you are conducting at least, whatever you call it, a special military operation, but if these are military operations, military operations require a different level of mobilization of the entire society, the army of society, and so on and so forth, that 's all. this is a very important reminder for all of us. well, for those who are not in the know, in general, when hostilities take place, and on the other side of these hostilities are people who i spoke about this a million times before the start of a special military operation. you can check me on the other side, people who have a military tradition. i don't i'm talking about the ideology of the military tradition in many respects the same as we have now encountered here, the two most stubborn military sense with the military traditions of the people, more precisely, one people collided. and so this is another reminder to us that this can't be easy. not just without mobilization.

therefore, if someone had any ideas, but about the fact that this is something like this. if you don’t have it yourself right away , then the guys need to get rid of them such goals that we set ourselves simply and easily. not achieved, especially since, as i said, ukraine in this case acts not as a country of ukraine, in any way the ukrainian army. and as, of course, the outpost is a tool, if you want a manipulator, and the entire military structure of nato is the point and, in fact, with this very west and with nato and the eu, the american-centric world. and we resist them not only in this theater of operations. well , where in the economic theater of hostilities? well , actually, formally, more precisely, formally today. in fact, since yesterday, such a very interesting economic operation began on forcing countries unfriendly to the russian federation to pay for gas in rubles, which we also

warned about for a long time? and as a matter of fact, gazprom sent notifications about the procedure for paying for gas in rubles, and the fact that this happened today is definitely not a joke, and, in fact, today's weather in many countries of western europe and eastern europe is either joking with them, or on the contrary, it encourages them to be more serious about what is happening, because in general, the weather there is about the same as in in a sense, i think, this is coolness , such freshness. here is the spring april fool's freshness, it should, well, somehow , to air the brains of people, that they somehow began to think, really, in principle, there are people there who thought realistically before and now continue to make quite realistic statements . well, for example, viktor orban, please. this is not about putting on sweaters in the evening to slightly reduce the heating about the fact that if there are no sources of energy from russia, there will be no energy in hungary at all

it is impossible to replace cheap russian gas with expensive american gas such proposals are absurd and disastrous for the economy there is no need to count on transporting sufficient volumes of lng across the ocean, therefore there is no alternative to gas supplies from russia to europe and in particular to hungary in the short term there is no absurd and disastrous for the economy . says the prime minister of hungary the man who comes out. well, as if from a certain reality and for the interests of the population of their country. it's like one side, uh relationship to the situation, another facet of the relationship to the situation. this is the german minister, and who demonstrates to us, in fact, the absurdity and disastrous for the economy, but on a completely different flank. here's cem ozdemir minister of food and agriculture of the federal republic of germany what? this means we need fewer animals for less consumption. he wants us well, and so on. in general, as they say, we hold on to nothing

. these are two flanks in the middle there are countries, like austria, which are somehow trying to do all this here, well, in my head in my head to collect a bunch and somehow decide to go in the direction of absurdity and perniciousness, or go in the direction of some kind of common sense. well, let's hear the statement, a statement. uh, first of all, here 's a rep from omv. this is the largest austrian gas company, which, please, argues like this. giving up russian gas is impossible if we are not ready to accept the huge consequences, some countries could do it , but for austria it is impossible. this year we are in a difficult position. we can not just take and do without russian gas, since austria has no access to the sea and no access to liquefied gas. and here is an interesting question. he's clearly not just talking to himself. although it may be, of course, in such weather it does not interfere with talking to yourself, but nevertheless. he is trying to

explain something to someone, to someone who tells him. well, as it were, and as a matter of fact, the austrian chancellor is also talking to someone, trying to explain something to someone or explaining it. let's listen. sanctions only make sense if they weaken who they are for, who drives them, and it's a terrible feeling to depend on russian gas, but my job is to secure the supply. and here is nikita sergeevich’s question, firstly, with whom are they both talking, these two people, who, on the one hand, have not lost touch with reality, but on the other hand, something is obviously pressing on them that they are trying to explain to the guys. well, as we understand everything, but we can’t who they are talking to, what kind of force they are trying to explain something. and most importantly, do they have any chance to somehow slip between the trickles, so i ’ll start with the second chance. and more recently , the rhetoric, including from austria, had a completely

different understanding of what kind of russian gas. you will have to pay in rubles appeared just in those countries that are actually 80-100% dependent on russian gas. one of them is hungary, there is still slovakia yes, other countries, such as again germany and so on, depend not so critically, but let's just think about what it means is not so critical when it is actually 40%, and gas consumption is due to russian gas, when your entire industry is very important and and the household depends on russian gas, then germany has not yet lived in a different reality, so in my opinion they are talking in this case with those who are trying to push through this decision without being guided, not that by logic, but guided simply by the format, you have to burn. all of it is fire, because it will not burn here, so it is, of course, the united states of america which they say that you, please, first refuse, and then we will replace. the problem is that the volumes that the united states of america can even theoretically replace according to the best calculations. look, even the most 10 part of 15

billion cubic meters out of 150,000. as far as i understand, 15 billion is 1/10. i'm not even talking about the fact that there is no infrastructure in germany to receive american liquefied natural gas. i 'm not talking about the fact that the organ says that prices will skyrocket and automatically this will lead to uh, it means that people will simply be fired, there will be a huge amount of unemployment, the price of elementary products will rise. all this is possible only if the united states of america is sold. i now have an opinion that they will not succeed; i explain why this is so, because our president is literally the other day. with perseverance and, in general, with some kind of patience worthy of incredible respect. you can say, i explained on my fingers, you know now the meme is very popular, when our president was talking to scholtz, he didn’t understand anything and asked him to somehow explain in more detail, and now the meme is walking around there, you know, like a picture. it just says russia rubles, which means germany dash gaga here is the same thing, but and what is interesting is that they

simply deny reality. in fact, even in terms of contracts. it is very important. they won't lose anything. they won't lose face. they will not lose russian gas, they will not lose their economy. the only thing they will lose is that hand that strokes and periodically beats, forcing them to give up the risk of gas, it is in some moment hangs. why because, if they refuse to do it? this will be the most important precedent that will hit all this uniform western sanctions policy, because the gas situation is so critical for europe, so critical for europe that what we hear, actually from austria and e, hungary and other countries , is confirmed. by the way, it is very important that slovakia is also ready for the russians. well, look nikita sergeevich, that's why i'm asking this question, what do i feel and you judging by your reactions agree with this, as uh, karl nyhammer and many others. they seem to say, these are the obvious things. they are conducting a certain dialogue with someone that tells them the guys, all these are

your reasonable considerations. they are not all critical. you have to, you have to. yes, that's who it is with, in general, the scheme, as it seems even to me for the german, er, politicians of this generation. i think there should be enough fields. i do not know easier already probably, as it were impossible. maybe there on the fingers of some kind of fold it. so, i'm talking about what i say is that when they have a hammer, which i will now return, all this says. after all , he is trying to explain something to someone, and we understand to whom, when he says this phrase, it is a terrible feeling to depend on russian gas. that is, to depend on russian gas is a terrible feeling for him, but to depend politically on those who press on him in order to his country, well, roughly speaking, this is for him, apparently, not such a blow, or or that's what choice he makes, in fact, both an orban and a non- hammer. and so you say, slovaks are still somehow, but kachinsky for them for all puts

in fact the diagnosis is to him of the whole process. how is it in polish to openly say that in general my friends are not talking about gas, not about rubles, not about the euro, and not about the economy at all, please. from an economic point of view, russian proposals are of little importance. so ultimately the money has to be exchanged. here we are talking more about obtaining psychological and political superiority, in fact. what is the question, actually, what is the question of kachinsky, speaks for them for all the guys. yes, enough here to talk about gas about some rubles. it's about something else. this is about psychological and political superiority. that is, this existential confrontation with russia , we cannot go for it, because it doesn’t matter. who will notice you there, because he understood the most important essence. and you know, the decision to pay for gas in rubles, which our president putin made , is strategic for us, and

fateful for the international financial market. i say this, not without pathos. that's because we're here here on channel one. i'm just quoting the words of, uh, western banks. the first channel is just not missing. first channel. we say that the crisis of the largest swiss bank and one of the world's largest banks was the first. who said that we are now witnessing a revolution in the financial and credit system. we are now witnessing the birth of a new financial world, the emergence of new brits in a narrow system. let's remember what is the pre-factory system forty-fourth year america, which became a hegem following the results of the second world war, shared with us the whole world. yes, she said, here is a dollar. we will fill it with gold and the dollar will be the backed currency. and this currency will count for the whole world. now, he says, you understand, there is a currency backed by energy carriers. not these

fiat currencies dollar and euro, which were printed endlessly, especially during the coronavirus, $27 trillion equivalent was thrown into the global financial system. just like that, yes, they say there is a currency that will now be attractive to everyone. this is the currency of the first ruble the second one is like this. here it will be the yuan, because it is filled with goods with real goods, hello , given that india and i are also discussing a certain scheme with india, moreover, india and i will even test an analog of swift now yes, our system is developed by a washing bank system e, transfer of financial messages . e, with p. yes, this is an analogue of the font and indian banks will put it in our banks of this system and it will all work. look, you tell everything very beautifully, and i would listen and listen as if, but here i don’t i can ask a question. when you speak, quoting, which apparently, they understand the same way as you what is at

stake. you say that this is a revolution in world finance, and not in finance, like money, but in world financial political systems, changes in the general system of how the world functions, but when you follow them and we follow you, we talk about revolution. wherever there is a revolution there is a counter-revolution if there are reds who want the whole world of violence to the ground, and then there are whites who tell us, like, like, arranges. so in that sense, it's the same question we asked about orbán. and not a camera. what options i ask you here, because, probably, there are some options and of course they are, well, these will be questions for us. for them, this is a shakespearean question, there is nothing to replace gas with, so for them the question is to the european economy to be or not to be to die to sleep to forget and dream to be. maybe, yes, that's how hamlet speaks. here is their question, see the degree of development of civilization, the degree of comfort and life of people depends from the amount of energy that civilization

has, the country has, if they reduce energy consumption, and our gas is energy to the level of the middle of the 20th century, then the number of people who are in europe is 320 impossible not to feed. they must either be shipped to america or that's it. here's a simple dilemma, a simple dilemma, well , look, then one more question. well, uh, and this dilemma, which already concerns the europeans, who have this difficult choice and this entire western american-centric system, about which you yourself formulated that their question is to be or not to be, but i would add to be in the same capacity or continue to be in some other capacity to which they are not accustomed. you at one time, and here in this studio, and not only in this studio, where i listened to people say that no matter how hard they try, they can’t erase russia from the modern world, because the number of production chains in which we are built in percent world chains of embedded russia simply means to bring down the entire world system crisis a terrible crisis, in which even the great

depression will seem like flowers. and here the question arises for me, what if you tell me that for them it is about preserving the system in which they dominate or transitions to some quality where they do not dominate, but do not dominate, but for america it is possible absolutely death, what do you think, is there an option that they will go for what you are talking about, destroy these chains, return it all to what is even worse global. this is the great depression radius. well, you don’t get out of the series no one what are the options there is an option, because we see how that's the same klaus schwab and all the others. they are pushing. so let's you give us this option right after the advertisement. well, so that we somehow don’t leave financial and economic topics. well, somehow here is advertising the engine of trade and then ads on channel one. voice children

fights , watch after the program russia a. if you have no time to meet in person, visit our mobile application. you are waiting for high rates on deposits, and also cards of payment systems of the new time, so that it becomes comfortable in the old way, in a new way, the post bank. every day life boils in stores. magnet for any petit. there are always products in the magnet stores, that the shelves always keep freshness, therefore they trust the magnet stores, a daily visit to the whole family will inspire in the dark, the light is on in the magnet stores. first first i'm first first i'm first. no, i'm with a megaphone first

the way to be the first to connect the option with 5g and increase the speed of your mobile internet. the megaphone starts with you. profitable 100% stable free forever 3% cashback for everything and 15. once, in fact, gazprombank cards are available to everyone. ergoferon fights both the cause and the symptoms of viral infections ergoferon is recommended by specialists for the cold, viral season. remember ergoferon cherkizova presents no moms, not like that, who doesn't do that anymore. i have to look. look like this. well, mom, try delicious. mom, please do more. why do you need

many cards with installments for 10 months? attractions buy them in the store on the site or application it's about you. only until the end of april, have time to open a deposit with an insertion of up to 21%, issue it on the tinkoff.ru website, and execute it at tinkoff atms throughout the country or in our application from a card of any bank, bank of the year in russia tinkoff is the only one. program time will tell, we continue

to work live. ah, we continue the conversation about the fact that the nature of the current confrontation of the world economic and political e russia with part of the countries of the world and e the american-centric world through the mouth of yaroslav kachaisky. we said that they are absolutely, uh, not economic in nature, but in general, this is about psychology and politics, that is, to be or not to beat not to be their old world, in which they dominate and some other or and etc. we began to talk about whether, in your opinion, the united states of america is ready to go to the end in order to preserve this system, right up to some powerful global crisis, given that russia cannot simply be deleted from the world economy without harming everyone tatal. i believe that they are ready to build a new world order. the fact is that the

economic system of capitalism, which we have yes, the last decades. it came to its logical end and talked about it, even now, our president at the valdai meeting in the odessa club of the very last year is everything, e that we saw that all economic growth of the last decade was exclusively due to loans, because the owners of the means of production capital stopped sharing stop sharing with people state, and automation and output of the enterprise southeast asia e. this is the post- industrial world. what this means is that people, in order to maintain, uh, the previous standard of living, took more and more loans, is understandable. and uh, here it is now. it is clear what to grow further. this credit bubble increases impossible to deflate. now it's friday night. someone has already come home from work. someone just turned on the tv and says. so so so so so what's there? here losev tells interesting things. just something here is not very clear. people ask next time

ok so we go on principle and say guys. no, no, this is your old story. what do you print videos for everyone? how many dollars you want, we give you that, it means that for these candy wrappers we give oil, gas, uranium, palladium, and many other things that no longer work. we kind of disagree, they say, no-no-no, guys, of course, you may not agree, but somehow we will be a little stronger. here we will push to the end. and if it takes to crush you to hell with all this, then we’d better destroy it all to hell, and then be as it will be. that’s exactly the question that people have, and that’s what it can be fraught with for everyone, if we went on principle, and they went on principle, and then what then they destroy the entire world economic system and build a dystopia where the american elites retain control. they expect to retain control over us, and for good reason. they recently published an article on the face form about why you need to negotiate with russia, where the three main goals of the negotiations are set, the

first is to stop putin and prevent russia from defeating the second, although russia is manipulated obedient. and the third is the overthrow of the regime. these are the goals of the goals they set, they do not change the goals, that is, they will arrange a dystopia at home to sharply lower the comfort level of their population. at the same time, in order for the population not to die at all, they need our resources. and they will do everything to have access to our resources and not dispose of. that's what they're building, they're building a dystopia, but we now received unique opportunities on february 24th. jump out of this agenda, here's jump out of their plan and build your country without them. here only there is a conversation about that among the people who are now watching tv, and in general, this is quite. naturally they say, ok we all. in general, as if ready to jump out. we all understand. well, maybe not all the words. that's how not all of these schemes are, but in principle, we understand that from how the question should have popped up. they say that we are jumping

out of there, where and with what, relatively speaking, difficulties and possible losses jumps. here we are jumping out of the old one, and we’re jumping where, given that the essence, because you said, i read this article and even, in general, posted a complete translation of it on my website there, and so on. there is an option such that they are not going to let us look anywhere at all. look here. now, if the previous words, yes, uh hmm putin uh, admit it. uh, opponents too, of course, putin's strategic arsenal. it's unique. he really is a strategist. uh, that is, he sees the situation in its completeness. in 2003, in 2003, i wrote that putin was building a new empire, such as built on a network principle, where he wrote, why do we need all these pipes, railways, power lines. he built russia into the surrounding world. so pull it out today. so no damage.

the tenth is not obtained stop. but after all, we have already begun to say that, perhaps, they are ready to snatch it even to the detriment of themselves, you listen to this german minister and all the others. that's what losev is talking about, not in vain at the end of his i mentioned the performances on the 24th of february 24, 2022 , because this is the situation. eh, as if combat reminds me of, well, such a cartoon about a boxer, we box with an opponent. as if, well, more or less on an equal footing, and even, maybe, there we inflict serious blows there, right up. sometimes we have. and some bastards crawl under our feet and try to gnaw our legs like that, uh, that is , there are no more rules. i already told this to your studio, they are over. everything is going on now a war without rules, the rules are set by the one who has me i have been in the framework of this boxing analogy, there is a slightly different option that we are boxing with them at the same time . let's be honest, they're a heavyweight. and we're like that, but we're

boxing by their rules. and those who crawl under our feet, they don't crawl under our feet, in some places they kind of tie our legs. that is, we actually box it like this, yes, but that’s what i’m asking about, but what is it all for, yes, and in 22 russia came up with such arguments, against which there are no objections, for example, they were already demonstrated. by the way, a few months ago , putin uttered a phrase that is in the western press. there were solid question marks when he spoke, and he mentioned weapons based on new physical principles . on kinetic principles, and everyone thought , lord, what else did he come up with, and we just showed it, because, uh, the dagger came to this base without actually a warhead, then this is some kind of force. do you understand what it is, and no one knows. at what distance he flies, they also thought 200 km, it turned out he did not know. how far does it fly. this is the border, it's true, but you understand

that when we talk about how far they are willing to go, it's about defending their old world. we have to talk about how far. we are here here. there were times before february 24th. here i had such a stand. it was a long time ago, but i still remember it and that's somewhere around here in this place. well, where is germany now, there stood sytin alexander nikolayevich, who carried out this example many times, that if he told me artyom, we are arguing about something. and i know that you have a gun in your pocket. but at the same time, i’m sure that you won’t shoot at me from this pistol under the camera, then for me the presence of a pistol , even a grenade, even a machine gun, is not critical if i ’m sure that you won’t line up, and i’m sure that you won’t shoot passed on the 24th. why do we keep remembering? everyone was sure that putin would not do this. and we did it. we are already in there . eh, we went through this situation. now everyone understands, when our nuclear triad left,

did anyone hear, uh, the news that she returned no one, and they did not have this news. she , after the order of shoigu, the submarine left the oceans. and they are all there and remember it all very well, that is, now putin actually announced his stake in an interview. and why do we need such a world that russia will be for me but alexander grigoryevich lukashenko is such a good mediator. great, answered the question. why are they not ready to fight like this, but because they are used to living well. they are always relaxed. yeah, what if they take away their morning croissant, they already surrender, as they surrendered in the fortieth year, of course, that is, our bet is that we are ready to go to the end to the end and at the same time we have, roughly speaking , no reserve, well, the patience of perseverance. anything. more. we are not talking about ukraine now, we are talking about now, then look at the europeans. i roughly understand where their stock of patience is. yes, i

understand that they have gas there, that they are freezing, that they have gasoline, that they have croissants, and croissants without gasoline, oddly enough, it does not sound , but the fact is that we you started program with the fact that the americans who are sitting overseas. for them, this is in general, everything anita is played somewhere in a spillikin over the ocean. look here, baida. after all, he continues to knit some of his own. this one, as it were, a tie and all these experiences for him, that it’s not a hammer, that an orna, that they are all slovaks to him. he has some kind of his own. this is such a reality and his own game, please. i would like to talk today about the price that you and i have to pay here for putin's decision to brutally attack a sovereign country together with european partners and nato allies we answer. we are helping the ukrainian people economically, we are militarily and we are imposing on russia the most severe economic sanctions in history, but what

putin said war is making america and other democracies around the world pay a high price. now many do not buy russian oil anymore. i banned oil imports to america russian oil is leaving the world markets, so supplies are declining, and therefore now putin's price hike is hitting ordinary americans at the gas station. i am now i'm moving away from all this rhetoric somewhere. john well, putin jumped prices, that this is all right. well, that's it, it's quite obvious that when he says all this, he says it in a box. some plan of his own or somebody else's plan of which he is a part. what are they doing? we are talking here, we will go to the end. they won't go to the end europeans are freezing and so on, what are they doing? that's how you understand their game now. their game is very simple america first and the american national interest comes first. everything the rest of the toolkit. you and i must remember the excellent formula of anglo-saxon diplomacy

that these guys inherited from their former metropolis. no, permanent allies have permanent interests. yeah, america is interested in everything that was said to stay here, it will intensify even more, to rot us and drive us into the position of the nineties, but at the same time, so that american interests would not suffer in any way. if for these purposes it will be necessary to fight to the last ukrainian. you and i understand very well that they will fight, they will hours to drag out the war, when you say their goal is to rot us and drive the nineties. describe to me, just imagine for a second that you are not even biden. it's hard to imagine everything is so very foggy there. and what about you, as if it were them, here you are in a row. what is your goal here? how do you understand it? what do you want to achieve in russia and with russia, what kind of tools to bring it to, but it’s very simple that americans always think in the style of a cowboy with a colt hanging