where will it appear for sure? poland is doing its best to keep it there, that is, it will be new players in this yalta for sure. well, let them show up. ah, and there the question will be decided, as it were, from new points of view, from both new points of view. and here the americans will have to admit, uh, certain changes in the world policy of the world economy, and so on, i will paraphrase joseph vissarionovich. stalin, we can say that treaties come and go, and nuclear weapons are strategic non-nuclear weapons and much the other, which constitutes a complex of problems of strategic stability, remains unconditionally these problems. and you'll have to do it. and i don't think that we will succeed before 24 to 26. i beg your pardon for a year to work out some kind of new treaty to replace start-3. but uh, the real problem is the issue of strategic stability. it changes fundamentally. it is becoming much

more complex and a nuclear multipolarity has taken shape, while the relationship between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons is growing stronger. uh, many non-nuclear weapons are acquiring strategic properties and dialog for these questions is inevitable. but here is the main reason why the united states will not be able to defeat russia in addition to nuclear weapons, in addition to nuclear weapons - these are just historical measures of trends. this is the formation of a multipolar world. after all, they often say. well, here's what russia can oppose to the united states. russia is opposed to the united states by the course of historical development, and also. a. today's meeting in chinese tong-si, where a meeting of foreign ministers took place. the neighboring countries

of afghanistan and note that these are very different countries, belonging to different religions to different civilizations, which have a large number of bilateral problems. but what these countries have in common is a strategic vision. it is support for the basic principles of the formation of the world order. and that's what today after a series of meetings, and from china from pakistan and from iran as well. the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs sergey lavrov said listen to everyone our talks today with countries that are members of afghanistan's neighbors a-a. we have seen, heard and confirmed the commonality of our approaches to what is happening today in the international arena. a new reality is being formed, when the unipolar world is irrevocably a thing of the past and when a multipolar reality is taking shape. this is an objective process. it's impossible to stop him. but real. in which

there will be, not one power to rule, but in which it is necessary to negotiate between all the key states that today have a decisive influence on the world economy on world politics and which, while realizing their special position, provide the basic principles of the un charter that begin with the fundamental principle of the sovereign equality of the state no one on this earth should be considered as a minor player all are equal and all are sovereign vladimir alekseevich and all the key players who today have a decisive influence on the world economy and politics, and we are probably talking not only about the permanent members of the council security it is and probably not only about the brix countries but it is a wider set of countries. yes, that is, we are talking about the formation of a polycentric world. absolutely right and true, sergei viktorovich said that

a new reality is being formed and the course of history cannot be changed, no matter how much our american partners would like it to be. uh, it's impossible to return to a bipolar confrontation, the world is moving into a state of dust- centrism. there are no two systems that oppose each other, there is one western system that closes in itself closes itself sanctions. tries to force the whole world to follow their logic. it's impossible. against hegemony. all chinese colleagues have already spoken. today they said very clearly that they will fight in every possible way against any hegemony. in iran, this is recorded in the key documents of the islamic republic. iran , most of the countries of the world share, uh, the approach of both russia and china and iran to the fact that hegemony is unacceptable, if you like, the era of leaders. the era of leaders, not

hegemonism leadership rather leader. he is conditionally speaking, freely and fairly, very conditionally elected, and this also applies to regional leaders. eh, rising stars in various regions and that is why you absolutely rightly said, but here the world is not limited to the western e members of the un security council when sergey viktorovich said that there are a lot of western players, and we, of course, support the position of those who stands for the expansion of the east e, and its influence in this polycentric system of international relations. this is the reality which is impossible to leave, and here it is still very important to say what was said at this meeting. uh, just fairness. actually. uh, justice is one of the key questions that the east poses. in general, for the east, the very concept of justice is one of the most

key such ideas on value concepts that determine their behavior in the international arena, and in this regard, they see the injustice that exists today from the west of oppression. and many, many other words here, many synonyms can be given sewerage, market capture. and so. eh, this ideology needs to be opposed. uh, only uh, other ideas on value concepts, which undoubtedly should be built on justice in the first place. and this property e russian russian soul. we always measure everything with fairness, and here it is very important what it is. we are voicing these principles today. jointly undeniably with other actors of the systems of international relations and taking into account their interests and main value. we do not impose our value on the night model, we take into account the interests and

values ​​of other players. this distinguishes us favorably from the west. that is why we can get our own here . as they say, the place in this political process is the future. and i would also add that we are creating such a context and such a balance of power. which most contributes to the independent choice of other countries in their development models, but by far the most important meeting that sergey lavrov had today was a meeting with the chinese minister of foreign affairs. van-i. ah. china has recently been subjected to very tough pressure from the united states and this is what the official representative of the ministry of foreign affairs of china said at the end. uh, lavrov's talks and cooperation between russia and china has no boundaries. our struggle for peace has no limits, our desire to maintain security has no limits, our opposition to demonism has no limits. but the fact that the russian-chinese

partnership has no boundaries was indeed stated back in the russian chinese declaration, and on february 4, if it doesn’t change me memory when vladimir putin came to beijing and talked to this ping, but today china has added a special element to this no borders no borders in the fight against global hegemonism. here, i want to ask nikolai viktorovich how do you interpret these words? is it worth uh to understand, it's like the readiness of russia and china to form a union maybe, uh. i think that our esteemed chinese partners. they said that i mean that there is no objective historical reality. there is a historical struggle and the results of the historical struggle that russia, china, and other states are waging today in order for the world to become multipolar and will give the result of thinking today that the world will become multipolar, because some historical clock has struck. and that means it's

bound to happen. this will be a big mistake. we must not rest on our laurels, there is an uncompromising fierce struggle going on. today, the field of this battle is ukraine, which, thanks to its corrupt politicians, has become a battlefield of great geopolitical powers, but we must not to think that victory is already assured. here we can recall the role of the individual in history. let's imagine for a second that at the head of russia at this most difficult moment was, for example, boris nikolayevich yeltsin would become a multipolar world, probably, the declaration of a multipolar world was signed, just yeltsin and uncles will be replaced in the ninety-seventh year, but still the role of personality in history, let's not underestimate in any way. uh, let's remember a small historical example, germany is the twenty-third year objective the reality of germany as a country, as a player. no, there is no thirty-third year, the situation is already different to power. near hitler, another 6 years pass; in

germany, one of the leading powers in europe, another two years. it is the strongest power in the world. that's all, she throws a challenge, there are no leading players in 1945, and then two germanys appear which, thanks to the betrayal of gorbachev and yeltsin, again becomes one of the leading powers in europe. has never been the result of some higher reality, so that you can calm down to say, now the world has become multipolar, it is imperative to fight andronicus in all hiv well, here is the absence of borders in the fight against global hegemotism. yes, this is china's answer to the american. pressure, but my next question is how do you interpret the american policy towards china when on the one hand they are waging an all-out hybrid war against russia on the other hand china is still declared to be its strategic rivals the main strategic rival

they do not offer him anything positive and only press him, only threaten him with sanctions, that is, only a stick of no carrot. it is the absence or loss of strategic thinking. or is it the desire to form a bipolar world that vladimir vatkov spoke about, but you know, this is not a new idea, the bipolar world of the deuce of the usa and china was already talked about 10 years ago. i would like to talk a little about something else. they will put pressure and will not be considered anything, because they have a strategic task with scrap china because there is global competition for world leadership. and that's why we just ended up, as if it were us as the americans say , roldamets, that is, we suffer, because we kind of ended up in this showdown, because they are fighting for world leadership, but the truth is, we

are a very important factor this is one and the other. of course, uh, right now i would like to disagree with the russian foreign minister. he said all the right words. but this is not the whole truth, because no one has canceled. orville and barnyard law. what is everything equal everyone is fair, what are we talking about? is this a school for noble maidens? is there one like this or something? this is what we say, we say possess. yes, we are talking about a very tough merciless sphere of human activity, and therefore there are large states for which the law is not written or, at least, they

can limit themselves if they are too strong and until others stop them, because they gathered and indicated the place for this state, and therefore i just see the situation a little differently. already a year ago, by the way co-author. uh, it means that tom graham as a rajman 15 years ago wrote an excellent book, the end of alliances. well, rest in peace. this is about nato, we are now moving not to some kind of bloc. uh, so the union is not in a collective confrontation. i've been saying this for a long time, and i think it's becoming even more obvious. we have moved into a situation from hockey to the formation of certain alliances and coalitions. that's why in this

situation we select those who have a vested interest in stopping. i want to finish by saying that i have been pleased that lately on american television. many began to say that grandfather deu can be impeached under article 25, because in two days he said so much that he showed himself to be an absolutely dangerous and irresponsible person. he wanted to use chemical weapons. he said that you are american soldiers who in poland you will go there to ukraine, meaning, and there you will see what the russians have done and then he said, in general, it is necessary to change the regime and that's all, they say you will hear. it is indeed a mental and physical degradation the man who leads the greatest powerful nation in the world. it's dangerous and head. still, we will continue to talk about the patterns of

international relations in a few moments. here. valery todorovsky represents nick, you know what i want to tell you, you need to give birth, i have lived my life, i have seen everything, knowing one thing, men in khabarovsk in moscow are arranged the same way everywhere , but you won’t. okay, i grew up hardened, unlike and i don't need all this. only to become a good mother, otherwise straight it's scary no one will know the premiere of a serial film from april 4 on pervy do not set conditions for me. i want to live my life, okay? we will deliver

the medicine that is right for you, download the application. ergoferon fights both the cause and the symptoms of viral infections ergoferon is recommended by experts about ergoferon hello my artificial intelligence. sticks out there is always food in stores a magnet

that always keeps freshness on the shelves, therefore they trust stores a magnet a daily visit to the whole family will inspire in the dark, the lights are on in stores magnet. profit at uralsib bank has become more profitable income up to 23% per annum on the balance of cashback on any purchases up to three percent, issue a debit card profit and earn uralsi a reliable private tank, which helps me keep my tone every day in a new wind, it has an asset even more selenium, zinc and vitamin c formula fortified with beta glitches that help activate immunity everything for health in a unique complex of vitamins and minerals here you see money all right money. in every second ticket. in russian lotto, there are already millions of winners playing a huge jackpot of 800 million.

join those who have already won soon for tickets. this is a video, ozone, which we just want to say that we are always there. we accept orders around the clock and seven days a week. we always have a lot of goods and ozon free shipping works for you. we work as a postal bank because we value stability just as much as you do and we are always happy to meet you at every branch throughout russia or online with us, you can easily issue cards of payment systems of the new time, so that it becomes comfortable in the old way, but already in a new way, post bank. first first i'm first first i'm first.

no, i'm with a megaphone every first. connect the option of varicose veins and affects the cause of edema in severity and more from the inside. detailex magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products russia get the ability to easily pay for purchases.

on air, the big game this week has sharply intensified negotiations between russia and the european union over the transfer of trade payments for russian gas. in rubles today, vladimir putin spoke with the german chancellor and scholz of the italian prime minister dragee. yesterday. uh. this topic was raised in the course of a conversation with emmanuel macron putin and manuel macron. well, uh, europe is still saying that it is not ready to switch to rubles to prepare for the worst-case scenario, namely shutdown or interruption of russian gas supplies, but on the other hand on the other hand. russia says that we hope to reach an agreement today sergei ryabkov, deputy foreign minister, said that a compromise

is possible and russia will work for this compromise, and the presidential press secretary. dmitry peskov said that the negotiations will not end on march 31, but prod. some kind of a longer time and uh, i want to ask vasily georgievich. do you think we can still agree on this issue? or have not agreed, we will certainly agree on this issue , uh, the european union well, the countries of the european union that have permanent agreements with gazprom, they will have to pay in rubles. you will have to circumvent your own sanctions. and they have already been warned that this will not end, that they will have to buy many goods for rubles and grain and fertilizer, and given that it is not very cool in ukraine. with the sowing season, it is quite possible that this grain will be missed and russia quite logically leads to the export of food goods. the same rule yes, buy in rubles. uh, the same as for fertilizers, fertilizers

can become banned from exporting, that is, you need to prepare for the fact that and if they do not want to pay for gas in rubles, then, well, they will have to. by the way, there are other sanctions, including those on fertilizers for oil. so they are trying to fight russian oil. what if they don't get it at all, and a few years ago. well, dmitry medvedev said that we shouldn't export oil, and then many perceived it. it so. well, you never know what the person said, how is it that oil cannot be exported or sold, but the point is that oil must be processed, that is, russia at some point will stop exporting oil completely and will export only refined products. and if well does not force this process to speed up, then european oil refineries. they will immediately lose what they will lose, in principle, so, most likely, the agreement on gas will be broken and germany may agree. moreover , the format, maybe two, germany can become a european hub that pays for rubles for gas

receives gas and distributes it on some territory, uh, and while the rest are in a mountainous position. and you admit the option that europe may somehow partially revise these sanctions against russian gold and foreign exchange reserves, and in this case, in fact, we will not have to switch to rubles. well, here is the question that negotiations will have to be conducted in the near future, it suggests that some kind of counter-movement from e russia will be, if there is a corresponding movement on the part of the european union, and some, perhaps not a refusal to sell for rubles, but the format of the transition to sale, that is, a refusal. russia will not refuse to sell its goods for rubles, because it would be wrong now, but it is quite possible to ensure a gradual transition in exchange for the lifting of some sanctions . it was stated that e russia and

germany at the expert level will discuss a longer transition to some new format. ah, trade. e for rubles, but now i want to ask ivan pavlovich well, the history of russian western relations shows that without any sharp gestures from russia, western colleagues do not meet halfway. yes, we often think that, well, russia is bluffing. well, russia did not dare not dare. yes, and we still have to show that we are not bluffing. here this time. do you think we will have to interrupt gas supplies in order to show that we are serious. i love, of course it won't come to that, because i totally agree that a is in this situation, but just ahh. the europeans found themselves in a hopeless situation. and you know, well, a simple situation when they tell you, well, walk around the market through the bazaar. find it cheaper, yes, and why not for some other money, well, then buy it. right here on the way to

odessa import. so they will tell you so, here, but here the situation is the same and therefore. i am sure that this will not happen otherwise, that i do not agree with the fact that we always have, uh, many conflict issues were resolved, but by some drastic actions. no, we even have bismarck. in general, just when bismarck was chancellor. he taught in no way. god forbid you fight russians. yes, he always said and the front can not be fought. there were many statements. yes, the russians are harnessing, but they are slowly harnessing. he's going faster. e the question is not in this, but in the fact that the strong leaders of europe, they have always warned that it is impossible to get involved with russia, because the leaders are strong. oddly enough, this is generally an interesting moment, but russia has always perceived strong leaders, and with more, as it were, with greater understanding, who could resist russia nonetheless. here we are, probably, that's right, we said, but on the right is the inner justice of a russian person. and

when you see a strong and intelligent person opposite yes, a strong leader always. negotiate with him . now, of course, there are no such leaders, and this is an obvious moment, and therefore i have no doubts that there are none. e of the european leader, who will unite some kind of protest it is. yes, it seems to be against russia, but in fact it is so ridiculous, because under it there is no military or economic basis, except for the emotional one, respectively, and there is no leader who could, well, boris johnson the leader, there is no such leader who could show us claims, and therefore they relied on zelensky , it just looks ridiculous. as a result, we have. excuse me, but there are a number of political clowns to deal with, and that is our problem. in fact, we do not understand with whom to have business something, yes therefore we solve questions economic. i think that russia and the european union will certainly come to an agreement, because in what currency and how it

pays for russian gas, but this does not remove the functional fundamental task. there is nothing strange about russian policy turning to the east, a sharp build-up of relations with the non-western world and a redistribution of diplomatic and intellectual resources. there is nothing strange in the vector of russian development that was set by peter the great and russian diplomacy and russian education and science were oriented to the west. agree that we know the history of europe much better than the history of asia and africa, but that era ended today, between russia and the collective west , a wall is being erected that is somewhat less permeable than the iron wall of the cold war, than the iron curtain of the cold war and wasting forces. there it is necessary to selectively the main prospects for our development are connected with other non-western regions of the world, and in order to fully switch to them, it is necessary. it seems to me to end the conflict on

ukraine and remember that the endless prolongation of the military conflict there is a transformation. ukraine in a second afghanistan - this is exactly what the united states is striving for, and this, by the way, is precisely the pit into which the united states itself has repeatedly fallen in vietnam and iraq and afghanistan, stepping on the american rake is definitely not in our interests. it was a big game, goodbye. we

first showed our great game, the history of the cyclical confrontation between russia and the anglo-saxon world, in 2007 2008 after the august events, and again this is from the russian book a lesson in the history of the sergians. kulikov valitov 2013 it must be understood that anyone who has adopted a western position against russia as against an enemy and competitors, and at the same time organically agrees with the myth of the natural superiority of the west, is in fact a racist. racism cannot be cured with the help of reasoning. it is eradicated through victory and punishment, which actually needs to be proven, which is what we actually do in the course of a special military operation. when everyone dies, only then will the big

game be over. us-soviet competition some kind of temporary deviation, but a long-term confrontation that has developed historically and in the future. this competition is global. this is not just a fight between two countries. this is the struggle of two empires in the georgian national security advisor to the president of the united states from 1977 to 1981 from the book two empires game plan. this in itself suggests equal-sized parity is somehow a big game. she's a cold war, perhaps only between an equal big game - it 's child's play and dee