or at the points of issue of orders at the public or at your own chicken or egg pickup or delivery , we understand how much you decide during the day, so the world map works for you every day. and bonuses from sper. thanks supermarket. order, first delivery free of charge anxiety anxiety, insomnia so in a circle you can help yourself cope with anxiety and insomnia 4 weeks for the most pronounced effect. i am ready to dedicate all my time in the dance studio, but you know why i'm not ready to put my business on pause, get free service for 6 months and 15% on the opening bank account balance. the novelties of which

there is nothing new sberbank changes the rules. meet osago in a new way reliably saving up to 50% registration online and in offices first first i'm first first i'm first no i'm first. no, i'm with a megaphone every first. plug in the option.

philips oneblade hair dryer, hair straightener and other philips beauty products at great prices prices why do you need so many cards, if any, one halva with an installment plan for 10 months up to 6%. everything i need from different cards is in halva just one card for everything pentalgin is the number one remedy for spasm and inflammation pain with periodic female headaches and other types of pain pentalkin will do without pain vtb team and get more from it issue vtb multicards for pensioners will be clean at 2.000 rub. and an impressive rate on the savings account, everything will turn out easily. there 's a big game on the air one of the main tools

hybrid war of the european union and the collective west against russia, there are certainly sanctions today in luxembourg, and the eu council at the level of foreign ministers began to discuss the sixth package of anti-russian sanctions, which, according to, uh, some countries, included the issue of oil mbago. true already at the end of the day, josé borel, the head of eu diplomacy, said that there was nothing, uh, agreed, and we really would remember with what difficulties the european union adopted the previous fifth, uh, package of sanctions against russia which include, as an embargo on coal imports from august this year. not right away, but since august, but at the same time, the european union constantly insists that the sanctions will be tightened. yes, and it seems like the fifth package was already accepted with a huge creak, but there should be sanctions. eh, should be tougher. i want to ask alexander

vyacheslavovich losev where to tighten sanctions further, yes, because each next step will cause more and more pain, more damage to the european union itself. well, i think that they are playing for broke. their task is at least this one. total war to make russia retreat, retreat, therefore the fourth fifth does not retreat the sixth does not retreat the seventh thirtieth and so on, but does not retreat further. uh, already europe is faced with a choice. and what's next, because if europe reduces the supply of energy, then it loses half of its energy, and the level of development of civilization and the comfort of people's lives, e it depends on the amount of available energy. that is, if europe goes in terms of energy consumption in the sixties, then 200 million europeans become superfluous. and they simply do not survive there, because here, squared, in the number of the population , everything is proportional to the amount of energy consumed. and what to do with them? either

these europeans will have to be disposed of somehow, they will have to be sent to america or a new crusade will be announced and it will capture the middle east, which, by the way, uh, is more likely that the europeans will inflame the americans. uh, a new conflict in the middle east already this year to get the very energy that they do not want to give up from the russian energy. something needs to be replaced, but they will also receive a stream of refugees, they will receive everything, they will receive everything, and it seems to me what the goal of those who are launching here is. now the crisis is simply to accelerate the crisis that is inevitable. the fact is that the world economy, and it is already in the crisis park. and that's what's happening in international global markets. as the bubbles are already starting to collapse there, uh, and we understand that by the fall. uh, this clap, he has bubbles will lead to the global financial crisis, and after it will follow an economic crisis that we haven't seen since 2008 and now, russia this is, well, such an uh reason to launch this crisis, immediately immediately blaming

russia for this everywhere, why is this being done? the fact is that the owner of capital and means of production began to share less with state people, that is, the capitalist economic model. it has come to an end. it is necessary to sharply reduce consumption . i don't know, there's a million, maybe be uh 100,000, uh, which has already stopped sharing with everyone who has accumulated a colossal amount of gas. it just redistributed. uh, some specific benefit to all these people. yes, that is, by creating a dystopia, the worst dystopia in terms of yelling. and as a result, war is a war - this is the best reason to scare the europeans, scare the americans and say we are in such a distress. we have to switch to cards. there are groceries we are obliged to reduce consumption because of the evil putin from russia but at the same time they will achieve their goal, that is, they are going to dystopia, they will build it. thank god we're

getting out. from this model, yes, and we will not have a dystopia, because we are now defending our e, sovereignty and defending our future. well, as the results show, so far the first round of the presidential elections in france. uh, ordinary french and europeans don’t really want to, uh, reduce their use of tightening their belts and agree with this dystopia, maybe in the future under the threat of war and agree, but for now, something doesn’t look like, and so in my opinion. uh, very important important outcomes. uh, this first round was not a macron's victory at all, it was predictable, but, firstly, the crisis of traditional parties and, secondly, the size of the protest electorate, because look, the socialists, but scored less than two percent. and the gallists scored less than five percent. and if we add up the votes cast for marine le pene, jean luc

melenchon and rick zimur, and these are just e -out-of-system let's say protest e votes, we get a figure of 52.17%. 52, that is, more than half of the protest vote. comment i agree with you, especially if you even listen to french political scientists. they say that french democracy is in crisis, that there is a large number, so to speak about the senteists, who did not come, this is not a record of 25%, which means that in the first round of people did not come to the polling station in 2002, 28%, but nevertheless less than a quarter of the electorate. i mean, these are the people who, uh, think they're useless to us. we have already gone more than once to these elections , nothing changes the amount and, therefore, as a further fragmented society. here. one french the sologist has described this society very well in speaking of the french archipelago. that is, these are

various social faults - these are faults, which means in terms of the standard of living. this is the rift and the territorial outback. e cities are social faults and so on, as these are faults, and finally religious ones, because we see the whole quarters. there are hundreds of so-called difficult quarters in france where people live according to their own laws, where there are no republican laws, they talk about it all the time, and therefore they don’t know how this society can give it a new impetus no one including macron, you were talking about ration cards. by the way, problems are being worked out in france. so not a problem. perhaps the introduction of food cards for low-income segments of the population gasoline costs 2 euros. here, well, transfer to our money. i think it doesn't seem like much. that's why the problem is really big and you said about the crisis, which means systemic. party indeed they have been for 30 years minimum. even more were at the helm of france back in 2012, the egoist socialists were

the main winners. quite right. now, years ago. now this means tcross 5%. 4.7. yes, socialists, in general, this is the mayor of paris and the dalgov received there for more than one percent, that is, we are talking about whether you are these parties or not. they hope to win back a little more during the forthcoming presidential parliaments after uh, but i'm not sure that they will get there, so to speak, a solid majority, so these parties can simply leave the political scene in france and i would add in the end that here you are they talked about the protest vote, in fact, the great result that the juggler melenchon received. he's almost level. uh, well, i lost a little on the x-ray, and just became the accumulator of this protest vote, because 20 percent really means something. the front uh, mostly left-wing views voted for him and for the far right, which we say, correctly said that these are those who express,

well, the protest mood of people who do not want to see the macron at the head of state again. here but nevertheless, so to speak, they are somehow forced to express their voices in protest. but uh, well, i understand that the problems are systemic, but still, here are the sanctions that were imposed on russia, and they played their role. here in this scale of protest voting, including there for melanchona. it's just that inflation in france also exists as a result, yes, well, i must say that macron. in general, the government secured itself, because you understand the inevitable rise in prices, but little help was provided. wealthy segment of the population, but the calculations of economists. i don't know how true they are. they believe that although france is less than germany dependent on gas from oil. it's in the region of 20. the energy balance, however. these are all the e sanctions that led to them, they believe that e

per person and it will cost him about 100 -something euros per year of additional expenses. here are some numbers. well, uh, western sanctions, they hit not only the well-being of the western countries themselves, but also destroy the global financial system, a, which has been based on the us dollar for more than 70 years, and recently more and more articles have appeared in western american analytical journals about how destructive the sanctions imposed by the united states have on the world economy and global finance and the european union. and so i drew attention to an article just recently published by the famous american economist philip pilkington, a in the journal american faces. listen by freezing russia's international foreign exchange reserves the united states the united kingdom and the european

union have made it clear to the whole world that other countries' access to reserve reserves in dollars, pounds and euros depends on their behavior in foreign policy the whole world will have this in mind, especially with china china has long had a positive trade balance with western countries and at the same time has accumulated impressive amounts of foreign exchange reserves, but now the chinese must look at this through the prism of their external politicians. if, for example, china decides to seize taiwan, then, most likely, chinese foreign exchange reserves will be frozen vasily borisovich well, what do you think china has drawn conclusions, will china i understand the chinese leadership is aware that their own irreversible confrontation with the us will only escalate. well, it should be noted that they were always aware of some vulnerability. e your investments into american assets and how they could they

took measures to diversify them, another thing is that they had few tools for this outside the dollar zone and the eurozone. difficult to find. uh, so some opportunities for investing so many colossal reserves that china has. they tried they invested invested in the currencies of various countries, including developing ones . they tried, but to increase the reserves of precious metals. it is clear that now these processes will have to be accelerated many times over, they will probably looking for new ways. uh, reducing your vulnerability for the end. uh, a long time ago they came to the conclusion about what is, uh, giant permanent balance. uh, positive balance. they also do not really need foreign trade. and, uh, there have been attempts at the state level, uh, to come up with a

slightly more balanced trade. eh, not much has worked out with this. although, in general, it is purely export, it does not make any positive contribution to the growth of chinese gdp in practice. well , for more than a decade. yes, i will add look, china once had three trillion dollars in the fifteenth year. he saw how america can induce capital outflows, what china is doing, it is investing in property , investing around the world, buying land, buying. uh, the enterprise buys resources, china uh, now uh, they are thinking that it is time to move on to yuan settlements. look, until recently, 85 percent of the world's settlements in the world took place in dollars. that is why central banks accumulated dollars in gold and foreign exchange reserves foreign exchange reserves in order to balance the e-trade balance and the

balance of payments, if you have everything in dollars, you need to have dollars, so 62% of the world's e- currency reserves of all central banks are in dollars, if we refuse dollars, so , accordingly, it is not necessary to have such a number of reserves in dollars if we switch to our own currency in our calculations, and we balance our somersaults already within the framework of specific partnerships. let's say a specific country. again, no dollars needed. what happened to the dollars ? , respectively, a gigantic trade deficit, which was formed at the same time, because america bought everything printed money, as they solved the problems of those who supplied it. america, these dollars returned goods back to the financial markets in american economic obligations

american stocks are called more like a bubble, imagine what will happen now if this reverse flow ends. this mass of huge dollars, it returns there from simply slamming this system. so i just wanted to move on to the consequences of this collapse of the possible, or at least.