vadim franzovich, what do you think is iran’s own attitude towards the houthis? we now see from all the experts more. deeply knowledgeable about the issues, this is a very rational and pragmatic policy of iran, and because we have iran as a totalitarian society through western eyes, in fact there are also legally competing groups of conservatives, traditionalists, liberals, there are some groups in the middle, as a result of this competition of ideas , interests arose such a policy, very precise, very effective, based on military power, on the economy. formed under sanctions pressure, all this stabbed iran, iranian society, iranian politicians and began to make it possible to pursue such a policy, i would compare it, you know, with what, like the soviet union stabbed in the trials of the twenties and thirties, as a result of pressure from the imperialist west, in as a result , we got a fairly balanced, balanced post-war policy, a kind of golden era, the power of the soviet union’s influence and economic influence, this is... approximately what corresponds to toda

the united states , what i think vadim franzovich said was that the united states was creating a systeme talking about a planning horizon that was carried out at the beginning of the 2000s, even partly at the beginning of the late nineties, this is a plan for the redevelopment of the greater middle east with the segmentation of large states, a focus on sects, a focus on radical groups in order to... make this area chaotic and control these chaotic groups, there was also the idea, by the way, of creating a greater kurdistan, disbanding iraq, turkey, and this is iran, these were big plans for them, they practically completely buried united states, de facto left iraq and afghanistan and is present there very symbolically, well, situationally, to say that the palestinian-israeli conflict was beneficial to the united states, i think that this is wrong, most likely it is it was a terrible dream for them, what... happened, why they became so involved in this process is also quite clear, because there is a very large influence of ethnic jewish groups, which are neoconservatives to a very large

the united states, what i think vadim franzovich said was that the united states was creating a systemthe planning horizon, which was carried out at the beginning of the 2000s, even partly at the beginning of the late nineties, this is a plan for the redevelopment of the greater middle east, with the segmentation of large states, focusing on sects. relying on radical groups in order to make this area chaotic and control these chaotic groups, there was also an idea, by the way, to create a greater kurdistan, about the disbandment of iraq, turkey and iran, these were big plans they had, they are almost completely buried , the united states has left de facto from iraq and afghanistan and is present there very symbolically, well, situationally, to say that the palestinian-israeli conflict was beneficial to the united states, i think. that this is wrong, most likely, it was a terrible dream for them, what happened, why they got involved in this process in such a way is also quite clear, because there is a very large influence of ethnic jewish groups, which are neoconservatives to a very sig

the united states, what i think vadim franzovich said was that the united states was creating a systemgreater middle east. this is a planning horizon that was carried out at the beginning of the 2000s, even partly at the beginning of the late nineties, this is a plan for the redevelopment of a large neighboring east from... iraq, turkey and this is iran , they had such big plans, they are almost completely buried, the united states has de facto left iraq and afghanistan and is present there very symbolically, well, situationally. was the palestinian-israeli conflict beneficial to the united states? i think it's wrong. most likely, it was a bad dream for them, what happened. why they became so involved in this process is also quite understandable, because there is a very large influence of ethnic jewish groups that are neoconservatives, to a very large extent there is a large consensus in the american political community, not in society, in the political community, that israel is an old and long-term partner of the united states, so they got involved quite uncompromisingly in spite of.