the big game is on the air today in brussels at the nato ministerial meeting and one of the main issues that will be discussed at it is the increase in supplies. uh, weapons and military equipment to ukraine, then they blinkent the secretary of state of the united states a said that the united states will provide ukraine with anti-tank weapons and that’s exactly what they will do. uh, one hundred those extra 100,000 er 100 million. excuse the dollars of military aid that joe biden announced yesterday. and you need to understand that this money is not money will come to ukraine. yes, this money will remain in american corporations at the american military-industrial complex, and in fact, death will come to ukraine, and germany claims that today, er, chancellor scholz. what does she intend to, but to provide ukraine with literally all the weapons that the bundeswehr has at its disposal that ukraine can

use? true, yesterday, uh, german foreign minister anna lena berborg stated that, in fact, there are no such weapons, and resources will be scope exhausted. anyway, here are the steps. they say only one thing, that the united states is interested in prolonging conflicts as much as possible , a protracted conflict, they are ready to fight, and try to exhaust russia to the last ukrainian with russia, and when yesterday general mark milli, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff in the united states, a spoke about that the war in ukraine may last several years. he basically made plans. e with military directness issued plans biden administration. yes, they really are going to fight with russia for several years until the last ukrainian, but it is interesting that not all military experts in the united states share this point of view. that

the united states can, and drag out the conflict for so long and in particular. here is what the famous american military specialist , retired colonel douglas macgregor, said about this. listen. i think we ourselves are the authors of our destruction. i wouldn't hold the responsibility for this on someone like putin, russia will not leave ukraine, we need to understand that they will not lose, assuming that russia will lose in ukraine is like assuming that if we invaded northern mexico we would lose. no, we won’t be able to, they can’t, because everything is nearby, ports, airfields, logistics, if we decided to enter mexico, we would do whatever we want and stay there, as much as we like, they think the same with russia and eastern ukraine igor yuryevich do you agree with douglas mcgregor depending on the degree, yes, because if we compare military potential. the two countries have the

capabilities of the russian armed forces and the armed forces and the real results that have been achieved by our army and navy and the aerospace forces over the past period of time. it is quite obvious that any unbiased analyst will conclude that the armed forces of ukraine will be defeated and defeated, especially cut off from sources of supply. here's the home front from the possibility of getting new weapons. well, they will already be in this situation. just don't just target their fate will be resolved. it is a matter of time precisely, which is why the plan to turn ukraine into a new afghanistan is so important for the united states of america, they seriously hope that they will be able to provide the logistics for the delivery of all these weapons, for which huge amounts of money have been allocated today. they think they can actually provide a vision here. well, the partisan

insurrectionary war, that is, to revive the bandera movement in the form in which it existed there in the forties and fifties, only on a different level, let's say, antichrist for russia, it is important not only to achieve a military victory, which will certainly be achieved absolutely, but also to sign the peace agreement on the basis of the principles that russian president vladimir putin outlined on the first day of the start of a special military operation. it is important for us to legitimize the completion. uh, actually a special military operation under the signing of a binding document that will exclude all those threats and challenges that we consider the most dangerous for ourselves. i think we will solve this goal and we have opportunities for this along the line and armed forces and special services. our intelligence goals are clear, to end the conflict as quickly as possible, to sign a peace agreement on the conditions that we put forward and thus

begin to stabilize the situation. the revival of those regions that were actually destroyed as a result of the resistance of the ukrainian nationalist forces and the armed forces of ukraine. well, russia initially said that she is starting a special operation in order not to start a war, but to end the war, and i completely i agree that, of course, russia will not allow a second afghanistan. russia will not allow a war of attrition in e. for many years, russia, too, has been in favor of a peace agreement, and even after a monstrous provocation in the bucha, which was certainly aimed at complicating the vision of the negotiations. yes, to complicate the exit to e, the policy is a diplomatic settlement of this conflict. russia still insistently repeats every day that it is for peace and that it wants to negotiate a peace settlement.

russia's spokesman said this again today russian president dmitry peskov listen, we are not talking about the occupation of ukraine in russia, zelensky is called a drug addict. nazi. we have many journalists studying this discourse. this is the president of ukraine, but we do not know what he uses, what he drinks and smokes. this is the president of ukraine and they are interested in him agreeing to the conditions of russia, about which he was clearly notified by the russian delegation through negotiations. we want to end the military operation. withdrawing troops from the kiev region. we have created favorable conditions for negotiations. we wanted to make a gesture. good will. we can make big decisions during negotiations, that's why putin ordered our troops to withdraw from the region. ivan alekseevich well , in order to reach an agreement, after all, we need a capable entity on the other side yesterday, just speaking at the un security council,

vasily went to russia in this organization, but directly turned to president zelensky so that he would not listen to western advisers who simply want, but to use ukraine as consumables, but listen to the national interests and aspirations of the ukrainian people and go for a political agreement. do you think it will work out? i was more optimistic about this two weeks ago 10 days ago. ah to peskov is still optimistic. yes, it's good that optimists remain. i thought that two about a week ago 10 days ago on the eve of istanbul and that istanbul meeting, partly scandalous, but created the conditions for zelensky made a fundamental choice and began to act in the interests of his own people, and for him

the sovereignty of his country is at stake, and he could well, through the negotiation process of the country's sovereignty, preserve and actually gain real independence, including from his western allies, but in fact instigators of those who are pushing him to continue hostilities. and we see that zelensky did not make this fundamental decision. ah, we see that the ukrainian country continues to manipulate the negotiations. arrange various leaks of the show, uh, some kind of manipulation around this. and as far as one can judge, all this does not come from some middle level of power, but directly from zelensky zelensky makes quite a lot of public statements where he speaks very dismissively about the negotiations and discredits these negotiations so imagine that he is serious. maybe suddenly go to the signing of an agreement. it seems to me over time. eh, everything, less and less

chance of that. i would pay attention. here's what i'm on yesterday i asked, just a layered non-benzya question about this. so i see that in the last 10 days, huh? zelensky is rapidly changing his image. before that, he was a politician. he looked like a politician, uh, politician, uh, and so on and so forth. in the last literally week 10 days. he is becoming more and more, in his rhetoric, in his manner of action, a field commander. and uh. here is the legitimization of the results of a special military operation with the legitimate authorities. it certainly is. uh, perfect, but big political agreements with a man who actually resigns as president of all ukrainians and becomes a field commander of radical groups. this is a slightly different

political content. if he goes further into this, then, in my opinion, there will be an opportunity for, uh, for an agreement. well, it's just closed. i agree that the ukrainians are doing a lot to complicate the implementation of even those agreements that seem to already exist, for example, uh, this one that has appeared, and the initiative to hold referendum. yes, when we first sign the treaty, then ukraine holds a referendum, that is, it means that the russian troops must leave, and then ratification of the territory of ukraine with an incomprehensible outcome. yes, and then we'll see about this, and in particular the minister of foreign affairs. sergey lavrov yesterday. e, said dmitry evgenievich a. this is what you associate with this transformation of zelensky, about which ivan alekseevich spoke, and how do you assess the prospects for negotiations? transformation? of course have. eh, although i

i would say that he plays the same role. uh, the role, after all, of an actor, that is, such a pr manager. uh, a certain, let's say, group of comrades who have already understood the situation and understood that these military actions should be dragged out. it is possible enough long and? they don’t need the armed forces, and even that’s enough. partizans they don’t need, the entire territory of ukraine, after all. i can imagine how, uh, if we are talking about afghanistan, how, uh, there will be some of these groups to make their way through the uh border, let's say poland and we there we will explain that you have terrorists there, in general, remove them, please, they will remove them. that is, i've been myself since the very beginning. e, imagined. uh, first of all, what kind of contract could this be? uh, and uh, how can there be trade on it, what can we give up there. what is fundamental? yes, but it 's also always helpful, when hmm something starts to still sharp plots, to imagine. and what will happen if well, there is no agreement, it just won’t be, because it’s impossible for a man who

, uh, it’s still unknown what he controls there. what kind armed forces? what economic resources? he may not be in kiev at all so that he, uh, keeps the situation suspended, so it’s possible without a contract. eh, the europeans have seen what it is like in kosovo and in other countries of the world there are many such stories. that is, one can imagine that we can do without it and will not depend on zelensky . well, we will continue to discuss the prospects, just international law and whether it is possible without a treaty and without treaties at all and without law in just a few seconds, do not switch. mozgaz executioner all series on sunday on pervy live live time goes on, and the joints remain in excellent shape revolutionary composition for joints with new generation collagen artyom let the joints remain

young. why do you need so many cards if there is one halva? with an installment plan for 10 months and a flask with a cashback of up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva, only one card for everything amelotex gel acts exactly in the focus of pain. t gel is the exact solution to free movement, we are constantly being sold expensive novelties of the new comfortable handle, in which nothing new newest alarm. sberbank is changing the rules to meet and cmtpl in a new way, reliably saving up to 50 percent online and at sberbank offices. you can not wait for a courier, but order

each other, because we value stability in the same way and are always happy to meet you at every branch throughout russia. if you have no time to meet in person, go to our mobile application you are waiting for high rates on deposits, and also cards of payment systems of the new time, so that it becomes comfortable in the old way, but in a new way, gennady bank urgently. come to me prostatitis you do not head to combat prostatitis drug reduced fibrous property. longidaza longidaza do not adjust your life to prostatitis. movie 1 tv introduces to each

other there is an easier way to look like the stars of the air is not just looking for, but looking for where to buy pants for the show. the big game is on air today the united states

must announce a new package of economic war, because the word sanctions here, it seems to me, is already irrelevant against russia and today the european union must document its fifth package of the same economic war, which was announced yesterday. by the way, it's very interesting that the european union always goes, as it were, one step ahead of the united states in announcing new sanctions, and this reminds me of the well-known proverb that if you have a dog, you don't necessarily bark yourself anyway, but here we are they said that the military policy of the united states is aimed at prolonging the conflict as much as possible, and the sanctions policy is also obviously aimed at exhausting and weakening long-term perspective, but the russian economy, and today dmitry medvedev, ex-president of russia, deputy chairman of the security council, very colorfully, compared this sanctions policy of the

west with the medieval inquisition, and also stated how russia is going to behave in these conditions. what actions to take? let's listen. our opponents, let's face it, enemies of russia who are so vehemently seeking to abolish ownership of russian businesses should understand that they will face a lot of lawsuits in the courts, as in national courts in the united states and europe, as well as in international courts. here it will be possible to check what will support the vaunted western machines, justice, theft of the inquisitors, or the fair demands of the owners. otherwise, legal impartiality and equality of all. before the law, they will perish forever in the fire of the political hatred of the west for russia, and that will remain true of the us from dell. well, usbellom is the law of war, and ivan alekseevich well, firstly, we must remember that the inquisition, in fact, greatly slowed down the development of medieval europe, especially in

spain, where just the scale of the inquisition was the largest, it was the inquisition that, perhaps, made spain from an advanced empire at that time. one of the poorest and most backward. uh, european countries and today really western countries are already suffering the most in an increasing degree from this economic war, because it is a double-edged weapon. well, uh, here, it seems to me, a very interesting statement of the question. with medvedev , yes, either we will still achieve justice in western courts and retain the right in general, as such a property right. and so on, or there will be only the right of war. you. what do you think we should expect? i think this is theoretically absolutely correct? fairly logical and so on, but it seems to me that we have already passed these forks. it is already clear that the law does not work. there was actually a confiscation of what the russian people earned for several decades, and what was kept for

investment in the development of the country by the courts, that is, the judicial system, both international and western, has not yet been involved. here, could there be something change and change? i think not in the end . ah, you see, we are a technical court - this is, of course, a kind of impartial. eh, themis is such an institute yes, but still, when it comes to justice, which closes on constitutional questions on questions. e devices. it all comes down to a basic idea of ​​justice. it is no longer purely legal. it is in spirit, in spirit, in representation, and in this sense. eh, here. uh, it is obvious that the ideological philosophical positions on which he now stands russia and the western world are different, and therefore the decision of the courts will be in favor of not our

worldview philosophical position to appeal here to the letter to the squiggle to the comma. i think it would be pretty pointless. this needs to be done and worked out. all technical options, but i would still consider it as a technical option to show the west that he is abandoning the principles that he considered e fundamental, and this, of course, will contribute to e, the collapse of the ideological moral. e hegemony west because they will show that they renounce their own principles of reinterpretation. e them, but to achieve, e, a real return of some resources through the courts. i think that we are unlikely to be able, well, at the international level, uh, as long as there is a guarantor of law and order. this is an organization of the united nations and it is quite obvious that yesterday's zelensky's initiative is actually very comical again, when a comedian gives

recommendations on the issues of the universe of international law and international political architecture, in existence since 1945. yes, but nonetheless. and the very dissolution of the un security councils and, uh, the united nations as a whole has not yet passed, and even this night in moscow and yesterday , american time, the ambassador of the united states , uh, out, and thomas greenfield a had to admit that well, it won’t work to exclude russia from uh, the security council, he, but nevertheless, she announced that, uh, i think she said a phrase no less comical than zelensky’s proposal that the united states would isolate russia uh in the security council, yes, in addition to russia, china is a permanent member of the security council; today, other non-permanent members of the security council are

countries such as india brazil mexico several african countries, that is, it is obvious that even here is isolation. yes, that is, leaving russia alone, but the security council will not work. uh, dmitry evgenievich here. how do you think? why does the united states generally use the word isolation so often, despite the fact that they still cannot put it into practice and, after all, uh, they hit on their own authority and demonstrate rather the collapse of the remnants of american hegemony. yes e not ability. to really achieve the isolation of russia, the word isolation is an ideological phantom of the kind that should exist at all. here are all the ukrainian special operations first. we see several such phantoms that were launched, like from a gruel cannon in a row. the first is that the entire ukrainian people? uh stood up for his motherland forgetting that there is not not one war, but two that the civil war is going on

more intense than any, the other second phantom was, uh, about the fact that there is a free world, a world of democracy, which make up most of the planet, well, there he gathered the bidens there, but for democracy. and what, all these security councils not only isolate us there, but in terms of the economy, uh, trade regimes and so on. this turned out to be the opposite. eh, that's how it is now, when a lot has already passed time, then all sorts of interesting nuances went. and uh people from india from china say that there is no visible free world unified most of the world hates sanctions because not a single elimination they brought any benefit. here comes the trouble. yes, and that we are talking about the fact that, for example, asians observe this opinion of one of the former advisers. examples of india former examples of india, asians observe that yes. the europeans are

sorting out their security problems among themselves. and what about us here? why do we have to suffer our trade deals with our partners and where it is possible to sabotage these same you will sabotage. uh, where you can maintain your, uh, dependence of several centers of power at the same time and on china, and this is russia, i'm talking about india. i will save from china from russia from the west. e, we will not cling to one center of forces, because then we will be tied and completely dependent. that is, we see, uh, instead of demonstrating the unity of the whole world against russia there, well, china at the same time, but we see fragmentation of this world split. and so, if the first time after uh, the special start of the special operation, uh, only voices sounded, that's in one tune, dooley, then now these assessments that the world is actually falling apart and something with it then the incomprehensible resurrects that nation -state. e, that is, e unpredictability completely. yes, this is a defeat for the united states, but uh, i admit

that they had to do this, because in fact, sanctions were not needed in order to support ukraine, but ukraine was needed in order to lead sanctions and e. break down international trade regimes and legal regimes. and to create some kind of camp, where american western rules will work, and try to drag as many other states there as possible. how many will succeed for now, that's all with this, fortunately they get it badly, well, you are absolutely right on one of the previous programs. by the way, we discussed a recent article by the former indian foreign minister in fore no fairs magazine, which said exactly this, that no anti-russian and there is no anti-chinese alliance of democracy, because such democracies are unquestionably democracies like south india. africa brazil mexico and many other countries around the world do not want to join the

us bloc policy, but nevertheless, the united states continues to put pressure on non-western countries, threatening them with secondary sanctions and, of course, one of the most important. the object of american and western pressure is china, we have already talked about the upcoming ministerial meeting today. nato meetings china will be one of the at this meeting, and nato secretary general stoltenberg, just announced that nato is going to increase pressure on beijing . listen. we see that china does not want to condemn russia's aggression, it has joined moscow and also questions the right. nations to choose their own path at a time when authoritarian powers are locking down the rules-based international order of democracy, it is more important than ever to stand together to defend our values, so i expect we will agree to deepen

nato’s cooperation with our asia-pacific partners in areas such as arms control, threats in cyberspace, the fight against hybrid threats, as well as in the field of technology, for the first time in the new strategic concept of the alliance, china’s growing influence and policy of coercion on the world stage will have to take into account. what constitutes a systemic challenge to our security and democracy at the same time the united states is strengthening uh, the tripartite bloc usa uk australia and a bite that is anti-chinese in nature and just the other day became known. that one of the priority projects of aus will be the creation of hypersonic weapons, that is, it is against china igor yuryevich in general, will the united states have enough forces? so, at the same time , increase, uh, the military deterrence of russia and at the same time increase the military deterrence of china , and how can it even fit in the head that the united states, on the one hand, is trying, but

how to convince china not to provide, uh, support to russia on the other sides, and they, uh, threaten china with an arms race with hypersonic hypersonic weapons. here in this new block. well, let's call it the pacific nato. australia is assigned the role of an unsinkable aircraft carrier, it is it that will be pumped with all systems, weapons, americans, british, and their western partners. i think china can not be broken, independently a powerful sovereign power. she won't give in to pressure. i want to go back to where we started today, which is death. and vladimir volfovich zhirinovsky , many treated him differently, but of course, he is one of the most charismatic russian politicians. and he's also a prophet. listen, and the prophetic statement of vladimir volfovich, said by him back in 2014. as for domestic

politics, but everything ends badly when mistakes are made in foreign policy 100 years ago, the russian empire was sweetie. everything was great. in the summer of 14, we were dragged into the war, and how did you know the end of the fortieth year, the soviet union was the second sweetie once pulled in and how did you know the conclusion e we are 1,000 years old. russia is on the defensive. we are waiting when we will be attacked, i will not take 1,000 years ago, we take napoleon, he is waiting for the outcome of the war. young in lithuania. the tsar does not think well and sits in st. petersburg and allows napoleon to seize all of russia, burn moscow, and only then you can catch up with the french a little and finally win the forty-first year, everything was clear, it would begin, it would definitely begin. well. june 5 and there is no defeat of the germans on the territory of

poland, we are waiting for fear, the inability to make a mistake, therefore this is very costly, therefore we must start first. we need power. our economy can only be militarized. that is, if we pass the militarization of the entire economy, if we again bring our army to the western borders. i'm not saying to fight, so that she stands here, she stands behind the urals somewhere in the south. here is everything to put the army, million two million. they are cowardly, they are afraid. they need to be taken by fright with a whip. we are a carrot, otherwise our budget for 10 years, the budget went back there, it must be profitable there. kudrin explained to us that it is profitable there, and now what is now hitting us in the face with our own money, therefore no you. and political wisdom lies not in not making mistakes, but in being able to correct them and how