including the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs sergey lavrov but i personally got the impression that, at least in the united states and great britain, this positive dynamics in the negotiations between moscow and kiev was not welcome yesterday, us president joe biden refused to give any assessment to the negotiations at all in istanbul and said very strange. in my opinion a phrase. let's see if they mean, of course, the russian, what about ? uh, they say, despite the fact that the obligation actually concerns the ukrainian side, and not russian side. and, of course, biden, but promised to continue military supplies to ukraine and maintain strong sanctions against russia, and british prime minister johnson took this position. let's hear what he said. an agreement between russia and ukraine on a cease-fire will not be enough to lift british sanctions on russia, british

prime minister boris johnson said through a spokesman at a meeting with ministers. he said that pressure on putin should be intensified, both through further economic measures, and through the provision of military assistance to ensure that russia completely changes its course . this is the reaction from the united states of great britain - this is another evidence that they don’t really need peace, they don’t need an end to the war, and they need a prolongation of this military conflict, and they are trying to turn ukraine into a second afghanistan . so, most likely, this. eh, the line of conduct has been visible for a long time. i said a long time ago that, of course, it was the dream of the american administration. in general, start some kind of proxy war. uh, try to drag russia in there. so to wear down these long battles, weapons will be put up. and so on and so forth, and then,

of course, using this situation. uh, also impose such serious sanctions in order to strangle economic ones, but it seems to me that uh, for example, it’s not right, yes, they are not happy with this, but i have the impression that kiev and probably you may be dissatisfied with these agreements agreements raise big questions. and we have because yes, of course, we all would like that as soon as possible. it was completed, but we cannot end these hostilities on any terms , and therefore this is the problem of denocification. as you said it's not worth it. this was one of the main goals set before our troops and the supreme commander in chief. uh, only ukrainian proposals were voiced. of course

, we are not ready to end the military conflict on any terms, not to achieve the conditions that the president formulated from the very beginning. yes, me it seems that i really support this idea too. i rarely agree with the russian foreign ministers, but i would like to agree with lavrov that there is a certain hope here and there is a subject for conversation. that is, it means that we can move further to convince that we must accept those conditions that are very important for us, the same, crimea donbass there and so on, but another question is whether they just want to drag it out in order to to get new weapons, and in general, to continue fighting, but it’s true, i also understand this, that this is a double-edged

weapon, because if they are delayed, then apparently military action by our armed forces can, in general, achieve an irreversible result, and then there will be no one to negotiate with and no with whom to sign anything. well, it seems to me that maybe zelensky would even like to agree, but the problem is that the decision is made in another city, this city is not kiev , but all the comments on the statement that we hear from washington they only talk about one thing what's the purpose the united states is not the world. and this is the victory over russia, which they understand in particular as the overthrow of the current russian ruling regime. and here is the phrase, which is a careless phrase, which joe biden said, e recently in warsaw. it is not a reservation, it is a confirmation of an illustration of a long-term

course. but the united states, but it seems to me that this is a double-edged weapon, including for the united states, unlike the west, we know our history, and we most likely do not let's allow ourselves to be dragged into, and even more so into the second afghanistan, but it is quite obvious that the united states is now trying to deal with russia in order to slow down, uh, the process of disintegration, but of its global hegemony. yes, it's talked about everywhere. well, i want to ask vladimir alekseevich obodkov. here's to your point of view. and by trying to pursue such a policy, the united states does not get the exact opposite result of what is desired. namely, that they only accelerate the process of the crisis of their hegemony, because look, but no, practically not a single major non-western country that would join the american policy of pressure on russia and total, but economic

or hybrid war, what do you think absolutely agrees with you that the united states , by its actions, yes, and inactive in fact deeds are pushing e world to fight against their own hegemony. hegemony is already relatively illusory. but some other elements of this hegemony are retained even by the dollar system, which is being abandoned today. uh, most of the world's countries today is not limited to the united states of america today is much wider and bigger, and it is with these actions that the united states is pushing the world. and including what is most interesting for europe to move away from a monocentric world order to a polycentric world order to the action of a state, a sovereign state that respects each other, among which,

undoubtedly, china, where minister sergey viktorovich lavrov a and india and many other countries are located today who are ready to switch to trading in national currencies, who are ready diversify this trade expand uh, different bundles. eh, with our country and no doubt. here it must be said that the west is in its russophobia. e in their such cave russophobia. yes, as they said, and in the sanctions struggle, he chokes on himself and digs himself in. and the longer it will continue to move in within this very line. uh, the more he will weaken his position in the world order of the future strategic thinking, uh, chinese colleagues who think for thousands of years will definitely have enough. but how today, falling from this pedestal, america lacks strategic thinking. it's a big question because these reservations, oh, that you said, and

not really reservations, but part of the plans of the united states. i'm talking about what biden said about the regime in russia and regime change for the americans. this is fine. they proceed from the fact that this is absolutely the norm of permissible interference in the internal affairs of other states. russia never allowed this. russia proceeded from the principles of international law, but the americans destroyed all existing agreements, came out of all possible and impossible international agreements, including in the field of armaments and thus they endanger the whole world, and kept it in the first place, responsibility, responsibility not only for themselves, but also for the fate of the world, and precisely thanks to without the responsibility of the united states, uh, there is a situation about which the world is at stake and the last thing to say here is we, uh, are facing a new reality. our chinese partners. uh,

concluded with us a number of declarations. this is the declaration of the ninety-seventh year of the declaration. it was called about a multi-polite polar world in the future, a world of devices. absolutely true, and these declarations continued further. it was the declaration of 2005 2022. in the end. not so long ago, but there was another declaration, emphasizing that we are forming a new polycentric measure of order. this is a new reality in which we and our chinese partners are. india, many other countries are becoming centers of attraction attraction of this future world order. well i think what we're seeing right now is uh. another confirmation of the immutable truth that, firstly, absolute power corrupts absolutely, including mentally, and secondly, that the international system strives for balance, and the hegemony of one center of power, it is unnatural and lasts for a relatively long time, she can't, but i want to ask nikolai viktorovich nonetheless. that's

when we talk about the west, how united is this west in its approach, including towards russia? are countries like germany france italy ready to fully support, er, the efforts of the anglo-saxons, and to fight russia, so to speak, until victory and until or until their own defeat. after all, europe is already paying. e much more economically. uh, the damage suffers much more economic damage. we see that the sanctions, but the desynchronization begins, the european union has not yet adopted, and the fifth package of sanctions against russia from europe, by the way, continental western europe sound more optimistic assessments, and perhaps an agreement between moscow and kiev , that's what you think about this possible, a a possible delimitation. between the united states and europe well, you have now voiced, probably, one of the main problems of the american

political establishment. how to make sure that satellites, they are allies, are obedient and do what you want to get from them. and for this, the americans use a whole range of tools, europe hmm provocations. well, for example, let's remember that europe imposed sanctions against russia in 2014 only after a boeing was shot down over the territory of donbass without this, the europeans left saying that it was difficult. we should think about finding out as soon as the plane was shot down. within literally 5 minutes, russia was blamed , and within a day all european countries were forced to join the sanctions, because such a cry, and such an op, stood in the world media that it was impossible not to do so, by the way, uh, literally, sorry to interrupt, i can't help but say that in the course of his 2020 presidential campaign, then us presidential candidate joe

biden was proud of the fact that he spent very, very big efforts in order to force the european union to adopt sectoral sanctions against russia which were introduced just against this boeing mh17, so today, approximately the americans adhere to the same strategy, some global things that make hmm europe forced to act in certain the way americans want it. at the same time, europe can follow opposing interests from its own. well, let me give you an example for about 2 years, ukraine, the united states of america, and after it, the europeans were forced to say that it is necessary to maintain the transit of gas through the gas transmission system of ukraine, this is the most important , but this can only be a condition for the certification of nord stream 2 meringue. well, in general, they talked and talked and now the question arose. pay in rubles for gas forgot about the need for pumping

gas through the gas transportation system of ukraine that is, if for you this is the most important cornerstone, then pay in rubles in mongolian tugriks. anything. the main thing is that the gas goes through the gas transportation system of ukraine. why do they not consider the issue this way today, because today they have other interests and the americans give them other tasks; today it’s not about driving russian gas into ukrainian ukrainian pipes, but about europe to refuse russian gas to its own detriment, to the detriment of the political careers of those leaders who have i'm on the nose of the presidential election. before the macron, but her and those political leaders, uh, german in this case, who will have elections anyway soon they will have to explain to the germans. why is it so important not to pay in rubles and why a german should pay much more because of this strange principledness of european politicians. well, i just want to ask vasily georgievich. here, in my opinion. there is absolutely such an obvious systemic contradiction, on the one hand. uh,

europeans have lost their international subjectivity and their policy, including in relation to russia , including on gas, economic policy in relation to russia is dictated by the united states on the other hand. europeans. today, the european union is already paying a lot of damage, a deep economic crisis is brewing, a deep recession, at least. and actually, the current european politicians are not elected by joe biden or nancy pelosi. yes, and they are elected by the same population, which now has to pay much more, which will face migration new crises. only on the part of ukraine, but also on the part of african countries, which will have a growing problem in unemployment. here is how the europeans will get out of this situation. well , let's start with the fact that the sanctions that are directed against russia are western sanctions of the collective west. actually directed against the european union. and we are seeing not so much an attack on us. because it is clear that this

attack is ineffective. if we talk about arrows, yes, these are the blows that we seem to have to get, having 200 rubles. there is nothing for the dollar , and the russian stock market has come out of the holidays. he grows. yes, respectively, everything that biden's grandfather said turns out to be untrue, but the americans probably know that this is not true. now, for sure, however, they understand that the function of the hegemon. economic function of digimon. it is very different from what i think about it. well, political analysts are military analysts. it is to ensure global economic growth, if not it turns out at least its global growth, and since you cannot force other economies to obey, the eurasian continental economies, primarily the russian chinese and indian ones, too. this means that you must ensure economic growth for yourself by taking resources from within your system. the european union is inside with this system of the west and thus retraction. a attack

against russia is, well, not some plot to make a german pay more. though of course it's supposed to be. and this is the intent to force european capitals will run to the american stock market to support it to support it in conditions when the us federal reserve system will try to raise the key rate, that is, to quietly normalize credit policy. somewhere. maybe the united states will start saving, including on military spending, because, well, they have overloaded themselves with expenses as much as possible, and europe will pay for all this. you see, here it is. the main contradiction now is here, if we step back a little from ukraine, from our actions there, from our contradictions with the west as a whole, then we will see that inside the western world there is a colossal contradiction in sharpness. this is a contradiction between the interests of the peoples of europe and the anglo-saxons, who simply want to ruin these peoples of europe to provide themselves with new economic growth, while withdrawing resources. yes , it is clear that this is a withdrawal of resources, it will

also stimulate our growth, because the action of the european union is precisely the european union, their sanctions against our country. they brought probably to the greatest shock for the markets. uh, and uh, that's good for russia in terms of exports, they 'll bend over, and they'll pay in rubles for gas, they'll pay in rubles for grain, for fertilizer, for practically everything. they will not be able to resist it, but most of all they will serve american interests, because they are americans, uh, from the very beginning of the conflict in ukraine, from february 24, even before that, they took a distance for them, it was fundamentally important that whatever happens there in ukraine yes, let it be problems for russia but don't let it hurt the us stock market and don't hurt the us stock market. seriously note, that is, biden solved this problem, he saved the american stock exchange, and this was the most serious problem of the twentieth year and in the twenty-first year, and american leaders were afraid all the time. that the us stock market will start

to fall because of the events in ukraine, they solved a small but very important problem, and then they solved the problem. they dragged the european union into an attack against russia and began to receive from this certain benefits. the only thing they ca n't predict. in this case, this is the behavior of the peoples of europe, because i think that's what they are now saying about the fact that russia lost the information war, that we don't have it very well, or what? it is not very efficient. uh, i think the peoples of europe not only in eastern europe not only in the balkans they will they will fail. the result of this information war. they will say what is good, what is bad, who lies. and who speaks the truth and their mood will change drastically against united states and we are already seeing this and this is a sign that people have begun to guess that they are the main victim of this complex knot of contradictions, and around ukraine well, i completely agree, and it seems to me that the peoples of europe will also sum up e. the actions of their own leaders as well, who are to

date. uh, really uh, acting not in the interests of their countries we will continue to discuss both the russian western and the main russian non- western attitude through after a short advertisement. vtb team savings - this is from the word cherish. and now, it is especially important to find someone to whom you can trust your savings. take care of everything that is important to you with a savings account from vtb with a rate of twenty-one percent per annum and the reliability of a proven vtb bank, everything will work out. buy diapers for newborns and our softest premium kia diaper panties at

wildberries with a cold every day, life is in full swing in stores. magnet for any petit. there are always products in the magnet stores, that the shelves always keep freshness, therefore they trust the magnet stores, a daily visit to the whole family will inspire in the dark, the light is on in the magnet stores. the vtb team is looking for an advertisement that will help you get a free vtb multicard and pay for purchases throughout russia, it is right in front of you. locate the smartphone's camera on the screen. and apply for a

free vtb multicard to get the opportunity to easily pay for purchases. there is no time at all, the car had to be changed on the second posted for free immediately bought. i took a new one there, and place the second one for free, sell quickly , it will be a good game, every second ticket wins, every second goes for money. i'm ready to dedicate all my time to the dance studio, but you know why i'm not ready to put my business on hold to get free service for six months and 15% on the opening bank account balance. i hear the call of the winks,

how did they get here? and this is how five popular video services united in a wink subscription, five in one you will have time to connect before april 30 for only 399 rubles. in a month forever, rostelecom technology is an opportunity, when acute pain makes you climb the wall, the staff of a large red package rushes to your aid. the staff is charged against pain. we work as a postal bank, because we value stability just like you and are always happy to meet you in every branch throughout russia or online with us you can easily issue cards of payment systems of the new time to become comfortable in the old way, but already new post bank the vtb team is smaller, but you always want more and enter the vtb pension and get more from it; it’s easy to issue vtb multicards for pensioners. take care of the bank office or online and

the bank will clean you up. damn, an impressive savings account rate. and in general, a lot of tasty things for your retirement. this is where it gets easy. then there , in silence, frozen more often, where the heat hid from the cold. when will the heart beat faster? when life returns svyaznoy what where when spring series of games from april 3 on the first enjoy the game the rest for us. the big game on the air is the west, and first of

all the united states and the anglo-saxons as a whole , are waging a fierce all-out hybrid war against russia, but, nevertheless, russia proceeds from the fact that in the end, the united states will be forced, but to return to a normal dialogue with russia and build with it a model close to what was called peaceful coexistence during the cold war , vladimir putin's press secretary dmitry peskov said this today. in any case, it is needed not only in the interests of the two countries, but also in the interests of the whole world, one way or another , sooner or later we will have to talk about issues of security stability and so on about those issues that only we can and should discuss. and ivan pavlovich and here,

what do you think, when will the united states ripen for this dialogue? we need to get to something akin to the cuban missile crisis, like we did in the last cold war, or maybe the united states will see that it fails to consolidate. no one outside of the collective west and then uh, they'll be a little more reasonable. well, you know, i wouldn’t draw an analogy with the cold war, because at that time we opposed, like two armed camps , after all, and in economic terms we were little connected, in fact we weren’t, we were connected yes with europe a in a certain sense were connected, but in general we relied on the socialist camp, and on our own strength. and now the situation has changed a lot. uh, americans and we are not economically related to each other. friend. well, i'd say it's not much related. you look, here they banned the export of oil. well, what, how did it affect? it didn't affect them. it didn't affect us. although they have. they

are growing on gasoline, but both the americans and we are connected with europe and very strongly yes, and the return of e to europe is more likely russia to europe yes, it is more profitable in europe than we are already discussing them now, because europe is obviously in a situation where it looks at that one, and recently close and such, but very financially profitable for russia which is now gradually emerging such a fence that the americans are building. yes, how will they do it ? e at this fence from the mexican border, a a europeans look at this and can understand how it is, that is, it seems that the europeans are russians here, but for some reason the americans across the ocean are building worries between two, as it were, but great civilizations. no one can understand this concept, and it is obvious that everything is moving towards this, but everything is moving towards the fact that this task will be solved not by these current governments, but by those governments that will come as a result of that. what, and these will be

thrown off as a result of popular indignation, it’s obvious that this will happen, you know, and the sixty-eighth year, uh, which happened only because de gaulle drove nato out of uh, paris uh, to brussels and demanded that the americans returned, that means, uh, paid for the money that american money had not left during their long stay in france. yes, these two reasons led to the fact that the degul flew off his own, and from his chair, the great great leader and throw these leaders. well, it's just, well, it's just that they're even funny, but with any very slight indignation they will fly off. and here's the problem - the situation is that, militarily, there is one treaty that remains between us. that's really. look, they destroyed everything. the anti- missile defense treaty was destroyed the treaty on

intermediate-range missiles was destroyed the treaty on open skies was destroyed us in fact nothing is military-related, but there is the start-3 treaty. and this is an agreement at one time, mr. trump also wanted to destroy, perhaps thinking that he would finally logically end this chain and, as it were , stop there. uh, any military cooperation between russia and the united states, and, accordingly, the world will turn, so to speak, into military anarchy, that is, each will be for himself, because the two great states provide stability in this world for the time being to this agreement sooner or later have to come, there are less than 3 years left for the americans. uh, apparently, this agreement will have to be resolved somehow, but we already know how what requirements we have presented, but over the years that will pass. and given the ukrainian crisis and in general many factors. i obviously think that

strategic drones will certainly be classified as strategic offensive weapons and much and much of what has now become a novelty, but most likely this will also affect economic wars. we are here too. uh, let's make claims, guys. this issue needs to be addressed, and i think, also a cyber ​​warrior, because hypers of presma can be used to destroy military strategic information. please note that the americans are announcing that there may be a cyberattack against the united states, but there may be an answer to introduce a strike, this, of course, is an amazing way of posing the question, but nevertheless, they put it this way, therefore, of course, what is now there is not much time left for us. i'm not saying that if nv3 is such a sign you are, but this will be the moment where you still have to decide. that's up to this point. we are obliged to win and dictate the terms here about the decision. this situation in a military sense, but as the winning side is will lead yalta and on yalta a new yalta on this new yalta where where will it definitely appear? poland

is doing its best to keep it there, that is, it will be new players in this yalta for sure. well, let them appear, and there the issue will be resolved, as it were. ah, from new points of view sobaiv new points of view. and here the americans will have to admit, uh, certain changes in world politics, the world economy, and so on, to paraphrase joseph wissanovich. stalin, we can say that treaties come and go, but nuclear weapons, strategic non-nuclear weapons, and many other things that make up a complex of problems of strategic stability remain unconditionally these problems. and you'll have to do it. and i don't think we'll succeed before 24 to 26. i'm sorry, you're looking at some new treaty to replace start-3, but uh, the problem is really the issue of strategic stability. it changes fundamentally.