people who kill civilians in order to hmm even some good attitude towards russia , e.g. buche should become a pretext for, let's say, the adoption of some tougher sanctions, that is, such a trigger, so that later it will justify itself to its voters. well , like where should we go? uh -huh well, fortunately, somewhere they still clumsily worked. punctures. i think that now there will be a lull e about the storm, that is, they will spin this situation, but without such a spark, one might say, but they will prepare some new, more carefully designed provocation. and we need to be ready for this. friends. you know, yes, we are talking about it. this is not the

first time we have been talking about this, of course, no one heard what vasily nikolayevich told you about this. yes , what they evaluate, it means it turned out well. no , let's move on. it worked. it didn't work. go ahead let's come up with new provocations a new reason vasily nikolaevich the last question. he's like don't laugh at me. but he really tormented me all this time and now he is tormenting me about the western audience there, on which this uh, so to speak, provocation in the bush was calculated, i see, well , what, they know there? what kind of russia is it, you don’t understand who the creepy strange people are, not smiling, you never know, but, probably, yes, what a horror western leaders are, it’s clear that cynical people understand, they don’t understand. they have their own tasks. they all it will still be used, but the most important thing you say is that it is also designed for the population of ukraine, i am trying to imagine. either you really need to brainwash, seriously, or something else needs to happen, or this situation itself, the situation of a person thinks it does not quite, as it were, adequate, but who do you have to be to see it, believe in it, assume that

can the russians really do it? you see, i can't get it in my head. it seems to me that this is some kind of wildness, some kind of fantastic plot, bloody fantastic and not in my head. but if i understand correctly, there, basically, in the minds of everyone, it normally fit in. tell me , vasily nikolaevich, calm me down, or vice versa, then, uh, so to speak, exacerbate my fear that everyone there has such heads in which this fits. you know, i will say this outwardly for everyone, but some sincere part believed it, and the other part is forced to mimic and pretend that they believe in it, because people are really afraid there, this is how we say, they are thirty-seven years old there repression, people were afraid to say something superfluous. so it’s worse in ukraine now, because in 1937 they were afraid of the state apparatus, and now in ukraine, in addition to the state apparatus , they are also afraid of, well, roughly speaking, the defense

of nationalist brigades of some kind. all people are just afraid, if you don’t say that butch is a terrible crime of the russian troops, then there is no guarantee that they won’t come to you at night, and i don’t know there, at best they will stick duct tape and fasten it to a pole, and at worst it’s just disappear. understandable fear. thanks a lot. vasily prozorov was in direct contact with us to a member of the security service of ukraine security council thank you yesterday, president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky delivered a video message e to a meeting of the un security council and he was so exalted so inflated like a soap bubble that this soap bubble allows himself to put it actually ultimatums that zelensky said either you exclude russia or he must dissolve himself, listen. where is the

security that the council must guarantee there is no security, although there is the security council as if nothing had happened, where is the peace for which the united nations was created. it is obvious that the key institution of peace, which should ensure that any aggressors are forced to peace. it simply cannot work effectively, ladies and gentlemen, are you ready to close the un, do you think that the time of international law has passed, if your answer is no, then you need to act now, you need to immediately force the aggressor to peace. need determination chain of massacres from syria, up to a som of years, afghanistan has reached the end of libya should be stopped and for a long time, but now it's time to transform the system with the core, which is the un to do this, we propose to hold a global conference, we ask you to do this already in mirny kiev to decide how to reform the global security system, how to the inviolability of state borders and the integrity of states, how shall we assert the supremacy of international law? show how you can reformat and work realistically

for the sake of peace, or if your current version has no alternative and there is simply no way out, then only the dissolution itself, then the dissolution itself was given. no. it is understandable that a deep understanding, so to speak, of international politics and situations and everything else and the foundations of legal functioning is felt. the current system. people it's not about that. here is alex how do you understand here? how do you explain this is amazing suddenly, suddenly awakened in zelensky. that is, if you say that the bubble is so to speak, saying, well, yes, they inflated, of course, and cheated, yes, but listen, but he behaves like this, either as a person who has nothing to lose at all, who has everything already. it’s already clear, therefore, you can allow anything, either i don’t know, this sudden cheerfulness, or he feels that there are some american hypersounds behind her back or something else? that what allows him to behave this way, that's right, everything that you now list everything is right. the fact is that yes, a person got into an environment unusual for himself and in a state of

passion he is capable of monstrous crimes. zelensky - this is very good. uh, illustrates and demonstrates this, we thought that a terbats are territorial battalions, and in fact they turned out to be terrorists and now in order to cover up the war crimes they are engaged in, and zelensky, his curators from mi-6 , are implementing these poorly done crafts of provocation, but distractions - creating a certain fund, informational noise, trying to switch the channeling of emotions that certainly arise as a result of military operations both in ukrainian society and in the western community on bad object. this is called, that is, a distraction to an unusable object. russia did everything, everything is to blame, russia and so on and uh, it actually works on western society, because it is distracted. it is e impressed by all this, to me there is obviously a psychological connection between what happened in odessa on may 2, 1914 . we remember all this, burnt yes people and

provocations in the bucha. that is, these are actually links of one chain, psychological emotionally these are apologies of one chain and now the guys who it was invented and implemented. they are trying to get fruit from this criminal tree, no doubt. ah, and they're trying to imagine. it's like you, remember, remember how after a while, a month later, in my opinion, or even earlier after the odessa events, they began to throw in, that the russians did it, that they did it? this is a provocation by the fsb and so on. here, approximately the same thing looks like hatred painted. how to say the fruits of the dehumanization of russia in order to isolate and abandon it, and so on, that is, in principle, in fact, everything rests on the banality of money, because the goal of the united states and the uk is to oust russia from the european market, everything, in fact, everything is simple there, just so simple alexey alekseevich even what is needed, so to speak, umnology comes to mind, a very unpleasant final solution of the russian question is what you described. yes, in fact , this is, so to speak, a general consensus on the

final solution of the russian question. sorry , but how else, and how else to understand this. how else is this understand? after all, he's just a governor. dnepropetrovsk said, if it all starts with the fact that somewhere yes, it always sounds hail , remember, yes, as in a movie there is a moment and uh, because you can laugh. yes, over this, as we called it parsley. they say on the hand, in fact. look, he is absolutely sure, he rolled up his sleeves, such a brave guy, but the fact is that he now felt that he was not the object of politics, but the subject we are observing. seemingly crazy picture when zelensky becomes the subject of the arbiter of the court in general, europe and the west, or such a sense of self. what is so inflated. you are right that the ukrainization of europe has taken place, the ukrainization of the west has taken place, and it checks whether you are with us or against us. but

euroskeptics european alternatives for germany are lindens. yeah, so you accomplices looked at this conservative sovereign moscow without gay propaganda with traditional values ​​​​and christians. so you are the accomplices of world evil, which means you must go to the markers, look. yes, it’s true, look at the ukrainianization, in general, and europe and peace. you look at these, it means people are unhappy. that is, he tells us zelensky, that is, either to dissolve himself. you are good for nothing , it means, either means that safety, if you change, or these are sitting. that 's how the bunnies are, they listen to nod. there, like guilty eyes on the floor. the truth is ukraine for the father and the truth is. so they don't listen at all. eh, carefully. so they think they analyze and then gene psaki. he says what he thinks about it, the white house will listen. resident zelensky expressed the opinion that the security council is powerless and

outdated, does the white house think that the security council needs to be reformed i think he obviously spoke of his disappointment, which we share that russia is a permanent member of the un security council we do not see the possibility of this change. even jennifer i'm sorry for saying this. i respect jennifer psaki. she seriously works for her and that's it. such a plus she is a mother. that's when he leaves, then and then shame on himself. but right now we can't do that. here, even jennifer understands that it smells a little. well , some kind of idiotic populism. yes, and very delicately. e explains this even. sorry yes security council which hmm requires a detailed consideration of the discussion, shall we say. estonia has prepared for shipment to ukraine e, 122-millimeter howitzer d-30. the fight. supplies for small arms body armor this was announced by the estonian embassy in ukraine. in addition, estonia urged other states and europe to follow its example. tallinn calls not only to

send weapons to ukraine, but also to continue strengthen sanctions against russia yesterday we showed just a picture of how the czech republic sends t-72 tanks zelensky they constantly say, well, you are not going to provide us with a security guarantee , united states well, at least you will help send us e soviet equipment, which remained the countries of the former warsaw pact, but although give some planes like this alexander nikolaevich i think this is just the same case when he demands to confirm with us on some actions. you or without the lord of culture. yes, that is, look, here it is about here is this shuffling that alice read, that is, this here. eh, it looks like it. this is not only funny, but also not funny, because this is the call of estonia, to which, of course , all those responsible will respond, so to speak with a strange leader , you understand, this is already a weapon. this is already death. they are just humor. well, that is, uh, zelensky tells them that they should disband themselves and show their loyalty and

commitment to the common cause in actions. that is, i mean the security council although when the united states america stopped before the decisions of the security councils, in principle it. yes, i want to say that zelensky is no worse or better than poroshenko, but he won the elections. he knows how to work with the public correctly, work with the media , it turned out that zelensky knows how to work with the public better, he presents himself well , works great in social networks. you are talking about the election period. yes, i'm talking about the election period and there is a feature film in which he plays the main role and one of the episodes where he with rapid fire machine guns are shot, which means the deputies, where this causes a huge enthusiasm of the public. yes, they are in the film alexander nikolaevich began to be shown in america in america for sure. i don’t know if they will understand me correctly, but to my surprise i found that on some russian channels they show feature films with the main roles of zelensky where he is, which means that in such a

good image, that is, some cable tv channels. of course you have to think. weird. a little strange. yes, on the other hand, i understand, and here he plays this role very well. he, of course, in some way feels the support of the united states of america. he is somewhere trying to use the moment, because before the provocation of staging buche to us. no worse, no better, and they will treat us the same way as before this case, but the local residents are, among other things, either helping or harming us, and, of course, it is necessary that the local population belong to the russian military. as bad as possible, you need to show this evil image of varvara as an aggressor who does not spare peaceful residents, and more degree on the ukrainian audience, because any time ago any movement of our personnel equipment. can not only be tracked via satellites drones surveillance camera. well, with calls from local residents

, in order for local residents to be involved in this process, they understand that they do not remain indifferent, they must constantly feed hostile attitudes towards our armed forces. those who killed a bunch of ordinary people like you. wife need to carry out relevant work need to be clarified, but to carry out the work, but also in action and, again, as a specialist in the field of the armed forces of my level, i believe that in order to prevent the delivery of weapons from some countries, it is necessary to destroy the communications through which they can be delivered, so someone wants then put. uh, there are no corresponding weapons to ukraine, there is no more bridge, no more railway. no, let's say some ukraine as it comes. they can go further, of ​​course, not in estonia, you don’t, peaceful people can’t touch anyone, everyone helps ukraine, we don’t have the right to touch anyone.

let the territory of ukraine help now, now let's listen to something else izlomsky offers. uh, so he'll bring it in, he'll dissolve it himself. yes, he sets conditions, but vasily is not a benzia, he also took the opportunity. i turned to zelensky at this meeting, let's listen to what he said. i would like to take advantage of the virtual participation of the president of ukraine in our meeting and address him directly. we leave on your conscience groundless allegations against russian servicemen, which are not supported by any eyewitness accounts. we are told that there can be no nazis in ukraine. however, we know perfectly well that you not only have them, but, unfortunately, rule the score. you simply chose not to notice the ukrainian nazis to me, pretending that they simply do not exist. and they,

unfortunately, there are especially many of them in the national battalions such, what a gift right sector. azov, they also act like nazis and kill. how are they, and not only in the captured russian soldiers with torment, which they then brag about on the internet, but also their own. your neo-nazi radicals are distinguished by their unparalleled cruelty to the civilian population, which they use as a human shield and install heavy artillery and mailing lists next to residential buildings. today we again heard a huge number of lies of russian servicemen. we have hundreds, if not thousands, not thousands of video testimonies of people who are ready to testify to the atrocities of ukrainian nationalists. yes and so,

let's see what the title came out with. e british newspaper. metro is very daring, they were outraged that russia dared to say something at all provocations in gucci well, that is, this is a topic that is available for discussion. only on one side , there can be no other side, and no evidence is needed. forensic medical examinations of the proceedings are not needed. everything is proven. well, olesya quite accurately described this, so to speak, and the level of western journalism and the general trend of discussion, such as someone who tries to at least squeak from the other side . you were a tip. well, i know what's going on in the papers, but i just want some. well, enough critical approach to this story. yes now psaki declares that it is impossible to reform, he dear colleagues, dear viewers, our minister of finance once said that the freezing of our assets by the central bank is impossible.

i remind you that we are in a completely different reality in which, twice in a row, the united kingdom, which the chairmanship and the security council, refused us a permanent member to hold this meeting as soon as possible so that this information wave does not sweep, we are now in a reality in which zelensky very importantly makes direct threats to our state to our diplomats. he is diplomats. there he threatened those people who work in our country. therefore, on the one hand , there are no legal instruments to exclude our country from soviet security, but i want to remind you that if they want, they will find another moment a month ago. i can't remember zelensky, who didn't know at all where he was speaking. at a meeting of the un security council, he at one time, in general i said that i am going to you now with and maybe the last appeal, because i don’t know if i ’ll stay. i'm not alive, and i have a question. here is what

the right things were talking about, and these hundreds of testimonies of documented facts, mockery of our prisoners of war about how these nazis use their own citizens as peaceful shields. i have a simple question that i think everyone in our country is asking. we still consider this president zelensky to be legitimate. we still believe that this ukraine, which is headed by such a person and the corresponding system. we will be able to agree on something, and then these agreements will be implemented. you see, the famous expression yes is very banal and simple fish. rotting from the head. on the one hand, we are talking about the fact that this fish is really completely rotten to the ground, because these are nazis, because this is russophobia. it's not human cruel to say. wake up the world community. open your eyes. look at these heinous crimes. not at all wake up, yes, they will not open their eyes, and until then, in my opinion. this is my point of view as long as we believe that this power is legitimate, nothing can

be changed, not only in ukraine, but nothing can be changed in the first place, including in international institutions. because if you give these scoundrels the right to speak in these institutions, these agendas will be there for me. yes , here we are talking on an equal footing, and therefore let's listen to each other. see. you say so far as long as we hold this power legitimate. yes, but how can we not consider it legitimate. well, what to do? with whom then to negotiate? here. well, as you see this situation, you know, i just suggested this formula. olesya rightly clarified what i meant, please, i was asked a question. yes? can i answer about what kind of negotiations to conduct, and history shows that the negotiations, or rather, history shows that there are certain goals goals were identified by our state. there are two ways. but these are the goals that the people spoke about the president stop reading this power as legitimate

there are goals that our president said correctly, these goals can be achieved by military means. and these goals can be achieved through negotiations, what i see now, at least i can be wrong, maybe everyone has their own point of view, the negotiation process, the one that was outlined positive, of course, and we all hoped for this showed that the negotiation process itself the process for the ukrainian authorities has no value, as soon as there are some concessions, as soon as it was, kind, will practically. you all know this. we closely followed the negotiations all of them answered alice's questions. so, how technically to stop considering this elk i am also very worried about this power to stop reading legitimate just to fulfill you in military purposes, which are negotiations. wait, look, well, friends, now we don’t shout, that is, i’m trying, we still have to work with the audience somehow for the viewer. that is,

simply ignore, do not consider that they even exist in the world to do their own thing, have you read milosevic's americans, legitim? well, excuse me for these examples, they considered hussein, they considered gaddafi, they did not consider them, they performed tasks even after these tasks were true. no, there is a similarity here. what i'm talking about is that it's very easy to read this regime as illegitimate. that's all. yes, lyosh, please, but listen, it can be considered illegitimate that it is now 2022, for example, someone will disagree there, he lives according to the jewish calendar, someone according to the old church slavonic and so on. you can't change this reality . zelensky does not change. no. at zelensky has a platform. he goes to e, so to e, he is together. and nikit danya says, but we will not consider him legitimate, and what will change for us and what will change from this when the state says then it will change when a person. i didn't mean you mentioned my name, so i didn't mean i'd answer.

sorry, right. it is important for us to understand, really, what is happening is important to us. it seems to me that we are not yet able to convey our own point of view to the west, what do i mean when i say to the west, it's just us we are well aware that the leaders of western countries do not hear a damn thing. they just don't want to hear russia's arguments. but it doesn't matter, everything was squeaking boeing butch there. they do not want to. it seems to me that we need to knock and knock on the door of the western inhabitants. how one way or another it is the western layman who shapes. yes, look, lyosh, you should listen, we, uh, how will i tell you, then no. no, not how, but what conclusions can we draw from green. actor we see that the western owner is short, which means zelensky actor. we see that he

he won this game applause that, yes, now in its place, when we say that it was he who was not at ease. no not like this. he he plays. this is what he plays for. and how is knocking out using that very new sincerity, and we see that everything that ukraine does is aimed at emotions. not for rationalism, not for nationalism, when azina is a short format, i need commercials, videos and so on. here's exactly what will happen. it seems to me that the audience, everyone will say appeals, but the only thing that i will allow myself to say so is not in quality, so tell e there participants as an arbiter to say what is what. what is a small flaw? it seems to me that nikita is your reasoning, namely zelensky is right. alexey speaks at the un security council under you are right under applause, so to speak, diplomats of the leading countries of the world, we declare it, so to speak, the illegitimacy of our

point of view, we oppose ourselves not to him, but to all this community, which his hand splashes precisely. maybe it's right. maybe inside ourselves we think so, but is it right, so to speak tactically, or he can strategically oppose himself to all these people who are sitting there in the social security. and in general, out, but in fact we will thus oppose ourselves to them now for this or not, a separate discussion, we’ll talk, i repeat, but i now want to speak with yuri podlyako and i’m sure to talk. and it will be useful and interesting for you, yuri ivanovich hello, listen to us, yes, if you want to speak on the topic that we discussed, please, i know you listened to us, and then we will turn to the situation on the fronts, please. well to begin with, about the entire world community, in fact, as shown in the vote. stations against russia, uh, if we take the population of 4/5 of the world community, just not against russia, therefore, about raising the question of the legitimacy of zelensky's power is more than relevant. how to do it technically know? everything

is very simple - it is the world practice to recognize this regime as terrorist proof that it is engaged in terrorism. yes, of course, western countries do not recognize this, but there is our a position that we can defend and, accordingly, put zelensky in the position that he is a terrorist, proceed from this. if the western partners, the so-called ones, insist on negotiations with these guys, first , put things in order so that they stop engaging in terrorism, namely, shoot prisoners . namely, hide behind the population. namely, this one and further down the list, and then maybe we will talk about something with them, but for now they behave like terrorists, and they behave exactly the same as the vilovites exactly the same in their the time of the flyers. why were they labeled terrorists? indeed, there was a cipher story here with a continuation on saturday on pervoi it is clear that

, returning to our discussion, there are no legal grounds for legitimately withdrawing russia from its security. and even more so, there is no un, but all this is true for me. times are so unprecedented right now. and here you are, please, confirmation of the unprecedented number of russian diplomats from eu 315 in the entire history of diplomatic relations. think about it.

yours

i open.