journalistic or of experts and create mechanisms for broadcasting our messages at the world level, and zaluzhnyk i understood from your message, created precedents when fundamentally important things were discussed, they resonated with our foreign partners and they probably... ensured a certain backlash there in political decisions , military decisions, and this mechanism has been worked out, and if we don't take advantage of it now, then we will actually lose some opportunities, right? i would add here that this is such a wide line, because on the one hand, the president deals with it, ours the diplomatic mission is doing very well , by the way, and on the other hand, mr. zaluzhnyi did just that, and in this synergy... we must also talk about synergy, because the combination of qualities gives scope, depth and primacy, and we had that, we should not lose today, yes, the decisions made, the decisions of martial law are correct, because this is martial law, and the question is now to keep the topic, and here in front of me the speaker spoke correctly, it cannot be allowed that... arguments, scale

formulations, journalistic or expert, and create mechanisms for these messages of ours to the world level and zaluzhnyk i understood from your message, created precedents when fundamentally important things were discussed, they resonated with our foreign partners, and they probably ensured a certain backlash there in political decisions, military decisions, and this mechanism was worked out, and if if we don't take advantage of it now, then we will actually lose certain opportunities, so i would here... add, it's such a broad line, because on the one hand, the president is doing it, our diplomatic mission is doing it very well, to things, and on the other hand mr. zaluzhnyi did just that, and here in this synergy, and we still need to talk about synergy, because the combination of qualities gives scale, depth and primacy, and we had this, we must not lose it today, yes, decisions have been made. martial law is correct, because it is martial law, and the question is now to hold the topic, and here in front of me the speaker spoke correctly, it cannot be allowed that the line of argumentation, the scale

secondly, general zaluzhnyk enjoys high authority in washington, like all ukrainian military personnel all. over the past few years, especially since russia's first invasion of ukraine, in the 14th year, experts in washington, who monitor the progress of the military. events in ukraine were impressed by the evolution and achievements of the ukrainian military, attributed to general zaluzhny important role in this transformation. and thirdly, many in washington perceive president zelensky as a hero, who is considered one of the most significant and effective national leaders in the world. he commands deep respect and admiration in washington circles, so regardless of president zelensky's decision regarding his commander-in-chief, washington is likely. will continue to support him. however, i personally believe that general zaluzhnyi is probably right when he says that ukraine needs more soldiers on the battlefield, whether it is 500,000, as tinned or some other quantity is offered. ukraine urgently needs replenishment of human resources at the front, as well as a significant increase in

ukrainian commander-in-chief has a negative effect on the morale of the ukrainian army, because valery zaluzhnykoys a very high authority among the ukrainian army. it can also complicate the work of senior officers with colleagues from other countries, from the armed forces of other countries, writes the new york times. fox points out that after rumors spread about the possibility of valery zaluzhny's release, and disagreements in the top leadership of ukraine became very evident, this publication writes. zelensky has the right to fire zaluzhnyi, but for this he needs to have a very clear justification and an explanation that is understandable for ukrainians, the journalists write, referring to... experts they spoke with. the bbc , in turn, writes that reports about the possibility of zaluzhnyi's release caused concern among western partners and concern about possible differences in the country's political and military leadership. however, oleksiy noted that when asked about this at the pentagon, us defense ministry spokesman pat ryder replied that he would not comment reports in the press, and

journalistic or expert formulations and create mechanisms for broadcasting our messages. world level and zaluzhnyk, as i understood from your message, created precedents when fundamentally important things were discussed, they resonated with our foreign partners and they probably ensured a certain backlash there in political decisions, military decisions, and this mechanism was worked out, and if we now if we do not take advantage of this, then we will actually lose certain opportunities, so i would add here, they are wide. such a line, because on the one hand the president deals with it, our diplomatic mission deals with it very well, by the way, and on the other hand it is mr. zaluzhnyi did, and in this synergy, we still need to talk about synergy, because the combination of qualities gives scope, depth and primacy, and we had this, we should not lose today, yes, the decisions made, the decisions of the military state. are correct, because this is martial law, and the question is now to hold the topic, and here in front of me the speaker correctly spoke, it is impossible to allow that the line o

and zaluzhnyk , as i understood from your message, created precedents when fundamentally important things were discussed, they resonated with our foreign partners, and they probably ensured a certain backlash there in political decisions, military decisions, and this mechanism was worked out, and if if we don't take advantage of it now, then we will actually lose certain opportunities, so i would add here, it's such a wide line, because... on the one hand, the president is doing it, our the diplomatic mission is doing very well , by the way, and on the other hand, mr. zaluzhnyi did just that, and in this synergy, and we must also talk about synergy, because the combination of qualities gives scale, depth and primacy, and we had that, we for today , we should not lose, yes, the decisions made, the decisions of the military state are correct, because this is the current state and the question, now let's keep the topic and here in front of me the speaker correctly said: it is impossible to allow that the line of argumentation, the scale of argumentation and perception our arguments, ukrainia

in october 2022, general zaluzhnyk. was included in the hundred most influential people in the world according to the version of an american magazine, although he is called an iron general, the ukrainian military respects and trusts him: everyone in the family is friendly, you and he and i, our father zaluzhny, from ssu, a family, we have a powerful spirit, god is in our head, zaluzhny will give an order, we will be in power! we discuss and continue to discuss the main news of this day and this evening, the resignation of general zaluzhnyi and the appointment of general oleksandr syrsky , colonel general and hero of ukraine, as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. it is interesting that the syrian hero of ukraine is still not a hero of ukraine. so we include pavlo keshkar in the conversation. he is the deputy commander of the artillery division, major, project manager. accelerator office the ministry of defense, mr. pavle, i congratulate you , i hope that i said everything correctly about good evening, mr. vasyl, good evening ukraine, good evening, well, actually, h

secondly, general zaluzhnyk enjoys high authority in washington, like all ukrainian military personnelafter all. over the past few years, especially after russia's first invasion of ukraine in 2014, experts in washington who monitor the course of military events in ukraine have been impressed by the evolution and achievements of the ukrainian military, and general zaluzhny is credited with an important role in this transformation. third, many in washington perceive the president. zelensky as a hero who is considered one of the most significant and effective national leaders in the world. he commands deep respect and admiration in washington circles, so regardless of president zelensky's decision regarding his commander-in-chief, washington is likely to continue to support him. however, i personally believe that general zaluzhnyi is probably right in saying that ukraine needs more soldiers on the battlefield, whether it is... artillery ammunition. we remember from our time, about one and a half years ago , the so-called istanbul meetings took place, certain negotiations took place. now

zaluzhnyk remains in the team, at the end he was awarded a star... at least it was really well playede, now about mr. syrsky, so many of our soldiers, i saw my information bubbles, the military is outraged, the military community is outraged, the volunteer community outraged, as it is, but on the other hand , and the team that there seems to be five people, whom he proposes to appoint to key positions, at least the reviews on them from the military themselves, oh, not bad, these are normal people, they ... 10 years in the war , they understand military affairs, they understand mutual relations with subordinates, that is, well, maybe it’s not so, it’s not so bad, my personal opinion is, give his syrian team a month to take the first step, and then, first of all our soldiers from the fronts, they will say whether we were all wrong about the occasion syrian and his team, or vice versa is happening as it was understood and well, further prospects. well, what is not, they are bad. yes, well, i read mr. butusov, who very often informs us from the front, he says: the new leadership team of t

our main strength, all that we have , he said so at the time, everything we have means that if valery zaluzhnyk the army, our president organizes aid to ukraine, everyone said, what is the main merit of the president, he does not command the troops, he mobilizes the whole world to help ukraine, well, moral. the leader of the civilized world, as we liked to say, well, this is the moral leader of the civilized world, and this is the person who leads the army that stopped the influx. in principle, volodymyr zelenskyy himself should understand what kind of society he is dealing with, because if it were a different society, he would now be leading the troupe of the 95th quarter, and not the president of ukraine. society mythologized him, invented him, gave him those features that it would like to see in to a person who is in... the state and voted for him for the position of president, despite all the convictions that the hopes of the vast majority of people, who they invested in this figure, will not come true, but will be this, that and this, what happened , the president himself once summed it up

there is still a specific other person who is responsible for it, and there is a second point, the same zaluzhnyklso understand it , mr. kryvonostce to some extent confirms that the system worked, but when the mass dismissals of these heads of the tsk began, some of which were absolutely reasoned and substantiated. and it is connected there with some kind of corrupt actions, there is no point in arguing with it right away, it collapsed the entire system in general, because no one wanted to replace them, people from the front, they do not want to risk their image, their reputation, go to this position, where they are a priori guilty, where the presumption of guilt, and not the presumption of innocence, and this system, well, it was overturned for political reasons, i i remember the president's address that we are firing everyone, cleaning up and so on, so we just had to modernize this law... well, let's put it this way, to introduce certain actions, starting at least from the middle of the 22nd, at the most from the end of the 22nd, the beginning of the 23rd year, and not to do it at the end of th

fact, in this paradigm, we are now building a system of protection and defense, which even general zaluzhnyky talks about when he says in his article that we have to look for options for more effective means of influence in the conditions of... limited foreign aid at the enemy what is happening in avdiivka now? was it reported yesterday that there are actually street fights? well, avdiivka remains one of the most difficult areas on the front line, if we are talking about the fact that the number combat operations are increasing, yesterday there were 31, today we are talking about 44. combat operations along the entire perimeter around avdiivka, and there are certain nuances here, when we talk about avdiivka, there were actually three directions of attack there, from the north, when there we talked about getting the enemy in the steppe zone, this is actually the northern approaches to avdiyivka, eh, but now the main dynamics are developing already in the south in the very north. of avdiivka itself, because from the north of avdiivka there is an advance of the enemy right to the section, which

general zaluzhnyk enjoys high authority in washington, like all ukrainian military personnel, after all over the past few years, especially since the first russian invasion of ukraine. in the 14th year, experts in washington, who monitor the course of military events in ukraine, were impressed by the evolution and achievements of the ukrainian military. general zaluzhnyi is credited with an important role in this transformation. thirdly, many in washington perceive president zelensky as a hero, who is considered one of most. significant and effective national leaders in the world. he commands deep respect and admiration in washington circles, so regardless of president zelensky's decision regarding his commander-in-chief, washington will likely continue to support him. however, i personally think that general zaluzhny is probably right when he says that ukraine needs more soldiers on the battlefield, whether it is 500 thousand as suggested by zaluzhny or some other number. ukraine urgently needs replenishment of human resources at the front, and also a significant one increase in artill

so, what are the conclusions of the technological vision expressed by general zaluzhnyk, which involvesn of new approaches due to a significant number of robotic platforms of various purposes, new approaches to their application in order to reduce the burden on personnel, which is currently lacking on the front line, but there are everyday needs from the point of view of the production of armored vehicles, ammunition, other things, some of which our domestic defense industry can do, but there are also certain... related to the lack of long-term orders that do not allow to ensure the purchase of equipment, scaling due to this the equipment of products, and this also creates challenges for our defense to be strengthened precisely at the expense of our own capabilities, i think that all these challenges should be taken into account by the ministry of defense, the general staff, and other bodies, so that our defense is stronger , and the potential of our defense industry developed rapidly. these were the main summaries of this program, stay tuned to the espresso channel. greetings to all vi

the conclusions are the technological vision expressed by general zaluzhnyk, which involves the creationw approaches due to a significant number of robotic platforms of various purposes, new approaches to their application in order to reduce the burden on personnel, which is lacking now on the front line, but there are everyday needs in terms of the production of armored vehicles, ammunition, other things, some of which can be made by our domestic defense industry, but there are also certain disadvantages associated with the lack of... long-term orders that do not allow for the purchase of equipment, the scaling of products at the expense of this equipment, and this also creates challenges for our defense industry to be strengthened precisely at the expense of our own capabilities, i think that all these challenges should be taken into account and the ministry of defense, and the general staff, and other bodies, so that our defense is stronger, and the potential of our defense industry...

threat in the commander-in-chief, i mean, political, sorry, not a threat, a political competitor, valery zaluzhnykemonstrates himself as a statesman, an expert in his field, which is extremely important, and there is not even a hint of political ambitions or competition in this area, so this topic should be closed and postponed, and the key question is whether there are groups in the political community... who are interested in i am weak-minded, of course there is, of course there is, that's why, regardless of all the statements or articles there, including, it seems , cnn, yes in the information streams, three days, three days to change the hard-working one, i will still keep my hand for the president not to pushed for this decision, but once again i emphasize whether there are groups... groups that are not interested in the commander-in-chief, in the talking head, who will start telling you that you need to cede territory, negotiate, peace there and more. some and so on, there are usually such groups, and that is why i emphasize once again that the authorities should be better prepared for self-

so, what are the conclusions of the technological vision expressed by general zaluzhnyk, which involveshe creation of new approaches at the expense of a significant number of robotic platforms of various purposes, new approaches to their application in order to reduce the burden on personnel, which is currently lacking on the line front, but there are everyday needs from the point of view of manufacturing armored vehicles, ammunition, and others. another part of which can be done by our domestic defense industry, but there are also certain disadvantages associated with the lack of long-term orders that do not allow to ensure the purchase of equipment, the scaling of products at the expense of this equipment, and this also creates challenges in order to our defense was strengthened precisely at the expense of our own capabilities. i think that all these challenges should be taken into account by the ministry of defense and the general staff, and by other bodies, or... our defenses were stronger, and the potential of our defense industry was developing at a rapid pace. these were the main