0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of colorado. of the lawyers trying to keep trump off the ballot offered this argument for why it is not legally sound. >> the constitution tells us over and over that the presidency is an office and that the person who holds it swears an oath of office before assuming the execution of his office. and the plain meaning of an officer is just one who holds an office. so we think the text here is very clear that the history supports it and certainly the core purpose of the provision supports that reading as well. >> notice the wording there. the text, the history, it was drafted carefully. you see how he referred to the plain meaning of the language of the constitution. likely a direct appeal to the so-called originalist not on the state supreme court of colorado before whom he was arguing, but on the supreme court of the united states who tend to take the view or at least say they take the view that the constitution should be interpreted only as it was understood at the time of their founding, origin
supreme court of colorado. of the lawyers trying to keep trump off the ballot offered this argument for why it is not legally sound. >> the constitution tells us over and over that the presidency is an office and that the person who holds it swears an oath of office before assuming the execution of his office. and the plain meaning of an officer is just one who holds an office. so we think the text here is very clear that the history supports it and certainly the core purpose of the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the ballot, which was a decision, of course, made by the supreme court of colorado, the highest courtn that state, answered each of those questions trying to make his case. >> the framers were concerned about charismatic rebels who may rise through the ranks up to and including the presidency of the united states. >> now, in a moment i'm going to speak to jason murray, who you just heard here, who is also like the country waiting for the decision. it's a decision that the former president also believes will go his way. >> in watching the supreme court today, i thought it was very beautiful process. >> a beautiful process, when it goes his way, appears to. trump didn't stop there, though. he then went on to repeat a litany of lies. >> nancy pelosi -- >> of course, that's false. >> if it was an insurrection, which there were no guns -- >> that's false as well. it's been proven in court, some of the people who enter illegally the capitol were armed with guns. jess that schneider begins our coverage outside the supreme court on this historic day. we heard the audio there, heard what happe
the ballot, which was a decision, of course, made by the supreme court of colorado, the highest courtn that state, answered each of those questions trying to make his case. >> the framers were concerned about charismatic rebels who may rise through the ranks up to and including the presidency of the united states. >> now, in a moment i'm going to speak to jason murray, who you just heard here, who is also like the country waiting for the decision. it's a decision that the former...
1
1.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25, so let's see. what will happen next, let's hope, thank you, igor eisenberg, professor of new york university, there was espresso, and we talked about the difficult situation that is currently happening around the support package for ukraine, and actually today they will try to vote again on this decision, we will inform you, but roman and i are already saying goodbye to you for today, these few hours it flew by very quickly for us, we are passing the baton on to our colleagues, and we will see you tomorrow in this studio. take care and be safe until we meet, greetings viewers of espress. the news team will talk about the most relevant events of the moment, and this one i start the issue with this: an enemy without eyes. the sumy teroborona destroyed the russian surveillance complex by murom m. the system was located in the belgorod region near the border with ukraine, equipped with a powerful optical zoom that allows you to see a p
that the supreme court will uphold the decision of the supreme court of the state of colorado, but regarding criminal cases , the first trial will be on march 25, so let's see. what will happen next, let's hope, thank you, igor eisenberg, professor of new york university, there was espresso, and we talked about the difficult situation that is currently happening around the support package for ukraine, and actually today they will try to vote again on this decision, we will inform you, but roman...
1
1.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
pressing issue of the election campaign, are you entitled... this is what the supreme court of coloradothe main court will side with trump, decide not to participate in elections is fraught with too unclear consequences, both legal and political. there is no national voting in the usa; it takes place in each state separately. the rules are different everywhere. in theory judges are nonpartisan, but one can imagine that in a given state a judge with very strong views in favor of democrats would decide to remove trump from the ballot. if this happens, it is only possible in the blue states, which always vote for democrats anyway, that is , they will still go to biden, but this will only inflame trump’s base; in the rest he will get more. by the way, you can always write in a candidate if he doesn’t exist. a positive supreme court verdict for trump would be a major victory for him, but there would be problems won't solve it. the ex-president is accused of criminal cases. according to rumors, he and his team are admitting that, in the midst of the campaign, trump will be found guilty in the
pressing issue of the election campaign, are you entitled... this is what the supreme court of coloradothe main court will side with trump, decide not to participate in elections is fraught with too unclear consequences, both legal and political. there is no national voting in the usa; it takes place in each state separately. the rules are different everywhere. in theory judges are nonpartisan, but one can imagine that in a given state a judge with very strong views in favor of democrats would...
1
1.0
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
the presidential elections, congressional elections, i think, that... the supreme court of coloradobout disqualifying trump from the election because he allegedly took part in insurrection against the republic, and this is done on the basis of the so -called fourteenth amendment of the constitution, so let's see what this the amendment says: no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or an elector of president or vice president, or hold... any office in the civil or military service of the united states, or in the service of any state, unless he, having previously accepted oath as a member of congress or as an officer of the united states or as a member of the legislature of any state, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the constitution of the united states, then took participated in rebellion or rebellion against the united states, or provided aid or support to enemies of the united states. here two questions arise, one is very fundamental, and trump took part in the insurrection, he says that he did not take part in the insurrection, n
the presidential elections, congressional elections, i think, that... the supreme court of coloradobout disqualifying trump from the election because he allegedly took part in insurrection against the republic, and this is done on the basis of the so -called fourteenth amendment of the constitution, so let's see what this the amendment says: no person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or an elector of president or vice president, or hold... any office in the civil or military...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as a matter of fact, donald trump engaged in insurrection and the supreme court of colorado affirmed that finding and ruled he is therefore disqualified. you want to complain about the lack of consistency among the 50 states in the way they go about qualifying and disqualifying candidates? well, you know, the justices on the right are generally enamored of and devotees of states' rights, the states have the rights to set their own election procedures including qualification and disqualification of aspiring candidates. everywhere you turn, donald trump looks like based on the law and the constitution he should be disqualified. how creative might some of these supreme court justices get if they are determined to avoid reaching that conclusion. >> well, let me ask you about one more part of this case, the colorado lawyers held a press briefing in just the last couple of hours where they said one of the core arguments they'll focus on tomorrow is to push back against the argument that the president is not an officer of the united states, even bringing in this comparison to yesterday's im
as a matter of fact, donald trump engaged in insurrection and the supreme court of colorado affirmed that finding and ruled he is therefore disqualified. you want to complain about the lack of consistency among the 50 states in the way they go about qualifying and disqualifying candidates? well, you know, the justices on the right are generally enamored of and devotees of states' rights, the states have the rights to set their own election procedures including qualification and disqualification...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which they are reviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and should be rejected. host: explain hypertechnical arguments. guest: there is a whole bunch of ways that trump's counsel is trying to win this case, all of which are for the most part highly counterintuitive and hypertechnical. they are the kind of things that make people dislike lawyers which doesn't by itself means they are wrong but it should make us suspicious of those kind of argument. they have the argument which was mentioned that the person who holds the highest office in the federal government is somehow not an officer of the united states, the kind of argument that only a hypertechnical
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which they are reviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was the supreme court of colorado that said, no, it does.o the supreme court could use that as an off ramp. >> also, march 4th was to be the start of the trial. the judge on the federal election interference case, that's now been postponed based on the d.c. appeals court ruling. what's the time line on that? >> i mean, everybody who has guessed when the d.c. circuit is going to rule on presidential immunity, i think, has been wrong. everyone thought it was going to have happened already. and, so, it could happen any time. and then after that, there are still a few more appeals that could happen to continue to delay it. for example, donald trump could ask that the entire d.c. circuit rule on the case because this was only before a three-judge panel. he could also ask the united states supreme court to hear the case. so a few things -- >> it will be dragged on for quite some time. >> it could. it also also get mandated back to the trial court. but there is -- there is still a lot in play. and, so, i think we have to all get ready for the manha
it was the supreme court of colorado that said, no, it does.o the supreme court could use that as an off ramp. >> also, march 4th was to be the start of the trial. the judge on the federal election interference case, that's now been postponed based on the d.c. appeals court ruling. what's the time line on that? >> i mean, everybody who has guessed when the d.c. circuit is going to rule on presidential immunity, i think, has been wrong. everyone thought it was going to have happened...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court -- the decision of the colorado supreme court. >> i listened today, and i thought argumentstrong. and and can you take the person that's leading everywhere and say is, hey, we're not going to let you run. you know, i think that's pretty tough to do. howard: first time i've listened to two hours of supreme court oral argument as. robby, any question in your with mind that the supreme court was extremely skeptical of donald trump being kicked off the a ballot and is going to knock that down? >> not at all. they asked all the right questions, they gave every indication that they think it would be too much of a blow to democracy. the thing democrats are running on -- howard: right. yeah. >> but you can't have the other candidate on the ballot, we can't even give people the option to vote for him even though he's not been convicted of insurrection? there's a question whether what happened is insurrection, these are all questions that have not been litigated yet. so to proactively strip donald trump off the ballot would be an incredible movement the justices were, i think, rightly
supreme court -- the decision of the colorado supreme court. >> i listened today, and i thought argumentstrong. and and can you take the person that's leading everywhere and say is, hey, we're not going to let you run. you know, i think that's pretty tough to do. howard: first time i've listened to two hours of supreme court oral argument as. robby, any question in your with mind that the supreme court was extremely skeptical of donald trump being kicked off the a ballot and is going to...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now colorado's secretary of state's an piped up before the supreme court and said colorado can do this within the law. they can decide donald trump is ineligible, but all of this is going to come to a head on thursday. we're not going to get a ruling at that time, but it is one of first times we'll be able to see the supreme court pepper trump's team with questions. the last time there was an argument like this, service when people were pursuing donald trump's tax returns several years ago. legal teams from both sides are preparing. donald trump's legal team as well as others representing the people who want to keep him off the ballot. they're all getting ready for the oral arguments where the justices will be asking questions, and at the same time so much is hanging over donald trump in court right now, include the possibility of a ruling any day about whether he can sit for trial related to january 6th as a criminal defendant, a totally different issue that has a lot to do with whether he will go to trial even this year or at all in cases related to january 6th as a criminal defendan
now colorado's secretary of state's an piped up before the supreme court and said colorado can do this within the law. they can decide donald trump is ineligible, but all of this is going to come to a head on thursday. we're not going to get a ruling at that time, but it is one of first times we'll be able to see the supreme court pepper trump's team with questions. the last time there was an argument like this, service when people were pursuing donald trump's tax returns several years ago....
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of colorado made this happen. these are not voters.one's name off a ballot, deleting a choice. you better love america enough to want to defend democracy by allowing the people to choose what happens in november, not these little handful of bureaucrats or judges. >> harris: and it brings to the point, why people distrust this process, you look at that map and think, the united states is not united when we vote? real quick question for you. when do we reach the point too close to the election? like is that being talked about, do you think in the white house? calculus being, if we could speed this up a little bit. >> kayleigh: it is being talked about openly. i heard an anchor say everyday counts, like toward what? speeding up a process in election interference? people are openly saying that. jamie raskin talking about the supreme court, we should be engaged and aroused because of supreme court. what does that mean? really, nancy pelosi? way to disturb faith in institution. yes, he used those words, check it out. illinois and the decisio
supreme court of colorado made this happen. these are not voters.one's name off a ballot, deleting a choice. you better love america enough to want to defend democracy by allowing the people to choose what happens in november, not these little handful of bureaucrats or judges. >> harris: and it brings to the point, why people distrust this process, you look at that map and think, the united states is not united when we vote? real quick question for you. when do we reach the point too...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court justicesappeared skeptical of colorado supreme court decision barring former president trump from the republican primary pl ballot on grounds he engaged in insurrection in trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating on the january 6 capital attack >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >> reporter: the trump legal team argues he did not participate in the storming of the capitol and that it did not qualify as an attempt to overthrow the government >> this was a riot it was not an insurrection the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those thing, but it did not qualify as insurrection >> reporter: the justices questioned whether congress should enact a national standard before states can invoke a version of the 14th amendment which was enacted after the civil war to prevent people who engaged in insurrection from holding office, and whether that provision even includes the president. both conservative and liberal justices voiced concerns abou
supreme court justicesappeared skeptical of colorado supreme court decision barring former president trump from the republican primary pl ballot on grounds he engaged in insurrection in trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating on the january 6 capital attack >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power >> reporter: the trump legal team argues he did not participate...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the state supreme court of colorado ruled that this rule applies to donald trump and his actions duringhe riots of january sixth. after the 2020 election, most legal experts say in the arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices seemed reluctant to rule in favor of colorado. >> whether the conservative justices or the liberal justices are really worried that one state here, colorado, could start excluding somebody from a ballot and that will lead other states to do so as well. and as they pointed out, tens of millions of votes might not count if that happens, the supreme court is expected to issue a ruling before the colorado primary, which is scheduled for march 5th. >> our time is now. 449 donald trump has won the nevada republican presidential caucus. he was the only major candidate to participate. that means he will win nevada's 26 delegates. it's his only major republican challenger, nikki haley did not compete in those caucuses and decided and said to run in tuesday's republican primary. >> mlb commissioner rob manfred says he will be disappointed if the new ballpark for the a
the state supreme court of colorado ruled that this rule applies to donald trump and his actions duringhe riots of january sixth. after the 2020 election, most legal experts say in the arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices seemed reluctant to rule in favor of colorado. >> whether the conservative justices or the liberal justices are really worried that one state here, colorado, could start excluding somebody from a ballot and that will lead other states to do so as well. and as...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado supreme court looked at all the district court findings, special a specialized amount ofe and determined he did engage in insurrection. and that on top of that the constitution applies to the president. there is no get out of jail free card for insurrection for donald trump. and honestly, erin, i think they got it right. and i'm making this clear statement in protection of colorado law because i think that's how the constitution should work. section 3 of the 14th amendment is there to protect the country from insurrectionists like donald trump, and i hope that the united states supreme court looks at all the facts, all the case law and the clear words of the united states constitution in making their determination. >> does the fact that there appear to be delays for the special counsel's case, i mean there was supposed to start on march 4th. that is not going to start now. it's been postponed indefinitely. ryan goodman was pointing out a judge there could give another date, a provisional date. so the fact it is indefinite is significant possibly. does that -- obviously yo
the colorado supreme court looked at all the district court findings, special a specialized amount ofe and determined he did engage in insurrection. and that on top of that the constitution applies to the president. there is no get out of jail free card for insurrection for donald trump. and honestly, erin, i think they got it right. and i'm making this clear statement in protection of colorado law because i think that's how the constitution should work. section 3 of the 14th amendment is there...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court of colorado and their decision to reject trump from being on the ballot, that we're speaking to everyone else in the country and in doing that it seemed that the justices were pretty uniform in answering that question, a at least it did to me, that they would reject the colorado decision and therefore allow him to be on the ballot. why? there were questions from a liberal justice, ms. jackson, listen, does it even apply to the president? in doing that they assess the intent, the intention of when the 14th amendment section 3 was passed, with a it is really designed for the president and if it was why did it not say so? you looked at things from conservatives like kavanaugh which would suggest we may be disenfranchising too many voters. roberts and his discussions should we really be giving states this power and authority. insurrection while it wasn't really addressed, kavanaugh said there is a statute, regarding insurrection, if you are convicted of that, right, then you can't be on the ballot anyway so what are we doing here? so it seemed to me that they really wanted to try no
court of colorado and their decision to reject trump from being on the ballot, that we're speaking to everyone else in the country and in doing that it seemed that the justices were pretty uniform in answering that question, a at least it did to me, that they would reject the colorado decision and therefore allow him to be on the ballot. why? there were questions from a liberal justice, ms. jackson, listen, does it even apply to the president? in doing that they assess the intent, the intention...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court justices today appeared skeptical of a colorado supreme court decision, barring former president donald trump from the republican primary ballot. this is on grounds that he engaged in insurrection, trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the january 6th capitol attack. >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states, to disrupt the presidential power. >> reporter: he did not participate in the storming of the capitol, and that he did not qualify as an attempt to overthrow the government. >> it was a right, not an insurrection. >> reporter: the justices, deciding whether congress should enact a national standard, or they can provoke the constitution's 14th amendment. it was adopted after the civil war, to prevent people who had engaged from holding office, and whether that provision includes the president. both conservative and liberal justices voiced concerns about allowing individual states to decide who is an insurrectionist. >> a good number of states will say whoever the democratic candidate is, you a
supreme court justices today appeared skeptical of a colorado supreme court decision, barring former president donald trump from the republican primary ballot. this is on grounds that he engaged in insurrection, trying to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the january 6th capitol attack. >> for the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the united states, to disrupt the presidential power. >> reporter: he did not participate in the storming...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
support for the supreme court of colorado decision because i think it's going to be tough to get a compromises a 6-3 vote, that's just going to reinforce the concerns that this is a supreme court that's hyper partisan. >> susan, when you look at what's going to happen tomorrow, we understand that the former president is not going to be in the chamber for this. that's been our latest reporting. of course he could always change his mind, but anytime these issues come to play, even when he loses as he did yesterday and it was a crushing defeat in the appeals court, but he seems to raise money on it, victimize himself, and go up in the polls. >> yeah, it's been one of the astounding thing about former president trump's appeal, that everything seems to galvanize his supporters, only increase their devotion to him, and the question is if he is convicted of a felony, if for instance this trial goes ahead in time and he is convicted in it, does that behave differently? does that peel away some of the supporters who have stuck with him so far? >> brendan buck, paul butler and susan page, thanks all of
support for the supreme court of colorado decision because i think it's going to be tough to get a compromises a 6-3 vote, that's just going to reinforce the concerns that this is a supreme court that's hyper partisan. >> susan, when you look at what's going to happen tomorrow, we understand that the former president is not going to be in the chamber for this. that's been our latest reporting. of course he could always change his mind, but anytime these issues come to play, even when he...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit, would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice law, rules and rules on collateral that there is non mutual collateral against former president trump and the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide his question for many other states, perhaps all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i'm joined now by jeffrey toobin former federal prosecutor and author of countless bestsellers, i'm hoping he knows what collateral means, including inside the book the nine inside the circuit court of the supreme court, also -- former trump communications white house communications director. so, jeff, what was alito's point? >> in terms of the argument itself, jason marie represented colorado. i would say his argument was somewhere between a calamity and a disaster. it was everything he was telling they were not buying. he did not do a bad job, it is just that every argument, whether trump was covered under
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit, would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice law, rules and rules on collateral that there is non mutual collateral against former president trump and the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide his question for many other states, perhaps all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i'm joined...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on december 18th of last year the colorado supreme court kicked the leading g.o.p.ntial candidate off of the ballots i think the 14th amendment. colorado does not, however have the last word appear this thursday the supreme court of the united states hears oral argument in that case. a careful listener will be able to tell which way the court is leaning based on which justices ask which questions.ques regardless, it has the potential to be as ta monumental decision. so does the 14th amendment apply in theh am absence of a charge r conviction? will the high court pass the buck and say i higt is up to congress or the people at the ballot box? this case has become something of an economic boom forco constitutional lawyers hasarri dozens of groups have filed friend of the court briefs arguing either for or against kicking trump off of the pilot. just across the street from the supreme court, congresths caught the attention of doj. missouri con congressman cory cory booker but not for herself. she spent a lot of money on her own security but was it government money, camp
on december 18th of last year the colorado supreme court kicked the leading g.o.p.ntial candidate off of the ballots i think the 14th amendment. colorado does not, however have the last word appear this thursday the supreme court of the united states hears oral argument in that case. a careful listener will be able to tell which way the court is leaning based on which justices ask which questions.ques regardless, it has the potential to be as ta monumental decision. so does the 14th amendment...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court's docket where the ultimate result for colorado and the rest of the country is far fromlegal counsel mario nicholas. he's one of the lawyers representing the petitioners in this colorado ballot challenge. so mario, as you head into tomorrow, what is on the line? what's at stake? >> i think our democracy is at stake. i think that our u.s. constitution, which is our democracy is at stake. we either abide by the terms of the constitution or we do not, and i think that's what the justices will have to decide. >> so what do you say to those who argue the voters should decide, not the courts? >> well, i think that you have to look at the constitution itself. the constitution doesn't allow us to go for just anyone we want. you have to be at least 35 years old, so taylor swift is not eligible. you have to be a natural born citizen, elon musk is not eligible. barack obama and george w. bush are not eligible. this is just one more qualification the constitution puts in place. >> "the washington post" profiled one of the colorado voters you're representing, 91-year-old norma anders
supreme court's docket where the ultimate result for colorado and the rest of the country is far fromlegal counsel mario nicholas. he's one of the lawyers representing the petitioners in this colorado ballot challenge. so mario, as you head into tomorrow, what is on the line? what's at stake? >> i think our democracy is at stake. i think that our u.s. constitution, which is our democracy is at stake. we either abide by the terms of the constitution or we do not, and i think that's what...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to be prevented. i think you should be kept off the ballot. if people want to vote for him, they can write it in. host: so to listen closely today? sounds like you did? caller: i listened a little bit. host: ok, because of your civil war reference, that was brought up in today's case? caller: yeah, that has been talked about a lot in the last few weeks. host: thank you. joseph in pennsylvania. hi, joseph. >> you are on. go! host: [laughs] joseph, someone is prompting you. it's your turn. caller: my question is, say that he loses the ballot can he go back to colorado saying tha
caller: i think the supreme court should affirm colorado supreme court decision. believe trump off of the ballot, because we have a constitution for a reason. and the constitution states insurrection, and he participated in the insurrection, for sure, and the only other time that the insurrection act has been used, the people who were presented from being in office after the civil war because of the insurrection act, or not convicted of anything either. so, trump doesn't need to be convicted to...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which theyeviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and should be rejected. host: explain hypertechnical arguments. guest: there is a whole bunch of ways that trump's counsel is trying to win this case, all of which are for the most part highly counterintuitive and hypertechnical. they are the kind of things that make people dislike lawyers which doesn't by itself means they are wrong but it should make us suspicious of those kind of argument. they have the argument which was mentioned that the person who holds the highest office in the federal government is somehow not an officer of the united states, the kind of argument that only a hypertechnical lawye
guest: i believe the supreme court should affirm the decision of the colorado supreme court which theyeviewing which says trump should indeed be disqualified because he engaged in insurrection by instigating and trying to exploit the attack on the capital on january 6, 2021. i also believe he is in fact an officer of the united states or was when he was the president under section three of the 14th amendment and the other hypertechnical argument that his counsel has advanced are flawed and...
0
0.0
Feb 1, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is the appeal of the colorado state supreme court ruling that kept trump off the colorado primary ballot for violating the 14th amendment's ban on insurrectionists holding office. the supreme court's decision on trump's eligibility will be enormously consequential, not least because maine has also disqualified him from running and there are similar similar efforts underway in at least 17 other states. in anticipation of next week's hearing, colorado secretary of state just filed a brief that seems aimed squarely at the court's conservative majority, arguing, quote, just as colorado can't be forced to place on its presidential primary ballot a non-citizen, that is someone who is not born a u.s. citizen, a minor, or someone to a selected, it can also cannot be forced to include a candidate who is engaged in insurrection. a former prosecutor in new york, white-collar criminal defense attorney, and deputy attorney of stewart, persistent united states attorney for southerners renew arc, and both join me now. let's start with that argument, that the secretary of state colorado is making
it is the appeal of the colorado state supreme court ruling that kept trump off the colorado primary ballot for violating the 14th amendment's ban on insurrectionists holding office. the supreme court's decision on trump's eligibility will be enormously consequential, not least because maine has also disqualified him from running and there are similar similar efforts underway in at least 17 other states. in anticipation of next week's hearing, colorado secretary of state just filed a brief that...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> under the reasoning of the colorado supreme court -- >> just on the face. >> a candidate must have -- meet all criteria for eligibility. i don't perceive any distinction between meeting eligibility criteria and not being disqualified. i don't see any meaningful difference between those two things. >> thank you. >> you represent the secretary of state, right? >> that's correct, your honor. >> if you are the secretary of state somewhere and someone comes in and says, i think this candidate should be disqualified, what do you do next? >> administratively and what the deputy elections director testified to is if they obtain objective information, the secretary can act on that and inform -- >> the secretary decides whether that's objective, knowable information? >> in some instances. in this case, the challenge was brought before the candidate's paperwork had been submitted and because there had been a challenge assert and put into the proper court procedure. the secretary didn't even make that determination because she didn't have the paperwork. >> in other case where that wasn't the p
>> under the reasoning of the colorado supreme court -- >> just on the face. >> a candidate must have -- meet all criteria for eligibility. i don't perceive any distinction between meeting eligibility criteria and not being disqualified. i don't see any meaningful difference between those two things. >> thank you. >> you represent the secretary of state, right? >> that's correct, your honor. >> if you are the secretary of state somewhere and someone...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
colorado supreme court they did find him guilty of insurrection. it was not a criminal trial and what would meet most people's definition. hard to believe this court would find that, either. >> dana: the lawyers representing both sides. as you go through law school you maybe imagine yourself arguing in front of the supreme court but never, i would imagine, did it enter their mind this would be the case. >> you know, i think i'm of two minds about this. you're right, it's kind of -- if you think about it in the abstract, it is epic to be in a kind of a case like this. but one time long ago and far away i tried a case that, you know, got similar attention, probably nothing like this but a terrorism case in the 90s and i have to say, you really have to tune that out and live in the day-to-day and the mission you are trying to accomplish. so i actually found at least my experience of something like this was a lot of camaraderie with the people around you but mainly tuning out the noise because what you have to be doing strategically is trying to figure
colorado supreme court they did find him guilty of insurrection. it was not a criminal trial and what would meet most people's definition. hard to believe this court would find that, either. >> dana: the lawyers representing both sides. as you go through law school you maybe imagine yourself arguing in front of the supreme court but never, i would imagine, did it enter their mind this would be the case. >> you know, i think i'm of two minds about this. you're right, it's kind of --...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>>december the colorado supreme court ruled donaldrump ineligible to appear on the state's presidential ballot for violation of the constn's insurrection clause. the u.s. supreme court hears oral argument of donald trump's appeal of the decisiowe will ha, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. now president bided speaking with union members after a recent endorsement for his reelection for the united auto workers. this comes at the after donald trump met with the teamsters union who has yet to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential minute -- presidential race. this is about 15 minutes. pres. biden: thank you. supporting you is the easiest thing i have done. i was raised on gm. my dad managed a dealership. in delaware we used to have the highest percentage of autoworkers in any state because we are a small state. we had the largest gm facility and the largest chrysler facility outsidethat is how we h school, that is how we all made it. i am going to be brief because i know you have been doing a lot of work. thank you. the expression growing up in delaware was you are the ones who br
>>december the colorado supreme court ruled donaldrump ineligible to appear on the state's presidential ballot for violation of the constn's insurrection clause. the u.s. supreme court hears oral argument of donald trump's appeal of the decisiowe will ha, c-span now, and online at c-span.org. now president bided speaking with union members after a recent endorsement for his reelection for the united auto workers. this comes at the after donald trump met with the teamsters union who has...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
republican secretaries of state urge the supreme court to rule against the colorado supreme court to that if the secretaries of state and partisan individuals obtuse the section 3, there are obvious safeguards, and i have to admit that i am sympathetic to the argument, because i have seen in washington that any time a norm is shattered or, or something new like this happens, it goes on to be abused, whether it is the filibuster or whatever. what do you say to that argument that, i mean, we have heard governor ron desantis saying that joe biden should be kept off of the ballot because of what is going on at the bord ser a rebellion or insurrection? >> i don't think that saying that one party is going to act poorly is a reason to uphold the law or the constitution, and we do have safeguards, and it is the legal system. in colorado, i did not make the decision, and this was brought by unaffiliated voters who did not want a disqualified candidate and the ballot. he has had two trials to this point, two trials in the colorado district and supreme court, and now indicating that the republi
republican secretaries of state urge the supreme court to rule against the colorado supreme court to that if the secretaries of state and partisan individuals obtuse the section 3, there are obvious safeguards, and i have to admit that i am sympathetic to the argument, because i have seen in washington that any time a norm is shattered or, or something new like this happens, it goes on to be abused, whether it is the filibuster or whatever. what do you say to that argument that, i mean, we have...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court will also hear from lawyers for the colorado secretary of state, and then of coursefrom mr. trump's attorneys who argue that any move to keep him off the ballot would disenfranchise millions of voters and they also say it could cause bedlam in the united states, which the opponents seized on in their briefs and said that is a veiled threat. we've seen the kind of bedlam in the words of the proponents of keeping mr. trump off the ballot. we saw that on january 6th, and it shouldn't be allowed to continue and that's why they say mr. trump should be excluded from the ballot. >> we want to bring in ken yoshino, let's go over the questions at the center of this case, the supreme court may be getting ready in just minutes to take this case up. the first one is is the president an officer of the united states? >> yes, absolutely. it's a pleasure to be hear on this momentous day. one of the lead arguments trump's lawyers are making in a counterintuitive way the presidents is not an officer of the united states. section 3 of the 14th amendment only applies to individuals who
the supreme court will also hear from lawyers for the colorado secretary of state, and then of coursefrom mr. trump's attorneys who argue that any move to keep him off the ballot would disenfranchise millions of voters and they also say it could cause bedlam in the united states, which the opponents seized on in their briefs and said that is a veiled threat. we've seen the kind of bedlam in the words of the proponents of keeping mr. trump off the ballot. we saw that on january 6th, and it...
0
0.0
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock and say you have three months from today to prepare for trial and i will set up ryle -- a trial date in may. if the supreme court waits late into the summer, it could be in july we get a decision postconvention, then we will not have a trial before the election. host: the georgia case and what we saw last week in georgia, what does that mean for the timing on when or if that case comes to trial? guest: that is the one case we don't have a tentative trial date set. it has already been scrambled little bit because the situation there in essence, the district attorney, had a romantic relationship with
if the supreme court decides we will not take this case and supreme court watchers think of the supreme court decides that from can stay on the ballot in colorado for instance, he might get an unfavorable ruling on the immunity thing and they might refuse to hear the case. when the supreme court in effect decides whether to hear the case or not. if they decide not to take the case in the immunity question, jurisdiction go straight back to the district court and the judge can restart the clock...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but during three hours of arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices were highly skeptical of colorado's decision. >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> this doesn't seem like a state call. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot. and others, uh, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election that trump's team argues the terme officer of the united states in the 14th amendment applies to an appointed official, not the president. >> a ruling from the supreme court is expected within weeks. lionel ike, thank you for that update. >> a major shakeup in the war in ukraine. president zelenskyy has fired his top military commander. he has replaced the officer who led ukrainian forces since russia's invasion nearly two years ago. zelensky's office says ukraine is facing a severe ammunition shortage, wit
but during three hours of arguments yesterday, the supreme court justices were highly skeptical of colorado's decision. >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. >> this doesn't seem like a state call. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot. and others, uh, for the republican candidate, you're...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so if the supreme court were to rule in favor of colorado, the rest of those dominos, jonathan, would probably fall. so, based upon that, how do you think the supreme court is going to rule? >> well, first of all what's interesting about this case is that colorado was the outlier. all the other cases either suspended consideration or rejected this on different grounds. there were three basic questions and many of them decided on three different grounds. so it's interesting going to the court to see which of these areas they can find being unanimous. i think john roberts was listening to jackson. many of us thought jackson would be the toughest sell for roberts. it appears maybe sotomayor will be the tougher sell. you could not help but feel some sympathy for murray, it's like "west side story," you show up and find out none of your sharks are there. everyone is a jet. and he did the best he could, you know, but he was looking very lonely at points and i thought he did a very good job. i thought mitchell did an outstanding job and you know, i think that overall, the argument was really
so if the supreme court were to rule in favor of colorado, the rest of those dominos, jonathan, would probably fall. so, based upon that, how do you think the supreme court is going to rule? >> well, first of all what's interesting about this case is that colorado was the outlier. all the other cases either suspended consideration or rejected this on different grounds. there were three basic questions and many of them decided on three different grounds. so it's interesting going to the...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we have this issue pending before the supreme court and the justices were skeptical of the colorado supreme court's ability to unilaterally remove somebody from the ballot in a self-executing way. i'm not sure why illinois decided to do this, i don't think ultimately they will be able to keep him off the ballot given legal framework argued of the constitution. >> carley: politics rules the day, trump campaign spokesperson says. this is a ruling we will quickly appeal. thank you for waking up with us. breaking now, fire crews working day and night to control the out of control wildfire in texas and oklahoma which are being blamed for at least one death. more than one million acres have burned and fires are only 3% contained. >> todd: next guest is a texas pilot using his own money and helicopter to help crews along the fire line. he will join us to tell us what he is seeing right now. i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. i'm under 7. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular
we have this issue pending before the supreme court and the justices were skeptical of the colorado supreme court's ability to unilaterally remove somebody from the ballot in a self-executing way. i'm not sure why illinois decided to do this, i don't think ultimately they will be able to keep him off the ballot given legal framework argued of the constitution. >> carley: politics rules the day, trump campaign spokesperson says. this is a ruling we will quickly appeal. thank you for waking...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral, that there is non-mute rail coll collateral estoppel against president trump and the colorado supreme court could decide this for all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i don't think so. i believe the effect of the decision would be determined by colorado law rather than the law of another state. i think your question gives rise to an even greater concern because if this decision does not have precluesive effect in other lawsuits it opens the possibility a different factual record could be developed in some of the litigation that occurs in other states and different factual findings could be entered by state trial judges. they may conclude president trump didn't have any intent or make a finding differs from what this trial judge court found. >> exactly. in this decision the trial court in colorado thought it was pr
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral, that there is non-mute rail coll collateral estoppel against president trump and the colorado supreme court could decide this for all other states. could it not lead to that consequence? >> i don't think so. i believe the effect of the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court rejects the colorado supreme court's decision, of course donald trump will continue to appearhe ballots across the country. after today, still only 3.78% of the delegates nationally will have been allocated after these first three voting states. i think it's important what we heard from donald trump down in mar-a-lago after the supreme court's oral arguments today. it goes beyond just the actual question of whether he can appear on the ballot or not, but it also hits at the heart of what a future donald trump presidency in the white house come 2025 could look like. what you heard from his remarks there at mar-a-lago was one. talked about the insurrection, he placed the blame on nancy pelosi. there's no evidence she had any involvement in any of the security measures taken on the day of the january 6th attack, but for donald trump it is about a justification of his actions leading up to that day and on that day. there has been no acknowledgment of any wrongdoing. instead he has justified his responses in those hours after, and when we talk about the appeals court in their rulin
court rejects the colorado supreme court's decision, of course donald trump will continue to appearhe ballots across the country. after today, still only 3.78% of the delegates nationally will have been allocated after these first three voting states. i think it's important what we heard from donald trump down in mar-a-lago after the supreme court's oral arguments today. it goes beyond just the actual question of whether he can appear on the ballot or not, but it also hits at the heart of what...
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so now it's all on the steps of the supreme court. how would you expect this particular court to decide? i don't think the supreme court is going to deal with colorado law. i do think the supreme court's more likely to go head on into section three itself. so there are a number of questions. what is an insurrection? and was january 6th an insurrection? i think that's a strong case for colorado, frankly, that january 6th was an insurrection. but that's never been defined. if it's an insurrection, did donald trump engage in it? his lawyers are arguing that sort of engaging behind the scenes doesn't qualify. number three, uh, the constitution lists the people that can be, um, sort of implicated in section three. and the argument is the president isn't specifically named. i don't think that's the strongest argument, but that's one that the court could take up. then the court could take up. the question is it a requirement that congress step in and give us that bridge between a getting before a court and the constitution itself? there are
so now it's all on the steps of the supreme court. how would you expect this particular court to decide? i don't think the supreme court is going to deal with colorado law. i do think the supreme court's more likely to go head on into section three itself. so there are a number of questions. what is an insurrection? and was january 6th an insurrection? i think that's a strong case for colorado, frankly, that january 6th was an insurrection. but that's never been defined. if it's an...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is going to reverse the colorado supreme court's decision, and then some of the air went out of the balloon. i think there are probably eight or nine votes to reverse on the ground that states cannot enforce section 3 against presidential candidates. now, there are different problems with that rational, if that's the one they adopt, but i think after the first hour or so, it became clear even before mr. murray took the podium that that was going to be the outcome of the case. >> on january 6th, you had just written a paper about section 3 of the constitution, which here to fore had gotten very little attention, and suddenly you're the legal scholar of the moment. i wonder on that day, what your initial thoughts were, and today, did anything change your mind? any of these arguments? >> no, i think the arguments have been gone over for years now, and so there's really nothing new in them. my thoughts on that day were sadness about what was happening, and then as soon as members of congress, senator mcconnell, for example, described what had happened as an insurrection, i knew this iss
is going to reverse the colorado supreme court's decision, and then some of the air went out of the balloon. i think there are probably eight or nine votes to reverse on the ground that states cannot enforce section 3 against presidential candidates. now, there are different problems with that rational, if that's the one they adopt, but i think after the first hour or so, it became clear even before mr. murray took the podium that that was going to be the outcome of the case. >> on...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> the big headline at the supreme court are that the majority of supreme court justices sounded skepticalument that former president trump could be kicked off the republican primary ballot. we had both justices who are considered liberal and conservative questioning whether colorado as one state can make the case that they can take him off of the ballot. we also heard robust arguments from both sides. on the trump side, the lawyer for him arguing that all of this, the section 3 of the 14th amendment does not apply to him for a number of reasons. chief among them, he's not an insurrectionist. we heard from lawyers for the state of colorado arguing that trump was trying to disenfranchise millions of americans and did, in fact, partake in an insurrection. afterwards, we heard from plaintiffs, take a listen to one of them now. >> as a republican, i believe in rule of law. i believe in our constitution. i believe in its plain words that said you cannot take an oath of office and then subvert that oath and foment violence and insurrection. >> colorado's secretary of state told nbc news after th
>> the big headline at the supreme court are that the majority of supreme court justices sounded skepticalument that former president trump could be kicked off the republican primary ballot. we had both justices who are considered liberal and conservative questioning whether colorado as one state can make the case that they can take him off of the ballot. we also heard robust arguments from both sides. on the trump side, the lawyer for him arguing that all of this, the section 3 of the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the justices seem to be singling that they will not be going with the colorado supreme court reeling -- the high court's conservative members say they were seeking a way to sign with the former president, most likely based on reasoning that does not address the question of whether or not he is or is not an insurrectionist. ♪ ♪ ♪ let's go back to cnn senior legal analyst elie honig, you are at the legal man magic wall. to the arguments play out the way the you expected them to? >> i think they do. jake, we identify three key arguments to watch. did he engage in the insurrection or not? we said that it would be unlikely the supreme court would want to be deep into this. in fact, they went into it one time, justice jackson for the very end of just -- donald trump's lawyers asked a question about whether donald trump engaged an insurrectionist. the lawyer said no, they gave a convoluted definition of insurrection. the supreme court was much more focused on the procedural questions starting with who gets to decide whether and how the 14th amendment applies? is it up to the individual stat
the justices seem to be singling that they will not be going with the colorado supreme court reeling -- the high court's conservative members say they were seeking a way to sign with the former president, most likely based on reasoning that does not address the question of whether or not he is or is not an insurrectionist. ♪ ♪ ♪ let's go back to cnn senior legal analyst elie honig, you are at the legal man magic wall. to the arguments play out the way the you expected them to? >> i...
0
0.0
Feb 7, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court will hear oral arguments in the case of former president donald trump's eligibility to be on the 2024 colorado ballot. the colorado supreme court ruled that former president trump was ineligible for running from office because he violated the 14th amendment to the u.s. constitution and supported an insurrection on january 6. watch live coverage beginning at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal, with expert analysis previewing the case. at 10:00 a.m. eastern it's live coverage of the u.s. supreme court oral argument. at 8:00 p.m. eastern we recap the day's events and take your calls. watch live coverage of the u.s. supreme court oral argument benning thursday at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal, on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile video app, or online at c-span.org. click c-span is your unfiltered view of government. funded by these television companies and more, including cox. >> this syndrome is extremely rare. but friends don't have to be. when you're connected, you are not alone. >> c supports c-span as a public service, along with these other television
supreme court will hear oral arguments in the case of former president donald trump's eligibility to be on the 2024 colorado ballot. the colorado supreme court ruled that former president trump was ineligible for running from office because he violated the 14th amendment to the u.s. constitution and supported an insurrection on january 6. watch live coverage beginning at 7:00 a.m. eastern on washington journal, with expert analysis previewing the case. at 10:00 a.m. eastern it's live coverage...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say, using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral estoppel, that there is non-mutual collateral estoppel against former president trump. so the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide this question for many other states, perhaps all other states. could to not lead to that consequence? >> joined by jeffrey toobin. i hope you know what collateral estoppel means, including the book the nine, inside the secret world of the supreme court. so, jeff, what was alito's point there? >> just in terms of the argument itself, you know, jason murray represented colorado, and i would say his argument was somewhere between a calamity and a disaster. >> wow. >> it was everything he was selling, they weren't buying. he didn't do a bad job. it's just that every argument, you know, whether trump was covered under section 3 of the 14th amendment, whether colorado had the right to do
the consequences of what the colorado supreme court did, some people claim, would be quite severe. would it not permit -- would it not lead to the possibility that other states would say, using their choice of law rules and their rules on collateral estoppel, that there is non-mutual collateral estoppel against former president trump. so the decision of the colorado supreme court could effectively decide this question for many other states, perhaps all other states. could to not lead to that...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the colorado district court and the colorado supreme court, of course. not yet been litigated on the federal level, which i think something people have raised. and i'm in justinterested in your viewyou the on ton, jenyour show for the very first time. and with your introduction, i grew up in a cabin with a house outside on -- so thini states constitution. rovision, it has toto be what dhapphere. you arprioand c ould have accepted donald trump's grip is on the republican party, and how mainstream maga extrnow imagint are of don e, and ahonjustchaos are yoyourn personal safety? i hdeatthworkeof state. iton the line. if a political partis trywith t democrprior host saibe intimbeintidonald trumpsa would be bedlchaos to the united states supreme court, depending on their decision, just reek grave threat his ou, your brave and coach. lot of lwayou had e as welme this evening. n thuthank yothink you has fall we've beeninto one authoritaria impulse of donald trump is real quick break. ♪♪uick break. my safetnce 20 whenhreat arted tol three of it ing file death t.
the colorado district court and the colorado supreme court, of course. not yet been litigated on the federal level, which i think something people have raised. and i'm in justinterested in your viewyou the on ton, jenyour show for the very first time. and with your introduction, i grew up in a cabin with a house outside on -- so thini states constitution. rovision, it has toto be what dhapphere. you arprioand c ould have accepted donald trump's grip is on the republican party, and how...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court, case of colorado attempting to keep trump off its primary ballot. throughout the entirety of the session. all nine justices expressed skepticism and doubt over the state's argument including the liberal wing, questioning whether colorado even had the authority to decide the presidency for the rest of the nation. a decision on that is expected relatively soon considering colorado is a super tuesday state, which is march 5th as you know. back to you. >> brian: thanks so much. i thought one of the most significant thing is the president's reaction afterwards. he was kind of measured afterwards. >> ainsley: he was happy. >> brian: 2020 election had come out differently, wow. so it shows 90% of his post comments campaigning a very disciplined approach to winning back the white house except for the eruption in new hampshire, this has been a different president. >> did you all notice when he came out to say this is a beautiful process what the supreme court did? democracy, beautiful. gave rit adjective. when he said that he had an opportunity to talk about
supreme court, case of colorado attempting to keep trump off its primary ballot. throughout the entirety of the session. all nine justices expressed skepticism and doubt over the state's argument including the liberal wing, questioning whether colorado even had the authority to decide the presidency for the rest of the nation. a decision on that is expected relatively soon considering colorado is a super tuesday state, which is march 5th as you know. back to you. >> brian: thanks so much....
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they were looking for some reason to take this grave step of confirming the colorado supreme court'shat's a momentous thing, you've got to reassure them, unfortunately there wasn't that reassurance. >> so catherine, let's talk about the appeals court ruling, the unanimous appeals court ruling decision, denying donald trump presidential immunity. how likely is the supreme court to take up that issue, do you think? >> oh i'm going to agree with what neil said, i think earlier this week. and i have never argued before the supreme court. i think there won't be for justices to take the case, and i'm happy to be wrong, if i am found wrong. i think this was such a well written, narrowly tailored decision, it was unanimous, as you said, a -- decision, and they basically made it clear that you can't really get it on bond, which is the entire court to review it. and even if you did, it would still be going back to judge chutkan. so, i think that the supreme court will not hear it and. if they do not hear they will go back to judge chutkan. and there will be a trial. now of course they agreed t
they were looking for some reason to take this grave step of confirming the colorado supreme court'shat's a momentous thing, you've got to reassure them, unfortunately there wasn't that reassurance. >> so catherine, let's talk about the appeals court ruling, the unanimous appeals court ruling decision, denying donald trump presidential immunity. how likely is the supreme court to take up that issue, do you think? >> oh i'm going to agree with what neil said, i think earlier this...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you know, in the colorado supreme court, some of the justices who ended up disqualifying president trump from the ballot were asking pretty aggressive questions that would lead you to think that they were on the other side. so i do think it's premature. but part of this is, it's such an unprecedented situation because it was literally quite some time since the civil war that we had an insurrection like this. donald trump broke the law. he needs to face consequences for everything he did to try to steal the presidential election, which was not just the insurrection. >> let me play one sound bite for you. this is chief justice roberts, pause the other thing they seemed to be concerned about, as you pointed out, were the political consequences of taking donald trump off the ballot. take a listen. >> i would expect that, you know, a goodly number of states will say whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. tha
you know, in the colorado supreme court, some of the justices who ended up disqualifying president trump from the ballot were asking pretty aggressive questions that would lead you to think that they were on the other side. so i do think it's premature. but part of this is, it's such an unprecedented situation because it was literally quite some time since the civil war that we had an insurrection like this. donald trump broke the law. he needs to face consequences for everything he did to try...
0
0.0
Feb 5, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
lastly, colorado secretary of state, jena griswold, filed a brief urging the supreme court to keep trumpnd to issue its ruling as soon as possible. secretary griswold is here now. secretary griswold, it is great to see you. thank you for coming back on the show. let's talk about how you expect thursday's hearing to go. the state solicitor general will be representing you, as i understand, we will only have ten minutes to make your cases to the justices. what is your plan with the limited time you have and what is the central argument your team will make? >> thanks for having me on. next week, it definitely, will be a historical week for our democracy, with such a big supreme court case. we are focused with one message to the supreme court. a state can keep off their ballots and out breaking insurrectionist like donald trump. we expect trump to continue to say he is above the law, above the constitution. that he has no ability to be held liable for his acts. frankly, i think that is not correct. i think the president should not be above the law. that is an affront to what this country sta
lastly, colorado secretary of state, jena griswold, filed a brief urging the supreme court to keep trumpnd to issue its ruling as soon as possible. secretary griswold is here now. secretary griswold, it is great to see you. thank you for coming back on the show. let's talk about how you expect thursday's hearing to go. the state solicitor general will be representing you, as i understand, we will only have ten minutes to make your cases to the justices. what is your plan with the limited time...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and i think the supreme court is seeing that, you know, the state of colorado with a completely democraticurt following suit here was really just -- you know, arguments that don't make any sense under the 14th amendment. i was heartened to hear all of the supreme court justices, the liberal ones and the conservative ones, really question the soundness of the state of colorado's argument that somehow the state would have supremacy over a federal candidate and the ability to disqualify them. you know, chief justice roberts pointed out very quickly that, look, if we we ruled in your favor, things are going to turn just the opposite where where red states are going to knock liberal candidates off of the ballot, and we'll have all chaos. but i think the most important thing was all of the liberal justices like ketanji brown and kagan and even sotomayor pushed back on this idea, you know, where the 14th amendment, everyone knows that the history of the 14th amendment, maria, was to take power away from the states, and yet here's the state of colorado saying it actually gave them more power, powe
and i think the supreme court is seeing that, you know, the state of colorado with a completely democraticurt following suit here was really just -- you know, arguments that don't make any sense under the 14th amendment. i was heartened to hear all of the supreme court justices, the liberal ones and the conservative ones, really question the soundness of the state of colorado's argument that somehow the state would have supremacy over a federal candidate and the ability to disqualify them. you...