculous even for this court. make no mistake, republicans may have lost this battle, but they are still fighting the war. it is all but certain that they will bring a similar suit again and will absolutely do so given the opportunity. they don't want to stop there. today senate republicans blocked a bill enshrining protections for ivf only a day after the southern baptist convention, the largest protestant this domination days protestant denomination in the country voted to condemn the procedure. the republican party and grassroots of the party truly believe in this. they are not going to stop there crow seed against -- stop there crusade against reproductive rights. joining me now is nbc legal correspondent lisa rubin. i guess let's start with the decision today which was not surprising. they kicked it on what are called standing grounds. what does that mean? >> standin
the decision was mostly upheld by the court of appeals. in the land. the supreme court threw it out today because plaintiffs lacked standing and the entire ruse was too ridiculous even for this court. make no mistake, republicans may have lost this battle, but they are still fighting the war. it is all but certain that they will bring a similar suit again and will absolutely do so given the opportunity. they don't want to stop there. today senate republicans blocked a bill enshrining...
0
0.0
Jun 29, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, the public, three levels of courts, first instance, appeal, supreme court cassation, and in the end in the supreme court cassation, the supreme court confirmed. the fact that the decision to extend the activities of the state film council is illegitimate, in fact, this legal process took about a year, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the state film council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business andriy yermak's partner, i.e. such people, well yes, absolutely, well if, in general, these people should have simply left in the 23rd year and instead of them, they should have been at the transparent competition they can be there twice if there is a big, big nuance, they cannot by law be in positions twice and obviously this has become a problem for them or for the people whose interests they represent, now the community has consolidated, it seems to me that this is the first time in recent years when... very different productions , who, i don't know, competed with each other a few years ago, united in order t
, the public, three levels of courts, first instance, appeal, supreme court cassation, and in the end in the supreme court cassation, the supreme court confirmed. the fact that the decision to extend the activities of the state film council is illegitimate, in fact, this legal process took about a year, we are now seeing one of the meetings of the state film council, there we saw, could see yuriy gurbanov, this is one of the members of andriy artem kolyubaev, who is a business andriy yermak's...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for reinstatement, so the former judge, not somewhere, but of the supreme court, bohdan lviv, whose passport was discovered by the sbu, lost his appeal for reinstatement, the case. was heard by the sixth court of appeal, and could not decision on this case, it is interesting that there is a lawyer in ukraine about the supreme court, who for some reason calls it the supreme court, not of ukraine, but also those people who do not know whether they have russian passports or not, but in some of their statements and actions, well, they work, as they say, not entirely in the interests of ukraine, and these people get public access to certain events, and they will also train someone, tell me more about this event. well, look, in fact, last week everyone was talking about how buzhansky could be, he is a cotton wool folk a deputy who came from the servants of the people, and it is clear that he supports the moscow priests, how could he get to the west, the military institute of the taras shevchenko kyiv national university and tell someone something about critical thinking, and this is not a
for reinstatement, so the former judge, not somewhere, but of the supreme court, bohdan lviv, whose passport was discovered by the sbu, lost his appeal for reinstatement, the case. was heard by the sixth court of appeal, and could not decision on this case, it is interesting that there is a lawyer in ukraine about the supreme court, who for some reason calls it the supreme court, not of ukraine, but also those people who do not know whether they have russian passports or not, but in some of...