it hits its intended purpose, but this is the problem of the american taxpayers, nevertheless, a significant part of them are distributed in the form of grants of various other forms of encouragement among the native population, creating a colossal and self-propelled agency of influence. here it is after the crash. union it turned out that this whole machine considers the field of its activity, not only the outskirts of the empire, but also its own russia. it turned out that siberia is too large and rich, that in russia it could dispose of food on its own? now it could turn out to be what alaska california, taken together, once became for the americans a source of enormous wealth, in order to keep siberia, russia will need help beyond its strength. to overcome this task on its own in the conditions of the demographic decline it is experiencing and new trends in neighboring china, thanks to the large-scale european presence, siberia could eventually turn into a common, eurasian

property, the use of which took place in it on a multilateral basis, having escaped jeans 2004. the idea in the society of siberia is quite in the spirit of modern american geopolitical doctrine. right now , the arctic shelf has begun to be divided. and this, by the way, is another undeveloped territory of the big game. it turned out that the american share adjacent to alaska is too insignificant to meet their global ambitions, the united states immediately took the initiative to internationalize the arctic, including the shelf and sea routes, even the russian or pre-dig fleet, principle. it's just that everything should belong to america, and if something for some reason cannot belongs to it, then it should be common international, that is, american control, the tragic difference between the current stage of the big game is that it has practically already spread from the traditional central asia of the caucasus to inner russia itself, which you can expect to lose under your bellies, do not be surprised that you got into the

belly. the first production sharing agreement in history was the 1901 william dersey persian oil concession we mentioned. naturally, they were extremely predatory, as was customary then, and just for the pounds drc earned there. founded the current british petroleum. by itself, the prince under psa, when a foreign investor gets the opportunity to recoup his costs through the independent sale of part of the product. in general, it is quite acceptable. although , as a rule, it is used in countries where there is no independent mining skills, or the political climate excludes other guarantees, however, our agreements on the sakhalin psr, according to their conditions, were more reminiscent of a colonial concession drc. rather than mutually beneficial agreements. you know, this is a colonial treaty that has

absolutely nothing to do with russian interests. federation, i can only regret that in the early nineties, russian officials allowed themselves such antics, for which, in fact, they should have been put in jail. the fulfillment of this treaty led to the fact that russia allowed its natural resources to be exploited for a long period of time and received nothing in return. just practically zero. what the reaction was caused by the restoration of russian control over the oil and gas sector. actually, here lies the main material content of the claim of our western partners to the current russian government. in the 1990s, a series of publications by the leading consultant of the us world policy institute walter russellamide appeared in the american press under the general title. should we buy siberia? years, the annual payment will be approximately 200

billion. at the same time, 100 billion will be used to purchase goods and services produced in the united states, spending on the creation of infrastructure for administration and environmental services. they will add another 100 billion annually to this amount. however, it is assumed that over time these costs will decrease due to the new states' own development if russia claims that it wants to be a sovereign state to control its country , this should not be taken seriously russia cannot control your destiny. and if she succeeds, then it will be carried. the fate of a closed country, not an open state the soviet union was the author's closed and closed, which is not typical of the modern world, the authorctic soviet union had many shortcomings, which did not prevent it, by the way, from trading oil quite smartly. in fact, it ruined him. as you remember. that

the balance in europe has changed, it has changed since the end of the cold war, but russia, which emerged as a result of the end of the cold war, is not the soviet union and russia's interests are different from the interests of the soviet union but although russia emerged from the collapse of the soviet union i think that some of what happened during this collapse and its end result left some scars, the scandals of 2007 tore yasnoe the matter is the interests of change nothing will heal the interests of russia, of course, differ from the interests of the soviet union, we do not have global ambitions for the reorganization of mankind, in contrast, by the way, from our american partners, but russia is not in seventeenth year. they were the second to appear and the interests of this thousand-year-old russia are quite successive. first of all, these are integrity sovereignties, americans. sacredly sure that they

won the third. the war, even in the cold, was won and should enjoy all the fruits. these fruits of victory in no way imply the existence, for example, of nuclear deterrence, which is selected for the good old doctrine of mutually assured destruction. that is, they do not imply real sovereignty, tutmentin saw, in fact, he is right, it is often said that they say the cold war. not no reimbursement. it's impossible for her. it's absurd we're doing the only reasonable thing. we are reviewing our positions after the cold war has ended. why should we keep troops defending germany from whom the red army is not going to attack germany i assure you. i think that you can also see me and the germans in this. what they didn’t notice was that the american troops were briskly withdrawn from germany and something was being withdrawn somewhere, the advantage to poland and the czech republic is actually the ideologist of the neoconservatives of the rights, in which the fact is that the cold war is the lot of equals

, when parity can be pushed around and pinched each other within the strictly allotted limits, which is why it is cold because everything is according to the rules. in any case, according to the concepts, the cold war is impossible now, because there is no parity, there is no equal, in fact, the cold war, if it is not a fanatical ideological enmity aimed at mutual destruction, declare it a big game. this is the reality of geopolitical confrontation, where there are global players and global interests. there is no need to be afraid of the cold war or the big game, it must be earned. there is no

need to be afraid of the cold war, it must be earned. whoever tries to interfere with us, and even more so to create threats for our country for our people, should know that russia's response will be immediate and will lead you to such consequences that you have never experienced in your history. we are ready for any development of events, all the necessary decisions in this regard have been made. hope i will hear. russia returns russia always returns after any catastrophes, crises and court and cold war. she's a big game lot of equal returns. we deserve it. hello , the time will tell program within the framework of the information

channel on the first, we continue our work and artyom sheinin, which day we are talking about the fact that a special military operation is taking place only a military stage is taking place in ukraine is very important, but in fact it has a huge number of layers , and in general, so to speak, a huge number of fronts, including global fronts and, probably, the most important events for all their importance what our guys are doing there, we will definitely talk about it today, but the most important event of today. this is an event on the economic front, like any important military operations, for which they first prepare to redeploy units , concentrate reserves in the same way before today. we focused. well, as it were, in the spirit of our russian tradition, in principle, it was originally said. i’m going to you, i’m going to you, the president said, when 10 days ago he announced that we would be on the 23rd of march 23 8 days ago

announced that we would transfer trade, and gas for the beginning of gas into rubles 3 days ago on the 28th confirmed. this is giving an order e to the thirty -first number. work out this order. and then the day came, march 31st. this is not yet a battle. this is like the first day of the battle, when the regiments are lined up and the banners, as they say, are already developing. well, let's listen to our commander in chief, and on this front, too, please. today i signed a decree that establishes the rules for trading russian natural gas with called unfriendly states. we offer counterparties from such countries a clear and transparent scheme to purchase russian natural gas. they must open ruble accounts in

russian banks, and it is from these accounts that payments will be made for the gas supplied, starting tomorrow from april 1 of this year. if such payments are not made. we will consider this not the fulfillment of obligations on the part of buyers. with all the ensuing consequences, no one gives us anything for free sell, and we are also not going to do charity work, that is, existing contracts will be stopped again emphasized the situation when the financial system of western countries is used as a weapon, when companies from these countries refuse to fulfill contracts with russian banks and individual enterprises , when assets are in dollars and the euro are frozen to use the currencies of these countries does not make sense. in fact, what is happening, what

has already happened, we have delivered our resources to european consumers. in this case, the gas they got it and paid us in euros, which they then froze themselves. in this regard, there is every reason to believe that we delivered part of the gas delivered to europe virtually free of charge. naturally, it cannot continue, especially since in the case of further gas supplies and their payment in the traditional scheme, new financial receipts in euros or dollars may also be blocked. such a development of the situation is quite expected, especially since some. politicians in the west talk about it publicly; moreover, it is precisely in such a er, the heads of the governments of the eu countries speak out. the risks of the current state of affairs

are, of course, unacceptable for us. and if you look at the issue as a whole, then the transfer of payments for russian gas supplies to russian rubles is an important step towards strengthening our financial and economic sovereignty, we will continue to systematically move in this direction as part of a long-term plan to increase the share of payments in national currency in foreign trade and currencies of those countries that are reliable partners. by the way, you surely heard that many traditional energy suppliers, but the global market. also, they say that hydrosification is already here. uh, the currency of settlements, i repeat again. russia values ​​its business reputation, we comply and will continue to comply with obligations under all contracts, including gas. we will continue to supply gas in the prescribed volumes, which i would like to emphasize both

in the established volumes and at the prices specified in the current long-term contracts. i emphasize these prices are many times lower many times lower than our current quotes sweat market. in fact, uh, what the president was talking about today is, in fact, what it is. uh, the most important thing that we discussed more than once in this studio and will continue to discuss it, namely here in our studio. eh, many experts began to talk about what, in fact, for quite a long time after the announcement of us e sanctions after the start of a special military operation. and gas went there, either completely free of charge, or partially free of charge to many. it seemed impossible, that is, you understand, this is the moment of denial lasted for quite a long time, but now the president has confirmed it, that is, it is obvious to all of us that this situation will continue for a long time and could not continue further, and therefore our motivation. in general, it is quite understandable and obvious. i am more interested in the motivation of our western partners and

, let's say, some of their internal inconsistency, because look from the one side. they, uh, declared right there, in fact, they had stated this more than once before that they would not buy. for rubles, and here, for example, is the statement of the minister of finance is the mayor bruno of france that they refused to refuse to pay for russian gas in rubles, but uh, this is such a question, you know, how that's psychology. yes, the stage of denial is the stage of anger, and here is the question, when will the bargaining come, because it is still denial. but then we listen to what german chancellor schultz says please. probably within a year we will be able to eliminate dependence on oil and coal imports. for gas, it will take more time. german companies want, can and will pay for russian gas in euros. here comes an interesting economic or political or psychological construction, when we have russia

that says guys. tomorrow is april 1st and that's no fools. well, how would you start to think. france germany who say no, we won't, but immediately germany says that we can't get gas from anywhere. or is there where or what do they count on? explain here economically, how to explain this triangle e and in general, how much in this economy the economy here a little they made big bets on this political economy rate, of course, and they are designed to hack the russian economy. somewhere, sometime politically they will take everything away, but these are very distant goals. and now it is still obvious that this is completely unrealistic, a and in this situation, they are forced to hold a position once they have already taken this position. we do not want to pay in rubles. we will not pay in rubles. and they only have one maneuver. here, how to save face. yes, they can say to show not a single european government will not buy russian gas for rubles, but the economic structures can if they

make the appropriate decisions, that is, throw the responsibility on the companies on the economic structures - this is the way that they have to retreat when they retreat. but now, guys, give me back the first title of the minister of finance of france. is it now when they say, we refuse to buy gas, is it now the government was because now it is also bought by commercial structures, and commercial structures that are now bought for euros and from whose name is obtained by the authorities of their countries. we say we won't. yes, you are absolutely right, because they are now speaking on behalf of these commercial structures, uh, and accepting their decisions, as they always did, as it always happens in such cases, because to imagine that these agents of the structure are there, who conclude an agreement with the russian gas supplier that they themselves are in no way connected with the governments. but that would be a big utopia e. well, a very naive fairy tale

performance, so for now, that they just don't allow. act as the defender suggests to your words, what maneuver do they have? this is what kind of coin they have. i wrote how they can retreat when they will retreat. they can say that we are not changing our government's position, but you are allowed to do so and how will they retreat? well, until they are not going to retreat, while they are trying, who will survive? who will blink first? that's what they call they little points of view when they hold that position with them. so there is some kind of gas supply and how much gas they have. approximately 25% is left in european gas storage, uh, and. q. in general, they have a small amount of gas, they can be trying to hold on. well, for example, they can try for a month, which is now in storage it may be enough yes, with very careful use for a month and a half, there may be a plus with additional gas purchases at skyrocketing prices, but at the same time they will cause severe inflation once, and there will be completely unfeasible

commercial industrial enterprise programs they are these industrial enterprises to put work on pause, send people on vacation, fire someone. that is, it is still a troubled scenario. this scenario is the scenario of the strongest stress, first of all for germany, then for france. well, and then for the rest, probably, too uh-huh, that is, roughly speaking, uh, there is uh, such a calculation, well, as it were, more or less economically, you confirm that the month uh, pulling up, tightening, freezing there, and so on you can have a calculation, but the calculation is by and large . no, you understand, it is possible to calculate, but the calculation is not the calculation that we have never lost ground in the economy. we have always moved east. they took everything they wanted, and in the post-soviet, well, in the zone of influence. yes , we will talk about this now or not. after all, i’m bringing you up to something , as it were, carefully, or else they don’t believe. there is one moment after all, they do not

believe that physically in this universe a situation is possible in which tomorrow we will close the screw. this is a very important point indeed. after all, they have left, because they know us poorly, how it turns out. yes, the whole history of this conflict is very tragic, of course, and so on. he says that they do not know us well as a character, as a type of relationship, and so on. uh -huh. perhaps they hope that there are some people or little people left who will crawl to vladimir vladimirovich on all fours. father native listens to the case of the move. come on, come on, you're there somehow, we 'll come up with something now, and so on, that is, the calculation of the national traitors. well, if it’s so rude to say, and the fact that there is still a more sensible story about the fact that in general, of course, these incomes are gigantic in our budget. what is there to say important and these betrayal of us, which means, as a course and pressure and circumstances, but

in a month nothing will happen to us and to them, but there is some kind of hope anyway somewhere to put pressure on something will happen somehow something will happen. and now, it seems to me, they have about them, i don’t know how he works in such a dreamer in the bear. uh, so, well, at least, you said that they don’t know us well, but you said so carefully that we themselves. and we don’t know very well either, because you say, maybe, or maybe they’ll crawl, or maybe they’ll crawl, or maybe on shepchet but we don’t know, or maybe they will find some artyom true we don’t know . that's really honest pioneer their calculation, perhaps also on the fact that we do not fully know, right? and anything can be, yes, who is everything that is here, strange as it may seem, such a concept, firstly, maybe russia will lose the war. perhaps russia will begin to sag under sanctions. it will start working anyway. maybe

what we have is enough for us for a month and a half there, and then you again tell me all the same things that they don’t know and don’t understand and they think that we can do it so quickly they don’t exist, as if there is no single defense plan but they have to count on something. they simply rely on the fact that time will somehow work for them, because there is a huge rollback in russia. russia is under pressure, it was just said, perhaps russia will be able to be broken from the inside, that is, you understand, this is the very case when people they grab hold of the time, because they gave them 2 months to last there. let's stick with these two months. and suddenly for these two months will break. they are anime. so you're talking about the depth of planning there. eh, a month and for this month they decide e hope somehow somehow. yes, otherwise still for a month. no. well, two months. this, i think, is really a planning horizon that they can look into, because further things begin that cannot be calculated. the heat starts. the heat is again the consumption of gas, you know? and so look here, alexey alekseevich, in fact, this is

the conversation that we just started, because the conversation is not only, and maybe not so much about the economy, and even in a sense not about politics. although politics is always a continuation of some kind of psychology, yes, political, and for me this political psychology is very clearly manifested and it seems to me that it is there that we need to look for reasons and analyze. what could be next, who we are to them and they to us, here's the big seven, which also says that they will not, but the most interesting thing is motivation, what they appeal to when turning to us. why don't they just won't. why shouldn't they listen? we will not accept requests to pay for gas in other currencies. this is not provided for in the contracts. contracts are contracts. they must be strictly observed. and look what i'm talking about psychology. my main question is what? i don’t understand in this story, i’m talking about gas, about the economy, about politics, not very much. i'm the most interesting thing here in a sense, you

know how an anthropologist is who they should think of themselves people who have frozen our money, who are squeezing. it’s just because of the lawlessness of our property, which declared there almost a hunt for all russians who violated all the obligations that are possible, but in a conversation with us, the french finance ministers have enough of the same. here i leave an empty space, which is enough for him to appeal to contracts, which we are nevertheless obliged to continue. here i have a feeling that this is some kind of setting. they have an idea in their head about who they are to us, a who we are to them which has a very strong effect. this is the american pattern. remember how they walked out of the nuclear deal with the country and told iran to go ahead with the nuclear deal. no, we got out of it, but you continue to do the same thing. the same pattern of behavior. why is this happening? what is yes? well, that is, if you

signed, we exercise this right. mm. we can uh admit our right not to comply. that is, in fact. this is a very perverted model. eh, why is this happening? uh, very simple the answer is that none of the european politicians is scholz, not all of these respected people. they are not responsible for the result. they are not selected. they are not responsible for the result. they can say anything. here as on what is called the devil - details. i imagine what is happening in the offices of politicians in european countries. they listen like that, well, the russians there said to buy in rubles. listen, there are already trucks. uh, these people are blocking the streets in a band. he told me not to hit. america said you can't buy russian gas. but uh, like i said, the devil is in the details. pay attention to what is happening with the ruble. he returned to the position until february 23 buys him buys, of course, and here first. what is called not what broke. i think the vatican bank,

which calmly bought it, took it upon itself in the expectation that it would calmly buy this gas later and that’s all, the rest is not recognized, but they are buying. there are no miracles, the ruble cannot strengthen just like that, that is, your version, what do they say, all these texts can’t be beaten quietly for america bendery , we’ll tell everything that everything is fine quietly they buy these rubles, which then their companies, as if, violating an unspoken order. yes, they will buy under, uh, noise, these politicians are informational noise, they will still be purchased in the amount we need. yeah. they are not suicidal. this is it, by the way. and for rubles to buy ukraine here, after all, somehow there is a break in patterns, you understand? what's the matter? and here is the question. what will be bought for rubles? ukraine is a separate interesting question for me, which i periodically asked in this studio, after all, and we are still continuing

pumping gas through ukraine, but we have always discussed this in the context of gas supplies by a lawless person from europe, but just a minute, ukraine, where hostilities are taking place, which are killing our soldiers, she receives money for transit. and according to my data, this is, in general, such strong millions a day. she keeps getting them. this is an interesting separate issue. and if now it will be for rubles, this is really a very interesting concept of darin. i would only like to add that i completely agree with your position. they are so not sovereign that they absolutely do not care what the americans say to them. they say this, but it seems to me that they don’t know that much, but they don’t, as our military people put it, you understand, but who knows what will happen in the near future, it will happen in a month in the united states, it’s like a situation. trust

me, they are waiting, for example. well, for example, well, listen to all mortals. suddenly biden dies. yes yeltsin meeting things. lord biden comes mosquito or glory hoot, wait, wait, or what is there? well, how should i put it, no some. to put it mildly, the unstable situation in the united states is a, and we know how the ratings of both the democratic party and the biden are now falling, how the ratings of their opponents are rising. and what does our beloved trump say there, in any case, i personally know. which one turned out? here, and i think that there are a lot of things, maybe, and they know this well, but they will bet on this and not in the first, not in the second, not in the fifth. they even know. it seems to me that we are with you because what what is happening in the united states, they still track nervously and very carefully

, they really know ours a little worse, and in this case we are in this sense, well, as if secondary to them for them, here is the owner of the syurn there, who says this, and suddenly you are all zrena. they see what is happening with the overlord, and they are watching this very much, so they are waiting and this month will be enough for them. they have enough to wait completely with all due respect, the story is that they have gas for a month and a half, and they sit and wait. as if god bless biden, god bless biden. well, this, of course, seems to be so true, maybe the other way around. well, i just didn’t want to say this about the breakdown of events around us-china relations, because china oh, or rather , the united states is now much more important than the health of their respected leaders, who have been talking such nonsense lately, which is very scary. so i think that now they are watching how it develops. this is the line of conflict, because china has moved to action. and if the usa is torn apart, and on

two fronts to fight this with hitler will say more. it 's very difficult, then i think that europe will start to make informed decisions. come on, when such a person wrote a certificate for one british party regarding energy, which makes it dependent on russian energy resources for britain, she caused a shock, which surprised me very much, because irina aleksandrovna , a philologist, graduated from oil and gas with a basic education. here i am, with alexander, you don’t know many-sided, well, you know, we have arithmetic there in primary school. i was all right. i had five to count. it's pretty easy. the fact is that it can do without it, but in general it cannot do without our energy resources, even proud britain simply cannot do that. here i am not citing now, the numbers are nothing. i think colleagues are with me. yes, they agree with me. that's why this question is nothing to discuss at all.