united services institute, i correctly translate it somehow as the royal united services institute,hat's how we know it in british writing. that they are actually analyzing the reasons not for the failure of the offensive, the failed offensive, the counteroffensive of the 23rd year, and they say that it was possible to predict in advance that it would be a failed offensive, because, since the russians had well prepared for this offensive and knew well, where this offensive will be, and here is another interesting thing, that they believe that if in a few months the russians will soon lose... the initiative and will no longer be able to attack along the entire front line, then the ukrainians may be tempted to try to implement a counteroffensive again, and their conclusion is that when i quote, when the 14th division of the army still lacks weapons, and another counteroffensive by the armed forces of ukraine would be an unsuccessful double, they say that in the fourth year of the 20th ukraine it is better not to carry out. no offensive operations, because it will be an adventure. inde