alexander ii, and my other great-grandfather was an engineer, whom the same alexander ii shook handswo of my great-grandfathers were war heroes, and two of my great-grandfathers were repressed, you know, one of my grandfathers was. communists, yes, and there were two more great-grandfathers who served the tsar, you know, faith and truth, that ’s all, well, at least it creates a non-black and white picture of the world, this is again an antinomy, what edward says about loving your dad and mom, i, my favorite concept is antinomy, that is it’s against the law when two contradictory and mutually exclusive things both exist in real space, that is, just like that here, you know, on the one hand... there can’t be anything black and white, because there are many shades, that’s it really interesting twist you made, yes, because in our opinion, this is a split in our consciousness in the russian consciousness, and which now leads to the fact that we take a completely irreconcilable position regarding many, for example, historical characters. well, that is, starting there with peter i, that is,

alexander ii hanging, and the clock of god the tsars had previously played, but this did not stop himrld war at all. therefore, the fact that it seems that someone loves us there, it’s actually all illusory and very deceptive and there is no need to delude yourself, but as for the united states, it seems to me that there are three important ones... the first point: public opinion polls means much less in the usa than in in any other country in the world, elections in america are not direct, they have a different system, each state has a quota of electors, and, yes, they can carry you in their arms in one state, but the importance in it for victory is much less than in a less enlightened one, more boring inland state of the usa, so you have to look very clearly by state. another difficulty: america has a very unusual election system, if you vote for one candidate, another candidate won in your state in most states, your vote goes to him, even though you, yes, this is not a direct election, this one won in your state, that’s it, your vote went to him through the electoral college, the e

simultaneously with the manifesto on the accession of alexander ii, a decree of the new tsar was promulgatedred from previous ones? the thing is, well, alexander ii freed the peasants. and this decree actually said that peasants must also take an oath. i can also add that it is necessary, well, maybe it is not necessary, it also seems to me that i’m just afraid, when when they start adding, they talked about the swearing in of peasants, the russian peasant for the first time took an oath of loyalty to his tsar, for the first time he met the new reign as a citizen of the russian land, and not as a powerless slave, serf, or... knowing only one power of your master, you owe loyalty and obedience only to him, you are smart, in principle you don’t need to answer anything anymore, because you won on the green track and now everything depends on how things go on the yellow track. too narrow, who won? i'll listen to the correct answer now. alsou khakimova, ulyanovsk region, bolshinogadkinsky secondary school, four dates: 862, foundation of the state, 988, baptism of russia, 1497. you see, you are no

alexander ii, the future tsar-liberator, sitting on these very secret committees, sometimes took moreire, respectively, the british and french have steamships, the well-known story is the battle of sinop, nakhimov destroys the turkish fleet, sank the turkish fleet, and with turkish coastal batteries, one ship was saved, an english steamer flying the turkish flag, yes, it must be cancelled, yes yes, well, you said that they were afraid of the revolution, that’s all true, and alexander ii, when he was forced after the crimean war to undertake all sorts of reforms , and when we talk about serfdom, about the abolition of serfdom, we still need to understand that in itself, i don’t know, any decree, any order, there, go to freedom, something like that didn’t work, so we worked for a very long time, working out the technology of all this and it was impossible to just take and let the peasants go, we still had to do something with these new free people, we had to help them , on the one hand, with on the other hand was the concern of the landowners themselves , they cared about their own safe

ii, then death , which means the death of nicholas, the death of alexander ii, then the death of herek king george. so, later, that means the death of her husband and... the entire royal family, can you imagine, she, before the last one, she sailed from crimea on the last passage, she hoped to the last that someone might survive, she wanted to see him, a difficult fate, she gave so much wise advice to her son, and he used this advice so disgracefully. but he just didn’t follow them, he just didn’t follow them, that’s why, what can i say, she was really courageous, a strong woman and an intelligent woman, a wise woman. from my point of view, the wisest woman, who is foreign, who was next to russian tsar, well, if you again take catherine out of the equation, well, catherine, you know, i don’t perceive catherine as a wife, a wife, well , it’s quite strange to perceive her as a wife , given the fate of her husband, and that’s what we’re talking about, catherine is a separate conversation , a separate song, in the end, we have two great ones. these are peter the russian and catherine the

then death, that means the death of nicholas, the death of alexander ii, then the death of her brotherhen, and later, that means the death of her husband and the entire royal family, can you imagine, she uh until the last, she sailed from crimea on the last passage, she hoped until the last that someone might survive, she wanted to see him, a difficult fate, she gave so many wise advice to his son, and he used this advice so disgracefully, but he simply didn’t follow it, he just didn’t follow it, that’s why, well, what can i say? she was truly a courageous, strong woman, and an intelligent woman, a wise woman, from my point of view, the wisest foreign woman, who was next to the russian tsar, well, if, again, you take catherine the second out of the bracket, naturally, well , ekaterina, you see, i don’t perceive ekaterina as a wife, well, it’s quite strange to perceive as a wife, the fate of her husband, about this is the point, this is... a separate song, in the end, we have two great ones, these are peter the russian and catherine nemko, which in no way cancels the greatness of the se