s. x has a cross, i kids are as the judge and as the court and does that with the furniture. it's all in one and she the number and this is terry i regarding the death of nev all nasal it is a prime example of that. and you to which i don't even one to go in soon as the comments here, these people have no rights to interfere in our home affairs, especially given farrell and such as problems. i got the story is what you learn a sound scottsdale that's happened show. so we've been looking at, it was kind of died from tortures and the ukranian jail is and you have the americans or any other westerns, political figure, commented on that, showed us with this. there's just another example that's not says are allowed to do anything. and this is very serious and video, but when you go there for a talk about your requirements, comments like a invoices for an open, an independent investigation we. this is a shame we used to require you to put an open investigation on you. then you can put it in the system, is that, you know, it's in connection with what happens with us. citizen of this

we also raise concern about the application of the u. k. u. s. treaty. that treaty prohibits x regarding someone for a political offense. the united states has applied for his extradition, but is treated as a criminal. and this clause car to this is, julian is a dangerous terrorist who is going to flip out on a k installed gunning everyone down in the cold. i was sitting up in the gallery watching this astonishing spectacle of injustice and order to talk to his lawyers. he had to kneel down, fresh, easy that's of across. so a cause here was they had to say and to talk. it was absurd. it makes it very difficult for us as easily will team to take instructions from join. when he's sitting behind us, we have to be constantly watching to see if he's got instructions on what's happening during the course of the hearing. and it's very difficult to talk to him in a secure and confidential way. because in order for him to communicate to us, he has to say it loud enough so that the people next to us can often hear it's our opposing counsel. that's unsatisfactory,

we also raise concern about the application of the u. k. u. s. treaty. that treaty prohibits x regarding someone for a political offense. the united states has applied for his extradition, but is treat it as a criminal in this clause car to this is, julian is a dangerous terrorist who is going to flip out on a k installed gunning everyone down in the cold. i was sitting up in the gallery watching this astonishing spectacle of injustice and order to talk to his lawyers. he had to kneel down, fresh, easy that's of across. so it was here was they had to say and to talk. it was absurd. it makes it very difficult for us as a legal team to take instructions from join. when he's sitting behind us, we have to be constantly watching to see if he's got instructions on what's happening during the course of the hearing. and it's very difficult to talk to him in a secure and confidential way, because in order for him to communicate to us, he has to say it loud enough so that the people next to us can often hear it's our opposing counsel. that's unsatisfactory, of cou

we're looking at x addition to the u. s. a right slot with no decision announced this of was march to the appointment is office on the dining seat. the modeling and the 13 year long plus edition again split jail, the whistleblower.

it's all the c u. s. land. the owner rocket made by e law knox companies space x is trying to become the 1st commercial space cross to line successfully on the moon. now the aim is the c u. s. to search for war. so in what's being called a 2nd space race the american movie then no, just use i use up to set of into space. it's aim is to bring a camera and newly develop nice measuring equipment to them in its destination. is the luna south pole? there are this, here's what's called a spot to lend softly on the moon stuff and a new race to the moon is on satellites have discovered water and its poles. the most important resource for schumann space travel. this race is not driven just by scientific curiosity. it's a quest to develop the best technology, discover resources, and to secure future markets. nasa wants to build a station in the moon's all good, and i'll post on the surface of the space agency is working together with europe team, japanese, and canadian partners. many u. s. companies are hoping for newpor

s. continue their military confrontation escalation is becoming a real threat with diplomacy being pushed further away in the warren gauze, expanding beyond dispatch alf order and rattle of hon. elgin's here the to the us now with former president donald trump is the projected winner of the latest republican primaries between nikki haley in her home state of south carolina . it extends his winning streak, bringing trump closer to the presidential nomination and the re match with democratic president joe biden. but a defined haley has filed to remain in the race, or i'm not giving up despite when a majority of americans disapprove of both donald trump and joe by south carolina spoken. we're the 4th state to do so. in the next 10 days, another 21 states and territories will speak. they have the right to a real choice. we'll see how brit tennessee is in charleston, in south carolina joining me now, she have a good to see. so nikki haley vows she's going nowhere. but to what end does she sta

you on a co which was forced into russian x on and in august 2015, i started at the u. s. department of state as european energy security advisor. i took over the job about a year after russia legally invaded eastern ukraine, the done das region and purportedly context. the crimea. the idea at the time was north spring to have been shelves, right? the idea that you would still build up this dependence on russian energy was thought of is, is crazy. but less than a year later, north string to was back in, in the ghost of pollutants pipeline was once again haunting during the contract for the construction of north stream 2 was signed in september 2015, which they go kind of talk to you cuz you don't see any strategic trap there. i mean, the current situation is very much defined by the more with the train, which is bad, really bad. they can actually be justified. but i think it's an exaggeration to say that we've fallen into a strategic trap here. you finally get guns of these couldn't patrol shortly before the annexation of crimea, miller visited berlin once again, he bla

s t u, a stomach last year was not in the quote, long term interest, all the manian people. now we've heard from joe politics x by the fury montrose bowman. he described the all manias, policy and the specifically, what it's a that this is a dangerous game of from the mist opinion because he looks like we've be so communication strategy to wherever several advantages. at the same time, i want to like, your ease will not be involved to be you a conflict with us or by joining the high camera back. but you could be mentor. you even started now to about to carol back was pato for us and by john and do so, we each was a games victory, t you the made between the manual. i was there by john on russia. and in addition, this looks like for mister question and would like to with a move mental cooperation, people west we, for united states, nighted states would for us to actually be i would never could not be provide a media both salt and security road and the same time it varies the russian base, you know, i mean, yeah, which is teams there. so it looks like the east communication pha

u. s. journalist tucker carlson has teased his upcoming interview with loving or putting in the scope his video. just noticing that it's already has more than 51000000 views on the x spot for the president has not yet confirmed. when the highly anticipated cit diamond will take place. carlson says he wants to bring the other side of the story to western audiences as they have only being fed images, a slew of media interviews with ukraine's president who just keeps asking for more and american taxpayers can. this is dana warren, you, creighton began american media wetso spoken to scores of people from ukraine, and they've done scores of interviews with ukrainian presidents lensky. we ourselves have put a request for an interview with. so i'd say we help in steps, but the never easy is already done in united states or got traditional interviews. they are forming pep sessions, specifically designed to amplify. the wind speeds demand, the thing us enter more deeply into war in eastern europe

welcome to the news hour on the archie, prominent u. s. journalist tucker carlson has teased his upcoming interview with lot number putting your in moscow. now here's the video. another thing that's already has over 60000000 views on the x platform. it will be the 1st time the russian presidents that's done for a one on one with a western journalist since the light break of the ukraine conflict not almost 2 years ago. at the same time, our politicians and media outlets have been doing this. promoting a foreign leader like he's a new consumer brand. not a single western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict. flooding or putting. most americans have no idea why put an innovative ukraine or what is goals are now they've never heard his voice. that's wrong. the americans have a right to know all they can about a war. they are implicated in and we have the right to tell them about it, because we are americans to freedom of speech is our birth right? we were born with the right to sa

thkaer doctrine never had s and x moment where this court make clear the agency can ip180 degrees. indeed in kais self it suggests that the opposite. here with chevron wekn this is a reliancedestroying doctrine. here ianher thing to think about in terms of kaiser. as i read the court's decision in addition to the fa tt we know it doesn't directly speak to chevron, i alsoad it as all this at the unitspecial justification. i think we've offered specia justifications in droves. special justification beyond the decision. i do not know of a case where you would defer when the relevant decision did not cite the relevant statue at all. this would bea fferent world if chevron went in and russell with 706 is that despite all xtural indication it focles review of statute. i suppose i would have to be here ki every single starry cisis argument. that is not what chevron did. it did not ntn the relevant patch you. i do not want to en as running away from the starry decisis factors. i am happy to walk through all of them. i think all of them cuinur favor. the decision is tremendously unwoab. nob