to the next in brief ukraine is proclaimed a permanently neutral state under international legal guarantees. in order to implement a non-bloc, non-nuclear status , a list of guarantor states guaranteeing the security of ukraine is given below. these security guarantees do not apply to the territory of crimea and sevastopol, that is, ukraine refuses to seek to return crimea to sevastopol by military means and declares that this is possible only through negotiations between diplomatic and and so on, of course, this does not correspond in any way to our position, but ukraine has formulated its own approach, and also does not apply to that part of ukraine which it calls separate areas of the donetsk luhansk regions. ukraine refuses to retreat to military alliances from the deployment of foreign military bases of contingents to conduct military exercises on

the territory of ukraine without the consent of states with guarantors, including the russian federation for its part, the russian federation does not object to ukraine's desire to join the european union, this is by no means a provision contracts - this is a proposal by the ukrainian side, which we consider a constructive step towards finding a compromise, and which will be considered and russia will be given an appropriate answer. so, it was said twice that this proposal, which was conveyed by the ukrainian side, i remind everyone who is in alarm and bewilderment, may have forgotten that even 2 weeks ago. this is the ukrainian side. before each round of negotiations, she announced that she was generally going there solely to discuss the terms of our surrender and also our reparations. this is to to what, well, so to speak, e statements and proposals that are passed on the negotiations. and this is not a contract. this is not yet an obligation

, moreover, the same arami. who has taken a big step as the negotiator since he is already coming. now without a baseball cap there, he made a statement today that they only recognize the international borders of ukraine in 1991 . that is, as if you understand that it completely contradicts everything that, that is, if they transmitted these proposals, then they are this statement. right here they also win doses. and you and i, so to speak, as if, uh, we are talking. oh, what is this happening, this is it, how and what michael please, and that is another good example of the fact that you need to be attentive to the words, understand them completely, and do not snatch out pieces from the text. i had a wonderful experience today. at first, i didn’t understand very well in the morning, and then now people who watered me with all the swear words. now , in connection with this, they begin to

offer condolences to me in the same language. in connection with these events colleagues. there are no grounds for condolences and for alarm. the ukrainian side has finally formulated its point of view, since this point of view has been voiced. you know, there is a small nuance in diplomatic negotiations. if we take something as a basis, if we seriously agree on something, we can agree, then we don’t say it, we don’t say it out loud. respectively. these are some drafts, which will be straightened further, well, mr. rahami, straightened in the other direction. it is clear that frightened a lot of we also heard such a wording, a decrease in the intensity of the chernihiv and kiev direction, yuriy ivanovich podlyak, two days ago, in my opinion, or maybe a day, it should be clear publicly showed that the russian federation is redeploying troops in order to finally put an end to this lawlessness that the

ukrainian military is doing in the donbass to make a cauldron there to close these troops and for this. naturally, it is necessary to translate as early as friday, general rutskoi spoke about this. quite right. absolutely true, that is, they talked about it, but vladimir rostislavovich medinsky, as i understand it, gave it some diplomatic connotation , well, wonderful. here is an offer now. now we will express our point of view, which will be more intelligible and understandable, and maybe the negotiations will continue. i don't see the nature of negotiations sometimes, and we generally went through this in our recent history of the last eight years, that they, in my opinion, can continue. in the general endless peace enforcement continues until those as long as it does not bring to peace or until there is no one to force one of the two. in addition, in addition, a wonderful phrase was said. i don't know if this is true or fake. sorry.

now we have a very tense informational environment, that allegedly someone somewhere knows you read the channel on telegram. delcification requirements but nothing is heard about this first. and secondly, i immediately remembered the wonderful words of the left hand of mr. kolomoisky, promise them anything you want, we will hang it later, i think it’s a useful approach, because each rule must be applied to those who profess it. understandable and important questions. you have touched. we are not going over to us now . and, of course, just the fact that there is another statement that was made in istanbul , which, together with what mr. medinsky said and with the missing beginning and end of what he said, that this was only a proposal from the ukrainian side was perceived as something like that. here is the total. well, here's something that deputy defense minister fomin said, and i'll tell you now let me remind you, i will remind you of these words and, accordingly, we will also discuss this part, please listen

carefully. due to the fact that the negotiations on the preparation of a non-nuclear treaty for ukraine, as well as providing ukraine with ukraine a security guarantee, are moving into practice, taking into account the principles condemned during today's meeting by the ministry of defense of the russian federation in order to increase mutual trust and create the necessary conditions for further negotiating and achieving the final goal agreement signing of the high-quality aforementioned agreement. a decision was made to radically reduce military activity in the kiev and chernihiv directions , we proceed from the fact that relevant key decisions will be made in kiev and conditions should be created for further normal work.

on this occasion, too, there are a lot of all sorts of worries and emotions. and yes, and maybe this is the most important moment, but because, of course, what was said by the human general on friday, no one remembers anymore, uh, everyone is looking at it, but nevertheless, nobody does not remember what he says about this, which day everyone reacts to what is said today here and now how it should be perceived. how do you perceive it? well, first of all, let's start with the main thing, which is none other than the deputy minister of defense of the very same minister who somehow quite rightly said in 2 hours. before that, as if he set specific tasks, that is , imagine that these two people did not coordinate with each other. uh, these messages are impossible, and the second. uh, exactly, of course, what is it what has been happening for 2 weeks 2 weeks is stated. we are holding the group in kiev, we are not letting it get out, and accordingly we are conducting a search. uh, intelligence activities. that is, in fact, we have reduced that military activity for a long time simply because, well, we completed the task. and

thirdly, i consider this statement in general. wait, now let's move on to the third, when you say that we actually completed the task near kiev. and to ask you a question, so what was the task? which spoke many times and we wrote and podlyako, and i and all of you talked about it. the main task was to initially block the grouping around kiev, to prevent it from moving anywhere from there , not to be transferred there, not under kharkov, let alone towards the donbass, or to odessa, here’s the airborne gastomil. he meant, he was a nail, a nail with which this grouping was nailed to kiev then on behalf of those people who ask questions about this on the second point. i'll still ask you so then, what now makes us believe that if we they nailed it with this nail, and now this nail, we, as it were, are either pulling it out, or that now this group will not twitch anywhere from there. after all, i have not heard that the guarantees of non-use of this grouping, in the same donbass, somehow sound no, firstly, it was said that to hope for this is such, well, this is the

wording. we're talking while we're negotiating. i'm talking about military activities, firstly, for a month. this grouping is very seriously rolled out. they made several attempts to attack, available reserves. they received a very serious defeat. they lost a huge amount of equipment and within the framework of the general military-strategic situation. they can’t attack anywhere now, moreover, now the tasks that our group is coping with are already quite confidently coping with our kks, because they solved a very large number. eh, as if the goal is final and the third moment. yes, the main point of the third, i consider this statement, most likely with a high degree of probability, as a concession to the organizer of the negotiations to the president of turkey because what we remember. how much importance has passed on to turkey, because these negotiations are also held by erdogan, who is considered our partner, who emphasizes this, who has shown this in general many times, although doing other things too. there was

some kind of baksheesh, you know, such a gift called the military-strategic situation wrapped in a diplomatic wrapper of peacekeeping candy. as a matter of fact, this is what it is. that is. we called those things that in military language are called, as it were, stabilization of the front by the fact that we are just all this case. uh, so to speak, we have reduced our military activities; nowhere does it say that we are stopping hostilities; nowhere does it say that we are doing something to stop; nowhere does it say that we are changing targets. that is, we remember what havyu is, it has nothing to do, even the slightest repeat. i am considering the deputy minister's statement. solely as a diplomatic uh, nod to turkey and since you said that word, i want to remember what you wrote on your social network, you wrote that if it happens, it’s me i will not say anything, since you say that this is not something, somehow i have a reputation for sure. i will never keep silent, so that it happens suddenly there are some such that i do not see. no threat

that we went through once and the country ca n't afford to go through it a second time. i'll add it to you. we did not go through this once i participated in the war, which we went through for 10 years, and then we kind of know what happened, and so on and so forth, so many people who are asking questions now. they do not ask from an empty place and afghans and chechens. and it's still a lot of who and you went through it all, and i went through it all. and these are normal pertinent questions. it is important when asking these questions to focus and listen carefully to the answers. yes, egor, i will add a little bit that mr. medinsky has already said that and this does not mean that the decrease in activity in the kiev training direction does not mean a cessation. fire understands the start of mr. medina, explaining, as it were, the position of this, as it were, regarding the military side. everything has been said here with regard to the diplomatic country, and the second so-called concession to the ukrainian side, which was designated by the gentleman. medical was a

fundamental agreement to arrange themselves between mr. zelensky and mr. putin, which, of course, almost immediately began to paint as something so indecent from our country. but there is what was said. it was clearly stated there that the summit would take place when it was ratified, when it was initialed, that is, the text of a comprehensive agreement was agreed upon, which would spell out all the points and the denocification and recognition of the lpr dpr crimea and delilitarization all together, and the master first capitulation, then absolutely, first, not just surrender, initialing, that is, agreeing on a complete agreement on this and only then a summit where the signature will be put, and mr. rachami, and speaking and saying that we only recognize border of ukraine in the ninety-first year. he himself nullified the possibility of such a holding. since you are talking about it. and you have an understanding within the framework of this negotiation secret. we drew the attention of our viewers to the fact that all this should be treated as

tactics i would even say the negotiating strategy of both sides. and what then is the negotiating strategy of ukraine if certain proposals are transmitted from one side, and from the other side. they are refuted in the public space. in what strategy the nervous strategy of ukraine consists of several elements. the first maximum delay in time and the second attempt to create at least some kind of victory is an attempt to draw for decoration, i must honestly say that part of ukraine is already on this news today. well they really are a lot no need to start what but in general already a victory as this task. they performed the ukrainian strange degree. created by failing to create victory on earth. they created some kind of temporary diplomatic oh not so the ghost of a temporary diplomatic victory, which, of course, will dissipate after some time, but by that time they will come up with something else, that is, it turns out again a conversation about two realities, absolutely one, the reality of which the delegation ukraine is negotiating and writing some proposals that have not yet become any clauses of the treaties on the other

side. they, for their audience, which lives in a completely different cocoon, and who will not pay attention to this, say no. we have taken a tough position, and now we have won from outside, the americans are calling them and they themselves are calling the americans and everything starts anew. no, well, there's nothing to start over here. yes, it is important, because now we will talk about it too. yes, maybe some part of ukraine jumps there, but a large number of representatives of the ukrainian politician perceives it as a victory. on the contrary, as for - it’s absolutely obvious why, because it’s not only gerashchenko, moreover, there’s also a minister, i explain why, because zelensky’s statement, which he made just a week ago, that we can only talk about the situation on february 24 about the challenge troops. now, in principle, this is not even in the discourse in that parallel reality that you are talking about, ukraine is advancing contour ukraine is fighting back positions. this parallel

reality has reparations in this parallel reality has all these things, which in fact , now this is also very important at this round of negotiations, and the third point is not very correct. it seems to me that they said about khasavyurt that it is important to convey to ordinary people no khasavyurt, i remind you that when he spoke, uh, shoigu, he spoke about the first stage of the operation. he is within the first stage. he indicated that they destroyed the navy , destroyed the infrastructure there by 8%, but there are still ground forces, and the second very important point. let's remember what these sentences are about also said that medinsky did not pay attention to this and will be transferred to the president. i just remember those tasks that the president announced when he addressed several times and repeated 95% of those dreams. sorry. they offer a diplomatic group of ukraine with these theses of the president do not fight. the problem is that the media, in the pursuit of speed for the hype, really wrote the medina colon in the headlines. russia does not oppose it there. the european union and so on is all an element

information manipulation, therefore, no demilitarization of khasavyurt, denocification that they really want to encircle the main grouping in the donbass as soon as possible and, it seems to me, destroy it is absolutely obvious. naturally, the diplomatic process. it’s based on this, you ask, it’s also a very important moment, when there was a terrible situation with, uh, torture of our soldiers yes, filmed on camera of murders, which he said in diplomatic diplomatic, although well, we ourselves understand that it was necessary in a different way, probably in stand by others. he said, a strong protest. although everyone is well aware that this resolute protest. this is that these killers will be found and, accordingly, only diplomacy will be over them. especially on the territory of turkey, therefore, no panic is very important for the guys who are now performing combat missions. uh, there are no ledges, there are no rewinds, and even more so, there are no khasavyurt journalists.

calm down this topic is untwisting, as far as i am. uh, by the way, i understand e about uh cruel treatment of prisoners. and i’m saying, not only about the video there of the last days, these videos have been flooding us from the first day, and as far as i understand, mr. medinsky said that the ukrainian side also announced that they would investigate this, and so on and so forth further , as far as it can be believed, to what extent the ukrainian side controls anything at all, including including the national battalion and including, perhaps even now, some parts of the armed forces. this is, uh, a separate question, but here it arises, a very good one. more precisely not that good. but you said the word panic. i would still not talk about panic moods. i don't see any panic. i see anxiety, i see, i hear. they write it to me. i'm getting anxiety, which is normal. this is correct. and a lot of things we went through in our lives and people who worry about our guys there.

those who fight and die, and people who have risen throughout the country this month to support this , they have the right to do so. they have the right to worry, worry, ask questions. it fine. the main thing is that these questions should be answered from the appropriate levels, and here is another important question that is asked and something needs to be answered, that for all the importance of negotiations and diplomacy and anything, the question arises, what if the main and important goal operation was declared decency? and we've been saying for this month that what we're disinfecting is actually the essence of the entire regime, and not some thugs running around. uh, somewhere there, or ran some of them already disposed of in the national battalions, what kind of mode it is. now they say, people, we are talking about an agreement with the regime. and

then they ask, that is, all these avakov zelensky gerashchenki and so on. they will remain artyom, uh. you see, in the history of mankind there has already been one decification. it was the delocification of germany that our country was carrying out, but the question is: what is the difference here? certification, germany from the genocification of ukraine, it is that the great german culture was not limited exclusively to nazism, there was also schiller kant goethe mozart beethoven is a huge culture, therefore, they took out nazism, germany left we recently talked with a pole not so long ago, and we also discussed this topic of denazification. he told me, the following we agreed with him, that if we honestly carry out the denocification of ukraine to the end, then

there will be no ukraine, because the whole essence of the ukrainian state lies in chauvinism and non-nazism. therefore, if the identification is carried out to the end , then that’s it, because then we are talking about that ukraine will not exist, because there is nothing but petliura bandera shukhevych a and these modern neo-nazis that do not exist are people. what about the people who are waiting for us? today ukraine represents itself. uh, such an option is someone elitist religious from a semi-satanic sect, so, therefore , we need to deal with this, and people are waiting for us there, people are afraid that russia will come and then leave. people cannot be disappointed by those people who today are zombified in this terrible nazi propaganda, and i mean about civilians, not about the nazis themselves. and these people need to be treated.

these people, these people need psychiatric help. i really need to liquidate the nazis, but i asked you, or rather i broadcast the question to you, which in my opinion. fairly enough, people ask, if you are talking about some negotiations, agreements yourself and whatever, then how will you treat, that is, roughly speaking, if you have uh in the next room, as in our case lives, uh, a mentally deranged person , then either you say so, its some. well, you surrender to treatment by force, or you negotiate with him, and he continues at your door one thing does not interfere with the other, to turn off all this is not unascism turn off this processing of brains turn off this propaganda turn off the zombification of the population. needed in the liberated territories, uh, and that's it. sorry russian land. it is necessary to establish russian power there. and yes, within 10-12 years, then a real demonstration will take place, when

the information policy and educational program are changed, for which, if this is an agreement with the current ukrainian authorities, it will be changed from no agreement is possible with this ukrainian government, because any ukrainian government will deceive any talk, perhaps an agreement. we will start negotiations. we are negotiating for the sake of negotiations, but nothing more than that, no one is going to sign any serious documents with this government, because they are not able to sign anything. they will not be signed not to be transferred, nor under the surrender of the lc. dnr nothing of it i don't like everything you say, but i since i live in the real world i want to. remember that the deputy minister of defense said that we are reducing activity near kiev, because work will be carried out there to prepare for the signing of some documents and people have heard this fact. and so elena vladimirovna says that the

turks do not think so either. by the way , i can tell you how the tour is considered, how the turks think, because the day before the start of negotiations in istanbul i succeeded. uh, in doha, the capital of qatar, at an international conference to talk with three guests from turkey very briefly. this is the colusia of the minister of defense turkey is my age. what is the corner of the turkish foreign minister and in more detail with ibrahim kolin, who is erdogan's adviser to erdogan, whom you have now seen on the screen next to erdogan. here, i’ll say exactly from uh, my personal impressions after talking with them, in particular , erdogan’s adviser, that they were optimistic ahead of time. that is, i got the impression that turkey was counting on some progress in these negotiations, and these proposals that are being voiced now were already known to the turkish leadership in the countryside, and

here. i agree with vladislav, who said that turkey needed some statements that could be interpreted, at least, as the success of turkish diplomacy, the success of turkish mediation, i’ll say more, their mood was such that it was, apparently one of the conditions for the continuation of this mediation. that is, it was necessary to say something, to do something, to say something, so that it was perceived as a movement forward. and here are some things that already existed on earth. before in the region of kiev and chernigov they were presented with absolutely some success. although in reality little has changed and this is actually professionalism. russian diplomacy and especially russian military diplomacy, therefore, i would urge you not to panic here, but on the other hand, you need to carefully look at the reasons. why did these informational manipulations go, but purely

psychologically, when the head of the russian delegation voices the position of the ukrainian side as stated, then people experience such a cognitive dissonance. and the last phrase is forgotten, of course, and they put into the mouth of the heads of russian diplomacy what he said about the ukrainian position. here, probably, the negotiators should also. eh, it's more careful to approach such things, because the headings, and the conclusions, they sometimes change places and in the information field they no longer understand. who said what? and who voiced what position, in fact, this is a very important, very important addition to what i started the program with. and what all the colleagues were talking about. now let 's continue talking about it. this one has more there are many, but there are other facets, and you spoke about them internationally, what will they say to whom in washington and what will they tell to whom? where else is the

news just now. uh, french president emmanuel macron is having a telephone conversation with russian leader vladimir putin, this is reported by the francpress agency with reference to the elysee palace, the telephone conversation began after seventeen local time, that is, 18:00 moscow that is, as i understand it, it continues now and this to the question that these negotiations are also important because they are very many, for their own reasons, erdogan, for their own macrons, for their own, want to be a negotiator, and for one reason or another, perhaps some progress has been indicated in some way that is important for relations with them. this is all very important. there is also a lot of economics. you will continue to discuss all this now advertising. don't switch. well, you asked questions. we have all the answers here. janissaries watch the premiere of a multi-part film after the vremya program, the vtb team that will help you get

a free vtb multicard and pay purchases throughout russia get the ability to easily pay for purchases. why do you need so many cards, if you have one, one halva in installments for 10 months? until 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva , only one card for everything, we are waiting for you to visit for what you love. inspiration chocolate 790 we work with the bank's post office because we value stability as much as you do and we are always happy to meet you at every

branch throughout russia or online with us you can easily issue cards of payment systems of the new time to feel comfortable in the old way, but already in a new way post bank, but there is one force that unites us all. or weakness. i have been learning about cars for the author for 20 years. how much is better to buy and sell to the author, post for free, sell quickly. many are accustomed to making out osago on the machine following the same insurance route and can pass by the benefits. i have my own route through skin services to a profitable

osago in 5 minutes with a saving of up to 60-3%. the first personal finance platform. profitable 100% stable free forever 3% cashback for everything and 15 for the rest i am ready to spend days and nights on a recipe for truffle and caramel ice cream. and i want more people to be imbued with the energy of dancing. pause

expenses, not business in a bank opening a business account for free for 6 months and 15% on the balance of the account. why do you need a lot of cards when there is one halva with an installment plan for 10 months?