the watergate scandal began with a crime, a break in at the watergate complex in washington, d.c., in june of 1972. by people who were associated with president richard nixon's reelection campaign. it evolved into a battle between congress and the president over access to tape recordings that contained evidence about the crime and the cover up. and it concluded with the resignation of president nixon under threat of impeachment. so i wanted to point out several documents in this case. one is this security log right here from the watergate complex. and this security log, you can see the date of june 17th, 1972, which was the date, the break in at the watergate hotel. and the log has a note written by the security guard from the watergate frank wells, who made a note there in the log that he had seen a piece of tape on a door that prevented the door from latching and made the door accessible from outside. first, he removed the piece of tape, but later, the same night as he was continuing his rounds, he found another piece of tape on the door and that tipped him off that something was ha

the watergate scandal began with a crime, a break in at the watergate complex in washington, d.c., ine of 1972. by people who were associated with president richard nixon's reelection campaign. it evolved into a battle between congress and the president over access to tape recordings that contained evidence about the crime and the cover up. and it concluded with the resignation of president nixon under threat of so i wanted to point out several documents in this case. one is this security log right here from the watergate complex. and this security log, you can see the date of june 17th, 1972, which was the date, the break in at the watergateel. and the log has a note written by the security guard from the watergate frank wells, who made a note there in the log that he had seen a piece of tape on a door that prevented the door from latching and made the door accessible from outside. first, he removed the piece of tape, but later, the same night as he was continuing his rounds, he found another piece of tape on the door and that tipped him off that something was happening and there mig

so therens that came out of watergate as well.t to be one of the most cancer essential oversight investing actions that congress has conducted. and it set a standard for how congress conducts its oversight of the executive branch. so on september 11th, 2001, a, there was a terrorist attack in the united states by the terrorist group al-qaeda. and as york city, in washington, almost 3000 people died. in the aftermath of that■e congress created a house and senate investigation into intelligence failures that allowed 911 to happen. in addition, congress also created an independent, bipartisan legislative commission. the commission on the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the united states. but that commission is better as the 911 commission. the staff of the 911 commission made this map right here, document the events that happened on 911. the map shows the paths of the four. of the flights of the four hijacked planes. and those paths are initially marked as solid lines at the moment that the were hijacked. the turned off

hugh moved and wrote one of 2023 pulitzer the history of watergate and last couple of years ago, you were here to talk about your watergate book you and i were having a private dinner across the river. and i every every you've been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's next in your response was? i'm writing a book on ufos. and i know my response. what? so garrett y ufos, as you i'm a very weird person have written this book because i am not a i was not raised:r watching x-files or star trek. i'm not a sci aficionado. i come th as you just outlined as someone who has covered national security for the last 20 years watching dean in the last couple of years was the convoy processionround changed and that there was a series of blockbuster reporting by the new york times and politico, where i used to work in the fall of 2017. that outline of two threads of a changing perspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harry reid and had been by a las vegas businessman and space entrepreneur named robe

watergate book and fully remember this. you and i were having a private dinner across the river. and i every every you've been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's next in your response was? i'm writing a book on ufos. and i know my response. what? so, garrett y ufos, as you say. i'm a very weird person have written this book because i am not a i was not raised watching x-files or star trek. i'm not a sci aficionado. i come this book, as you just outlined, as someone who has covered national security for the last 20 years and what i noticed in watching dean in the last couple of years was the convoy procession around changed and that there was a series of blockbuster reporting by the new york times and politico, where i used to work in the fall of 2017. that outline of two threads of a changing perspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harry reid and had been run by a las vegas businessman and space entrepreneur named robert

watergate book and fully remeerhis.nd i were having a private dinner across the river. and i every every you've been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's next in your response was? i'm writing a book on ufos. and i know mywhat? so, garrett y ufos, as you sa'me written this book because a i w. i'm not a sci aficionado. i come this book, as you just as someone who has covered national and what i noced watching dean in the last couple of yearsconvoy procd and thatblockbuster reporting i used to work he fall of 2017. that outline of two threads of a changingerspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harry reid and had been runy a las vegas businessman and space ■=entrepreneur named robert bigelow. and series of videos that came out navy pilots, navy aviators encon the sky that they could not explain. and there were a series of three videos that cameaviators the pif testified about these encounters said was, you know, technology

his history of the watergate and last couple of years ago, you were here to talk about your watergate book and fully remember this. you and i were having a private dinner across the river. and i every every you been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's next in your was? i'm writing a book on ufos. and i know my response. what? so garrett yfos, as you say. i'm a very weird written this book because i am not a i was not raised watching x-files or star trek. i'm not a scicionado. i come this book, as you just outlined covered national security for the and what i noticed indean in the last couple of years was the convoy procession around changed and that there was a series of blockbuster reporting by the new york times and politico, where i used to work in the fall of 2017. that outline of two threadsng perspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harryd had been run by a las vegas businessman and space entrepreneur named robert and at same time, there were a series of videos that came out tha

his history of the history of watergate and last couple of years ago, you were here to ta d fully remember this. you and i were having a private dinner across the river. and i every every you've been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's next in your response was? i'm writing a book ond i know m. what? so, garrett y ufos, as you say. i'm a very weird person have written this book because i am not a watching x-files or star trek. i'm not a sci aficionado. i come this book, as you just outlined, as someone who has covered national security for the last 20 years and what i noticed in watching dean in the last couple of years was the nvoy procession around changed and that there was a series of ing by the new york times and politico, where i used to work in the fall of 20 outline of two threads of a changing perspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harry reid and d en run by a las vegas businessman and space entrepreneur named robert and at same time, there were a series of videos that came out

the presidential records act which was created in the aftermath of watergate in the aftermath of watergateordings of 0val retain tape recordings of oval office meetings, the infamous 0ffice meetings, the infamous 18 minute gap, to decide what was personal and what are presidential records act, prior to that statute staff and presidents and vice presidents would take home all sorts of documents for decades, including classified information. this statute makes a very clear as to what is and what is not personal and presidential. it does not apply to classified or national defence information. there have been numerous executive orders which govern classification, no mention of the presidential records act, there were numerous orders that existed before the presidential records act and there was no mention in that statute. it is a civil statute and president trump wanted to challenge whether or not these are his records, he could have returned them to the national archives and then filed a civil lawsuit to challenge. i don't know why this motion still on the table and my hope is thatjudge cann

i at the watergate they were in a surrise. . , ., , , , surprise.s extra months _ surprise. i had ten years plus extra months on _ surprise. i had ten years plus extra months on the - surprise. i had ten years plus| extra months on the passport which i did not and could be a passport problem. he which i did not and could be a passport problem.— passport problem. he fell for -- he fell _ passport problem. he fell for -- he fell full— passport problem. he fell for -- he fell full of _ passport problem. he fell for -- he fell full of the - passport problem. he fell for -- he fell full of the passport —— he fell full of the passport to new problem. he could be refused entry to any eu country. refused entry to any eu country-— refused entry to any eu count . , , , country. they “ust said sorry ou are country. they “ust said sorry you not _ country. theyjust said sorry you are not coming - country. theyjust said sorry you are not coming on, - country. theyjust said sorry you are not coming on, off. country. theyjust said sorry - you are not coming on, off

watergate book and you and i were having a private dinner across the river.d i every every you've been here, i usually ask you so, garrett, what's was? i'm writing a book on ufos. and i know mywhat? so, garrett y ufos, as you say. person have written this book because i am not a i was not raised trek. i'm not a sci aficionado. i come this book, as you just outlined, as someone who has covered national security for the last 20 years and what wate last couple of years was the convoy procession changed and that there was a series of blockbuster reporting used to work in the fall of 2017. that outline of two threads of a changing perspective on ufos. one was a series of about a secret pentagon ufo study program that had been funded by then senate majority leader harry reid and had been run by a las vegas businessman and space entrepreneur named robert bigelow. and at same time, the wer videot that the pentagon released from navy pilots, navy aviators encon the sky that they could not explain. and there were a series of three videos that came out the the aviators

you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the b, eyesore. yes. would only meet with uh, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only send the flowers on balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is . so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state. you don't have to call it a deep state. you can call it the state, you can call it the federal bureaucracy, but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out with a president, powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep state. that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrat, always and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama. it's bigger than all of them, and it ain't good. it's not, john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. a great life is all mine. thanks for the that's really,

so i on the watergate page and i find alexander butterfield's name. so i click on it and it's a very limited profile. so automatically i'm like perfect. he did not try to do anything. after he went forward, he did the right thing already. green flags, all around. and then i'm starting to read about what he actually did and forward and testified to and i extremely moved not only his story but by his commitment to his country and by his commitment to honor his oath. and it he didn't want come forward to the watergate, but he knew from the get go that if he was called, he go without question, he would go and he would tell the whole truth, because he had served in the military. he had taken the oath once when he swore into the military, he had taken oath another time when he swore to work in the white house. and then he worked at the faa as well. and i saw alex, a vision of the public's that i had wanted to become and the person that i felt that i could not grasp. i felt that i could so kind of claw my way back. so he gave me that second wind of optimism,

it's the only way to protect yourself, you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the, the ice or yes would only meet with a, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only sunday last village, flowers on the balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is. so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state, you don't have to call it a deep state, you can call it the state. you can call it the federal bureaucracy. but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out with a president powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep state. that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrat, always and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama, it's bigger than all of them. and it ain't good. it's not john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. a g

you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the b, eyesore. yes. would only meet with uh, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only send the flowers on balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is . so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state. you don't have to call it a deep state. you can call it the state, you can call it the federal bureaucracy, but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out weight a president, powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep sea, that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrat, always and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama. it's bigger than all of them. and it ain't good. it's not john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. a great life is all mine. thanks for the that's really,

it's the only way to protect yourself, you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the, the ice or yes would only meet with a, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only sunday last village, flowers on the balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is. so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state, you don't have to call it a deep state, you can call it the state. you can call it the federal bureaucracy. but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out weight a president, powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep state. that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrats and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama. it's bigger than all of them. and it ain't good. it's not john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. a great

. >> joining me now is john sale, former federal prosecutor and watergate assistant prosecutor and emily basil has stayed and is back with us. on previous occasions, we have spoken publicly about how you declined to represent donald trump, and now that we are closer to trial in several of the cases, are you still feeling good about that decision? >> i don't look back, there's always temptation to represent a former president, probably no hyperbole, the biggest case in the world but it just wasn't for me. i thought for a while, maybe i could separate just being a lawyer and put aside the political agenda but that's impossible, and when someone's running for president, there's no way you can do that. that just wasn't for me. >> john, i'm also glad you are here because the presidential records act, as we heard in the last segment enacted post watergate, post next and, to be able to handle what happens to documents, materials, when a president exits hopefully gracefully, out of the oval, you were an assistant watergate prosecutor, your thoughts about the arguments that are being advanced by

you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the, the ice or yes would only meet with a, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only sunday left village flowers on the balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is. so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state, you don't have to call it a deep state, you can call it the state. you can call it the federal bureaucracy. but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out with a president powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep state. that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrats and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama. it's bigger than all of them, and it ain't good. it's not john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. great life is all mind. thanks for the i just really

you know, during the watergate scandal or in the events leading up to the watergate scandal deep through the source, the, the ice or yes would only meet with a, with bob woodward in a parking garage. it was the only send the flowers on the balconies and stuff. i don't question to you since you said the deep throat. let me give you another deep it is. so is there a deep state and how would you define it? oh yeah, there is a deep state, you don't have to call it a deep state, you can call it the state. you can call it the federal bureaucracy. but any group of powerful and elected people who know that they can out with a president powerful and elected people who know they could outweigh the present. that's a deep state. that's actually a good description of what i think is happening too often in this country. and it goes beyond trump and beyond democrat, always and beyond republicans and beyond bite. and then beyond titans and beyond obama, it's bigger than all of them and it ain't good. it's not john, it's a pleasure to talk to you. a great life is all mine. thanks for the i just really, r

richard nixon's response to the watergate investigation got him into more trouble when he covered up the break-in and was accused of obstructing justice. bill clinton ultimately faced impeachment over his lying about an affair with monica lewinsky during independent counsel, ken stars it's investigation of handle. >> i think the one lesson that's been learned over the years is that a president hides things at his own peril. >> these investigations change the course of presidency is often for what they revealed, the iran contra probe exposed a scheme by the reagan administration to sell arms to iran in exchange for hostages with the money from the sales going to fund the contra rebels in nicaragua. in spite of a congressional law against it, which the president ultimately admitted to what began as a strategic opening to iran, deteriorated in its implementation into trading arms for hostages several officials in the reagan administration were prosecuted by independent counsel lawrence walsh, but not reagan himself. some of these probes have been outright unwieldy. iran contra went on f

an exhibit with the curator looking at the congressional investigations through the yeakc to watergatehe investigation process and artifacts included in the investigation. this weekend at 7:00 p.m. eastern american history tv begins its new series congress investigates looking attoat ledy and law. it would look back at the joint house and senate committee which investigated conditions in southern states during reconstruction and the ku klux klan wave of violence against freed slaves. watch american history tv sa c-span 2 and find a full schedule on your program guide or watch online anytime at c-span.org/history. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyrit national cable satellite corp. 2024] announcer: c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are fundeby these television companies and more, including sparklight. >> the greatest town on earth is the place you call home. at sparklight, it is our home too, and right now we are all facing our greatest challenge. sparkligh

since the 1960's, let's say least since watergate, maybe even. >> before watergate to during civil rights. movement. 68 convention in chicago. democrats are having their convention again go. and there's a lot of concern about how that's going to play out there's a lot angst in and a lot going on in inside the democratic party as well as they grapple with 80 year-old president seeking reelection. people who are fans joe biden say behind the scenes to this, you sharp and is able to make decisions and >> you know, hopefully we will have an opportunity see that site tonight. but again, all eyes will be on him. and even, you know, a slight misstep. i'm sure people will be seizing comment. and it's bound to happen. you know, he has a speech impediment that's that's well known. he's had longtime senator and he's overcome it right. and and he's been a great inspiration to starters. but it's it's a tough job. somebody has got to do. absolutely. this is his night to >> mister speaker, the president of the united states. >> fire smart. i go home now. mister speaker. madam vice president members of c

so i on the watergate page and i find alexander butterfield's name.so i click on it and it's a very limited profile. so automatically i'm like he did not try to do anything. after he went forward, he did the right thing already. green flags, all around. and then i'm starting to read about what he actually did and forward and testified to and i extremely moved not only his story but by his commitment to his country and by his commitment to honor his oath. and it he didn't want come forward to the watergate, but he knew from the get go he go without question, he would go and he would tell the military. he had taken the oath once when he swore into the military, he had taken oath another time when he swore to work in the whihouse. and then he worked at the faa as well. and i ' the person that i felt that i could not grasp. i felt that i could so kind of claw my way back. me that second wind of optimism, strength to go forward and continue working with the january six committee. and at this time to you know it's this is about april of 2022. so we're not i

joining me nuto discuss is jill wine banks, former assistant watergate special prosecutor, msnbc legallyst, and cohost of the sisters in law podcast. jill, thank you for joining us tonight on "the reidout." i am -- i am who they speak. i am one of the many people who has been complaining for years that merrick garland has taken too much time. that it's not just an issue of caution. it almost looks like complicity at this particular point. in your perspective, given your political experience, given your legal experience, is there any justification for why merrick garland has worked so slowly in a situation that was so -- it continues to be so absolutely crucial to the future of this country? >> let me say that i have joined you in being critical of merrick garland. my husband is the only one i know who is more critical than i am. but, you do have to be careful when you're dealing with a unique circumstance, a first-time prosecution of a former president. you want to make it exactly as good as it can possibly be. you want to cover every possible error that could come up. and make sure yo

but then, you know watergate hit and that was just cataclysmic event i was in a position of run by this time i was running the speechwriting and research team was pretty big big team and i knew bob woodward from college and woodward to call me when they had a hot story at the post. they would call me and say, i need read you the first two or three paragraphs of this and see if this factor it. i'm not i'm not going to change it just because you don't like the way it's written. but i do need to know if the facts were right. so we had a sort of relationship and and nixon blessed the relationship, knew i was talking to woodward, but for a year and a half or so, we talked a lot and it helped to bond behind the scenes. it helped to take some of the out of the process, but not all it was a richard nixon was the stuff of shakespeare. i mean, yes this was a man who was one of the most talented i've seen in washington in the last 30 or 40 years. he was easily the best strategist along henry kissinger. the two of them together. you know, they really it out there at that at that point the both chin

huge water needed -- watergate nerd. the other things that makes me chuckle morbidly, a bunch of people went to prison. they did not just get disbarred. there were also criminal consequences. >> thank you for pointing that out and putting it right next to the way in which the segretti case was name checked in the john eastman recommendation . the way segretti was brought up was oh, by the way, what john eastman did was way worse than what donald segretti did and segretti, of course, went to prison. john eastman may yet go to prison. wish you trump lawyers here. giuliani with his license suspended. i still don't understand what happened to the federal investigation of rudy giuliani and how exactly that went away. there are still unanswered questions there. he is not currently a defendant anywhere. he is just facing a defamation judgment and likely suspended. his got the recommendation that he is likely disbarred leg right now. sidney powell, jenna ellis have pleaded guilty. we've got all of them. stephanie lambert in mich

. >>> through the investigations of the so-called watergate affair.bring that investigation and the other investigations of this matter to an end. one year of watergate is enough. [ applause ] >>> if there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation. ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, but i manage it well ♪ ♪ jardiance! ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to tell ♪ ♪ i take once-daily jardiance ♪ ♪ at each day's start! ♪ ♪ as time went on it was easy to see ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c! ♪ jardiance works twenty-four seven in your body to flush out some sugar. and for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease, jardiance can lower the risk of cardiovascular death, too. serious side effects may include ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration that can lead to sudden worsening of kidney function, and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare, life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection ketoacido

times it really changed during watergate. it was republican leaders who went to richard dickson has said, it's time to go in the year 2024, republicans have made donald trump. there. they're basically their presumptive nominee. we're not officially there yet to married close. it's a two-man race or a john dean thank you very much. in the meantime, we are following some breaking news out of ukraine. if you're just catching up on all of this stunning situation in ukraine this morning, president volodymyr zelenskyy says a russian missile hit near his convoy killing several people. the details are ahead president biden's last state of the union before the 2024 election >> with challenges at home and abroad, can he make the case for four more years? and the white house? join cnn for special live coverage of the state of the union address tomorrow at times cnn. >> yeah. >> your worst nightmare, your car broke down unless you already called car shield the logit number one, auto protection company in the country. well, you're protect

it seems to be working just fine, joining me now, are jon sale and former assistant special watergate prosecutor. and former assistant attorney at sdn. why? made rocha also is with us former division chief at fdny and district attorney of westchester county, new york. mimi, this trial was supposed to be the one that was most likely to happen on a quicker timeline. how significant is this potential delay and what do you make of the fact that bragg is willing to give it to them? >> well, i think that da bragged had to agree to something when you have documents. however significant or insignificant they are being turned over to the defense, even if you believe that they are not core to the case. ace or material or whatever your position is as a prosecutor, you're going to say, of course, we're going to give time for you to go through these because otherwise, if there is when there's a trial and if there's a conviction that could be something that could could cause an issue on appeal if you don't, and it's the right thing to do to allow them to you have time to go over the documents. so i

the presidential records act, which was created in the aftermath of watergate, in the nixon administrationfamous 18—minute gap, to decide what was personal and what were presidential records. prior to that statute, staff and presidents and vice presidents would take home all sorts of documents for decades, including classified information. this statute makes it very clear as to what is and what is not personal and presidential. it does not apply to classified or national defence information. there have been numerous executive orders which govern classification, no mention of the presidential records act, there were numerous orders that existed before the presidential records act, and there was no mention in that statute. it's a civil statute. had president trump wanted to challenge whether or not these were his records, he could have returned them to the national archives, and then filed a civil lawsuit to challenge. i don't know why this motion is still on the table and my hope is that judge cannon will issue a very well reasoned, whether lengthy or short, opinion and puts this issue to b

the presidential records act which was created in the aftermath of watergate in the nixon administrationngs, the infamous 18 minute gap, to decide what was personal and what were presidential records act, prior to that statute staff and presidents and vice presidents would take home all sorts of documents for decades, including classified information. this statute makes it very clear as to what is and what is not personal and presidential. it does not apply to classified or national defence information. there have been numerous executive orders which govern classification, no mention of the presidential records act, there were numerous orders that existed before the presidential records act and there was no mention in that statute. it is a civil statute and president trump wanted to challenge whether or not these are his records, he could have returned them to the national archives and then filed a civil lawsuit to challenge. i don't know why this motion is still on the table and my hope is that judge cannon will issue a very well reasoned, whether lengthy or short, opinion and puts this

there are differences between the watergate scenario in this scenario, the watergate scenario, the time pressure there was richard nixon already won his second term. he wasn't up for an election. there was no looming election. the concern was we have a criminal investigation of the guy in the white house here. the concern is really more political concern is while we have a looming election, and how might this trial impact the election? and i think there's an argument that it is appropriate for prosecutors and courts to consider the former situation. but once you get into the game of judges and prosecutors thinking about whether there's an election day and how should we play this? you're starting to turn those jobs that we don't want to be political into things that are political trump has a very varied take of the supreme court, or less obviously, he put three justices on there, but he's gone from saying, i remember when he wants tweeted, when they were going against him. i don't think they liked me very much, but i mean, clearly right now, even if maybe it's unwittingly or not on purpo

all of you were executive editors of papers that from pedagogy me lie. watergate. is this the same papers or not? i mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i racked wrong serious, wrong rushing a really wrong. okay. in the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through we, we had to wind out that the lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, if your parcel suited to at least say, right, that's a wednesday we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. that's what is pretty fair rides in prison. all of these guy, you know that check's you because he's in jo for doing your job and you know what type of person they know. seymour hersh, but he did something you guys are scared to do to speak the truth and actually make critical of the war, which is why he was actually the single one of you. you had any relevancy and you know what the mainstream presence know the diet. nobody's ever

all of you were executive editors of papers that for pedagogy me lie. watergate. is this the same papers or not? i mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong rush. i get really wrong. okay. kind of getting the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledged that through means we had to wind out that the lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, a parcel suited to at least say right, that's the lensky. we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. that seems pretty fair. the rides in prison. all of you guys, you know that check's you because he's and joe for doing your job and you know what? tucker carlson, a know seymour hersh, but he did something you guys are scared to do to speak the truth and actually be critical of the war, which is why he was actually the single one of you. you had any relevancy and you know what the mainstream presence now the diet and nobo

even acknowledge seymour hersh, all of you were executive editors of papers that for pedagogy me lie. watergate. is this the same papers or not? i mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong rush, i get really wrong. okay. kind of getting the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through we, we have to wind out that the lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, if you parcel suited to at least say, right, that's a wednesday, we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. that seems pretty fair. rods in prison. all of you've got, you know, that checks you because he's in jail for doing your job. and you know what, tucker carlson a know seymour hersh, but he did something you guys are scared to do to speak the truth and actually be critical of the war, which is why he was actually the single one of you. you had any relevancy and you know what the mainstream presence now the diet and n

all of you were executive editors of papers that pedagogy me lie. watergate is this the same papers or not? i mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong rush to get really wrong. okay. kind of getting the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through we, we had to wind out that the lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, the parcel suited to at least say right, that's the lensky. we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. that seems pretty fair rides in prison. all of your god. you know that check's you because he's in jo for doing your job and you know what? tucker carlson, they know seymour hersh, but he did something you guys are scared to do to speak the truth and actually be critical of the war, which is why he was actually the single one of you. you had any relevancy and you know what the mainstream presence now, the dia, nobody's ever going to listen to you ag

he ultimately wasn't hurt by nixon's resignation or by watergate. and he waited for his timing and ran again in 80 and won. so probably in hindsight, it looks like reagan probably did the right thing by not running. and i think that's one of the lessons to newsom is the right thing might be not to run, but see, he hasn't called me. if he does, i'll let know. nixon on the issues. nixon on the issues. again, i would call him a kind of a moderate to liberal, moderate to liberal wing international of republican party. i think he was probably in terms of what was he politically i think he if you take nixon in large and 60 and you take goldwater the right in 64, nixon was somewhere in between the two. i think nixon felt in 60 he drifted a little to left. never. he promised the first african american in the cabinet nixon lodge one. i mean really bold declaration on civil rights at a time when that was still controversial before the 64 civil rights act, goldwater showed the pendulum went the other way and republicans got wiped out. so nixon, i need to be so

me lie. watergate . is this the same papers or not? i mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong, russell game really wrong. okay. kind of getting the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through links, we had to wind out that the lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, if you parcel students who at least say, right, that's a wednesday we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. that seems pretty fair rides in prison. all of your god. you know that check's you because he's in joe for doing your job and you know what? tucker carlson, a know seymour hersh but he did something you guys are scared to do to speak the truth and actually be critical of the war, which is why he was actually the single one of you out of you had any relevancy and you know what the mainstream presence now the diet and nobody's ever going to lis