, he, i think, is quite predictable, i... for general zaluchny, also gerasim, and then they said thatto in order to change something in the dynamics, we will come up with something like this, we will change the war to a maneuverable one, about this decision. was not accepted, i normally treat general sersky with respect, he has done it before, but even now he has done many things, and very successful ones, i am not about that, i am just saying that it is no does not signal a change of approaches, but i do not see how this can signal a change of approaches, they worked together, both generals and together developed all these operations together, well, and one more point, after all, this decision goes beyond the scope of purely rotation, changes in the armed forces of ukraine , there will be many more consequences, and i do not want to give details now, there will be no major external ones, because in principle, officially, everyone will say that this is your right, your decision, the americans found it out personally, everything is here with a visit, they heard everything. others partn

actually the first element of the fact that a special operation was being prepared for zaluchny was statement of the ex-president of the russian medvedev's federation on january 24, at the time of the downing of the il-76 in the sky over bilhorodchyna, when he said that the downing of this... ilse is an internal, intra-political showdown between the military and the political leadership of our country, that is, the foundations of a possible further scenario were laid in this way regarding the compromising of his meritorious removal from office, and finally i finish, the campaign of discrediting syrsky in the russian media, which is currently taking place for the last two days, shows that this scenario was being prepared again in advance. we calculated the possibility of appointing her successor zaluzhnyi, and currently the main task is not even zaluzhnyi syrskyi, introducing an element of her distrust in... decision-making by the top military leadership of our country, i.e. the main target audience is servicemen of the armed forces of ukraine, demoralization of personnel and accordi

actually this has become a kind of standard, but now even when the situation with the removal of general zaluchny from his post happened , everyone at once rushed to read what foreign media are writing about this situation, i would like to ask you why it is necessary... does such secondaryness in perceiving one's own vision and trying to perceive everything through external evaluations carry risks? here we can say , first of all, that the perception of information and the perception of the meanings you speak of is precisely the culture of statehood. you and i, unfortunately, understand that ukrainian statehood in its restored form was a short story, as the russian federation was created almost a little more than 30 years ago, and ukrainian statehood was also restored for 30 years, and until this was the soviet union, and this soviet union practically did not provide a culture of free worship. meanings, categories, processes, discourses, and therefore today, unfortunately, what you are talking about is just a stereotype and a flaw. of the past, the past in administration, because this is exactly w

actually this has become a kind of standard, but even now, when the situation with the removal of general zaluchnym his post took place, everyone immediately ran to read that foreign media are writing about this situation, i would like to... ask you why this happens, whether such secondaryness carries risks in terms of the perception of one's own vision and trying to perceive everything through external evaluations? here we can say, first of all , that the perception of information and the perception of meanings, which you are talking about, is precisely the culture of statehood, which you and i, unfortunately, understand. that ukrainian statehood in a restored version, it was a short story, after all, just as the russian federation was created for practically a little more than 30 years, so ukrainian statehood was also restored for 30 years, and before that there was the soviet union, and this soviet union practically did not provide a culture of free confession meanings, categories, processes, discourses, and therefore today, unfortunately, what you are talking about is precisely a stereotype an

zaluchny is applying for his position, he has five or six different plans for further offensive, counteroffensiveow to inflict maximum pain on the russians, he enjoys authority and respect among the military plus western partners, so this replacement will not be equal, but much... better, that's it, no questions, everyone understood, if there is a replacement, let's go, a football player on the field , when replacing a football player, one is tired, or his injury will be replaced by another one, who is not worse, but maybe better at some points, it’s great, if you just replace him, fire him precisely because of political motives and put in his place a person who is not, for example, a media person, not are respected among the military, they don't trust her, okay, not civilians. and western partners , after all, do not enjoy the authority and respect of ordinary people, so i believe that this is a wrong step and it is wrong to do so. well, we agree with you, well, industrious is, i don't know, fortunately for him or unfortunately , well, we understand, this is not just a military man, he entered t

actually this has become a kind of standard, now even when the the situation with the removal of general zaluchny from his position , everyone immediately ran to read what the foreign media were writing about this situation, i would like to ask you why this happens, does it carry... risks such secondaryness to the perception of one's own vision and trying everything perceived through external assessments? here we can say, first of all, that the perception of information and the perception of meanings, which you are talking about, is precisely the culture of statehood. you and i, unfortunately, understand that ukrainian statehood in... the restored version, after all, it was a short story, just as the russian federation was created almost a little more than 30 years ago, ukrainian statehood was also restored for 30 years, and until this was the soviet union, and this soviet union practically did not provide a culture of free expression of meanings, categories processes, discourses, and therefore today, unfortunately, what you are talking about is precisely a stereotype and a defect of the past, th

in principle, the general is diligent... he, as there, i think, is quite predictable, as for general zaluchnyasim, and then they said that in order to change something in the dynamics, we are something like that. let's figure it out, let's change the war to a maneuverable war, no decision was made about this, i have a normal attitude towards general sersky, with respect, he has done it before, but now he has done a lot things, uh, and very successful, i'm not up to it, i 'm just saying that this does not in any way signal a change of sub-sweats, but i don't see how it can signal a change of approaches, they worked together, both generals and together, together.. . developed all these operations, and one more point, after all, this decision goes beyond the scope of some kind of rotation, changes in the armed forces of ukraine, there will be many more consequences, and i do not want to give details now, there will be no external big ones, so that in principle everyone will officially say that it is yours right, your decision, the americans figured it out. personally here with the visit everythi

in russia, in principle, is a diligent general, he, as they think, quite predictable, as for general zaluchny gerasim, and then they said that in order to change something in the dynamics, we would come up with something like this, change the war to a maneuverable war, this decision was not made, i normally treat general syrsky with respect, he did it even before. but even now he has done many things and very successful ones, i am not up to that, i am just saying that this does not in any way signal a change of approaches, but i do not see how it can signal a change of approaches, they worked together, both generals and together together they developed all these operations, and one more moment, after all, this decision goes beyond the scope of some kind of rotation, changes in... the armed forces of ukraine, there will be many more consequences, and i do not want to give details now, there will be no external big ones, because in principle , officially, everyone will speak , that this is your right, your decision, the americans found it out personally, here on a visit, they all heard everythi

it is worth mentioning that the resignation of zaluchny was prepared precisely by the russian side, because element of the fact that a special operation was being prepared for a foreigner was the statement of the ex-president of the russian federation medvedev on january 24, at the time of the downing of the il-76 in the sky over bilhorodchyna, when he said about that which knocks down this ilsa is there internal, internal political showdowns between the military and the political leadership of our country, i.e., in this way , the foundations were laid for a possible further scenario regarding the compromising of his meritorious removal from office, well, and finally i finish, and the company of discrediting syrsky in the russian media, which is currently taking place for the last two days, shows about the fact that again this scenario was being prepared for... lie down, they calculated the possibility of appointing her rightful successor, and currently the main task is not even zaluzhnyi syrian, introducing an element of distrust in decision-making by the top military leadership of our cou

has become a kind of standard, now, even when it happened. the situation with the removal of general zaluchnym his position , everyone immediately ran to read what the foreign media were writing about this situation, i would like to ask you why this happens, whether such secondary perception carries risks own vision and trying to perceive everything through external evaluations? here we can say first of all. that the perception of information and the perception of meanings, which you are talking about, is precisely the culture of statehood. you and i, unfortunately, understand that ukrainian statehood, in its restored version, was a short-lived story, as the russian federation was created for almost 30 years, yes. and ukrainian statehood was also restored 30 years ago, and before that there was soviet rule, and this soviet rule practically did not provide culture free confession of meanings, categories, processes, discourses, and therefore , unfortunately, what you are talking about today is just a stereotype and a defect of the past. of the past in management, because this is precisely what

it is worth mentioning that the resignation of zaluchny was prepared precisely by the russian side, because actually the first element of the fact that a special operation was being prepared for an outsider was the statement of the ex-president of the russian federation. medvedev on january 24, at the time of the downing of il-76 in the sky over bilhorodchyna, when he said that the downing of this ils was an internal, intra-political showdown between the military and the political leadership of our country, that is, in this way, the foundations were laid for a possible further scenario regarding the compromising of the meritorious elimination him from the position, and finally i finish, that company of discredit. of syrians in russian media, which is currently taking place for the last two days, indicates that this scenario is again was preparing in advance, they calculated the possibility of appointing her legal successor , and currently the main task is not even the tsarist tsar, introducing an element of mistrust into decision-making by the top military leadership of our country, that is

there is no unity, ugh, and this is the whole process and going, in fact, this is not a story about zaluchny, this is a story about the need to preserve power in the conditions of the expiration of the term of legitimacy, it is not a story about the armed forces, and that is terrible, you know? yes, because the war comes first, because the war comes first, because the people who occupy high positions in ukraine do not live in the world of war, in the world of the need to extend their term of office, to preserve power after the war. this is some kind of, you know, stubborn confidence that ukraine is no longer in danger, and nothing will happen, no, there is no such confidence, i think the more the more. well, you understand, these people have never lived in reality, there is a huge problem. the vast majority of ukrainians have never lived in reality. there. volodymyr zelenskyi, his entourage, are representatives of this overwhelming majority, because they won, and they continue to perceive the world somehow differently. here we see in this book by simon schuster that zelensky was convinced th

god forbid, the encirclement of the armed forces will cause zaluchny’s resignation.s, the armed forces of ukraine began to transfer troops to the front line from units in the rear, writes the new york times. the publication characterizes the situation of ukrainian soldiers as extremely difficult. they no longer think about the offensive, they went on the defensive. this footage shows the consequences of an unsuccessful attempt by the dry land workers to go on the defensive in the rabotino area. action they tried to stretch bruno’s spiral, which would delay our infantry, but were covered in fire and remained lying among the barbed wire. and this is the kherson direction. the vabs continue to destroy the place that has become a mass grave . kiev’s western sponsors, instead of negotiations , are calling on zelensky to mobilize more soldiers due to the loss of fatigue in the troops. this was stated by bundesferen general christian freidin, who is in charge. mistakes you regret. constantly, i am still a person, our soldiers are people, we are all people, there may have be