they will behave and how the logistics will be built in order to supply these products to different markets. we also went through this in soviet times and we know that there were no obstacles that could not be bypassed, with all the prohibitions, sanctions, and so on and so forth. we have a certain immunity to this. at least the older generation remembers this well, but, uh, indeed, the americans tried to contribute to the collapse of the soviet economy, but i must say that there is still a greater contribution. eh, you may not agree with me, but the decision that the enterprise, when it was allowed , to withdraw non-cash payments in cash, which never happened in the soviet union and was categorically forbidden, these are the contours of non-cash payments of enterprises and cash circulation. they simply did not come into contact when they created cooperatives, they decided to turn non-cash funds of the enterprise into cash at factories for a person. here and the financial

flow gushed out and, of course, the united states is related to this, and the same thing is happening now with the dollar, because and they, of course, had no restrictions, but the bulk of the dollars were in the stock market and little by little money from the stock market began to flow into the commodity markets, and then inflation and rising world food prices and amazement. where did all this come from? who organized this for us? now, of course, very interesting processes are taking place in the big asian game. here in central asia, ivan alekseevich did a lot. e this region. uh, afghanistan, which is acquiring a new subjectivity already under the leadership of the taliban, and today there was a decision of the russian ministry of foreign affairs. in fact, recognize the representative of the taliban government. as an official representative of the government of afghanistan, on the other hand, the pakistani crisis, which is also clearly connected with all this smart game

and the game of the united states, which has very strong positions inside pakistan against the current government there, is focused more on cooperation with us. this one here is central asian. eh, knot. yes, today i saw how 10 minutes, and carlson showed exactly this scene the president stands on him, everyone sneezes, no one wanted to pay any attention to him, the main character, prince obama, he even laid his hand that i'm a guy here. i'm the president, and obama doesn't pay any attention to him. look, here he is, and of course, no american president has ever experienced such humiliation, but just like obama's benefit performance, as if he is in reality usa well, after all, we will return now to asia, i understand for them i saw such a scene, really, remarkable official reception at the white house, a mass came to to

and biden, no one pays attention at all. you know, there is still a little yes, a little remark about this. uh, yesterday we were talking, and i'm supposedly discussing this, but supposedly biden's reservations, when he said that he was vice president. uh, michelle obama, apparently, at that time they still interfered. obama has been kind with the president. and now obama continues to be president. well, then who was biden, who was the vice president. it's unclear who he was when he was vice president. and when the president is now yes, apparently, uh, everything is in opposition the same a but returning to your question. this is a very serious question. it may be good that we slightly diluted this with detente. the fact is that the united states has been in eurasia for a long time and the strategy is that they divide countries into those that are their friends, satellites are under their complete control. either these countries should uh be uh, consumables

should be spoilers and interfere with someone. eh, someone else. here we see now an interesting situation, when countries do not want to be american allies. in such a full sense of the word and at the same time they don’t want to be, uh, spoilers, uh, in the hands of the united states. i would like to pay attention to 10 years ago, the united states tried to create a very large asian block that would include everyone asian countries, in my opinion, except for china and north korea. they wanted to. yes, they wanted to unite everyone. it didn’t work out, then it moved to indo-pacific. such a construction has become, where there are already a smaller number of states, the pacific ocean partnership, it seems that they created it, but it turned out that there are so many disagreements that japan wants one thing, india wants another, and so on and so forth. then we moved out to the fourth quarter. also,

the construction did not fly, as a result, it moved out to the aukus , uh, to the top three. well, let's see if this construction works, the united states of great britain and australia, and from my point of view, the united states, uh, although they do not continue to pretend that they maintain their hegemony, in my opinion, they themselves have already understood that hegemony lost and now their policy is not directed maintenance is not about maintaining world leadership and control, but about maintaining a narrow circle of its allies. so that these people don't run away, that's all they do to the united states, they pretend. they tell these allies of theirs, stay with us, and then the whole world will be with us from my point of view, the united states is now deceiving its closest allies, trying not to simply let them go on a free independent, but independent voyage. as regards the central asian region and afghanistan directly

afghanistan, roughly the same construction is a country that has long been played out in foreign geopolitical combinations. unfortunately, there remains. this is the mindset that whatever game we play and the taliban have, uh, the government is in control of the movement. the taliban have a unique chance to return to work in their own interests, and not to work for e for others, and we have seen that for more than six months. uh, this government is working, that they are demonstrating independence for now, and independence means neutrality, a and so uh. i think that it is surprising for the united states that we in eurasia did not all quarrel ; it seems to them that if without them, then everyone will quarrel like in kindergarten. actually. on the contrary, if there are no americans, everyone lives perfectly. yes, they will appear here, just the

problems begin. uh, and it seems to me that for a long time we had this point of view, that oh, let the americans clean up there if there is a mess, it's bad for us. from my point of view, everyone in eurasia understands that a to create russia's problems are more expensive than suicide, this is more expensive for yourself. and only those who work in someone’s interests and, most likely, not in the interests of their people, but precisely in the interests of an external player, can decide on this. therefore, from my point of view, russia does not need to be afraid of independent players at all, if they really independent, well, the fact that they do not always distinguish our ideas about the organization of society. well, in this diverse world, you need to come to terms with this and not redo, uh, and not redo. e others, therefore russian foreign policy. it seems to me that i captured the nerve of the world game very correctly. we do not want to

drive anyone into our camp, and we do not even want to drive anyone out of the american camp. but if you want to remain their satellites, stay, but we support everyone who wants to pursue an independent independent policy and it turns out that there are a lot of such people today, this internal political one. in pakistan, this is still a large country, yes, whose population is larger than england france and germany combined and which embarked on a path of common cooperation with us. and yes, for 20 years they lined up with different zigzags, but gradually good relations were built. and now we have very, uh, good relations with pakistan, good relations. and we were able to overcome this uh combination that again the united states and great britain were trying to play that and if you tremble with pakistan then you will have problems with india if you are friends with india then you will have problems with pakistan could balance and have good relations with russia since

india has good relations between russia and pakistan, but i already told you about your broadcasts, that the pakistani leadership might have agreed to a small compromise with the united states, but western diplomats published in the pakistani press, an appeal, uh, open publicity what? support sanctions against russia, well, and then the population already said that in no case, in no case, the united states, apparently, went. i had to play a rather dirty game on the organization of this vote of no confidence in, uh, the prime minister, which he successfully thwarted and, uh, if the parliament, yes, dissolved the parliament, and i am sure that the elections that will be there will probably be the most anti-american elections in asia in recent recent history. that is, what happened in iran before will now happen again, and we will

have the opportunity to verify the correctness of such a forecast and continue after the advertisement. shot at close range, first in one eye, then the other i feel like a shot from here from the war. do you want me to talk about this heroic past did you tell the children to her face? tell me when i

can look at the archive only there is nothing the best detective of the soviet union hates your family institute brain gas executioner all series on sunday at first magnit cosmetic cares, it means love up to -60% on goods, finish magnit family of stores we are there we are with you. deep

sleep for a long time velson promotes natural falling asleep and sound snus sleep, as in childhood, they say if you stand here together and make a wish. it will definitely come true. i want you to be the one to whom i care, finally applied, i don't know. yes, me too. yes, you get a tariff or additional options in the my mts application and receive a 10% cashback for each vtb charge-off are looking for advertising that will help you get a free vtb multicard and pay for purchases throughout russia and apply for a free vtb multicard get the opportunity to easily pay for purchases when transferring commission refund up to twenty percent. we

choose fashionable quality at reasonable prices. there is no time at all, and the cars had to be changed on the second one for free right away bought. i took a new one there, place it for free , sell quickly, as honestly to support our body. we count calorie steps, the amount of vitamin d does not need to be counted. here are pills just one tablet a day is better absorbed than other forms of vitamin d the number one rates on the exchanges. we always bet on people. for us, confidence. not just words, we value traditions and look beyond the horizon. we build the future, invest in our earth and grow wealth for us, the state is not millions, but confidence, dignity, pride in

this is our strength the strength of our country. the magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products, finnish servelat. papa can 129.90 family stores magnet we are near we are with you. first first i'm first first i'm first no. i'm not me with a megaphone every first. the first way is to be the first to connect the option with 5g and increase the speed of your mobile internet. megaphone starts with you gennady urgently. come to me prostatitis is not your boss for the fight against prostatitis, the drug with the antifibrotic property of landidat longidase is not adjust life to prostatitis. the most important

rule of giving is to buy everything, sitilin buy everything for the summer season in sitilin. in the broadcast of the big game we continue the united states of america their allies in recent times more and more often. they say that now there is a conflict of two worlds, one world of democracies, which personifies the united states and the world of autocracy, which leaves china and all their allied countries to russia. but democracy is like about freedoms. see what's happening. who restricts freedom

of movement. well, it is clear that we are not limited. west the freedom of our movement by restricting air travel. who limits the freedom of trade by imposing sanctions. well, it’s clear that it’s not us who restricts freedom of speech by banning our media around the world, it’s clear that we don’t do it , the soviet union time jammed, but now it jams that side who canceled the right to property is now taking away property from people simply because they are russian yes freezes gold and foreign exchange reserves. though they don't belong give up their own obligations under these securities, but waive a fair trial. well, finally, democracy is after all, first of all, following the interests and will of one's own people of one's own people. this is where in europe now who follows the will of their own people, who definitely don’t need it, there

are price increases, some kind of sanctions and so on, if they are yes, serbia, hungary, perhaps, but the rest, they obviously don’t follow. e the will of their own people, they follow the will of the united states of america and in the end it happens, where actually the world of freedom and where i measure freedom here and it seems to me, it is already possible even to speak not about it. uh, the division of freedom is not freedom, but a significant part of the western world lives in some kind of fairy tale. so they came up with something and live in this fairy tale. here, as in andersen's naked king. here they believe that they are dressed in beautiful beautiful clothes, and a significant part of the world begins to see clearly and begins to wonder at the ugliness of these uh, these designs, i can say, uh, my own experience when i was a young specialist that on what occasion did i ask

the first questions about what democracy is and how it is judged in general, when i got to know each other better. for example, with the iranian system , it was completely incomprehensible to me earlier. why does iran call all saudi monarchies a non-democratic country, sort of like a democracy, flood monarchies. yes, that is, there is one, it seems to be good, but they also live their own lives and now they are showing independence, there are no questions for them either, but i could not understand what problems there are with democracy in iran. here, especially in comparison with all the neighbors. well maybe in israel, uh, something yes, really comparable , too, a free system has elections, and there are certain filters for admission to these elections, but many candidates participate all the time, the real struggle is polyphonic. ah, there are more disputes than in america, so i looked at, say, the discussion of the

americans and the discussions of the iranians. it seemed to me that the narrowness is more clear who, well, you just need to call a spade a spade. isn't that right? it seems to me that even honest educated people in the united states don't use the word democracy. they use the word republic, they say we don't have a democracy. it's a lie. this is a propaganda myth in our republic. and this is true, but it was so, but in general a republic is also something similar to the word democracy, the same thing, in fact, the press is the business of the people, and democracy is the power of the demos. the demos are the wealthy sections of the urban population or the population of the polar state. it's not all the people. uh, the ancients who coined the word republic. they knew the difference, especially since he was describing the colibbie republic, and he showed that the sin that lived in rome that the republic is a completely new phenomenon is more complex, but the society is more complex

larger in size, but the fact is that there is no freedom in the west, and the terms democracy, they have turned into such an accusation. now, if they don't like someone, they say you don't have democracy. freedom you do not respect human rights, my god. what rights do you now observe human rights, where are they observed in ukraine, where is the fascist terror? you say why don't you see the lack of compliance there respect for human rights? why they don’t want to notice this, but they don’t want to notice it, because they have removed everything from democracy in its even form, there is liberal democracy, as it could be more accurately, probably, it could be called in the 20th century. the republican form of government, because the tops in the west are so afraid of the media from russia, because they are so afraid, and they are generally both freedom of movement and freedom of the word, as such, that they are already in antagonism with society. maybe

perhaps this antagonism is still immature. yes, but at some point, the conflict between society and western elites, it will lead to the fall of these western ones. these elites who started the sanctions war against us. yes, i think that china. you probably know without me what claims western countries make about the democratic system, nevertheless. and how, including a specialist in the political system of the book, the chinese authorities, firstly, the constitution is in effect, it is changing. it means something to chinese society. secondly, 2/3 of parliament. yes this the communist party, but the third of the parliament, a purebred 8 small party, agrees moreover, moreover, even if we say that there is a big action that unites in the constitution , there are elections at all levels from the head of the city district and try to somehow remove the governor the legislative assembly of the province should change and the most interesting thing is that the chinese are making demands. and for the new, she came up with about, techno -technological authoritarianism, supposedly a social

rating for us. made to believe that there points none of this is being charged, not a single chinese looks with surprise, what kind of social rating that you are trying to introduce to us, the chinese, this is not really there. there is a normal power of the people and the communist party takes into account the whole, as it were, the spectrum of opinions of the broad popular oils. yes, i can't react e the way i've been doing democracy all my life, history, theory, and so on democracy. it's basically majority rule. even liberal democracy is a manifestation of the majority. why didn't americans create democracy? first, they despised democracy believed that this is one of the worst forms of government founders founding fathers created the republic and what is a republic, and here, of course, not on anyone. here i will refer to the great maquis valley and the first decade of titanilius just writes about when the plebeians opposed the patricians and they were not expelled. as

usual, they were expelled from the polis system, and they created the institute of the people's tribunate, that is, the institutional protest voice was formalized and they had to negotiate, and therefore the mechanisms of checks and balances created a complex an unusually interesting system of power is the republic, and the latest means when e biden wants to oppose authoritarianism with democracy. this is complete nonsense, because it's one thing when communism and capitalism are fundamentally different systems that are existential threats to for well, that's understandable. in fact, it's just time for us to call a spade a spade. indeed, there is a clash between the forces of freedom of freedom from american hegemony and the forces that submit to american hegemony and therefore are called americans

democracy. and there is nothing else behind it. and if we look like this, up, we see something of ours, this is absolutely right, and therefore victory will certainly be ours. well, today we remember vladimir volvich zhirinovsky and immediately after us vladimir pozner interviews zhirinovsky well, the big game says goodbye to you. all the best to you. until we meet again. take care of yourself. state program today, well, you could meet his last name on ballot papers on various labels, as well as bottles. uh, well, in general, a lot of where i am i believe that you have already guessed who we are talking about. the leader of the ldpr party to fight with the vikiri

of the state duma vladimir volfovich zhirinovsky. hello, good evening. let's go more means, and at the beginning of the program, we always have , uh, there are questions from our viewers, they send them to the site, knowing who we will have, but i want to ask one question. uh, in the beginning, just pure curiosity, when you changed your middle name to zhirinovsky, you also wanted to change your patronymic. it's not really. interesting, so i'm the very beginning was recorded by the name of the mother, zhirinovsky yes kindergarten home, management and so on. why because she mani began to change marriage, they entered. but once after the war, not before and then, so that there were no problems. she remained with her last name, and led me everywhere. well , of course, uh, at the age of majority. you can , uh, change your last name, first name, middle name, whatever you want

, and that means, uh, it's been done. it was purely formal. it was in the registry office as if zhirinovsky and so on at school for 11 years in a nursery they left the garden, that i was also embarrassed by it, because after all, somehow people here are not russian. well, yes, to prove it. and why is this? yes, i also asked. well, well, thank god they didn’t , but you don’t know your last name, and you wanted to change it? well, i had such an idea, pure. here, well, aesthetically or what? well, somehow, everything seems to be such that her children from andreychich's first marriage wanted you. i have a first husband andrey vasilyevich well, then i am now glad to imagine all my life to bear the name of a stranger. by the way, torment the surname, the surname of the mother , we can take all the surname of the grandfather, but the patronymic could only be the father, even the patronymic father, patronymic. here in this sense. i'm even glad that i stayed. vladimir andreevich is not at all what vladimir volvovich, i agreed, yes , now already in these times, as if, of course,

gennady andreevich already has such things. yes? good questions, yes sergey sergeevich shadrin, he says, that's what you position yourself as an independent and oppositional politician, nevertheless , over the past 10 years, the current government with enviable regularity noted your legislative activity with high state awards in 2000 was awarded the title of honored lawyer of russia in 2006 the order of merit to transfer the fatherland of the fourth degree in 2008 the order of honor in 2009 the honorary competent president of russia for comparison the leader of the larger duma faction. here is the same gennady andreevich, who is not older than you, does not have any regalia from the current government. here, how do you understand that you are being awarded this what is being explained? uh, almost all deputies are awarded or ministers or governors regardless of political views, party situation. but the work they do. if, for example,

we, as deputies, don’t have it, we don’t have a brother on fire at home, for example, people who are sick with doctors don’t die there. if they die, how are they rewarded here, yes, that is, in this sense, for common work. let's say it's 2002. it's been years, er, 10 10 years. uh, look at the constitutions. we live lower, we live by it , there is a constitution, but we are the only party that insisted on adoption, because otherwise there is no chaos of the constitution. yes, and the elections were useless battles were planned. so basically you were rewarded. well, in general, for your work. but as a lawyer, well, we have adopted a thousand laws. the country lives. thus, in this sense, work is being done and will continue to be done. and it doesn't matter anymore. uh, so to speak, party sympathy and so on come to mind. solomonovich korzh asks you being half- jew all the time. talk about your love for this people, when you visit israel, it’s not

love that passes at least a little, or you are there too torment, then there was no love. uh, there was a period when we had, uh, such, as it were, maybe such an easy propaganda of non-semitism. these are the years there from the eighty-ninth to 95 participated in this. it just hung in the air. articles came out somewhere. there was something said that a comparison was made there. the first government of lenin stood there. there was the first government of yeltsin, that is, we never participated in the party program. there was nothing close to anti-semitism. i am different. i'll tell you. the only parliament in the world. here for some reason he does not notice this comrade. after all , it happened somewhere and is on the internet. i told the meeting room that the jews of the world's most talented folk measure did not speak of the old book. ivan the smell of nerds. so much worker, he undressed completely. so to speak, prepared by analysts randomly came out in the first building in all

subsequent selected 100%. well, i didn't read everything. i could n't read that they added it, that is, they put it in the lunch. well, of course, i gave my thoughts my thoughts. and it adds statistics. again i'll make some specs. he took this from the carrot man. it's not. italian can no longer italian sociologist who wrote about the short story to you. it has nothing to do with it. never bold and completely this denial went to israel at the invitation of a political party of one and all ivan andreevich kharchenko, whatever you would like to do when you retire. and by the way, how do you feel about the proposal of the minister of finance and the dark fund to increase the retirement age, then two questions, what would you like to do, and well, considering, let's say the work of a lawyer is connected with people, all the work of a lawyer, at least take risks , even a lawyer, even a prosecutor, a judge, and for the last 20 years, in general, voters have been meeting only with people.