0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a. secretary of defense law austin, for health reasons. nato secretary general again spoken back says despite the challenges the outlook remains positive. i'm confident that to the nathan will remain the strongest and most successful lines of history. and i expect not the states to continue to be as don't show ally for at least 3 reasons. first, it isn't the national security just over the united states. they have a strong active or the 2nd there is actually ruled by parts and support from a store in united states. and certainly, the criticism in united states is not primarily against nate, though. it's a, it's against nato allies, not spending enough money all night to get installed. am i speaking with donald john by the w as a terry schultz. terri, you've listened into that whole press conference. what are your main take away? well, as you heard from that sound bite from secretary general souls and burke, he came to this meeting fully prepared to have to counter the trump statements that said, anyone who isn't spending enough on defense should, might as well be attacked by russia. s
a. secretary of defense law austin, for health reasons. nato secretary general again spoken back says despite the challenges the outlook remains positive. i'm confident that to the nathan will remain the strongest and most successful lines of history. and i expect not the states to continue to be as don't show ally for at least 3 reasons. first, it isn't the national security just over the united states. they have a strong active or the 2nd there is actually ruled by parts and support from a...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. representative investor, julie smith, who was standing in for defense secretary austin. so it was, it was good timing for the nato meeting to put out their own messages to counter what uh, what we've heard from donald trump. all correspondence that terry shows, i have nasal headquarters in brussels. thank you very much, terry. as of now, some of the other stories making headlines today. the 1st criminal trial of a full us president is set to go ahead. next months off to a new york judge rejected a bid from donald trump to have the case dismissed. the challenges stem from hush, money paid to 2 women ahead of the 2016 presidential elections authorities in thailand have issued a 2 day work from home, owed at full bangkok, city employees due to the highest mobile apps. and that quality index shows the amount of dangerous product goes us 15 times higher than w o h o recommendations. the city is small. this caused by crop burning, industrial pollution, and heavy traffic. in india, the government is to hold talks with pharmacy following most protests coating, full guaranteed cr
s. representative investor, julie smith, who was standing in for defense secretary austin. so it was, it was good timing for the nato meeting to put out their own messages to counter what uh, what we've heard from donald trump. all correspondence that terry shows, i have nasal headquarters in brussels. thank you very much, terry. as of now, some of the other stories making headlines today. the 1st criminal trial of a full us president is set to go ahead. next months off to a new york judge...
0
0.0
Feb 2, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s. president joe biden, and the defense secretary lloyd austin said that the response would come and it would come in a multiple of fashions. so this could very well be the 1st phase, but to reiterate that retaliation, those retaliatory airstrikes from the u. s. have now be gone. okay, ross and we started now that we have that confirmation from the pentagon itself, are we learning anything more about how long this is going to take and what's, what's the next steps are? so we're not getting that level of detail yet. and in fact, it's a little hazy to suggest just how long these air strikes have been going uh, according to uh, the us military's clock. but i think it's safe to say that for at least the past hour, this military operation has been underway. now there, of course, there been lots of reports about who exactly is being targeted, what their national affiliation might be, where they might physically be located. us officials are not giving that level of detail at least on background just yet, but suffice it to say, there has been considerable concern about letting this attack on
s. president joe biden, and the defense secretary lloyd austin said that the response would come and it would come in a multiple of fashions. so this could very well be the 1st phase, but to reiterate that retaliation, those retaliatory airstrikes from the u. s. have now be gone. okay, ross and we started now that we have that confirmation from the pentagon itself, are we learning anything more about how long this is going to take and what's, what's the next steps are? so we're not getting that...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
also on the program, the u. s. is prepared and retaliatory strikes against iran. fact malicious defense secretary lloyd austin confirms washington will take significant action of the deadly prominent cover us and based in george a you the this a c a major a deal for ukraine? then the states overcome hungarian objections on.
also on the program, the u. s. is prepared and retaliatory strikes against iran. fact malicious defense secretary lloyd austin confirms washington will take significant action of the deadly prominent cover us and based in george a you the this a c a major a deal for ukraine? then the states overcome hungarian objections on.
0
0.0
Feb 4, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
as this came from outside the us defense intelligence agency document of 2012 said that the u. s. allies in the region wanted to establish a solid, fed, a solid office entity between iraq and syria. and then the general general michael saying, who was the head of the that agency at the time said in an interview on the, on al jazeera, that the you let us took a willful decision to support the establishment of the solid present to the that was isis so the ronnie and when the us and it's allies, we're establishing highest and i'll kind to and there are fairly, as the right means we're helping the syrians and the rockies to prevent ices from taking over damascus. and by that right out of my so a lot of them, what do you make of what he just said as well? i think, i mean it's important to kind of new on some of the history of the americans. we're also invited to hear ok and 2014 by the iraqi government to support in the fight against isis. so at that time and during the fight against isis, the americans and the iranians had the, had a common enemy. and they, fox, uh, you know, not l
as this came from outside the us defense intelligence agency document of 2012 said that the u. s. allies in the region wanted to establish a solid, fed, a solid office entity between iraq and syria. and then the general general michael saying, who was the head of the that agency at the time said in an interview on the, on al jazeera, that the you let us took a willful decision to support the establishment of the solid present to the that was isis so the ronnie and when the us and it's allies,...
0
0.0
Feb 22, 2024
02/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the u. s. has spoken out in defense of israel at the international court of justice at the united nations and just last hour. we heard secretary blinking speak at the g 20 meeting and there seems to be a broad argument coming from the us. that immediate respect for international law shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of the us is diplomatic efforts to try and bring it into the war and generally figure out the israel gods, a conflict. what do you make of that broad argument? i think the united states and secretary blinking in particular are in a, in a mode where they're genuflecting trying to show respect for international law of the opinion of the international community for the lives of a palestinian civilians being killed in big numbers in gaza. but they're not willing to really stand up to israel, and that means my opinion threatening them with withdrawal of support, including financial support. if they don't do what we ask them to do. so it's not that a blinking and by the administratio
the u. s. has spoken out in defense of israel at the international court of justice at the united nations and just last hour. we heard secretary blinking speak at the g 20 meeting and there seems to be a broad argument coming from the us. that immediate respect for international law shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of the us is diplomatic efforts to try and bring it into the war and generally figure out the israel gods, a conflict. what do you make of that broad argument? i think the...