oleg , thank you for the conversation, oleg tsaakyan, political scientist , head of the unified coordination center platform, was with us, and i want to thank our tv viewers, so we asked, explaining like this, 15:00, yes, it arrived during this time, while we were talking with oleg sahakyan, let's have another roar. here are 41 thousand, let 's exchange, we, we will give you a whole shevchenko prize laureate in a few minutes, and you on this qr code or on this card your donation, even 1 game from each of us from the community, and we will cover it 40 00, which remain, by the way, i actually watched how these funds accumulated and there were large donations, it is difficult for us to measure, but it seemed that there were about 10 thousand, there was one donation, but it was so small. 20 hryvnias, 30 hryvnias arrived, and together they were all added together and we have this amount, we are taking a short break now, but before that we will say that in the sky over russia in the kurshchyna, some aircraft are flying, machine guns and small arms are chirping, and the legion of freedom has shown

coordination center platform, oleg sahakyan, in connection with our studio, mr.leg, congratulations, good evening, congratulations, glad to see and hear, well, we ask everyone, and we ask you too , because you also have the right to vote and the answers to our question, the drying up of otstra has a third less ministries, some of the functions will not be performed by a minister at all. how do you feel about this idea? not very positive, i would say yes, because the very principle of reducing ministries seems to me to be vicious. whether it is necessary to reform the civil service absolutely, whether it is necessary to reform the structure of the cabinet of ministers with both hands, but this is not a question of quantity, this is the very last thing that should be determined, if the task is simply to reduce the number, then this means that they are either completely ignored or not communicated, but covertly imply some wider changes inside, ah, and then the question arises that they simply most likely do not understand at all what the tasks are now and... what th

oleh sahakyan, head of the unified coordination center platform. mr. oleg, i congratulate you. you for joining our broadcast. my greetings are the same. vitaly kulyk, director of the center for researching civil society problems. mr. vitaly, i congratulate you and thank you for joining the broadcast. i congratulate you. well, since gentlemen, we are asking our viewers whether they think there is a parliamentary crisis in ukraine, i will also ask you, forgive me, obviously inside the parliament is much more visible, but since you are one of the best political experts in ukraine, i will ask you mr. maksym, is there a political-parliamentary crisis in ukraine? well, it is obvious that a parliamentary crisis is such a thing that should be very pre... clearly, most often a sign of a parliamentary crisis is the inability parliament to make important decisions, blocking of the legislative process or failure to form a government, etc., to date there are certain hints or prerequisites for a parliamentary crisis, but in some acute phase and hopeless situation it has not yet reached my op

coordination center, oleg sahakyan in contact with our studio.r. oleg, congratulations, good evening. greetings, glad to see and hear. well, we ask everyone, and we ask you too, because you also have the right to vote and answer our question. drying, drying, a third less ministries, some of the functions will be performed by non-ministries at all. how do you feel about this, this idea? not. very positively, i would say yes, because the very principle of simply reducing ministries seems to me to be vicious, whether it is necessary to reform the civil service, certainly whether it is necessary to reform the structure of the cabinet of ministers with both hands for, but this is not a question of quantity, it is the very last thing to be determined, if the task is simply to reduce the number, then this means that either are completely ignored, or not communicated, but covertly implied some wider changes within a ... and then the question arises, which is simply sooner than everyone does not understand at all what tasks are currently facing and what c

coordination center, mr. oleg, i am you congratulations, thank you for joining our broadcast, my congratulations are the same, vitaly kulyk , director of the center for the study of civil society problems, mr. vitaly, i congratulate you and thank you for joining the broadcast, i congratulate you, well, since gentlemen, we ask our viewers about whether, in their opinion , there is a parliamentary crisis in ukraine, i will ask you, forgive me, obviously, it is much more visible inside the parliament, but since you are one of the best political experts in ukraine, i will ask you, mr. maksym, whether there is ukrainian politician parliamentary crisis? well, it is obvious that a parliamentary crisis is something that should be very clearly visible, most often a sign of a parliamentary crisis is the parliament's inability to make important decisions, the blocking of the legislative process. or failure to form a government and so on, to date there are certain hints or prerequisites for a parliamentary crisis, but in