marchuk entered the political arena there, first yevhen marchuk, then viktor. but after such high-profileignations, they actually became political figures, that is, it is bad and it can also end for them in a political sense, not to mention how much it can disorganize and demoralize the ukrainian army, i would say so, the team, the team of our victory, i would call it that, but the other version is that it is such a political techno. geek games that supposedly release, supposedly don't release, throw in one piece of information, another piece of information, there was information about there, well , the last one, this is the last drop there about what abuses alcohol, there we remember these posts of one deputy about it, that is , systematic discrediting is going on, that is, it is not such a disruption of the situation. not resignation , not a collapse, but some kind of, perhaps even more dangerous , successive destruction of authority, bringing the person himself to a kind of insecurity, to a decrease in charisma, and this is also bad for the country and for the states, well, you correct

marchuk, then viktor yushchenko, but after such high-profile resignations, they actually became politicalgures, that is, it is bad and for them too it can end in a political sense, not to mention how much it can to disorganize and demoralize the ukrainian army, i would say so, the team, the team of our victory, i would call it that, but the other version is that this is a kind of political-technological games that supposedly free, supposedly do not. they throw in one piece of information, another piece of information, there was information about there, well , the last one, this is the last drop there about the abuse of an alcoholic. there, we remember these posts by one deputy about this, that is, there is systematic discrediting, that is, it is not, not so, not a disruption of the situation, not not a resignation, not a collapse, but some such, perhaps even more dangerous, successive destruction of authority, bringing the person himself to a kind of insecurity, to a decrease in charisma'. integrity, and this is also bad for the country and for the states, well, you correctly mentioned ma

well, we remember how entered the political arena there, first yevhen marchuk, then viktor yushchenkoter such high-profile resignations, they actually became politicians. figures, that is, it is bad and for them it can also end in a political sense , not to mention how much it can disorganize and demoralize the ukrainian army, i would say so, the team, the team of our victory, i would call it that, here is another version lies in the fact that these are such political-technological games that allegedly release, allegedly... do not release, throw in one information, another information, there was information about there , well, the last one, this is the last drop there about the fact that he abuses alcohol, there we remember these posts by one deputy about it, that is, there is systematic discrediting, that is, it is not, not, not , not such a disruption of the situation, not a resignation , not a collapse, but... some such, perhaps even more dangerous, successive destruction of authority, bringing the person himself to a kind of insecurity, to a decrease in his charisma, and this is a

marchuk entered the political... arena, then viktor yushchenko, but after such high-profile resignationsey actually became political figures, that is, it's bad for them too... it can end in in a political sense, without speaking already about the extent to which it can disorganize and demoralize the ukrainian army, i would say so, the team, the team of our victory, i would call it that, but another version is that these are such political-technological games that supposedly liberate, supposedly not release, throw in one piece of information. other information , there was information about there, well, the last one, this is the last drop there about the fact that he abuses alcohol, there we remember these posts by one deputy about it, that is, there is systematic discrediting, that is, it is not, not such a breakdown of the situation, no not resignation, not a collapse, but some such, perhaps even more dangerous fallout. the complete destruction of authority, bringing the person himself to a kind of insecurity, to a decrease in charisma , and this is also bad for the country and for the s

marchuk entered the political arena there, first yevgeny marchuk, then viktor yushchenko, but after-profile resignations, they actually... became political figures, that is, it is bad and it can also end for them in a political sense, not to mention the fact that how much is it can disorganize and demoralize the ukrainian army, i would say so, the command of our victory, i would call it that, but the other version is that these are political technological games that do not... allegedly fire, allegedly do not fire, throw in one information, other information, there was information about there, well, the last one, this is the last drop there about the fact that he abuses alcohol, there we remember these posts by one deputy about it, that is, there is a systematic discrediting, that is, it is not, not, not such a failure situation, not resignation, not... a collapse, but some kind of perhaps even more dangerous, the successive destruction of authority, bringing the person himself to a kind of insecurity, to a decrease in charisma, and this is also bad for the country and for the states

marchuk wanted to be in 1999, here is the third force, a strong general who can take the situation intods and bring ukraine to power. well, to some certain victory or to some order, mr. igor, why is zelenskyi’s team so concerned with zaluzhny’s ratings, because it is a trust rating, and zaluzhny’s trust rating is probably a trust rating including the armed forces of ukraine, that is, not only the policy of zaluzhny or to general zaluzhny, it is obvious that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure... on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest rating trust in the country, well, he personalizes it in the first place, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is a significant part of his rating, which is related to his surname and the actions he takes, regarding such the picky attitude of the president's office in general to the rating of meritocracy, here the problem is different, the office of the president is generally picky about any people who get into it. rating and trust and confidence in which, well, it is either commensura

marchuk wanted to be in 1999, that is the third force, a strong general who can take the situation into hands and to bring ukraine to some certain victory or to some order. mr. igor, why does zelenskyi's team care so much about zaluzhny's ratings, because this is a trust rating, and zaluzhny's trust rating is... probably a trust rating, including the armed forces of ukraine, that is, not only a diligent politician or a diligent general, obviously , that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest trust rating in the country, well, he personalizes it first of all, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is also a significant part of his actual rating, which is related to his... surname and the actions he takes, regarding such a picky attitude of the president's office in general to zaluzhnyi's rating, the problem here is something else , the office of the president is generally scrupulous about any people who fall into the rating and trust and trust in which is either commensurate, or eve

marchuk wanted to be in 1999, a third force, a strong general who can take the situation into his handsd ukraine. to some certain victory or to some order, mr. igor, why is zelenskyi's team so concerned with zaluzhny's ratings, because it is a trust rating, and zaluzhny's trust rating is probably a trust rating including in the armed forces of ukraine, that is, not exclusively in the politician industrious or to the industrious general, it is obvious that we are talking about the fact that he heads the structure on which the future of ukraine depends, which has the highest trust rating in the country? well, he personalizes it, first of all, and that is why he really has such a high rating, although there is a significant part of his rating, which is related to his surname and the actions he does. regarding such a meticulous attitude of the president's office in general to zaluzhnyi's rating, the problem is different here: the president's office is generally meticulous about any people who get into it. rating and trust and trust to which well or commensurate or even worse there than with