yes, let's leave them in order to leave them, so that there are no provocations, so that, well, firstly, we do not set up belarus because, but they have already started there. uh, questions about the fact that belarus is a participant in hostilities, which alexander grigoryevich lukashenko denies in every possible way. that's why we didn't supply them. but at the same time, they covered the belgorod kursk and bryansk regions there, partially cover the border with our territory, partially redeployed in order to exclude excesses. but, although excesses are happening now, but, that is, there is a separate mobile sabotage group so exciting mortars, what is it called? that is, a civilian car drives up, uh, to make a few shots. so it was podsunji fired, here uh, border checkpoints and disappeared in the green, but they say they were found there and uh, as they say punished for it, but this kind of provocation, they are likely to be. and there was another attempt. it will hit belgorod, but

the air defense system worked. that is, it now holds the border there, but let's focus on this, because how it turned out. this grouping is very important, very important, because it has the most capable trained units there, so they sent this fifteen thousand strong, and sometimes they say twenty thousand strong, to help them, but these groups are small. as they say , the difficulties associated with heavy equipment, they need tanks, they need infantry fighting vehicles, and so we saw that around the world they are starting to collect them, they need artillery. that is, those units that they stood, let's say, that's all all weapons were given to the eastern group. well , uh, these maneuvers are more or less sorted out with maneuvers, but, of course, all maneuvers are on the ground. eh, this is also part of a big political, and game, probably, and in this sense , the mini statement is very revealing for me. the strange deeds of

our sergey viktorovich lavrov, who in his speech just touched on the reasons why the troops were withdrawn from here and how he understands the events that are unfolding against him after that, please. what is the reason for this frank false provocation, truthfulness, which is simply impossible to justify, we tend to think that the reason lies in the desire to find a reason to disrupt the ongoing negotiations, and to do it at the very moment when, as they say, dawned, even if not very bright, but still the light. maxim here, as a matter of fact, here is this construction, that there was a certain light, and we want this color to remain, but the other side does not want it, and in this sense, our, uh, withdrawal of troops from here, which we have just discussed. ah, well actually he was instantly answered by provocations in the bucha. in my opinion. this is an indicator of that. and what about those with

whom we are negotiating, in contrast to our readiness for this, they are not ready? and in your opinion, what is it? well, it is obvious that there is a party of war there is a party of war everywhere in ukraine, it is also on the one hand. here, when we even spoke with alexei before this program. he said what heavy losses the ukrainian armed forces are suffering. well, you probably have to dislike your country and your soldiers very much in order to want to fight before the last ukrainian. how can they want somewhere in warsaw or washington if you accept these soldiers as your own, the big question is for zelensky arrestovich and all this big top of kiev whether these soldiers are theirs, if the civilian population is not theirs for them , i repel from the words of sergei viktorovich, i try to decipher them, but the light of hope still dawned. yes, at some point in the negotiations, it means, but still there are representatives.

a beer that's obviously ready for something reach an agreement. now after bucci it will be much more difficult, but in general. if so, i do not rule out that somewhere in washington, warsaw, london, there are people who would like us to not only fight before autumn, as in the quote , we fought for several years, but there is a chance to reach an agreement if we silence party of war party of war in kiev party of war with us, who say that we must definitely reach the polish border. do you remember the day before yesterday there was a whole deputy of the duma right here, who said already, yes franz just picks up. so i was just stunned, in fact, that is, it turns out that the duma deputy is calling for us to send troops into germany after passing through poland. but this is a world war. well, not that i hope i just know that there, at the very top in the kremlin, such people do not share such a position. but if you know what, if you know, these people share a little, but which one? what do

you need to stop somewhere? to whom? well, this special operation is too expensive for everyone, it’s too hard for everyone, first of all for ukraine, but also for us. and if the poles, the british and the americans want our main ones, as here again, the words of alexei are followed by our main opponent. if want us to the end of time. uh, they fought. come on, i'll give you a direct answer. and you already there decide to answer directly or not, a direct question, but you are aware that for us to stop somewhere, and not where we would like to stop. this is equivalent. to defeat no, the direct answer is no, because in the course of combat it turns out that sometimes your initial plans are too optimistic, because they are based on too good information that

provided, that is, in fact, the value is in fact, and the leaders that they draw conclusions somewhere correct these plans. well, not just because they withdrew troops from three regions in order not to stretch the front line. so, initially this is too maximalist position. well , then it’s clear here, everyone said that there aren’t so many of our fighters, our guys there, in order to solve all these tasks, then the five millionth kiev then needs to be guaranteed, there is a military civilian administration. how many thousand people? look here . here, look, when you say, when i say that somewhere when we say you, you say more precisely, i don’t know i personally have no answer to this question. that's why i'm trying to look for him when you say that you will need to stop somewhere. you come from the fact that everyone is ready for everyone to stop somewhere, but here you are, for example, sava biden's national security assistant i in his words about what is included in their plans no

desire for someone somewhere did not stop i see and that there was a world i do not see. let's listen to him, shall we? did the events in bucha prompt the administration to reconsider what kind of military aid? we render to ukraine whether the supply of tanks will be the scale and depth, the efforts to acquire and transfer a variety of advanced weapons are extraordinary unprecedented, and they existed long before the advent of terrible cadres, you understand, yes, that is, he actually says that to us, to bucha something someday butch we will pump up and pump up pump up pump up. i do not hear in these words that one concept that you present. no, what, you need to negotiate about something, agree on somewhere to stop and everyone will arrange it. he tells us that the concept is just the opposite . moreover, i hear their statement that we in the united states and great britain will supply there such a number of anti-tank grenade launchers that there will be 10 grenade launchers per russian tank. as i

understand it, against these same er, stingers will be about the same, moreover, they no longer hide. what do the experts prepare? ukrainian outside territory of ukraine for you. e. now they brought it to me the pentagon said a small number of ukrainian specialists are in the usa where the use of american kamikaze drones is being trained and stoltenberg said yesterday that they really train american military personnel outside ukraine and so on, there and so on your opinion, in general , someone in the west has some idea. well, it means that the united states, that it all somehow stopped. i'm always interested. and what's really, and since i'm not military expert, and it's not good to interrupt. tom i also wanted to ask alex a question, but i'm not the host of the program time will tell i wanted to ask one question. this is what i observe if we experimentally test our advanced weapons in combat conditions. so now i see

it, konashenko tells me about it. yes, we talk about it, at least it hides a lot of things and they do it right, as it should be, right? but they tell me about this, and the west supplies some kind of second-hand to ukraine, not always. i just wanted to ask anita what's in the field conditions i process some kind of produces me this question excites. this is the first one. well, this is the question i wanted to ask, and it seems to me that it is necessary to look for an answer to it. second e with all the mumbling to maxim a and. uh, it's clear that i'm not a latent sadist. i am against the war and , accordingly, the death of people, but discuss these issues. i consider it completely redundant, because i hope that there are no crazy people in this studio after all. here is what i would like to say. the fact is that i am not satisfied with the relationship to

to all this phenomenon, ukraine because i have never seen a debriefing from the point of view of even classical conflictology, firstly for our society, judging by the eighty percent who support, and the supreme commander and the actions of the army, 80% of the population consider this conflict constructive so , but for ukraine it is a conflict. this is a bipolar conflict. this is a conflict. in any case, destructive is correct. that's why there are so many moments. it's a conflict that's recurring. yes, because i can bring you there, and yura's son bogdan khmelnytsky each time the same matrix is ​​reproduced and these hetmans flee. take the same places to turkey and poland, you understand. they seem to, well, now it’s clear with some amendments. this means that the matrix is

​​always reproduced. we even have orlikov lane in moscow in honor of that same eagle. e, who was an ally of mazepp in my opinion, yes, and the son of bogdan khmelnitsky was executed by the turks in the end. he went there from them to stop the authorities for cruelty. do you understand? i am more every time one thing and that is cruelty you know, and you know the battle on kalka 1.241 on m you know where you know where the rekalka you know, where you know forty-first, 23, or something, the river 1238 1.238, here yes, it’s clear that the river kalka was. right there in the donetsk region. i don't dive into deep stories. i say that the matrix of this conflict is very deep, and it is reproduced. it was reproduced 100 years ago, and so on, and yes, we understand that makhno and petliura are out of touch with the grushevsky conflict and the specifics of this conflict. and uh, as for, and

then i'll also speak out. no opinion where we can and must stop. for obvious reasons, if we are already spending such efforts and it is clear that the restoration of everything that is unconditionally destroyed there, and mostly, but in fact, with these terbats and other different ones, and so on, it is conscious that the entire perimeter of the border and coast should be under such control, so that nothing more gets into this country, neither from the point of view, ideological, not material, it is clear. that's all de fact, that is, de jure, will remain. i'm sure absolutely yes yura will remain ukraine in turn the united nations and we do not need it, we will arrange everything before it. if, for some reason, parliament wants to federalize shame, we will not be our job. but the fact that under our

control should be the entire perimeter. this is completely obvious to me, otherwise, there will always be this alexandra in order to cover the entire perimeter of the country. which itself may be unfounded. we can cite a thousand historical examples, but which are aware of themselves as a country in order to take its entire perimeter under control, you need to defeat this whole country and its entire army and change its entire system of power. the only question is militarization. how are you going to control the border of the country, if inside you, here in dnepropetrovsk, this shaitan has revived again, so this philator, you understand, he hasn’t squeaked for three weeks now. that is, you say, so it means that filatov will stay here , some kim e will stay there and so on, then here. and we are like this, listen to all this. yes , it's obvious to me how these guys can change quickly. it also definitely won't change.

here, then they will leave, because like this, and now i have very close relatives in europe , and they mean next, these are the refugees who have flooded in, from ukraine, who immediately began to speak russian. well, insofar as you know who my fellow tribesmen are, it means, it seems, there is less suspicion towards them. they are, as it were, conditionally russian, or not russian. here, they asked, what are you talking about, this is the same phrase from different people. they just put it together for me there's a chance, and sit in europe that's all, of course. well, that's all. here is this question about the ability, uh, to change shoes, and he is known, but changing shoes always came when they felt the strength of bogdan khmelnitsky, whom we always cite as an example. in principle, it’s not that he served the russian state endlessly all his life, but by the way, mazepa

served faithfully and faithfully to the sovereign emperor all his life, and then once he felt the benefit , he ran across and was forever jammed by a pole. we all know this. so after all, in your opinion, in order to so that some kind of change of shoes, running over, and so on and so forth, would happen . what is the condition of this there military political on the ground in politics negotiations. they don’t know that please, very briefly, then the change of power in ukraine and its re-establishment now. what concerns the doves of peace and hawks. i would like no labels to be attached to anyone here, and an objective look at the events taking place. and for the purposes declared by the commander-in-chief for this ongoing special operation. how are the representatives of the party, how do they consider themselves of the world are going to denocify, do you seriously think that they will denocify themselves,

for example, zelensky here is an arrestovich, who else will denocify filatov, they will binasify themselves after which, after the cia began to work in the sbu as an army, the whole uh prepared according to nato standards and the instructors who prepared them and representatives of nationalist organizations in this army serve and continue to serve, you want to say that they will be nationalized by the nsa which will be denotified. sorry, but nb which did processing centers, yes. and the control center, which today is located on the territory of ukraine, if you are talking about the fact that something was wrong here, then you need to deal with those sources that transmitted the wrong information, draw conclusions and go further and think about who to rely on .

and what should be done to ensure that the stated goals are achieved, or then it is necessary to change the name of this operation. and i suggested changing it a long time ago. in general, it should wear a clear contra terrorist color, because the war, which has been going on for 8 years, and i remind you for 8 years, there were negotiations that did not lead to anything these negotiations for 8 years, they could not agree. this operation was in many respects a reaction to the fact that the negotiations obviously reached a dead end and did not lead anywhere, and the war they waged was a clear terrorist color they were destroying. they terrorized their own people with harassing fire, so that the people of the donetsk region and luhansk left the territory, traveled outside the state for 8 years, this continued and these people which today they do not embarrass themselves to demonstrate and spread their

atrocities on social networks. they feel their impunity , they will continue to feel this impunity. in addition, in the territories from which the russian units leave, all the people who supported them in one way or another begin to persecute that you, in fact, propose to liberate the territories and, in order to again give the nazis the opportunity to establish own rules. this is our peaceful approach no , i think that we need to look objectively today these are calls for peace. i think they will not lead to good, initially ukraine was preparing. as a weapon against russia, i repeatedly spoke out and said that back in 2015 i described in a book what ukraine was preparing for, at the beginning they said this ukraine, not russia later, it was said to be anti-russia, and then it was clearly said that it would be at war with russia and will definitely

win this war. yes, any that we remain is a self -reviving system. it will be reborn and will again attack and threaten the russians and in this sense, by the way, here's to talking about dima militarization of denocification. here is ramzan kadyrov and yesterday, in my opinion, he said a very good phrase that , in addition to the demilitarization of genocification, it is necessary to carry out shaitani. this is where the shaitanization of ukraine is, and in fact these words are much deeper than it might seem to someone at first glance, because, in fact, a shaitan. this is in the muslim tradition. this is an analogue of satan, and we are here with you, and we have talked with you more than once, looking at all these bastards who people they finish off, shoot and after that they are photographed without hiding their faces with some absolutely satanic joy and confidence. we all perfectly understand that this is the idea that they

will change their shoes somewhere, shake up and so on. this is already a changed consciousness, with which some are probably needed . well, other methods of work in this sense, nobody knows what these methods of work are, but nevertheless , examples of more or less successful, uh, denocification were carried out in austria and in germany and the frg of that frg and in the gdr, but after what? uh, after the complete defeat of this country and the complete destruction of the former regime of videology in militaristic constructions in education. excuse me for some propaganda and agitation and so for me there. eh, here. here, on this program, daniil bessonov, deputy minister of the dpr, said for us half measures and half victory is a complete defeat without the complete destruction of today's ukraine in the state in which it is without, as vitaliy said, without return, without the possibility and, rather

, the impossibility of the revival on territory of ukraine anti-russia. taran nothing is impossible. all victims will be. excuse me for the vain pain of this. i will already tell you now. and uh, if you listen to podlyak's arrest, they already want to perceive. this is russia's retreat, as lavrov said, in the form of a step forward in order to negotiate. they perceive it as a victory, and moreover, they are already offering zelensky to join nato in order to enrich the western military culture. he is like the ability to defeat the russians in the new conditions. that's the worst thing about them, uh, they're even worse than bourbons. they didn't understand anything, they bled their own country, and they don't want anything. uh, understand for ukraine too sorry, i wrote and i will run. e-specially, the military operation is an

operation of liberation and protection for ukraine of liberation from this regime and protection from shaitanism from this shaitanist ideology, which, excuse me, is based on hatred, nothing works in ukraine without this, but now these shaitans or satanists . whatever you call it. now this hive. he was, as it were, so to speak, game, but stirred up. and now the question arises, well, as if everyone who dealt with bees understands that to stir up coal, and along the beehive, and then close it up with something and the bees somehow fall asleep there, it doesn’t happen, but i will say the following, that the army forever corrects politicians' mistakes. uh-huh , 1955, a mistake was made when these non-fingerheads who fought ah, let's say, well, the waffle ses there and other units released them. how are you on prisoners as the

fat of the stalinist regime, huh? uh, and this led to the fact that this is a shoot, then we grew up we see that this has resulted, so now, if they are conducting polls, and how do people evaluate this a-a operation and even question the military and what are they afraid of? what is feared by both the people and the army, by the way, they are united in this that they will be betrayed once again by politics. and by the way, this is what we had in history, when you remember, afghanistan, when our troops were withdrawn in the eighty-ninth year, and how were the wars of the afghans perceived? yes, we did not send you to this war. who are you, this is this afghan kink, it walked straight, like a fiery shaft through the whole country, that is, people who believed that they were defending our homeland. at the distant frontiers there were politicians thrown into the trampled dirt, afghanistan was not even a distant frontier. it was

the border side of the soviet ally. so, uh, now these are the parties of the world, which are now cackling around here, and the operations, both on the side of ukraine and here, they are trying to repeat this scenario, so that, by the way, it will appear again in their abroad. this conflict is called afghanistan 2:0. yes, they are trying with these sanctions. with these attempts to undermine our economy with the help of ngo structures controlled by them, and so on. that is, they are trying to replicate the effect. in the ninety-first year, so that our country falls apart again, but now completely, therefore, here we play not only the role of denisification of demilitarization. we are still fulfilling the role of preserving our state as a whole. and by the way, remember the words of our president, who said that many of the earths we handed out just like that. it's time to return them, so

our country. and, by the way, back in zhizinski he said that russia without ukraine is not an empire. and we need to stop being ashamed of our imperial roots, we are an empire, and when russia was an empire, then many peoples who lived in it, they retained their identity and did not simply disappear from the map, and here, and here we observed such a thing that they tried not to lime to zero, the people who spoke russian. maxim i can't imagine how we will continue to live with the ukrainians in one state, because the hatred on their part is colossal - it is felt both in social networks and in communication, when you ask a question maxim is a fair question. and what i did not hear. just when i talk about focus. excuse me, please, you do n't know how you're going to live when you talk to ukrainians. and i'm talking to

her as fascists. you know when the nazis will continue to live. i'm not going to live. in one state, those whom you consider to be fascists. do you think the current ukraine is too much so much. i believe that we will live in different states of the inhabitants of these states. they will dislike each other very much. if i ever find myself in europe and i will be very, uh, wary to see if there are any ukrainians where you say that you need to leave everything as it is, that they will put something in there for me, just, well, you need to understand that hatred for us. she became yurievich asked you a specific question. how do you imagine that neo-nazis will remain where they are now? i just want to say that the boundaries that can be to put, for which there will be neo-nazis, with whom we will be able to get along quietly for some foreseeable time, and not for that, and

indeed neo-nazis. they are not even grown as anti-russia, but they are grown as a denial of russia to drive the nazis behind some kind of wall, because of which they do not climb, it is impossible that such a wall does not exist, and a solution to the issue must be sought. the girl and one and was the other did not fit. its just beginning.

brainz the executioner all series on sunday on the first live time will show again pouring into information channel on the first anatoliy kuzichev olesya loseva we continue to follow the progress of russia's special military operation in ukraine so, in the frontier, the fighters of the lpr are knocking out neo-nazis who have settled on the firing points of mariupol in the area of ​​​​the metallurgical plant. azu, stand up, heavy equipment of the people's militia of the lc. the dpr is advancing on the

firing points of azov, which the nationalists organized in the residential buildings of the city.

the russian ministry of defense will publish footage of the impact of onyx supersonic missiles on the fuel bases that supplied the ukrainian troops the rocket was fired from the bastion coastal complex, from the black sea coast in the city of snegiryovka, mykolaiv region, the national guard seized a huge amount of weapons and ammunition. during the retreat, this weapon was handed out indiscriminately to the civilian population of the so-called defense, i will add that the snowman is one of the first large us.