i remember obama who said, if you remember the libyan operation, we will lead the fronbe-hunt. i really can’t translate into decent russian, how you can lead from behind , but we see, or well, backstage. yes, but no, no, not zakones, actually means, the puppeteer who pulls after her no, well, from behind. and why because, but when the three nato powers with their aircraft could not do anything, but did not ask, and the americans returned to their aircraft and completed what they could not do, but apparently they leave a place for themselves for maneuver, so this is just for me, i see. well, in fact, the position of the united states on russian-ukrainian negotiations does not surprise me, and the united states has severed all contacts with russia now there are no contacts at all. agreements at

any level retain only the mechanism before conflicting, and the united states is supplying ukraine with more and more weapons in washington they are already openly saying that their goal is not peace in ukraine, but this is the overthrow of the russian regime, that is, inflicting russia the geopolitical position of the defeat, but this position is not absolute in the united states, there are other points of view, and andronicus has already mentioned in vsetsevich. ah, a very bright representative of the new generation of american experts in international relations, which we know well, is samel charab, and he now works for the rent corporation. and yesterday he published in fore magazine. nes is a leading american journal on foreign policy and international relations , an article in which he says that the united states urgently need to negotiate with russia and compromise. look, without making any deal with the kremlin, the best

outcome and there will probably be a long, hard war that russia will most likely win, a protracted conflict will perpetuate the current level of hostility between russia and the west, thereby undermining long-term us interests in regional and global stability . , as unpleasant as it would be to compromise with putin, the united states should strive for a speedy settlement conflicts through negotiations, but i will also say that , according to charap, one of the important elements of a compromise should be at least partial lifting of the sanctions that the united states imposed on russia after february 24, maxim alexandrovich, but you know very well, the united states but in your opinion. here is chap's point of view, how influential it is today in washington, not at the moment, but in dynamics in dynamics a, and can the administrations listen to this point of view, by the way, i will say that

charab liberal he is not a conservative. that is, he is ideally close to the administration of the baidu, well, indeed, the point of view that sam says she uh gradually. it seems to me that it will sound more and more in washington and gain new fans, but it is not necessary to quickly say that even before the start of the conflict. sam wrote some of these vibrant lyrics. there were several articles where he generally called for the united states in plain text a to declare to ukraine that nato membership is in the near future or does not shine at all. uh, suggest some neutral status and proceed from this further in negotiations with moscow, nothing of the kind. of course, we didn’t hear, but then, those specific proposals that he himself speaks of, in particular, the gradual lifting of sanctions, gradually reaching key, e.g., some points that are important for the united states and russia in general, the resumption of a normal dialogue not now. yeah, well, i don't know how much of a rubber perspective we can

talk about resuming some kind of normal dialogue, and it seems to me that sam indeed, as you correctly pointed out being a supporter of the democratic party. it is focused, but, in principle, this is a two-ported concertus point of view that the united states needs to concentrate on the key challenge, which naturally, uh, is, according to the americans, china does not need to be stuck with strong political will resources, uh, in the european theater and move on if we look at the document of the national rather than the intelligence community that produced. actually in reall hains and her wards. on the first days biden administration. there are three key issues. e, associated with russia was noted. actually the theme of nuclear strategic stability, and russia's capabilities in the field of cyber weapons. uh, in fact, russian opportunities in space, as well as such. the position was the ability of russia to form an alternative

american point of view on russia and the political agenda in key regions for america. i think sam is moving in that sense here. well, uh, in line with what colleagues from the section were talking about communities before that we focus on the essentials. and this is a big big distraction, which in a strategic sense will bring nothing to america, except for new headaches. well, the strategic direction of american foreign policy towards both russia and china will in any case be to contain confrontation, and the military sphere is one of the important segments of one of the important dimensions. e of this rivalry. here, the other day, and the white house submitted to congress a new draft budget for the next fiscal year in in the united states, it begins on october 1, and this budget provides for a further increase in defense spending. and especially the administration. $813 billion $813 billion per

e. defense, and evgeny petrovich buzhinsky , lieutenant general and professor of the higher school of economics, here. uh, in your opinion, uh, this money, what is there, uh, there is a social program, and there is inflation, or there is a serious increase in iron, and we should prepare for a new arms race. accordingly you know before i answer question about the budget. i still want to comment a little. these questions about the guarantee, of course, are generally a completely muddy story. uh, these guarantees are members of the security council, italy turkey germany poland is still there, in my opinion, from some side there is also at least something to guarantee. this is what, uh, in general, ukrainians are ukrainians - it interprets. you like some kind of second iteration of article five of the

washington treaty. do they all fight, or something, then there will be some kind of obligations there not to conduct exercises without the consent of all members guarantor countries. it’s that they won’t conduct any exercises at all, or what? well, this is up to militarization, but it’s necessary to set, after all, real goals, and not just there, uh, there are of course such opinions that leaving only the police in ukraine and that’s it and no armed forces, no military industry, nothing at all and even the state is not necessary now, uh, about the budget, i would not absolutize, of course, gigantic numbers, uh, ahead of the planet's entire 835 billion, but taking into account 713,713,813. but taking into account inflation. like uh fuck, i read, there is a very slight increase, in my opinion, by 4%, or 3% uh, but uh, you know, here is the american budget, uh, when we talk about the

budget, you need to look at the structure of the budget. here we are. i don't know, of course, how it is now after the start of the special operation. but in general, our ideal ratio has always been 50 to 50 50 for maintenance 50 for development development. well, the content is uh, so to speak, everything that concerns the activities of social payments. ah, combat training. uh, the maintenance of the bases is all this is the maintenance of the armed strength and development is just a ham not a ham about this orders for military equipment, therefore, we managed to become a very decent modernization in a fairly short time. and uh, to adopt a very decent amount of modern weapons from the americans. this ratio has always been 20 to 80, that is, 80% for maintenance, but still there is at least an unmeasured number of bases that cost who says 200, who says 600? it seems to me that no one says that's the point and

cannot count, because the base is one thing another object. he is on the territory of turkey, he is everything, the black sea coast is studded with radioactive stations. these are all objects of the united states. well , there, uh, the department of the military personnel department there is 7-6 people who serve this station. here but nevertheless 80% of the budget. eh, here count from er, well, eight hundred billion, that's 600 billion for maintenance and 200 billion for development. now i don't know, maybe they changed the ratio because they want to resume production of javelin stingers. there is something else they want to produce, but while it's all talk. well, i think that a little more will be spent on development, because unlike the previous few years, the united states is not conducting large-scale military operations. previously, a lot of money went to the war in afghanistan, to the war in iraq, and so on. now it's all the same, so i want to finish and that's when they

start comparing our military and the american military, despite the fact that we have an order of magnitude smaller budget, but if you take the amounts for development, uh, and given that any if a sample of, e.g., equipment and weapons produced by the united states in the russian federation differs in cost by 4-5 times, then we are not so far behind them in terms of development, but content, but content. we, too, of course, are more modest than theirs, yes, and objects of content. we also have significantly less than the united states, and the main tool that is now being used in the hybrid war that the united states is waging against russia is finance, and this is what president putin said about this today in a situation where financial the system of western countries is used as a weapon when companies from these countries refuse to fulfill contracts with russian banks and individual enterprises, when assets in

dollars and euros are frozen, it makes no sense to use the currencies of these countries. but vasily georgievich , but uh, it seems to me that using what has always been positioned as a global good as a weapon is very dangerous and cannot be used indefinitely, can't it. well, you know, for this it must cease to be a blessing. and this is the most serious problem for the west , because what was perceived as the heart of the world economy, its engine, i'm talking about western financial markets, the banking system. and yes , regulators. central banks do n't work. it doesn't work since it should work from theory and it doesn't generate. the most important economic growth in the world. moreover, the machine broke down in the sixteenth year for real, when at the beginning of the year there was a collapse of the markets for us. it hit china and china hard uh, essentially pulled out the markets. he increased purchases

of hydrocarbons, other commodities, not the united states, it turned out that locomotive miro economics the united states no longer counts, but you know, someone who is not a locomotive of the world economy, he cannot be a financial center, and he cannot be a haemon he has to rely more and more on violence and less and less on financial instruments in order to maintain his position, therefore, since the whole system was already pretty deformed and internally upset, they went to such radical actions that e. it would seem to destroy their reputation. yes, they understand that the reputation is destroyed. they understand that by freezing the russian reserves, the reserves of the country's big twenty for such a significant amount of more than 300 billion dollars. they lose face the whole world looks at them in horror and says, my god, how can you back up your papers. how can you work with your banks. they are better either to find aside and adjust to build in a different way, so russia and india have now agreed on a parallel a system similar to swift in order to

carry out calculations and further, most likely, they will transfer trading, and many goods of exchange trading to their currencies. dollars and china will do that, uh, but that's where the main problem with the united states is, yes. they did this, and they put everything on political and military instruments, with the help of which they are trying to regain at least part of their positions, and in the sense that in the situation that is unfolding in ukraine and our special operations. eu sanctions action against us we observe such a twofold state. west on one side. they all seem to be against us , the collective west, and on the other hand, the main enemy of the european union turns out to be the united states, which simply pushes them to ruin the conflict and gather and take part of their resources and, in this sense, under the real losing side in this conflict. this is the european union, germany, france in particular, and it turns out that everything is developing very interestingly, so the americans can, of course, go with us to deal and go. and here we had a very interesting

assessment of an american political scientist about the fact that they understand that the delay in the conflict. in ukraine and the long victory of russia is terrible for them, i will explain with what fear the economic markets will grow, because these events stress the world economy, the markets are growing. they do not fall as a result of commodity markets. they are growing. the price of food for fertilizers for timber for many materials, part of the materials becomes scarce, but it is necessary, well, as it were, there is more oil somewhere acquired by the united states itself. and it turns out that it would be much more profitable for the united states. if zelensky surrendered, he simply signed the capitulation and that's all and most likely to end it, because the impact of these events is not very beneficial. they affect, let's say, the world economy. well, from the point of view of the west, from the point of view of the west, but from the point of view of the european union, everything is exactly the opposite. and here is such a very complex

picture. well, uh, in support of your words, i will say that it is true even in the united states understand, uh, the counterproductiveness of their policy towards themselves today. uh, deputy general director of the international monetary fund, this structure, which is under the control of the united states, declared that the dominance of the dollar in the world financial system. the end may come and regional and regional currency blocs will form in the world, and the united states is parasitizing now trying to continue parasitizing on e, other countries and europe, but for now it allows the united states to do this, a here is not the west, is it ready to endure, and now, uh, or non-western countries are ready, after all, to oppose the attempts of the united states to maintain the remnants of its hegemony, including in the economic sphere. firstly, you need to understand that a

normal dialogue, as you said earlier with a conductor whose machine is broken, who is used to managing world political processes is impossible, that is, it is accepted today by almost all non-western countries dialogue with a country that considers itself hygemon, although, on in fact, it is already losing more and more of its resources in its capabilities; today, a dialogue with this kind of country is impossible. americans are used to dictating their conditions to the whole world. but today, most of the countries of the world come out with such, whatever, a national liberation war regarding the systems of international relations . yes, this is revisionism in a certain way, but with regard to a number of princes, but none of the eastern countries questions the rule of international law, which trampled on the sovereignty of american colleagues sovereignty and many other principles of international

relations that we are accustomed to here as well. there is a lot of room for dialogue. with this most not the west. there are, uh, and chinese comrades here, who, uh, went to see our foreign minister yesterday and something else. it confirmed everything that we have been saying since 1997, 2005, the beginning of 2022, the declaration of those with about that very polycentric world order. today, china is confirming this, indeed, a dialogue is being conducted with india on this system that will replace swift is already about to be put into effect. we will start work with udovskaya arabia. saudi arabia and china are leading the bail. and e trade in national currencies, in particular in yuan. and this, uh, if you like, breaks that same hegemanism, and in many countries now everything is israel uh. in iran i beg your pardon fixed. it is in the main documents, uh, the fight against hegemonism in any form in this regard. today we can

say that the world is, uh, more and more united regarding this fight against hegemonism. if you like. uh, we really need to change the clock. uh, because time goes by a little bit in the east, otherwise, uh, than it goes backwards, because time is fairly straight forward in the west. and in the east, it is spiral-shaped, and what our president said today, he said that russia cannot be broken. although they will try to break the sanctions and everything else why because there are national interests and there are national traditional values. so this is exactly what this rising east is about today here you need to understand that, of course, for a number of things that exist in the russian and political socio-political consciousness of this east, a number of things - this is the west, and we have to find this very balance. and we can just be here, the same balancer between the west and not the west, because yes, we have, uh, often, we, like the east , rely on fate, and uh, some things that

are prescribed to hear and nowhere sometimes not in a hurry, but sometimes. and what is very important we rely not only on chance, so the formation of this new systems of international relations. we must proceed from strategic offensive russian- centric concepts. we will continue to talk about tectonic movements in international relations after a short advertisement. valery todorovsky presents with one person and is even ready to help. we can forget about it right now. you went crazy fast. run. agree, i'll sign. consent no one will know the premiere of a serial film from monday on first i

do not want to accidentally see you from home i do not want to do with you staff who knows. hello we are going to sign with the donor, let's go. magnet cosmetic cares, means love minus 30% on dishes family of stores magnit we are near we are with you. the vtb team savings this goes beyond the word “save” even now, it is especially important to find someone to whom you can entrust your savings. take care of everything that

is important to you with a savings account from vtb with a rate of 21% per annum and the reliability of a proven vtb bank, everything will work out. in probiotics, prebiotics complement and enhance each other and just one capsule per day is the maximum for your microflora, which means for immunity. buy diapers for newborns and our softest premium care diaper panties at wildberries, many are used to issuing osago on the machine follows the same insurance route and can miss the benefits. i have my own route through finn services to a profitable osago in 5 minutes with a saving of up to 60-3%. finn services is the first personal finance platform. value your money supermarket - these are products from your favorite stores with up to 60% discounts and bonuses from thanks to the supermarket. order free first delivery

every day of life boils in stores. magnet on any fifty. there are always products in the magnet stores that always keep freshness on the shelves , therefore they trust the magnet stores, daily visits to the whole family will inspire in the dark, the light is on in the magnet stores. sleep deep sleep long velson promotes natural falling asleep and sound sleep velson sleep like in childhood millions of people choose phytolax laxative fruit-based chewable tablets. try the new phytolac with marmalade berries just one night for comfortable relief in the morning does not cause spasms and bloating fitolax from evalar gives rise to confidence estelle's trust there is no time at all, and the car had to be changed to carefully everything was immediately bought for free. in the same place, i took a new one to the author,

place it for free, sell quickly. choose your hit at ozone spring discounts up to 30% on hans household appliances plus free shipping. first or to the points of issue of orders we work at the post bank, because we value stability as much as you do and we are always glad to meet you at every branch all over russia or online with us, you can easily issue cards of payment systems of the new time, so that it becomes comfortable in the old way, but in a new way, the post office bank, when coughing interferes, there is rengalin rengalin for adults and children from three years old, both dry and wet cough with rengalin. we are not afraid of a magnet that takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products, sausage. doctoral knitting 1290 magnit family of stores we are nearby. you and i, the vtb team, are looking for advertising that will help you get a free vtb multicard and pay for purchases by throughout russia, it is right in front of you point your smartphone camera at the screen. get the opportunity to easily

pay there is a big game on the air, and the hybrid total and, above all, economic war that the united states unleashed against russia not only does not help them maintain the dominance of dollars in the global financial system. we see that reverse processes are taking up, but also undermining the political positions of biden himself, and here are a few figures just the other day, uh, harvard university held a question public opinion, and according to which if the presidential elections in the united states were held today, then by a wide margin

donald trump would win for donald trump , 47% of those polled would vote for bytan. only 41%. the question is why and the answer is yes? here the explanation lies in another, but the sociological issue is the main issue that worries americans today. this is inflation 39% of those surveyed is about. university of winnie-peck, and in second place is migration of 19%. and only then 13% respondents believe that an important issue is the fate of ukraine and, uh, the military operation. yes, 39% believe that the most important issue is inflation, and only 13% are worried about the fate of ukraine . now, when we observe this picture, doesn't it seem to you that joe is biden, but he is an elderly man, maybe he forgot the slogan that he allowed at one time. in the ninety-second year,

bill clinton will win the presidential election and defeat the heavyweight of american politics, then the president will be the eldest, and the slogan was supid icons. yes, it's all about the economy silly, what you think is true, but i would like to continue this line that we discussed and will answer the question that you asked. you know, i remember very well, the fourteenth year. i worked in new york all the time i was in washington , then the first ukrainian crisis began. look how much smarter they were then under obama in general, an absolutely inexperienced team of people in international affairs. as far as she was experienced, she said that they were pushing there too. come on, let's go. let's push ukraine to the war. we will participate serious analysts. then they told russia to win in ukraine ukraine

for russia is an existential problem for america this is not an existential problem. and so today it became obvious that, tactically, it seemed to them that they could very quickly bring russia to its knees with these monstrous ones. i, as they thought, and so on, quickly deal with russia, set aside if possible, change the regime. like this one, in general, a very old man, apparently, innermost secret things are already blurting out in public. yes and then everything will be all right, but the fact is that this happened, i wanted to focus on this. through the efforts of the americans themselves, through the efforts of the west, they transferred this conflict from

russian ukrainian relations to the russian west and russia to the united states, and hence a very complex and painful problem arises for washington. and now from ukraine - this will turn into a political disaster for biden political disaster for the democratic party. that's why they don't know. then take the current situation. this is what serious american analysts, journalists and so on criticize in the first place and say. these people are adventurers. these people are irresponsible. they got into a story and do not know how to get out of this

story, moreover, many people say that you are good at these monstrous sanctions. they wanted to apply it to russia well, why didn’t you calculate, it seems that in america everyone has computers, it seems that they have it nationally models do game. why are you shooting yourself in the foot? why didn't you read? how will this affect the price? they are? why didn’t you think about the truth about food allowance, and it seems to me, in my opinion, i have already said something in our program. three things, in general, what the head of the country should always think about. this food is water, and this is energy, energy, heat. yes, in all major areas they have dealt themselves a very serious blow. and the longer this goes on, the consequences will become even more obvious. and i think it's very, very serious. we

for you, you are right, you touched on the topic of oil very much. president biden today. maxim aleksandrovich announced that the united states is unpacking its strategic oil reserves and intends to supply the world market with 1 million barrels of oil per day, but in general, i remind you that biden introduced his election campaign under the slogans, green energy, renewable energy and so further. here is the decision on oil. i think the left wing of the democratic party will not like it very much. and what happens is biden he is for the americans in any if an enemy, now he is even more of an enemy to the e left wing e republic to the left wing of the democratic party trump remains the most popular politician among republicans, if my memory serves 59% of republicans. ah, pro trump, which means we should prepare for a trump presidency in 2004. well , i will note here that any