0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people sleeping in tents in public places , the supreme court of the united states examines this case . the number of homeless people in the united states has reached more than 600,000 people, and some cities have declared it a crime to pitch tents in public places without providing shelter for these people. for fear of the law, they have to constantly change their place. being homeless is very difficult. day by day we case we are harassed. either by the police or people driving by or our neighbors. the court of this city of 39,000 people on the banks of the ragivar river 7 years ago declared the accommodation of homeless people in public places illegal and a crime , that's why the homeless people constantly see the shadow of the law enforcement officers. you know we live in tents here. you know, if i were the owner of the house, i wouldn't want it here. it's really sad for me. i mean, i have a right to a place to live. in two or three years, their number will double. if the supreme court of the united states accepts the decision of the local court of grandpas and confirms the crimina
people sleeping in tents in public places , the supreme court of the united states examines this case . the number of homeless people in the united states has reached more than 600,000 people, and some cities have declared it a crime to pitch tents in public places without providing shelter for these people. for fear of the law, they have to constantly change their place. being homeless is very difficult. day by day we case we are harassed. either by the police or people driving by or our...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court of the united states should've spent its entire 2 1/2 hour argument on whether the former president is immune from prosecution for having committed a grave offense of attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding the votes of the american people. instead, of course, we never know what the court will do, but it seemed evident to all that the court will end up remanding the case to the lower courts, even the court of appeals in the first instance or more likely, the federal district court who's going to sit and preside over the trial. if it does that, it is the most likely ask of that court to determine which of the president -- former presidents criminal acts constitute acts in his official capacity as president of the united states, and which constitute acts in his personal private candidate status, if you will. these are decisions likely that the supreme court -- it should make itself in a first instance when it has the case before it. again, it appears that the court will almost certainly remand the case to the lower co
the supreme court of the united states should've spent its entire 2 1/2 hour argument on whether the former president is immune from prosecution for having committed a grave offense of attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding the votes of the american people. instead, of course, we never know what the court will do, but it seemed evident to all that the court will end up remanding the case to the lower courts, even the court of appeals in the...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, which is not what the supreme court of the united states is. the job is to answer all the questions and concerns of the justices, not walk away in some sort of grandiose i got this, see you later, peace out, drop the microphone. that is not the way supreme court arguments are done. at the end of the day, i'm not sure that is going to be the determinative factor. they will go back and say what are we more worried about? a president who could get indicted all the time or a president who can't get indicted for the crimes he commits. >> i just cannot thank you both enough. andrew weissman, neal katyal. harvard law professor laurence tribe will join us next. next. symptoms can sometimes take you out of the moment. now there's skyrizi, so you can show up with clearer skin... ...and show it off. ♪ nothing is everything ♪ with skyrizi, you could take each step with 90% clearer skin. and if you have psoriatic arthritis, skyrizi can help you get moving with less joint pain, stiffness, swelling, and fatigue. and skyrizi is just 4 doses a year, after 2
, which is not what the supreme court of the united states is. the job is to answer all the questions and concerns of the justices, not walk away in some sort of grandiose i got this, see you later, peace out, drop the microphone. that is not the way supreme court arguments are done. at the end of the day, i'm not sure that is going to be the determinative factor. they will go back and say what are we more worried about? a president who could get indicted all the time or a president who can't...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and to the explicit position of the biden department of justice has argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of this senate to vote on political expediency to avoid listening to arguments the only rational way to resolve this question is to actually debate it to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize the senate is in a non- debatable position at the center has a right to offer his point of order. or his emotion but we are and eight non- debatable position because my motion is to change that. so that we can actually debate the law senators can't with the constitution and law says i therefore move the senate proceed to close session to g allow for deliberation on the question as required by impeachment rule 24. >> madam president for. >> majority leader progress in our previous consent request we gavet your side a chance for debates in public where it should be. your side objected. we are moving forward. >> the question is on the motion. >> asked for that yeas and nays is there sufficient
and to the explicit position of the biden department of justice has argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of this senate to vote on political expediency to avoid listening to arguments the only rational way to resolve this question is to actually debate it to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize the senate is in a non- debatable position at the center has a right to offer his point of...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of the united states -- against, by the way, brilliant desent by justice alito concluded that the state of texas didn't have standing to what address violations of law and variations of law from secretary mayorkas and the biden administration. so if not us then who? countless instances courts can't do it. the executive branch isn't going check the executive branch. the buck stoppings with us it is our job to do this and we failed we didn't just fail in the stheans we tried and didn't. but the majority of us unfortunately tried not to when out of our way to define our role as thing that it is not to define law as saying something other than what it, in fact, says so that we can sure our responsibilities yet again. shame on us, shame on those members of this body who voted to do that today. i wonder what future generations will say about this. i wonder how many ways in which future generations will suffer from what we did today. i hope to shout -- they'll take this as a lesson and whatnot to do and soon depart from this awful precedent otherwise this will lead to the sheddi
supreme court of the united states -- against, by the way, brilliant desent by justice alito concluded that the state of texas didn't have standing to what address violations of law and variations of law from secretary mayorkas and the biden administration. so if not us then who? countless instances courts can't do it. the executive branch isn't going check the executive branch. the buck stoppings with us it is our job to do this and we failed we didn't just fail in the stheans we tried and...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
IRINN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if the supreme court of the united states accepts the decision of the grandpas local court and confirms the criminality of sleeping tents in public places, it will be spread to the entire united states. a country that has nearly 600,000 homeless people and their number has seen a 12% increase last year. good luck to you. this side of the table is a martyr in your eyes. in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings to you, honorable compatriots let's enter the subject of both umrah and hajj trips , which is not long until the season, maybe 34 weeks at the end, but sooner, i think it will start anyway, and in this way, we are hosting mr. hosseini, the honorable head of the organization, on the first page of the program tonight. hajj and pilgrimage , we will talk about umrah and hajj, and also about my pilgrimage . i say hello again , mr. hosseini and khair moghaddam . well, about this news, first , explain a little about what happened and from now on what is going to happen next, in what order, at what times , how long can we travel for umrah? well , you know, alm
if the supreme court of the united states accepts the decision of the grandpas local court and confirms the criminality of sleeping tents in public places, it will be spread to the entire united states. a country that has nearly 600,000 homeless people and their number has seen a 12% increase last year. good luck to you. this side of the table is a martyr in your eyes. in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings to you, honorable compatriots let's enter the subject of...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
ESPRESO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on thursday , the supreme court of the united states heard the arguments of donald trump's lawyers on granting him the presidency. the hearing concerns the former president's actions between the november 2020 election and the jan. 6, 2021 attack on the capitol, in which trump supporters tried to derail the official declaration of biden's victory in the election. in february, a panel of d.c. court of appeals judges unanimously rejected the former president's argument that he has absolute immunity from prosecution because it would put the president above the. law. now the decision is up to the supreme court. in his own social network truth social, trump wrote: without presidential immunity, it would be impossible for the president to function properly, which creates a great and eternal danger for the united states. meanwhile, in the run-up to the election, the likely candidates, both joe biden and donald trump, are supporting israel in the gas war and confrontation with iran. how does the war in the middle east affect the american politics? says iryna shinkarenko. iran's attack on israe
on thursday , the supreme court of the united states heard the arguments of donald trump's lawyers on granting him the presidency. the hearing concerns the former president's actions between the november 2020 election and the jan. 6, 2021 attack on the capitol, in which trump supporters tried to derail the official declaration of biden's victory in the election. in february, a panel of d.c. court of appeals judges unanimously rejected the former president's argument that he has absolute...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
court of the united states. regarding former president donald trump, here's the headline for you, the headline where you can see how it says that giving trump sweeping immunity would bring k also according to former us generals avenue. busy and military service leaders. what's it about? well, it's about mr. trump asking for immunity from prosecution because he was after all the press, the united states, as the former generals argue that as mr. trump gets immunity, us troops stationed everywhere else will feel like if the president doesn't have to abide by the law. then why should we? the generals are telling the court that if it grant mr. trump's request for immunity, will threaten to inject chaos in the military operations. and also threatens to damage potentially irreparably, the public's trust in the military. that's what they say. okay, look, while that reasoning, george seems like a bit of a reach. the overall method presented by these generals is correct there, right? no one under any system of governance
court of the united states. regarding former president donald trump, here's the headline for you, the headline where you can see how it says that giving trump sweeping immunity would bring k also according to former us generals avenue. busy and military service leaders. what's it about? well, it's about mr. trump asking for immunity from prosecution because he was after all the press, the united states, as the former generals argue that as mr. trump gets immunity, us troops stationed everywhere...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
indeed when they built the marble palace, which is the supreme court of the united states, several people didn't want to have their offices there because they thought it was much too posh during the middle of the depression. so i a think at law school we teach you court, court but the reason the dean was here is we teach you the constitution is also about you, about elections, the congress, the presidency because we can get rid of courts there's other nations that don't have a court like ours. they still have a democracy and that is what they are fighting for. twe will have representative presley and bush. thanks for your patience. white house spokesm sam acknowledged the outcome of e trial in a statement saying the articles were rightly voted it down adding that predent biden and secretary mayorkas
indeed when they built the marble palace, which is the supreme court of the united states, several people didn't want to have their offices there because they thought it was much too posh during the middle of the depression. so i a think at law school we teach you court, court but the reason the dean was here is we teach you the constitution is also about you, about elections, the congress, the presidency because we can get rid of courts there's other nations that don't have a court like ours....
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
information they want the court to consider to the supreme court of the united states regarding former president donald trump. here's a headline for you, the headline where you can see how it says that giving from sweeping immunity would bring chaos according to former us generals admirals and military service leaders. what's it about? well, it's about mr. trump, asking for immunity from prosecution because he was after all the press, the united states to the former generals argue that as mr. trump gets immunity, us troops stationed everywhere else will feel like if the president doesn't have to abide by the law. and why should we, the generals are telling the court that if it grant mr. trump's request for immunity, will threaten to inject chaos in the military operations and also threatens to damage potentially irreparably. the public's trust in the military. that's what they say. okay, look, while that reasoning, george seems like a bit of a reach. the overall message presented by these generals is correct there, right? no one under any system of governance should be above the law. i
information they want the court to consider to the supreme court of the united states regarding former president donald trump. here's a headline for you, the headline where you can see how it says that giving from sweeping immunity would bring chaos according to former us generals admirals and military service leaders. what's it about? well, it's about mr. trump, asking for immunity from prosecution because he was after all the press, the united states to the former generals argue that as mr....
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
indeed, when they built the marble palace, the supreme court of the united states, several people did not want to even have their offices in there because they thought it was much too posh during the middle of the depression. so i think at law school we teach you courts, courts, courts, courts, courts. but the reason that the dean was here, particularly at our law school, is we teach you that the constitution is also about you. about elections. about the congress. about the presidency. because we can get rid of courts. there are other nations that don't have a court like ours. they still have a democracy. and that's worth fighting for. so thanks for that. we will get back here when we have representatives pressley and bush. as they're on their way. thanks for your patience. [applause]
indeed, when they built the marble palace, the supreme court of the united states, several people did not want to even have their offices in there because they thought it was much too posh during the middle of the depression. so i think at law school we teach you courts, courts, courts, courts, courts. but the reason that the dean was here, particularly at our law school, is we teach you that the constitution is also about you. about elections. about the congress. about the presidency. because...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
there is an exchange in a case argued last term and the supreme court of the united states called united states versus texas. in that case the supreme court heard arguments from the state of texas whether or not this administration's approach toward the same provisions of law is acceptable. whether or not they could challenge them. now unfortunately the supreme court a reached a conclusion. a conclusion with which i strongly disagree. might have concluded ultimately the state of texas lacks standing to challenge federal policy among so we are discussing today. notwithstanding the fact it is conduct and its residents. but the important part that we should have been known to argue today's exchange thatay occurred at oral argument between justice kavanaugh and elizabeth, solicitor general of the united states. in her's capacitor solicitor general as the biden administration chief appellate advocate before the united state supreme court, justice kavanaugh asked her a number of questions and on page 50 of that argument some of that discussion ensues. he asked the file if the new administratio
there is an exchange in a case argued last term and the supreme court of the united states called united states versus texas. in that case the supreme court heard arguments from the state of texas whether or not this administration's approach toward the same provisions of law is acceptable. whether or not they could challenge them. now unfortunately the supreme court a reached a conclusion. a conclusion with which i strongly disagree. might have concluded ultimately the state of texas lacks...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of the senate to vote on political expe expedy to avoid it listening to arguments the only rational way to resolve this question is to debate it to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize the senate is in a nondebatable position the senator has a right to offer his point of order, or his motion but we are in a nondebatable position. >> and my motion is to change that so we can actually debate the law senators care with the constitution and law says. i therefore move the senate proceed to close session to allow for deliberation on the question as required by impeachment rule 24. >> president. >> majority leader. >> in our previous request we gave your side a transfer debate in public. where it should be. and your side objected. we are moving forward. >> the question is the motion. is there a sufficient second? there is a sufficient second, the clerk will call the wall. >> ms. baldwin, mr. barrasso, m
as argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of the senate to vote on political expe expedy to avoid it listening to arguments the only rational way to resolve this question is to debate it to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize the senate is in a nondebatable position the senator has a right to offer his point of order, or his motion but we are in a nondebatable position. >> and...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is that they >> owe could i mean, yeah, it's the supreme court of the united states obviously. and they are the supreme court of the land and there's something called federalism, which means that they can definitely put it press pause if they wanted to. i don't think they will because this is very different than the presidential immunity case that they are, that they are hearing this particular case involves his personal life, right? although he was president when he wrote some of when he wrote the checks, at the time that he was doing this, he was candidate trump and he was trying to prevent this from going to the electorate. so that's personal. it's not presidential in nature, but you never know. so i just one of the things that he could have possibly done he's been making motions all week trying to delay and he's getting that has not happened, but we'll see if he if he does this >> yeah. i mean, it's everything in the kitchen sink, the catch-up against the wall, everything you name it. all right. karen. thank you so much for your time. this morning. we really appreciate it.
is that they >> owe could i mean, yeah, it's the supreme court of the united states obviously. and they are the supreme court of the land and there's something called federalism, which means that they can definitely put it press pause if they wanted to. i don't think they will because this is very different than the presidential immunity case that they are, that they are hearing this particular case involves his personal life, right? although he was president when he wrote some of when he...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in exchange in a case argued last term in the supreme court of united states and united states versus texas. in that case, the supreme court heard arguments about whether or not this administration's approach toward the same provisions of law is acceptable whether or not they could challenge them. the supreme court reached a conclusion of which i strongly disagree supreme court concluded effects the standing federal policy along for we are discussing today, conduct that substantial harm. the important part we should have been able to argue today is the exchange that occurred between justice capital and elizabeth, solicitor general of the united states in her capacity in the biden administration appellate advocate before the united states supreme court. justice capital asked for a number of questions. the argument transmits some of the argument. if a new administration comes in, we are not going to enforce environmental law labor laws. a blanket, just not enforce those laws, correct but that is direct but the framers intended political check. if an administration did something that ext
in exchange in a case argued last term in the supreme court of united states and united states versus texas. in that case, the supreme court heard arguments about whether or not this administration's approach toward the same provisions of law is acceptable whether or not they could challenge them. the supreme court reached a conclusion of which i strongly disagree supreme court concluded effects the standing federal policy along for we are discussing today, conduct that substantial harm. the...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the biden department of justice as argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of the senate to vote on political expediency to avoid listening to arguments. the only rational way to resolve this question is to debate it, to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize that the senate is in a non-debatable position. the senator has a right to offer his point of order. or his motion but we are in a non-debatable position. >> my motion is to change that so we can debate the law as senators care what the constitution and law says. i move that the senate proceed to close session to allow for deliberation on the question as required by impeachment rule 24. >> madame president. >> in our previous consent request away gave your side a chance for debate in public where it should be. and your side objected. we are moving forward. >> the question is on the motion. >> ask for the yays and nays. is there a sufficient second? there is a sufficient second, the clerk will call the roll. >> ms. ba
of the biden department of justice as argued before the supreme court of the united states. the majority leader's position is asking members of the senate to vote on political expediency to avoid listening to arguments. the only rational way to resolve this question is to debate it, to consider the constitution and consider the law. >> the senator will recognize that the senate is in a non-debatable position. the senator has a right to offer his point of order. or his motion but we are in...
0
0.0
Apr 13, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's exactly what the supreme court of the united states told the biden administration when it comes to forgiving student loan debt, don't. but that hand stopped the biden administration. in fact, their latest gambit is a $7.4 billion student loan forgivend program. "the new york post" has said the following, they said that joe biden, defern of democracy, loves shredding norms when these norms stand between him and his brazen efforts to buy votes. just look at a his latest student debt forgiveness ploy. keep in mind it's not forgivenesses, he's just making other people who never took out loans pay for them. rachel: rae yeah, absolutely. aoc, by the way, was on stephen colbert's show, and this is why she thinks we need loan forgiveness. we need to take money from the working class and give it to college grads. listen. >> you know, this is huge. this is -- can people getting student loan forgiveness, their student the loans canceled, it means that, you know, it's hope to buy a house or have a kid or travel abroad or maybe even go back to school and, you know, pursue a career that maybe
that's exactly what the supreme court of the united states told the biden administration when it comes to forgiving student loan debt, don't. but that hand stopped the biden administration. in fact, their latest gambit is a $7.4 billion student loan forgivend program. "the new york post" has said the following, they said that joe biden, defern of democracy, loves shredding norms when these norms stand between him and his brazen efforts to buy votes. just look at a his latest student...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating. there and i think we've moved beyond that. >> san francisco's city attorney's office has a very different take. the city says it has laws on the book to offer compassionate care for homeless, but also to clear streets when necessary. those policies have been blocked for now by the courts waiting for a decision on this case. city attorney david chiu says whether and how san francisco can manage its homelessness crisis will be det
the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is folks are out there because they...
0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. and while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, that case, of course, drawing major attention right here in the bay area. >> the reality is folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating there. and i think we've moved beyond that. >> i mean, not only is san francisco, meanwhile, san francisco's city attorney has a very different take. >> the city says it has laws on the book to offer compassionate care for the homeless, but also to clear the streets when necessary. those policies, though blocked for now by the courts waiting for a decision on this case. the city attorney, david chiu, says whether and how san francisco can manage its homelessness crisis will be determined by this ruling. >> hopefully have a much more nuanced ruling that strikes a balance between what san francisco has been trying to do, whi
the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. and while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, that case, of course, drawing major attention right here in the bay area. >> the reality is folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating there. and i...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is, folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them, because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating there. and i think we've moved beyond that. >> san francisco's city attorney's office has a very different take. the city says it has laws on the book to offer compassionate care for homeless, but also to clear streets when necessary. those policies have been blocked for now by the courts waiting for a decision on this case. city attorney david chu says whether and how san francisco can manage its homelessness crisis will be de
supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is, folks are out there because they...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
when our supreme court of the united states has ruled that abortion is kicked back to the states, so it's state—by—state for so long as we can for see. state-by-state for so long as we can for see. ~ �* . state-by-state for so long as we can for see. ~ �* , , ., , for see. we're 'ust seeing images of, the for see. we're 'ust seeing images of. the harris — for see. we're just seeing images of, the harris arriving _ for see. we're just seeing images of, the harris arriving there - for see. we're just seeing images of, the harris arriving there in - of, the harris arriving there in tucson — what do you think of what donald trumps trying to do ——, lloyd harris? is trying to appeal to everyone and no one by being so noncommittal? he everyone and no one by being so noncommittal?— everyone and no one by being so noncommittal? he recognises the slit noncommittal? he recognises the s . lit within noncommittal? he recognises the split within their _ noncommittal? he recognises the split within their publican - noncommittal? he recognises the split within their publican base,
when our supreme court of the united states has ruled that abortion is kicked back to the states, so it's state—by—state for so long as we can for see. state-by-state for so long as we can for see. ~ �* . state-by-state for so long as we can for see. ~ �* , , ., , for see. we're 'ust seeing images of, the for see. we're 'ust seeing images of. the harris — for see. we're just seeing images of, the harris arriving _ for see. we're just seeing images of, the harris arriving there - for...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
city's own legal battle over how to address homeless encampments as the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. >> while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating. there and i think we've moved beyond that. >> san francisco's city attorney's office has a very different take. the city says it has laws on the book to offer compassionate care for homeless. but also to clear streets when necessary. those policies have been blocked for now by the courts waiting for a decision on this case. city attorney david chiu s
city's own legal battle over how to address homeless encampments as the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness. >> while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon, the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can...
0
0.0
Apr 7, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
one, a sweeping, broad one was struck down by the supreme court of the united states as an overreach of executive in order. but -- authority. but tomorrow he's set to announce if another, and he's going to do it while he's in wisconsin. important swing state. most polls show that biden is, he's bleeding voters, quite honestly, with a couple of different segments. first of all, black voters, according to polling, in 2020 he got 90% of the vote. i think it's down to 68% right now. latino voters below 50% at this point. and young voters where in 2020, i think we can put these up, in 2020 he got 61% of young voters, voters under the age of 30. now "the wall street journal" is showing he's about at 50 among young voters. you combine these three groups, and this is pretty devastating for re-election hopes. so the student loan forgiveness plan clearly tied to trying to win back young voters. pete: and they think it won last time. you're right, the supreme court struck it down after the midterm election, so it had the desired effect. so if you start introducing things that are extra that-con
one, a sweeping, broad one was struck down by the supreme court of the united states as an overreach of executive in order. but -- authority. but tomorrow he's set to announce if another, and he's going to do it while he's in wisconsin. important swing state. most polls show that biden is, he's bleeding voters, quite honestly, with a couple of different segments. first of all, black voters, according to polling, in 2020 he got 90% of the vote. i think it's down to 68% right now. latino voters...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
city's own legal battle over how to address homeless encampments. >> the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness, while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon. the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can criminalize homelessness. >> the reality is folks are out there because they have no other choice, for almost everyone. and it's not okay to then cite them and arrest them, because they're destitute. that is, in essence, a pauper's prison that we're creating there. and i think we've moved beyond that. >> san francisco's city attorney's office has a very different take. the city says it has laws on the book to offer compassionate care for homeless, but also to clear streets when necessary. those policies have been blocked for now by the courts waiting for a decision on this case. city attorney david chiu say
city's own legal battle over how to address homeless encampments. >> the supreme court of the united states heard oral arguments over how cities manage the issue of homelessness, while the case in question came from grants pass, oregon. the case is drawing attention here in the bay area. homeless advocates marched and rallied in front of san francisco's federal court building and through the streets of the city, advocates saying the case will get to the heart of whether cities can...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court of the united states. but ironically, the o.j. case was such a setback for my argument because the courtroom was out of control. >> it took >> like a year as you just pointed out, judge ito just did not rain it in. he allowed the lawyers to ride rough shot. so forever, i've been saying to people there need to be cameras and courtroom, but don't let a o.j. your yardstick that is a really interesting way to think about it because yeah, you're right. it does. >> if it came really performative, i >> mean, those moments where he puts the glove on and i am interested to know what you think about how that impacts i mean, in theory, it's not supposed to impact a jury, >> right. >> but i think we all know in reality that it creates these cultural moments that can't help. but influence the process somehow. how do you think about that? >> it's taken me years to appreciate the jury nullification that took place in the o.j. criminal trial. i'm not defending it. i think he was guilty as sin. i thought it then i think it
supreme court of the united states. but ironically, the o.j. case was such a setback for my argument because the courtroom was out of control. >> it took >> like a year as you just pointed out, judge ito just did not rain it in. he allowed the lawyers to ride rough shot. so forever, i've been saying to people there need to be cameras and courtroom, but don't let a o.j. your yardstick that is a really interesting way to think about it because yeah, you're right. it does. >> if...
0
0.0
Apr 29, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
of the united states. >> let's turn to the trial that is already happening this year, dan, you've been a skeptic of this prosecution from the start. we're now deep into the testimony. what do you make of it? >> look, i'm still a skeptic of the fact he brought the case, right. two separate question, should he have brought it and second, is there a possibility for a conviction meaning is there enough evidence? i think you have to view it through the prism of a technical violation, a souped up misdemeanor. with all that said, they have certainly presented evidence of falsified record, right? and now you've got these first witnesses demonstrating particularly david pecker it does seem there is an argument it was done to impact the campaign, and that will be the legal question, that the jurors will be deciding, not the question of should the case have been brought, that's for us to decide out here, right? inside that courtroom, that's not really the question they should be assessing. the only question is going to be, is there enough evidence? and the prosecution is now presenting evidence t
of the united states. >> let's turn to the trial that is already happening this year, dan, you've been a skeptic of this prosecution from the start. we're now deep into the testimony. what do you make of it? >> look, i'm still a skeptic of the fact he brought the case, right. two separate question, should he have brought it and second, is there a possibility for a conviction meaning is there enough evidence? i think you have to view it through the prism of a technical violation, a...
0
0.0
Apr 1, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and on april 25th, the supreme court of the united states will hear arguments that will determine the breath beth, of presidential immunity. of course, trump is arguing that he has blanket immunity while he is president and cannot be charged for what he did while in office. so all of legal cases are starting to hit ahead and we are seeing trump attack the judges, the prosecutor theaters, the judicious judicial system at large. at this critical juncture, john >> all right. steve pareto for us following all this, appreciate your reporting, sir. >> their new this morning, president biden's path to reelection could hinge potentially on black voters but he has to reach them first. his team is trying to tackle a decades-long drop in black voter turnout especially among black men. and battleground wisconsin, could be the first test of their efforts. cnn's isaac dovere is joining me now. isaac, wisconsin's primary tomorrow what is the strategy here? what are they looking at? >> well like they'd been working for the last couple of weeks on implementing a number of new methods that they are try
and on april 25th, the supreme court of the united states will hear arguments that will determine the breath beth, of presidential immunity. of course, trump is arguing that he has blanket immunity while he is president and cannot be charged for what he did while in office. so all of legal cases are starting to hit ahead and we are seeing trump attack the judges, the prosecutor theaters, the judicious judicial system at large. at this critical juncture, john >> all right. steve pareto for...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sex marriage, but also the supreme court of the united states has to legalize same sex marriage nationally and any evangelical or christian who in 2016 holds the view that barack obama held in 2008 is now regarded a bigot or worse and they are not welcome in polite company. they are they are a deplorable they are an irredeemable. they are someone who is on the wrong side of history and that they are part of the sort of demographic death spiral that once we get rid of them, we will be able to move into a new, enlightened era in america. and i think that as one example of many has fueled this sense of persecution, of marginalization and a feeling that these people, as donald trump likes to say in his speeches, he talks to evangelical audiences that they are under siege, that barbarians are at the gates and i think the clearest, most concise way to understand the relationship between trump and these people is effectively to realize that. once you believe barbarians are at the gates, then you decide that maybe, just maybe, need a barbarian to protect you. and that is donald trump to these folk
sex marriage, but also the supreme court of the united states has to legalize same sex marriage nationally and any evangelical or christian who in 2016 holds the view that barack obama held in 2008 is now regarded a bigot or worse and they are not welcome in polite company. they are they are a deplorable they are an irredeemable. they are someone who is on the wrong side of history and that they are part of the sort of demographic death spiral that once we get rid of them, we will be able to...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
have two more pending appeals, one before the supreme court of the united states. do you have any indication of when you might hear back? obviously, they are known to have gone to the 11th hour in their decisions, even on a last-minute petition for an appeal such as this that's right. so it could come anytime tomorrow, tomorrow night and the execution scheduled that it could start at six, but the warrant is good for 24 hours. so we can wait past six for those decisions and we will and will remain hopeful this i understand is death by lethal injection the idea of a scheduled execution very difficult to put those two words together. megan crane. thank you so much. >> thank you so much. >> up next day. watershed moment for women's basketball. the antidotal a championship shattering records the most one botched basketball game areas since 2019 will the success continue? that's the big question. and jamal hill is here to talk all about it >> sunday and ninth of space for stoma whole story with anderson cooper, the james webb telescope. are we alone? mahmoud by the two p
have two more pending appeals, one before the supreme court of the united states. do you have any indication of when you might hear back? obviously, they are known to have gone to the 11th hour in their decisions, even on a last-minute petition for an appeal such as this that's right. so it could come anytime tomorrow, tomorrow night and the execution scheduled that it could start at six, but the warrant is good for 24 hours. so we can wait past six for those decisions and we will and will...
0
0.0
Apr 14, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it goes to the supreme court who decides who's on the supreme court, the president of the united states. howard: caroline, this is from the time before lincoln freed the slaves, a few thousand people lived in this arizona territory. half a century away from statehood. even carry lake, who once embraced -- kari lake now says it can't, i don't support it, it can't take effect. >> as i said, the coverage of this is basically trying to drown out the entire pro-life side entirely. but if you look at a how the public feels, the morning consult poll in 2023 found that 67% of americans believe in at least a 15-week limit. finish so, i mean, this idea that americans are so insanely pro-choice, it's just not true. granted, you know, this is taking up all the air time -- howard: are you saying the press is jumping on arizona as a way of winning the broader argument? >> of course. of course, yes. i mean, this is -- [laughter] this gets a lot of drama, you know? this is a lot of drama for the press to capitalize on. but the reality is that 15 weeks is very popular among the gop, and that still allow
it goes to the supreme court who decides who's on the supreme court, the president of the united states. howard: caroline, this is from the time before lincoln freed the slaves, a few thousand people lived in this arizona territory. half a century away from statehood. even carry lake, who once embraced -- kari lake now says it can't, i don't support it, it can't take effect. >> as i said, the coverage of this is basically trying to drown out the entire pro-life side entirely. but if you...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
recap of the proceedings at the united states supreme court and the new york criminal court downtown where donald trump is facing criminal charges related to hush money payment that was designed to influence the 2016 election. that was the start of the opening remarks to the justices today. he represents special counsel jack smith. putting that out there bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power. this is the entire ball game. it's not something you can slice in half and come up with a tidier way that keeps you out of the politics -- >> if you're someone who studied the 2025 project, the platform for a second term term, there is no separation at the policy level between trump, the private person who would act, and trump the wannabe resident again in his official acts. they are together officially and publicly. when he ran the first time, to unearth what he really wanted to do with the border. it was a scoop and leak that led to the store we know about and covered the part to do illegal th
recap of the proceedings at the united states supreme court and the new york criminal court downtown where donald trump is facing criminal charges related to hush money payment that was designed to influence the 2016 election. that was the start of the opening remarks to the justices today. he represents special counsel jack smith. putting that out there bribery, treason, sedition, murder, and here conspiring to use fraud to overturn the results of an election and perpetuate himself in power....
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in the hands of clarence thomas on the united states supreme court. it didn't seem like a life changing election. in 1988. when michael dukakis ran against george h. w. bush. i didn't know anyone who thought the country would take a major turn for the worse because of the outcome of that election. the stakes seemed about as low as they could get in a presidential election. but as i have said before in this program repeatedly, when ever the stakes appear low in a presidential election, you always have to remember the united states supreme court. and so for the democratic voters who were not excited enough about michael dukakis or the republican voters who voted for a guy who used to support planned parenthood, the truth is that, that time, at that time, they couldn't have possibly known they were going to change life in america profoundly decades later with their vote for george h. w. bush or the decision simply not to vote. same thing in 2000 when george w. bush was running against al gore. the stakes did not seem high. that is why enough people voted
in the hands of clarence thomas on the united states supreme court. it didn't seem like a life changing election. in 1988. when michael dukakis ran against george h. w. bush. i didn't know anyone who thought the country would take a major turn for the worse because of the outcome of that election. the stakes seemed about as low as they could get in a presidential election. but as i have said before in this program repeatedly, when ever the stakes appear low in a presidential election, you...
0
0.0
Apr 15, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
united states to bring court because he thinks -- supreme court, real problem with a lot of things happening -- having to do with this trial including the da because -- people are being mugged and killed all day long and i'm sitting here all they will not work 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. i can go so it might -- to my sun's graduation or i can go to the united states supreme court, that are not in georgia or florida or north carolina, campaigning like i should be. it's perfect for the radical left them a cat scan that's exactly what they want. this is about election interference and that's all it's about. thank you very much. >> [indistinct question] >> neil: we always listen to see if there's anything more to add. this is a bit of news watch that donald j. trump said that it -- the judge would not allow him because of the
united states to bring court because he thinks -- supreme court, real problem with a lot of things happening -- having to do with this trial including the da because -- people are being mugged and killed all day long and i'm sitting here all they will not work 12 prosecutors over nothing. over what people say shouldn't be a trial. so i just want to thank you very much. i can go so it might -- to my sun's graduation or i can go to the united states supreme court, that are not in georgia or...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
team, the future chief justice of the united states supreme court. charles evans hughes. but scopes, when he heard darrow wanted to do it, is like, i want darrow and that's going to give this case a lot of extra publicity, but also a anti-religion edge from darrow. that's going to be quite dramatic. and as darrow would say, he believe that, you know, absolute faith was the antithesis of science. he would argue this is darrow, the origin of what we call civilization is not due to religion, but the skepticism the modern world is the child of doubt and inquiry. as the ancient world was the child of faith and fear. cartoons, darrow telling bryan there ain't no santa claus now, when you see inherit the wind and you hear discussions of the scopes trial, it always looks like it's just darrow versus bryan. but there's both a prosecution team and a defense team. but for the drama, people often boil it down to darrow versus bryan. i just want to highlight one other member of the defense team, which is a four person team, arthur garfield hayes, who was the co-f
team, the future chief justice of the united states supreme court. charles evans hughes. but scopes, when he heard darrow wanted to do it, is like, i want darrow and that's going to give this case a lot of extra publicity, but also a anti-religion edge from darrow. that's going to be quite dramatic. and as darrow would say, he believe that, you know, absolute faith was the antithesis of science. he would argue this is darrow, the origin of what we call civilization is not due to religion, but...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 6
rises on the united states supreme court this thursday of april 25. this is leah in anderson, south carolina, republican. good morning. caller: yes, good morning. i respect and have a lot of faith for the supreme court but whether you support mr. trump or not, it is obvious that powerful people with big money are using our judicial system to take him down. right now, you can pay big money to go and sit and listen for three hours to mrs. monica lewinsky and listen to how young and naive she was when she was taken advantage of by mr. clinton inside the white house. host: so leah, bring me from there to today's immunity case. caller: again, with the supreme court's discussion on this situation, it really doesn't matter. we have seen and watched this play out, how it has come to this, how it has come to the court systems to finally take president trump down. and i believe they're going to do it. host: that's leah in south carolina in terms of how this is played out since special counsel jack smith brought this case. it was last year after this case was br
rises on the united states supreme court this thursday of april 25. this is leah in anderson, south carolina, republican. good morning. caller: yes, good morning. i respect and have a lot of faith for the supreme court but whether you support mr. trump or not, it is obvious that powerful people with big money are using our judicial system to take him down. right now, you can pay big money to go and sit and listen for three hours to mrs. monica lewinsky and listen to how young and naive she was...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
united states supreme court. your vote will live after you. it will live in the supreme court. your vote will live on in the hands of federal judges, in their 40s, appointed by joe biden, who will serve for another 40 years. your vote will decide what century we live in. will we live in an age of legal and constitutional enlightenment? or will we live in 1864? your vote is not just about the next four years. the importance of your vote has never been more clear. not just as a vote to preserve democracy in this country, we already knew about that. your vote for who chooses supreme court justices is nothing less than an exercise in incredible intergenerational power that will live long after you. leading off our discussion tonight is democratic senator of the senate judiciary committee, and chairs the subcommittee on federal courts, also the author of captured, the corporate infiltration of american democracy. senator, i really wanted to be able to talk to you about this tonight, because when i say, i'm going to ho
united states supreme court. your vote will live after you. it will live in the supreme court. your vote will live on in the hands of federal judges, in their 40s, appointed by joe biden, who will serve for another 40 years. your vote will decide what century we live in. will we live in an age of legal and constitutional enlightenment? or will we live in 1864? your vote is not just about the next four years. the importance of your vote has never been more clear. not just as a vote to preserve...