they warned, and there are people who see it for sure. putin would not have allowed this in a different way. we certainly would not have gone, and precisely on the basis of these considerations. today, of course, slowly you need to do your job. and the farther, the more the united states will understand that everything will be exactly the way it is, and not the way they conducted and chose their targets. about the middle east oh, and you know that the united states needs to be convinced of something. if a strong defeat, yes, i do not need their conviction absolutely in the sense that by the strength of our opportunities, this is what we are talking about, alexey petrovich , well, uh, if we talk about what is happening, you need to turn to the year 18, when our president uttered such a simple phrase, you did not hear us, now listen direct call. us hegemony because the us considered itself at that time before this was trump's february speech that they had a new nuclear doctrine that they would present

a new world order. here, about which, by the way, biden speaks, for which one must fight, and now russia has become whole, as they say, an obstacle for this new world order to begin to spread, and it is not easy to use nuclear weapons against russia, because not everything is with the nuclear arsenals of its nato countries, as we would like it to be, perhaps there, after all, they would have hit and would have gone into all serious trouble, but it turned out that they couldn’t hit, and therefore a bet was made on operations in the so-called gray zone, that is, the expectation that something inside us, some kind of agenda, would explode. and it will weaken us , too, did not grow together. then it was necessary to show that after all, in this world, the united states remains a kind of strong state that can steer the world agenda. and ukraine blazed, and how did we find out that in ukraine there are biological weapons and nuclear weapons, they were not going to create and created and tried to use these against us, but most importantly, they brought up in ukraine the force that

was supposed to destroy us, the force that similar to us, but in the image and likeness, but the inner content is completely different. yes the power that says they have their own ancient god, that god which i do not admire, and we call it a simple word satanism, because what we see is what is happening now during this special military operation. here are the atrocities that they demonstrate, here are the lies that they demonstrated, all these fakes. it's all part of one big plan that was to come true. they launched it earlier in the same way as it was with the maidan in the fourteenth year. they calculated it a little later, but launched it a little earlier, and therefore they have this bar does not work, so they go all-in-all for the wonderful world and for this they persuaded all their european officials who are sitting on allowances, who receive some kind of salary, who do not care about the europeans, who are now facing economic strings. they go for broke, that's why they go breaking bad, that's why

borrel breaks down when he talks about what they say on the battlefield, they already break down, because everything is collapsing for them, because what they planned to do to europe is to do single a monolithic europe without any contradictions, which do not have the national interests of individual states, but there is a single euro-atlantic security that does not have borders of euro-atlantic security outside the region. it spreads to the whole world, so the japanese and south koreans are present on the lieutenants themselves, because this strategy, which they did not come up with, spreads to the whole world. and the nato bloc is a power fist, an armored fist that must equalize. surface as they say on those states that carry against. another state opens the door, please, welcome nato become with us. they are given. green energy, all sorts of other benefits of civilization. we must enter into this, and all the rest should be absent, and in all their plans

, russia is always isolated, and in all their plans , russia must cease to exist, but russia does not stop, therefore, they have such an animalistic determination, no matter what you do began to reach their strength, i am what we are now and watch, right? well, actually there, uh, their ancient god was most likely satan, because in fact, god is with us. that's for sure. ah, christendom. well, since the west is already where it was christianized. the orthodox world is with us, the world of islam is with us, and it is not by chance that kadyrov, he says, is going to deal with the nazis and shaitans. that 's right, satan is the devil. well, actually , these are the people who are in many ways the same people who fought the same world of buddhism, which turned out to be with us the world of hinduism, which also turned out to be world religion. you don't take it anyway , it turns out that god is with us. and here it is highlighted. uh,

just the devilish idea of ​​this western community is completely christianized and it is the embodiment of absolute evil, and we are good at it. we see in many examples the most recent ones. in my opinion, probably the most obvious one that everyone understands is this igil-style video, shot naturally, like the igil videos by the british a girl decapitates a russian soldier with a sickle , show vitalyevich what is this? there is no other explanation for satanism here, because it also happens that isis is developing in ukraine. we talked

about this just during the operation in syria and at that time the ukrainians. this was the reaction . what yes, well, what kind of igil, what are you talking about? we have a completely different one here. here is lined up politicians in the state. and vice versa, they pointed out that they definitely did not have fascism, but somewhere far away, and as a rule, they showed on their neighbors to the russian federation, this is what is happening - this is preparation for the so-called long guerrilla war. they are already now declaring that, uh, some such. well, i don’t want to call him a non-politician or anyone there, well, such a freak, here is a ukrainian arrest officer. he declares that they will fight until the thirty-fifth year, then stuffing now went to social networks, which is supposedly. uh, decisions are made at the level of their so -called president that there is his decree and start waging a large-scale war, including

including on the territory of the russian federation, as far as it is there. true information is hard to say, but it has already begun to spread in networks in social telegram channels. we paid attention to it. and here's what happened in nato, we discussed the 8th of the broadcast here. at that time, i expressed my point of view that the west would strive to stretch the front in order to present even more threats, er. uh, the russian federation, and today the ukrainians are already saying that the weapons that they are supplied there are ballistic missiles, they promise them and tanks promise them and promise them. uh, anti-ship there, uh device. that's all. this suggests that they will fight and wage this guerrilla war. in my opinion. it is necessary here. i am

not the person who will discuss the decision of the armed forces of the russian federation, but in my opinion there are some issues, especially those related to the points of making managerial decisions, and our president spoke about this here. this is what you need to think about, where decisions of this level are made and it is necessary to strike under the decision -making points; they must be eliminated. i say again when these interballistic missiles will be available. god forbid they fly towards russia, then you need to understand who supplied them with these missiles or german tanks or german tanks will be. what is not clear? well, this is understandable. yes, these are centers, of course, and it is from these centers that the ukrainian army is controlled. look, i’ll say specifically, then more, it’s clear today the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine is operating, there

decisions are made. no, he's a mini performer. no, he executes the decision. i'm sure the overall command is not a military operation. in general, this is quite widely known to be carried out from the pentagon, certainly on the spot. here are the military who are here in mariupol, they are nato and they are also nato in the headquarters. and also they are in the security service of ukraine, representatives of the cia, i have repeatedly said that there are data centers on the territory of ukraine, these data centers were created by the nsa and they work and the adoption of managerial decisions, including on the basis of the processing of those data that occur, are made there, well, they are made. i think again in the general center of command. well, i’ll literally say that this center is good, but on the battlefield it plays a role for soldiers. this time. secondly, you see, there are pupils to the sea. this is another amazing thing. you

know, it feels like we're meeting. here is january, 43 years. here is this gumrak airfield in old town. and when these germans are on planes that fly to the mainland and falls breaks. that is, take it into your head, here is the very moment they are gathering. to evacuate on ships to ships that are captured there, where the kerch strait will meet them everywhere, do you understand what the situation, what general staff is almost a wild panic, even where it is called? that's what scary data centers, maybe there and so on. well, on the spot on the spot, when the question of life and death all gets out the question of life must be saved somehow. well, you know the strategic issues. e wars play a much larger role. than even there the heroism of a particular soldier on the battlefield is yes, this is understandable, the psychology of the people who are there now in mariupol, uh, the people there are different, but, of course, they are all united by the fear of death. this is all obvious, but there are decision centers, the decisions that

sergey lavrov spoke about today. actually evil walks from there. what do you think, that it is in ukraine that the decision is made at the general staff of the point to hit the station in kramatorsk where they are going? people specifically for the evacuation, to kill them for two days to collect. this is what, this is what will be is that the decision was made in some data center, right? or in some general staff and ukraine no, of course not. well, their goal, uh, the defeat of russia is quite obvious and the war is not up to the last ukrainian to the last russian. and that's what we should all keep in mind. analyzing both american european and ukrainian policy, we will continue after advertising. you shouldn't be so nice to me, why

shouldn't you be so good to me before. you go no one will recognize the premiere of a multi-part film, watch after the program time when exactly i lost you, what should i do? i love you. you then already looked for the second time, we check the history of the car about the car for 25 years.

1tv cinema presents, well, congratulations on the appointment of the service, the center of your importance has temporarily canceled, another

officer from moscow has been appointed acting brother, you are the lead of my wife's daughter. hello, you yourself must find out what kind of rat has wound up in our department, you understand? himself, as he is talking with someone from the center and asked to send an independent person. mom really wanted to get married, she will give the task, you can invite to the dance. do you hear me? what will you do? just try them. why did you set up this church? then the movie 1tv ran away from you represents the local kupchino gromov did not share with his son a certain city ritual anfis is all over. wash now petka

get ready. represents one two times, two, three four, plus the entrance is the most mathematical animated series in the world, it will help you creatively approach a variety of life situations music and mathematics. here are the best friends, mathematics saved my symphony such as the cat on the channel about to know more about the channel can be found at 1tv.ru/o. on the air of the big game, us presidential security adviser sullivan said that one of the goals of the current western policy in connection with ukraine is

to strengthen western unity. western unity is not all right. recently, the greatest concern is not even so much, hungary, with which, more or less, everything is understandable. where did you go to france yesterday? uh, the presidential election held the first round. uh, the first round brought macron and marine-liten to the second round - it was predictable, but there were, and i believe, several surprises, and elena kondratieva and elgero are in touch with us, who is closely following. naturally from paris behind the vicissitudes of french politics. uh, elena uh, good evening. i personally have two questions in connection with this. vision of the election results, well, the first question. uh, how did it happen that, uh, when counting votes up to 70% of the votes

, marina repen was in the lead, and then suddenly when counting the next thirty votes. uh, macron, sharply pulled ahead. i didn't quite understand how there was also a second question that i had. this is where they went. uh, the traditional big french political parties, after all, throughout all the decades, uh, the fifth republic was dominated by either the gallists, uh, de gaulle chirac, uh, sarkozy, uh, or the ram socialists, yes, and there are none, uh, and here is valeria excellent received less than five percent. the leader, er, well, gaullists in essence and socialists are less than one and a half percent. this is an amazing result of what is happening in france . well, first of all, there is nothing surprising in the alignment, with today's election, uh, i personally don't see it. secondly, the first big mistake in valeria epicas

cannot by any means be called a gaullist. i have already seen that some russian analysts. eh, they were very enthusiastic about this person and e ranked her, one might say, the holy of holies of french conservatism. uh, calling her selfish. uh, apparently, because some of her relatives are there. uh, dad, grandfather or uncle. i already remember them. ah, really supportive. uh, shard party more in itself, uh in itself political figure or fine no relation. even close to a hot de mountain, it has no charisma in any parameters, which are absolutely not, and the more than deplorable result it received was quite expected by absolutely all french analysts without exception. valery just this is rather the life of a skordist, that is, that is, this is a person who maintains views, and, uh, very cautious not at all, this is the very policy of a zheskar that passes between the line and or even

through the water without wetting his pants. e in lipecress. e suffered. i would just say a very shameful shameful defeat. yes, and now e because she did not even take five percent. eh, since morning. uh, hmm clicked cry uh to the fees, uh, so to speak, to compensate yourself, uh, losses from the election campaign, which also, in general, does not decorate . and without that, uh, deplorable image, uh, of this political. you can say a leader everywhere. there is practically nothing besides ambitions, uh, including uh, everything that i said can be attributed to the same row and the fact that one of the first people who spoke immediately after the announcement of the results. uh, valery petra called on her followers of her voters to vote for, uh, president of akron. eh, with this in general in these elections

it turned out very interesting, because i think that it is very important to need. eh, it is simply necessary for all those who wish to understand the real deal. here are these political forces to see for whom e in the second round they call on their voters to vote for the loser lady yes, including this is very important. and here's your second question. where did the parties go the parties were successfully and expectedly fragmented. uh, first of all, by shifting the meanings of e, you know , western democracy has reached such a degree of perfectionism. e in technocracy, carried out in life, what exactly is completely no longer needed. and for a long time already it is not necessary to falsify. whatever results. whatever the election, because the brains of the population for decades. uh, the planned policies are so well washed. eh

, how, for example, you sincerely believed that valery petras uh represents, uh, coybet, in any measure of de gaulle's party. e, for example, the majority the majority a significant number , let's say so voters, even french ones, still manage to be convinced that the party, such conservative parties as marina luten or erika zimura, are ultra-right parties, nothing to do with real concepts such as ultra-right or radicals, right-wing radicals or left-wing radicals these games do not have, but, unfortunately, absolutely all french analysts know about this and are much less known abroad, so the results were, of course, expected. no surprises have happened yet, and, certainly won't happen in the second round. unless there are extraordinary circumstances. e

of such a plan that, for example, i just listened to you talking about mariupol. e events. so, if i'm talking about extraordinary circumstances, at any given moment, then the fall of the meteorite is the landing. i don't know e alien landing. or for example. uh, something interesting, found, uh, in mariupol, if it succeeds, of course. uh, uh, take it alive with documents and give it all to the world to the community before the start of the second round, but you're talking about the fact that there will be no surprises if uh macron wins, i understand. of course it's good. thanks a lot. well, i must say that when i said, opekrest, like ogolists, it’s just that the republican party is positioning itself as the heiress of the gaullists. i did not in any way suspect that pekress is a

de gaulle-scale politician there and i assure you elena in russia understands quite well what ultra-right politicians are. i am personally very familiar with marina le pen uh, and i know what kind of person she is, what she is, but, and you still haven't answered the question. what happened to the vote count. eh, well from your answer. i realized that they consider honestly there. absolutely not. what about the vote count ? well, firstly, because i have been living here for more than 30 years, uh, i vote regularly, and i repeat once again that this does not require any falsification at all, the vote count showed absolutely the same ratings that absolutely all analytical structures. that is, there were no surprises. e rick zimur. i even got a few. i would say a little more than expected. eh, you understand? i am why i necessarily insist on the fact that this is not

necessary brainwashing. uh, it's already so good that people are scared of the very possibility of simply, like any changes , uh, based on those horror stories that have been stuffed into their brains for decades, in principle, this is an election to choose. there is especially nothing to choose between the already known disappointment and intimidation still unknown. here are the horror stories that mie is crammed with absolutely all the french media all the french media all the french media are almost a mountain behind the president of the macron, who was made in 6 months at one time, literally blinded to his knees. i am not afraid of this expression. dove. he was right, giving him a party that had never existed before, and in the same way they played with a bang, and put him, so to speak, on the reign. ok, thanks. yeah, thanks, elena, well, you know

the president. uh, or rather presidential candidates bytan was also supported by all the media of the united states. but it took monstrous falsifications to get him to the presidency. it is clear that there are so many international observers in france, and there are no other organizations there. therefore, we cannot share your absolute certainty that these methods are not used there, methods that are actually used everywhere in the west, and we know this very well. andrey ivanovich i very briefly in a short time the elections are insanely important. let's remember that france is the only country in the european union that has the right to veta in the light of security and that has nuclear weapons. england remained across the strait here too. of course, that's a very good question. who can move the situation there the driver will not know. the west, even if it finds something about it. if we capture some documents, they will block all information about this and the west will not know about it. this is the first second. it recalls that

yes party big parties that were really famous, not only the tripod of france but italy they this new era has disappeared, they do not understand this a little. naturally. here is a cadre, so to speak, class society. uh, france is going to the fact that italy has come there, alieva is such combinations, yes, and those are the socialists, there are gaullists, they dissolve, and yes, such synthetic voters and synthetic candidates. now we see, in fact, this is really a very big game. they were really very worried about the overseas masters of europe who saw that these were their low moods. they already failed budapest where there was nothing to be done about the huge advantage. and here, of course, will not play on the tip of the pastries called for the last and see, but u france you know the country of revolutionaries. eh, i brought my wife there somehow. here it shows. she says how beautifully the paving stones are laid out. i say you know that this paving stone with that or eight times was dismantled only

for badikat. we see what happens there every time. i think even if it is some kind of hint that there is some kind of going on. u say falsification, then the french will not be silent below , so we will still understand. well, let's see for sure. uh, the elections are the second round ahead, but it is already obvious that there is such a gap that was in the previous elections, when the macron won in the ratio of 67, 33. it is already obvious that the macron and his policy, including with regard to russia, will not survive quite serious economic problems . inside france causes serious rejection. but this uh brings uh nervousness inside the uh north atlantic bloc, including in terms of military supplies, which were uh promised and delivered and this is actually a serious issue. after all, france is also a country that delivers not only is

such a country, it is a nuclear power. here is a country that still has its own military-industrial complex. this is a country that has concluded an akhinsky treaty with germany. she is such a macron rebel, she is the figure who tried to lead the european agenda. e in this conflict. if you remember, he is very long and persistent. eh, god made a voyage to our country. ah, got back on the phone with our president. that is, he recovered to play the role of such a major european politician and it is clear that certain forces were behind his actions, which in this way tried to negotiate with russia about some kind of compromise. now, for example, he didn’t come, yes, we don’t talk to scholts, he came, uh, another person from austria who also brought us some kind of package of agreements there, in which the ukrainian agenda also sounds and it’s clear

that all these guys have. if we start when we we come to the front line there we go to the position. we see their signature, which yes, there is also their weapon. there are french grenade launchers. there are french means of communication, there is h3, there are german ones, which are just not there . they were born like that, they forgot to tell them, that is, we see that france is maneuvering between the trickles, as she said here, yes, she is trying to play, somehow and yours and ours, but here this game it becomes more and more clumsy, and therefore, if the macron remains in power. we understand that he will pursue some kind of predictable policy, but it will not be pro-russian . e that some will be reliable, but it will be about the french maybe, marine le pen

in any case, has always been guided and will be a guide with common sense. uh, unlike macron, who is always guided by american interests, and that's for sure. big difference. but this change is not only in the rhetoric of western politicians who talked about the military victory over russia, but also in real politics, which are now aimed simply at pumping weapons into ukraine and fighting for the last ukrainians. in fact, it means a course towards the war to the last russian until the destruction of russia, and we must perceive it in this way and the practical conclusion that we must draw from the words of borel sullivan and others. actually very simple. they leave us no other exit. we are obliged to win a military victory, and this is what we are talking about now and there is no other way to solve it, not geopolitical or geo-economic.