carried out by sociologists instead of measures of institutional trust. companies, we see how trust just reached unprecedented highs in 2022 and started to slip again in 23rd-24th, and institutional trust is very different from, for example, popularity, because it actually defines the level of influence of this or that state institution, and it determines with what force... with what level of authority this institution can appeal to society, and actually ukrainians mostly took away institutional trust from the state, because they were wary of the toxic influence of the state on their lives, because , that independent ukraine did not emerge as a result of the victory of the national liberation movement, but as a result of this unique compromise that took place in 1991 between the democrats and the communists. in fact, everything was inherited the soviet system of state institutions along with all the legacy, including the legacy of the extermination of millions of ukrainians, and ukrainians have been wary of state institutions from that time to the present day, they actually learned by ta

i do not trust the executive, i do not trust congress. thinking that perhaps down the road we should think about breaking up this nation. i know what would be very difficult, but to me, i am an 85-year-old longtime christian and to me it is just too painful to continue living in this country the way it is going. i would hate to becoming a state by h, but i am taking steps. host: sorry to interrupt, that was from the last segment. do you have something to ask of our guest now? caller: or any of our problems being solved. host: south carolina, one of the things. guest: they can make a motion to kind of get rid of it, which only takes a simple majority, and once they do that it is no longer public, there will be a trial. exactly what they will do, i don't necessarily know. the most logical option since democrats are in the majority, they don't want to impeach a ladder mayorkas is probably to make this motion to get rid of the impeachment charges. host: how much pressure are senate republicans pushing for toward the minority leader mitch mcco

indicators, which the polling companies constantly measure institutional trust, we see that trust just reached unprecedented highs in 2022 and started to slide again in 23rd-24th, and institutional trust is very different from, for example popularity, because it actually defines level of influence of one or another state institution, and it determines with what force of persuasion and with what level of authority this institution can appeal to society, and actually ukrainians mostly took away institutional trust from the state, because they were wary of the toxic influence of the state on their lives, due to the fact that independent ukraine did not emerge as a result of the victory of the national... liberation movement, as a result of this unique compromise between the democrats and communists in 1991, in fact the entire soviet the system of state institutions along with all the legacy, including the legacy of the extermination of millions of ukrainians, and ukrainians have been wary of state institutions from that time to the present day, they actually learned by taking away trust.

if you count the trust among those who know oleksandr syrskyi, more than 60% trust him, and his trustg has not changed compared to december, when he was also trusted by more than 60%, among those who know him, so this story has not affected him , now the majority of ukrainians trust him, that is, it is a certain credit of trust, which ukrainians still count on. although they are not satisfied with the resignation, they hope that the new commander will still be successful in his position. mr. anton, i have something for you tricky question, but who needs it, because when i start the analysis... i understand that in two weeks everything can change, moreover, now that everyone screamed, not everyone, many screamed, forgive me for saying so , that they insulted zaluzhny, now i think the opposite, i think so , that zaluzhny was removed from the attack after the situation around avdiivka, now everyone will say that it is syrsky's fault that zaluzhny was stationed in avdiivka, and zasyrsky left, and thus the white and fluffy zaluz again . the assyrians are under attack again, that is, everyt

change in behavior and actions, which are not based on an empty declaration, on actions to restore trust, and i understand very well what feeling you are talking about you are talking about trust in the authorities and state institutions in the 22nd year, this is when for the first time, perhaps in the entire history of our lives, we felt that... the state is not a stranger, that it is ours, that it protects, that we we can do something together, so we all began to trust the state and invest our money effort. as for the resignation of the meritorious officer, which took place a few days ago, and this was also about the loan of trust, the meritorious officer is the trust, it is his own, it is a representative of the government. state, which is ours. and here in society, this person who was trusted by many people, regardless of whether he was really effective or not, but he had tremendous trust, and this person is taken away, what are the consequences, how dramatic can the consequences be? i think that at this point it is too early to say what exactly the consequences will be, because they

that it is not the editors of espresso who invented the poll about trust or lack of trust, but sociologistsasure the rating of trust in news and before a single telethon works, it is obvious that it must take place with... here you can agree with maksym rozumny that work needs to be done, and if there is already this telethon, it means that it must somehow be made available to all political forces, and all political forces in that among others, we must comment on the events taking place in the state, and in the end, since we are on the air of the espresso tv channel, the espresso tv channel and the 5th and direct channel must still return to t2, where we were simply illegally kicked out. from digital broadcasting, and we are not present on many platforms and on many televisions that our viewers watch. however, friends, let's talk about russia, because the recent events that took place in russia, they testify that putin and his entire team, they are ready to go to the last and are not at all going to give up their plans for ukraine, for the destruction of ukraine, for the destruction of ukra

, most ukrainians trust zaluzhny, 94%, compared to 92% recorded in december, budanov is trusted by 66%to 60% in december, zelenskyi is trusted by 64%, compared to 77% in december, and serhiy uprytuli. 61% and 40% trust general syrsky, what does this trust rating actually indicate and whether it is indicative and reflects the processes that are currently in ukraine, it is meant, well, it is clear that generals are people on whom it depends not only the future of ukrainian politics, the future of each of ukrainians, the life of every ukrainian, and yet . oleksiy, let's start with you, what can you say about such a breakdown of the trust rating and does this mean that there could be other surnames in this list, i already mentioned that for some reason there is also an arresting officer, for me, too, so far it is unclear how these lists of trusted people are formed and whether this trust rating answers questions. orders this this this survey usually at least and so sometimes it's manipulative i have a question about some of the numbers that are in this survey about some of the there are so

the 22nd year is this return of trust in 23-24 years , society saw that the advance of trust did not lead to a fundamental change in the quality of governance, i.e. there was no more responsibility, no more accountability, and no less corruption and so on, that is, as a result of what began to be done in society, it began gradually weaken the state from within by taking away this trust. this process is on the one hand logical, on the other hand very dangerous, because it is dangerous, because we are in the process of war, and excessive weakening of the state will not... increase security citizen, on the contrary, it can lead to the collapse of state institutions, and as a result, we are now in such a very precarious situation, a very unpleasant situation, we do not know exactly how society is, where there are limits beyond which one cannot stand, we do not understand what these levels are confidence is expressed, for example, in some digital indicators, there, for example, 12 or 15 or 20. but we understand very clearly that the current trend requires all subjects, from the authoritie

the 23rd year - 43% . about trust or not trust, and sociologists also measure the rating of trust ina single telethon works, it is obvious, obviously, changes must take place, here you can agree with maxim the smart, what needs to be worked on, and if he there is this telethon, which means that it somehow needs to be made available to all political forces, and all political forces, including those who must comment on the events taking place in the state, and after all, since we are on the air of the espresso tv channel, the tv channel espresso, and the fifth... and straight have after all, to return to t2, where we were simply illegally kicked out of digital broadcasting, and we are not present on many sites and on many tvs that our viewers watch, but friends, let's talk about russia, because the latest events that took place in russia , they testify that putin and his entire team, they... are ready to go to the last and are not going to give up their plans for ukraine, for the destruction of ukraine, for the destruction of ukrainians, and the latest events surrounding the murder of

the 22nd year is a return of trust. 23-24 year society saw that the advance of trust did not lead to a fundamental change in the quality of governance, that is , there was no more responsibility, no more accountability, no less. these and so on, that is, as a result of what society began to do, it began to weaken the state little by little from the inside, by taking away this trust. this process, on the one hand, is logical. on the other hand, very dangerous, because it is dangerous, because we are in the process of war, and excessive weakening of the state will not increase the security of the citizen, on the contrary, it can lead to the collapse of state institutions, and as a result we are now in such a very precarious situation, a very unpleasant situation, we do not know exactly how society. where there are limits beyond which you cannot stand, we do not understand what these confidence levels are expressed, for example, in some numerical indicators, there, for example, 12 or 15 or 22, but we understand very clearly that the trend that is now, demands from all subjects, from the

himself, er, the president is trusted, uh , trusted, yes, that is, trust in the president, if you take, then, again, if. .. if we take the balance of trust and distrust, it is 43%, but if we simply take how many people trust the president, well, 68%, well, listen, well, this is a high indicator, but i was in davos and listened to the speeches of some prime ministers and ministers there of foreign affairs at the ukrainian sessions, and they said, yes, we would like such a level believe me, we would be very happy, that is, yes, the brave has a higher level, in the army. the level of trust, well, but, well, i think that it is obvious, and we know, even who, we guess, someone puts it to zelensky and says that, well, you have a competitor in the upcoming elections, so let's give something, we let's do something, by the way, mr. andriy, i thought that you would quote my proposal politically technologically, you somehow did not dare to quote it, because i said... i wrote in the post the day before yesterday that if you have any problems, what do with two man, they take a bottle, sit down and

zaluzhny's trust rating is probably a trust rating including in the armed forces of ukraine, that isclusively in the politician industrious or to the industrious general, it is obvious that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest trust rating in the country? well, he personalizes it, first of all, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is a significant part of his rating, which is related to his surname and the actions he does. regarding such a meticulous attitude of the president's office in general to zaluzhnyi's rating, the problem is different here: the president's office is generally meticulous about any people who get into it. rating and trust and trust to which well or commensurate or even worse there than with the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, that is, in this context, zelenskyi is very dependent in general. from such ratings, by the way, this is a common practice in many democratic countries, so as not to go too far, we can mention the two terms of the presi

so, whilst _ us putting that trust in them. so, whilst we — us putting that trust in them. from qatar, we have _ minister of state from qatar, we have to — minister of state from qatar, we have to believe that they will succeed... presenter: succeed. . . presenter: ., ., succeed... presenter: ., ., ., . “ presenter: you are watching bbc news, a presenter: you are watching bbc news. a press _ presenter: you are watching bbc news, a press conference - presenter: you are watching bbc news, a press conference of- news, a press conference of relatives of hostages who are still held in gaza. we are just going to say goodbye to our viewers watching around the world, but here in the uk, you can continue watching this press conference. iam the i am the daughter of someone who was released, and someone who is still held in captivity 120 for days later. my father is 83 years old, has complex medical needs and is really not built for the conditions of being a hostage. i want to remind something that sometimes people forget, and that is that my mum was released without a deal, she was r

the an instant database which was with a trusted brand in the uk.— trusted brand in the uk.ue for so many _ trusted brand in the uk. the issue for so many of _ trusted brand in the uk. the issue for so many of these _ trusted brand in the uk. the issue for so many of these retailers, - trusted brand in the uk. the issue| for so many of these retailers, not just currys, is how they combine not just currys, is how they combine not just price and convenience but service. you could go into the stores and work out if you liked it before you bought it. is there still a niche for retailers that do that bit of service very well? figs a niche for retailers that do that bit of service very well? as think so. as technology _ bit of service very well? as think so. as technology becomes - bit of service very well? as think| so. as technology becomes more complex, we turn to retailers for expertise. it is still very much a house of brands, which means that show grooming becomes easy for those who have a mobile phone in hand and can look at something online and really be motivated by costs.

my players and i trust _ good team but i trust my players and i trust this_ good team but i trust mynd i trust this team so much and i have a big _ i trust this team so much and i have a big belief— i trust this team so much and i have a big belief that we can create the a big belief that we can create the a good _ a big belief that we can create the a good performance tomorrow and from therem _ a good performance tomorrow and from therem an _ a good performance tomorrow and from there... an even game as possible. iii—time european cup winners real madrid are also in action later as they travel to germany to face rb leipzig. carlo ancelotti's side will be without england starjude bellingham who's out with an ankle injury after picking up a knock in their 4—0 win over girona in la liga on saturday. the spanish club haven't put a timescale on his return and say his recovery "will be "monitored". chelsea's slim chances of returning to european competition next season were given a boost after they came from behind to beat crystal palace 3—1. they were trailing after a first half goal fro

the 22nd year is a return of trust, the 23rd-24th year society saw that the advance of trust did not a fundamental change in the quality of governance, i.e. there was no more responsibility, no more accountability, but there was no... less corruption and so on further, that is, as a result of what society began to do, it began to weaken the state little by little from the inside, by taking away this trust on the one hand, this process is logical , on the other hand, it is very dangerous, because it is dangerous, because we are in the process of war, and excessive weakening of the state will not increase the security of the citizen, on the contrary, it can lead to the collapse of ee... state institutions, and as a result , we are now in such a very precarious situation, a very unpleasant situation, we do not know exactly how society is, where there are limits beyond which one cannot stand up, we do not understand what these levels of trust are expressed, for example, in some digital indicators, there, like 12 or 15 or 22 but we we understand very clearly that the current trend require

look, of those people who currently hold high positions, kyrylo budanov is the most trusted. the headof the main intelligence department, because zelensky is actually already coming after him, but as for syrsky , the new head of the armed forces of ukraine, the kmiz survey says that only 40% of ukrainians now trust syrsky, and in general, many did not even know about him, for example, in december 35% knew about syrsky, in december 23, in in february, 48% generally knew who syrskyi was, and, accordingly, of those who knew about him. confidence in the commander-in-chief was higher, how do you evaluate the figures for syrsky, that he is now trusted by 40%, and how do you think whether certain steps by syrsky can increase this trust, and in principle, is it normal when in the process, when a person occupies such a position, when there is a war going on in our country, that the level of trust in this person will increase, because, well , it is probably somehow psychological, people tend to trust those people more. that protect them on the battlefield than, for example, politicians, who we

volodymyr, about trust ratings, because this another trust rating was published last week, where 94% of ukrainians trust the hard worker, the general's trust rating increased from 92 to... 94%, the second place is occupied by general budanov, where the general's rating increased accordingly, compared to december from 60 to 66%, and third the place is held, or occupied, or rather volodymyr zelenskyi 77% in december, 64% in february, well, general syrskyi also goes there. and he suddenly also entered the top five of those whom ukrainians trust, but i looked at it from five positions, three positions are occupied by generals in this one. trust rating, this does it mean that ukrainian society trusts during the war, or would ukrainian society like to continue to have this trust in the military in the future, that is, after our victory, when we will restore and rebuild the country? well, first of all , there is a people's army in ukraine, which means that ukrainians trust the army a lot. this is such an original love for the military and respect for the army as an institution, for the mili

the key part is to maintain that trust. to build that trust. and that's where my focus is as the chairman. and i personally think it's -- i have a personal responsibility, and that's what i try to do throughout myer career. shannon: you talked about building a bond of trust between civil-and-and military leader sh-fplt how would you assess where thattance right now? general brown: pretty good. and part of that is it's how i try to operate personally. one of the key words was the word collaboration. that's the way i operate throughout my career. that's how i continue to operate today. one way to build trust is sit across the table from somebody and have a conversation. even if you disagree. i do believe there are many times there are things we do agree on. that's where the conversation should start before we talk about where we disagree. we can move and make progress together on areas we agree as we work through the details where we may have a difference of opinion. shannon: one of the places we do see agreement on capitol hill, which is rare th

my players and i trust _ good team but i trust my players and i trust this_ good team but i trust myg _ i trust this team so much and i have a big belief— i trust this team so much and i have a big belief that we can create the a big belief that we can create the a good _ a big belief that we can create the a good performance tomorrow and from therem _ a good performance tomorrow and from therem an _ a good performance tomorrow and from there... an even game as possible. 14—time european cup winners real madrid are also in action later as they travel to germany to face rb leipzig.

in the armed forces of ukraine continues, in particular, 95% of ukrainians trust the armed forces ,he volunteer unit , 82% in the state emergency service that saves ukrainians every day, 64% in the president , 61% in the church, 53% in the national bank, 58% in the national police , well, regarding politicians, by the way, it’s interesting that there is no trust, no trust in... rala zaluzhno, well, interestingly, he is not a politician in principle, but in any case, well, trust in president zelensky is 69%, there prytula 54, kuleba 50, kim 58, then podolyak is even there, and shmygalal 45%. well, actually these are the results of the survey, which in principle make it clear that ukrainians support the armed forces of ukraine, trust the armed forces of ukraine, and actually trust the military bloc globally, but most of all, of course, the forces. trust in the president remained roughly the same as it was, but it is important to communicate with people and take the right steps, because it is not the belief that we are moving in the right direction that increases the number of these un

, this is a trust rating not the same as for zaluzhny, as for the armed forces forces of ukraine.uzhny will not lose his trust rating, because he with honor and dignity went through all that extremely difficult time for the state, holding the position of the head commissar, and left this position with honor, saving face, unlike the authorities, which arranged a brutal series of beatings, humiliation and... deviating merits of the head of the committee, which he performed during his tenure, so i am sure that questions about the further actions of mr. zaluzhnyi should probably be asked to him in the first place, because he defines his vision in relation to his fate, as far as trust is concerned, then i i am sure that it will not go anywhere, because the level of trust both in the armed forces of ukraine, in the defense sector, and in the society will be preserved. thank you, ms. iryna, this was iryna friz, people's deputy of ukraine. friends, so there was a rotation, and the head coach was changed armed forces of ukraine. general valery zaluzhny headed the armed forces of ukraine fr

he said, "thank you for giving me your trust, trust that i promise to repay."y government had sucked hope out of the country. so there you can see big smiles on the face of damien egan, the new labour mp for kingswood. let's bring back end sirjohn curtis with more of the details there. so my maths say it's 2501 majority there, overturning the 11,220? there, overturning the 11,220 ? 2501 there, overturning the 11,220? 2501 majority, and you should note that the reform candidate got 2578, 10.4% of the vote. in other words, the reform uk vote is slightly greater than the majority, and i suspect that will add to the concerns of those on the right of the conservative party that the conservative party that the conservative party that the conservative party is now at serious risk of losing ground to the reform uk. the swing to labour at 16.4% is less than we saw and selby and amid bedfordshire. it will not be sufficient for labour to pick up sufficient for labour to pick up wellingborough, and it is a swing of up by a number of points, very credible but much less in t

and obviously the former military commander also carried a huge percentage of trust.ny budding political technologist will tell us that trust is very easy to translate, technologically, into ratings, ratings into... support, including in elections, the second question, the second question is related to possible elections, i think that until the end we did not receive an answer to this question from the authorities, but i very carefully analyzed all statements related to the elections, in no way did the representatives of the ruling team say that the elections were impossible due to inconsistency of the constitution, which is exactly what it is, everyone talked about the violation. the law that the law does not allow, well, i'm sorry, the law is 226 votes, it can be changed literally today for tomorrow and open the way to the election campaign, i think that the final point has not been set, and therefore maybe the authorities have a plan b there , plan c, plan d, but these are political, these are political plans, these are political-technological plans, unfortunately,

the key part is to maintain that trust. to build that trust. and that's where my focus is as the chairman. and i personally think it's -- i have a personal responsibility, and that's what i try to do throughout myer -- my career. >> you talked about building a bond of trust between civil-and- and military leader sh-fplt how would you assess where thattance right now? >> pretty good. and part of that is it's how i try to operate personally. one of the key words was the word collaboration. that's the way i operate throughout my career. that's how i continue to operate today. one way to build trust is sit across the table from somebody and have a conversation. even if you disagree. i do believe there are many times there are things we do agree on. that's where the conversation should start before we talk about where we disagree. we can move and make progress together on areas we agree as we work through the details where we may have a difference of opinion. >> one of the places we do see agreement on capitol hill, which is rare these days, is in w

, compared to the level of trust of president zelenskyi.nd so on. then they say that it was precisely this kind of political zeal that caused this resignation, i would like you to explain to our viewers and to us that these are all such, you know the tricks and moments of sociologists and why they bring in people who, for example, in political aspect, i don't have any ambitions at all, but they become those who fall into these ratings, pay attention here, it's very interesting, interesting, and contributed and not contributed general zaluzhnyi, some sociologists... authoritative agencies at least clearly spoke about the fact that they do not include in the presidential ratings, based on the fact that the probability that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces will take part in the elections, say, during the legal regime of military state, well, it's just minimal, the voters simply won't understand, well, here at least there is an explanation, other sociologists did not contribute, and then headlines appeared that the president of ukrain

some of the experts explained that this trust rating is not a trust rating, as to zaluzhnyi, as to theed forces of ukraine? zaluzhny will not lose his trust rating, because he with honor and dignity went through all that extremely difficult time for the state, holding the position of head of the commissar, and left this position with honor, saving face in contrast to the authorities, which arranged brutality... real, forging, humiliating and nullifying the merits of the headmaster , which he carried out during his tenure, so i am sure that questions about the further actions of mr. zaluzhnyi should probably be asked to him in the first place, because he defines his vision in relation to my fate, as far as trust is concerned, i am sure that it will not go anywhere, because the level of trust both in the armed forces of ukraine, in the defense sector, and in society will be preserved until... thank you, mrs. irina, it was iryna friz, people's deputy of ukraine. friends, so there was a rotation, and the chief of the armed forces of ukraine was replaced. general valery zaluzhny headed the

outside the armed forces, or whether the rating of trust in the leader is the rating of trust in the forces. well, yes, we're talking on this hypothetical plane, but since this has already been written about by fairly authoritative, western sources from... who have significant access to information from the president's office itself, from the president's entourage, i think the probability that in one way or another... in one way or another , they will try to remove the poor man from leadership positions any, it is quite large, so this hypothetical situation, it looks very convincing, and therefore it is worth considering, so we can say that in the event that there is such a gambit, such an exchange of pieces, and the lucky one will find himself outside his... natural the position of the commander-in-chief of the ukrainian armed forces, then he will have to become, due to many circumstances, well, if he does not personally make very strong resistance, then he will one way or another become an opposition politician, in fact, marchuk did not plan to become public either a politician, he

trusted everything they were saying _ still trusted everything they were saying through— still trustedprocesses and inquests it has come to light _ processes and inquests it has come to light that — processes and inquests it has come to light that within _ processes and inquests it has come to light that within 48 _ processes and inquests it has come to light that within 48 hours - processes and inquests it has come to light that within 48 hours after l to light that within 48 hours after she had _ to light that within 48 hours after she had died. _ to light that within 48 hours after she had died, they— to light that within 48 hours after she had died, they knew- to light that within 48 hours after she had died, they knew that - to light that within 48 hours after she had died, they knew that her| to light that within 48 hours after - she had died, they knew that her ccg had not _ she had died, they knew that her ccg had not been — she had died, they knew that her ccg had not been managed _ she had died, they knew that her ccg had not been managed properly, - she had died, they knew t

you can trust him. that's why we don't need any frozen conflict. >> so you don't trust anything that his name is on. you did say today as far as military plans that your new commander in chief is drawing up a clear cut plan, you said, are there to different plans? one for if usaid happens in one, if it doesn't happen yes. >> it meant that if we have munition or not, if we count on our partners or we have gone only on us. so does defending plan or defending with some steps forward with counteroffensive that's where important those back looking back previous year to previous year. so what success we had on the black sea, maybe not everybody saw it, but it was success. we destroyed their ships. we opened black sea, not totally, but anyway, we made and created the new route in the black sea, which gave for today about 30 million tons of grain and other agricultural products? yes it's a big success, but we could did it could do it with we're kontraktnik munition with very kontraktnik things. i'm not shared w

public trust. , .,, trust.rutinised - trust. it is the most scrutinised plane i trust. it is the most scrutinised plane in| trust. it is the most - scrutinised plane in the world in the — scrutinised plane in the world in the history— scrutinised plane in the world in the history of— scrutinised plane in the world in the history of aviation - scrutinised plane in the world in the history of aviation in i in the history of aviation in the — in the history of aviation in the safest _ in the history of aviation in the safest aeroplane - in the history of aviation in the safest aeroplane that i in the history of aviation in i the safest aeroplane that is out there _ the safest aeroplane that is out there today _ the safest aeroplane that is out there today and - the safest aeroplane that is out there today and i - the safest aeroplane that is out there today and i flew. the safest aeroplane that is. out there today and i flew on itiust — out there today and i flew on itiust tast— out there today and i flew on it ju

trust one 100% of all thef campaign managers. so that will be the next thing i trust all these people but i don't know about, there is too much to lose if you don't win a race.. but we are not there yet to date we want to make sure a verifiable paper ballot will do one 100% audit of any race we have in the state of georgia. over 90% of all states in america is a paper about this upcoming election. available to audit anything, pull up the stats one for candidate aid, onene for candide b, one for candidate c at the mall up and verify with that machine count you have an election night you will have a number of pieces off paper this was a fair accurate election and this person for one, this person lost precooked thank you for the question we are almost out of time have two people left in line go see if we can squeeze in. >> you guys be quick too. >> good evening. thank you for being here once again i am a freshman in the school of health setting management policy am also from georgia we spoke earlier with the other georgia students.

, but if they do not have a sufficiently high level of trust, then the initiative in shaping the agenda will be with civil society, it will be with the church, it will be with someone else, and actually the question arises as to who... influences the agenda more, who defines it, there is a lot of anxiety in civil society about what is happening in the state, because it is very easy to ensure the interaction of all parties when the administration is popular, 70-80% support its actions and so on, but we encountered the first serious defeat with the failure of the counterattack. expectations for the counteroffensive were inflated, they were fueled by the miracle that happened in the kharkiv region in the fall of 22, they were exacerbated by the fact that this global coalition was being built in support of ukraine and so on, and when we did not get the result that we expected, suddenly... changes began in the attitude of citizens to what the state says, the number of people willing to come, for example, to military bases decreased sharply, and the level of trust in state institutions began

as we do said, but to hope that if you remove a person from his position at the peak of public trust kiss him, give him the title of hero, and the problem is that trust in you will fall and in the person you appoint the position held by this person who has trust, objectively speaking, we are not now discussing with ... let's say, the trait of one or the other, it will not exist, mistakes will be hypertrophied and successes will be reduced, trust is a big thing , i have already told you many times, and i tell you again, any person who studied at a soviet school knows that there was a plan in the war between russia and france, the minister of war and the actual commander of the army... prince mikhail barclay to stop napoleon's army, lure it deep into russia, retreat, retreat as much as possible further, further there was a plan for moscow, and it could collapse, and it could lose all its morale and main weapons and all resources and so on, the russians treated this plan, although the situation was catastrophic, the russian empire could simply fall, eh the russians treated barclay's pla

trust in the armed forces as such, because if we say that there is trust in the armed forces... as such% of ukrainian society has it, if not more, then any commander of the armed forces of ukraine will have a high trust rating, any high-ranking public military man like budanov will have a high trust rating, but not as high as a former commander-in-chief of the armed forces, simply because the former commander-in- chief of the armed forces has become mythologized figure, this is not a question of position, it is a question of zaluzhny's personality, it seems to me that this is something that many cannot realize. this is generally what distinguishes such a society as the ukrainian one, the mythologizing of images. in this regard, we are not very different from the russians, but i can tell you how we differ from the russians. russians mythologize a character, very often completely random and incomprehensible, who appears out of nowhere, like lenin or stalin or putin. who are these people anyway? where did they come from? one arrived at the station, the other is there at all found himself a

so, you know, trust depends on facts and an of what's true. so does what you're describing fit in with some of the broader issues that we have around just absolutely divergent narratives within a given institution right there was a really good column the other day jonathan chait in york magazine about how republicans only have themselves to blame for the fact that the trump kind of lapping the field again, because didn't push back at him when he said the election was stolen. it's just it's not a fact, a lie. and no one pushed back at him. and so so you can't possibly have a society, a healthy democracy, when people when there's no basis of common fact. and so so have to not simply the person they also have to fight the of lies. and that includes think using every tool in our arsenal know media appointments and all of that. just you once you lose lose your foundation of facts and you know if you haven't reread 1984 lately it's all about that it's about just it doesn't matter true what we say why it is black white, black it's why you know so yea

it was a revolution which came about with reliance on god almighty and with trust in oneself through self-confidence without any help by foreign power. and or any eastern powers or western powers and that revolution was realized with hands empty of... weapons and without having the conventional weapons that the same weapons that the usually that armed forces and armed groups usually possess, the iranian nation, with their belief and trust and with the strong and iron will, they move forward and also with trust in the in their own power, to the teeth regime, which was supported by the united states and the regime was also supported by britain and supported by western other western countries, the iranian nation had the will power to topple this regime, it was pupet regime, a regime with the west, and it was a regime which served the interests of western powers and served the interests of foreign powers. the iranian nation managed to out that regime. in this equation, you see it was unarmed regime, a regime armed with weapons and on the other side there was a nation with trusting god. t

. ~ . , ., ~' be working hard to earn their trust. ~ ., , ., ,, ., , trust. this vote tonight? we ran— the one you this vote tonight? we ran an _ the one you this vote tonight? we ran an incredibly positive campaign on lots of local issues, including things like rejuvenating the high streets and town centres, putting more money back in people's pockets, growing the economy but also making sure that people got doctor's appointments as well, because we work prior constituency. aha, because we work prior constituency.- because we work prior constituen .�* ., ., , constituency. a lot of people sa in: constituency. a lot of people saying that _ constituency. a lot of people saying that it _ constituency. a lot of people saying that it was _ constituency. a lot of people saying that it was a - saying that it was a complicated story, they didn't send — complicated story, they didn't send rishi sunak or many ministers here, and they will be saying _ ministers here, and they will be saying that they can take this back at the general election. | this back at the genera

khrystyna, we they talked about it, i said that there is a simple formula, if there is such trust invalery zaloshny, maybe someone there considers it excessive, but it is connected with the first months of the war, when many ukrainians believed that the russians were about to in kiev. that they will take over the country, that they will destroy the ukrainian state, and they were stopped by the army led by valery zalozhny, and volodymyr zelensky himself was one of the authors of this idea of ​​reality, that the army is our main strength, that we have yes, he said so then, so everything we have means if the army is headed by valery zaluzhnyi, our president organizes aid to ukraine, everyone said that what is the main merit of the president, he does not command the troops, he mobilizes the whole world for help. to ukraine, ugh, the moral leader of the civilized world, as we liked to say, well, this is the moral leader of the civilized world, and this is the person who leads this army that stopped navala. in principle, volodymyr zelenskyy himself should understand what kind of society he

public trust. , , _ would take to regain public trust. , _ ., trust. far the most _ trust. the is the most, by far the most scrutinised - trust. the is the most, by far the most scrutinised air- trust. the is the most, by far| the most scrutinised air plane in the world in the history of aviation. the safest air plane that can be out there that is out there today. i flew on it last week with my family and all the flights i've been on have been full.— all the flights i've been on have been full. despite its problems. _ have been full. despite its problems, many _ have been full. despite its problems, many airlines l have been full. despite its i problems, many airlines rely have been full. despite its - problems, many airlines rely on the model, in fact, 1737 max departs every 16 seconds around the world and boeing are still receiving orders for the 737 max. most recently from vietnam airways and an indian airline. but there are contenders waiting in the wings. china's homegrown plane made an international debut at the airshow. it has regulatory approva

how can i trust that? we actually were sued by, you know, the democrat party prior to that, saying that's subjective prior to that republican party said it was subjective. we have begun to photo i.d. and modeled it after minnesota, a blue state, with drivers licenses. we think that's objective. that was the first aspersion cast on the absentee ballot process. that said, when your absentee ballots come in, they have to verify the signature. once you verify it, you take -- separate the eenvelope from the ballot, lay the ballot flat, and get it ready to go. that's all they did. they didn't do a lot of pre-processing from that level. we had them do that and start scanning it. you didn't tabulate but started scanning it so you could then press the cablation button after close of election. coming into the primary that we had in june, 2020, and other states, they were doing all of that after election day. that takes sometimes two ekes to do just because it's a very labor intensive process that. creates a lot of d

we think, today, _ trust to keep her safe. we think, today, i— trust to keep her safe. everard, her parents. — today, i have sarah everard, her parents, family and friends who have to live _ parents, family and friends who have to live with _ parents, family and friends who have to live with the shattering consequences of what happened. this is also _ consequences of what happened. this is also a _ consequences of what happened. this is also a day— consequences of what happened. this is also a day when many families who have lost— is also a day when many families who have lost sisters, daughters, mothers _ have lost sisters, daughters, mothers to violence here in parliament to hear my honourable friend _ parliament to hear my honourable friend the — parliament to hear my honourable friend the member for birmingham yardley— friend the member for birmingham yardlev to — friend the member for birmingham yardley to hear and read out the names— yardley to hear and read out the names of— yardley to hear and read out the names of women killed this year. so, today's— names of w

, and zaluzhny's trust rating is... probably a trust rating, including the armed forces of ukraine, that not only a diligent politician or a diligent general, obviously , that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest trust rating in the country, well, he personalizes it first of all, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is also a significant part of his actual rating, which is related to his... surname and the actions he takes, regarding such a picky attitude of the president's office in general to zaluzhnyi's rating, the problem here is something else , the office of the president is generally scrupulous about any people who fall into the rating and trust and trust in which is either commensurate, or even worse, more than that of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, that is, in this context, zelenskyi, well, he is very dependent in general, from such ratings, this is a common practice, by the way. in many democratic countries, in order not to go far, we can mention the two

zaluzhny’s trust rating is probably a trust rating including the armed forces of ukraine, that is, notcy of zaluzhny or to general zaluzhny, it is obvious that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure... on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest rating trust in the country, well, he personalizes it in the first place, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is a significant part of his rating, which is related to his surname and the actions he takes, regarding such the picky attitude of the president's office in general to the rating of meritocracy, here the problem is different, the office of the president is generally picky about any people who get into it. rating and trust and confidence in which, well, it is either commensurate, or even worse, more than that of the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi. that is, in this in the context of zelensky, well, he is very dependent on such ratings in general. this , by the way, is a common practice in many democratic countries, so as not to go too far, we can mention the two

> you didn't trust him to keep track on your son. >> oh, i trusted him to take track of my son. >> inhe messages in exhibit 423, asking him, where is your son? over and over and over again. does that signify trust or distrust to you? >> that was when my son was walking home from school, not that i did not trust my husband with my son. >> okay. and you didn't really trust your husband to hold down a job. >> it's not that i didn't trust him to hold down a job, he had a hard time holding one down after covid. >> in the messages, you are constantly asking him about work, how much money he is making, and what he is doing to obtain employment. >> correct. >> okay. >> you have been listening to the cross-examination of jennifer crumbley. the prosecution is pressing her hard on what she knew about the gun that was given to her son as a gift. she did acknowledge it was a gift. also, a lot of questions about exactly how she spent her time and how much time she was fo focused on her son. this is important testimony, and we'll continue right after the break. >>> we'll take you back to michigan wh

is, it is clear that general zaluzhny obviously has a trust rating, and this trust rating will not gonywhere, he was, is, and will remain a trust rating for zaluzhny. obviously, the commander -in-chief of the armed forces... of ukraine, oleksandr syrskyi, will still have to get to know our european colleagues who are helping ukraine, who are conducting negotiations in various formats with the military leadership of the ukrainian state, then let's see what to expect from syrskyi, from these negotiations, as his will perceive and how long it takes for so that he would be perceived as brave, because one way or another, brave has two years of the great war behind him and... he was the commander of the ukrainian army during the most difficult periods of the war, starting from february 24, 2022. and yes, of course, we will not publicly see any difficulties in the communication of the new commander-in-chief with european institutions, with european politicians, and already today there was a statement by the european commission at the daily briefing, the spokeswoman said that the appointment

, 19 do not trust, president volodymyr zelensky is trusted by 64%, 35 do not trust, and compared to december, this trust indicator has fallen from 77%. and then there he still goes to us, and oleksandr syrskyi is there, he trusts him. 40% do not trust 21, another 4% have an uncertain attitude , there is a list of many people, there are also those who are not trusted at all, well, this is the story in ukraine, ms. oksana savchuk, i have the floor, then mykola veresen, well, first of all, i i want to say about the fact that it is very important that this year we draw all the conclusions we had, look at our strengths and weaknesses. because this is the beginning of the year, we understood that we can , first of all, how we can close critical things on our own, at the state level, and there will not be such a story that everyone will quickly give us everything this year, this the fact is, it will really be more difficult for us to receive aid, it will be more difficult for us to receive even the promises given to us by the countries and europe. of america, britain, relating to the united states,