yelenskyi, who, as i understand, advises the president on many things, within the framework of religioneedom of religion and so on, and it may have been his initiative to somehow do something with the uocp, or what their position is, do they communicate with you, because according to my information, they still turned to you and asked to correct this law, because in the form in which it exists now, it will not be unrealistic to implement it, well, first of all, only in the form in which it exists... now it can actually be implemented, in no other form, and certainly not in the form in which it came to the first reading, and the law was voted on at the first reading precisely on the condition that it will be corrected before the second reading and will become effective, because it was not effective, it was framework and blanket and absolutely weak, and we immediately said that we would govern it, which we did, and the law became more powerful and truly effective. although again, you know , it is not ideal, if society expects that after the adoption of this law in one day we will get rid o