if thevr overturned, which is largely expected to be done or c back, t means is every agency rule, think f.d.a. decisions about the safety and efficacy of a new drug or decisions that are made by expert agencies according to frameworks they have come up with, that these would all be nd-guessing by the court and litigation by parties and itr reason to challenge them and say, we don't interpretation. and frankly the court shouldn't defer to t agency there. not because they are the ones delegated by congrs. that is the main concern the expertise of the agencies and up for grabs and subject to litigation. if the cou will. alan: i hope we can go deeper o. the case you described is not a health ce. did not arise outs of the health issue.e health implications are of a d without chevron. elizabeth: if we thi this historically, how we get a food andruion, it's not something that the framers, founders thought of. se pilgrims brought michelle: what does it come out of? a crafty, thoughtful journalist writer who is spending time on a century ago and looking at packin■ plants. what he's finding in th