this is still not yet. roughly speaking, this is very important here, but from the point of view of nato, which called it its own, everything does not end here. here, unlike afghanistan, unlike iraq , unlike other peripheral conflicts. here europe is the border of nato, and once again this will be very serious. we want to add something. i just wanted to help him george. the fact is that we are talking about a reputational failure of nato. they, uh, have laid a lot of things on this conflict and other countries, which are also 24 hours a day. children. it is known whom they are now watching, how the same states of britain will behave. this is the first second to talk. after the completion of the special military operation, we will not be zelensky, but the guys from nato will need a scapegoat, and this goat is already on this goat zelensky excuse my french. er, well, i'll say this. uh, a banality, it seems, but often do not forget to get an

answer about what is happening today and what will happen in the future, look into the past, especially since today is like a correct answered to this disposes on april 12, the sixty- first year, 12 years have passed. sorry, i mean first 5. first, the first launch of the satellite, and then another 4 years after the end of the great patriotic war, right. and what is the great patriotic war in european? and the continent is the then european union under the leadership of hitler, that is, nato, his union in the current uh wording, and we went east. well, as always, they went east. we did not go to the west of e. russia russian empire soviet and so on. who won we

won this is the key to our future successes space scientific potential, why is it always there in this victory now in this victory that is destined, because uh, what then these reich meant this merch uh, a general named slave he is a faithful ally of nazi germany table then -someone he is norwegian, norway is a true ally. uh, hitler's germany well then in europe there were almost no countries that were not an ally and hitler's germany were either active or passive allies, so it's pointless to list any european politicians. it's like, well, there was some kind of its own. yes, yes, yes , so, well, the british. and now we see the same thing. the beginning of world war ii the great

patriotic war the beginning of hitler's expansion how many allies were there from what later became of the nazi coalition can be counted on the fingers of one hand? and by the end, by the forty-fifth year, no matter how many this egyptian collection included, here are all those who were later recorded e.e. the soviet union is sitting in security, e. reich became his opponents, and were part of the technical coalition every 75 years. history repeats itself, of course, with all sorts of culprits of these logical ones, but if we take the general configuration, including the side configuration, we will see amazing coincidences, amazing coincidences in this, and my historical optimist in this e is not my capital, but the optimist of the history that i

see it this way and i think it was quite clearly explained, everyone can look at the cards in the textbooks and see. what i'm saying absolutely nothing came up with. thus we are doomed to victory we are doomed to victory question in tactical decisions question in operational decisions, how soon this will happen, of course, a scapegoat has been found. but ukraine more specifically bandera's this one then what then what now they were then collaborators. now they are someone, uh, to this reich helps the reichs. yes, he put them forward, but of course, it will be necessary to judge, uh, not zelensky or rather him in the first place. he is rather the defendants of the last, but all sorts of germany who, when they needed uh, reunite their lands frggdr. they were friends

with the soviet union for peace and reunited everything else, and now the russian lands want to be reunited, and for some reason leopards are now being sent about the mistake of the germans is that they sent these new leopards to the russian novorossiysk. let the ukrainian name the land. this is a metaphysical sign here they are here the fourth reich and perish oh, but about this metaphysical error of a metaphysical sign, and german tanks. and the fact that we are doomed to victory but still, in order to reach victory you need how to defeat the enemy of the enemy call it what you want. and here, in fact, the number of enemies and their readiness to actively fit into all this now. to be honest, it amazes me, and they understand everything about it, because it has

already been said about germany, germany, which sends its tanks, which can hardly decide the outcome of the war, but for some reason it sends them there, which sends the czech republic. let their tanks be old there, but nevertheless slovakia, which first sends s-300 anti-aircraft missile systems there, and now says that she can send 29 soviet fighters there as well. let the old, but, nevertheless, soviet, and soviet means excellent, we all know this and uh and much , much, much more. and it's not just that it's a large number of weapons, which you will answer my question. how much more of a weapon is it political, or is it a real weapon that somehow influences the course of hostilities. unfortunately, this weapon is real and the most terrible. here i agree with vladislav shurygin absolutely.

by the way, i also wanted to say about this that we are now already waging war, in fact, nato attacked russia in fact. well, they shouldn’t have declared war, but we should, in fact, have declared military operations and war against us, here you brought a number of points. well, in particular, weapons are supplied. e at the beginning. in general, it was portable, now we are talking about heavy weapons, which is amazing. here are the last 2 days. the first statement of the barrel of a peaceful solution to the ukrainian conflict does not exist is the european commissioner, respectively, they gave it all very in detail. this is the first moment, the second moment, the general broke the chairman of the us joint chiefs of staff speaks and says the war will last for decades, that is, nato has set a plan to pump weapons to ukraine until this is not the point of our conversation, that the plan has been set and the plan is being implemented. so how do we respond to

this one? here we are each, here is where the morning is, listening to general kanashenko, but not everyone always understands what he is talking about. here he literally reported that two radars for illumination and guidance were destroyed and further listed. what is two? the missile guidance station of the s-300 complex so, that is, slovakia put two divisions ceased to exist. it's a pile of metal without a guidance station. that's about this pile of metal before it became it. here. uh, when we say two divisions, two divisions - this is how many launchers are eight launchers, which means eight empty wears, and which are a-a set, eight in total. well post no, they could put more. that is, somewhere else there is a divisional report that these eight are already blind and deaf. well, in any case, they can only be connected to operating missile guidance stations, that is, the radar is illuminated in appearance, but the capabilities of these divisions are

practically reduced to zero. that is, you can simply transfer these installations and use them in some way, but in any case, the combat potential that was laid down, that is, initially the division will cover a large territory, has been cancelled. we are completely in addition, if we are now one second, i would like just about these s-300s slovak, who installed themselves or coded? no. we are missile guidance stations, plus the installation of one or two lipids there, too, that is, in other words. here it is always important to carefully listen to the experts. so, that is, roughly speaking, we destroyed one installation, as an installation. and seven more are still blind and deaf, because they destroyed these backlight guidance locators, that is, now these eight have been dealt with the second question that interests me and many people ask it, in principle, and in the arms trade there are many once talked about it. and we are slovakia, when we delivered it there, our alien system should have been clogged. yes, and now the question arises. how the slovak s-300s could

theoretically be used and whether they can be used for our purposes. here it is necessary to explain. you know not your stranger so much, but there are bookmarks. that's what they do. always in the equipment that is sold by special bookmarks, which are in software that allows you to remotely turn off the complex if it works on, uh, aircraft of a given country, that is, if in the usa they sold well, conditionally to iraq, this is this complex and the cancer can no longer work on american aviation, but these deliveries were there a very long time ago and i doubt that at that time we provided for such a protection system , but here we use other principles, that is, here is the high-precision weapon that we are also told, after all, we have completely forgotten the word demilitarization of the armed forces of ukraine. they have not forgotten, they just deal with it. there every day demet today. here are two and a half thousand tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, uh, two approximately 200 have already been destroyed and zelensky is shouting today, help

me, and now, returning to the situation with nato, therefore, but they are helping. mystery sent ukrainians to germany, i think to the uk. in the united states of america they teach to bring in tanks, the german british teach them to fly f-16 aircraft and use anti-aircraft missile systems british questions about, you yourself said, when they say that it drags on for years, then if it drags on for years, they will have time to learn these pilots tankers and operator in these complexes. well, and so on, moreover, well, i can already tell you from my own experience that when i read here, it means that here are the stingers for you. and here are the stingers and here are the stingers. well, you understand such a number of stingers, when in smaller numbers they got to afghanistan well, let's say it became, to put it mildly, unsafe, despite the fact that there is, as it were, a mountainous terrain, and here is this, that is, this, in general, serious thing. there are already

some changes. that is, we have protection systems, which, well, maybe 10 times greater than what was in afghanistan. but this still complicates the combat mission, but the effectiveness of the same ufo jewel stingers decreases many times due to the fact that we also did not stand at the place of work. here , uh, okay, there is probably something against stingers. it's still a dangerous story though. moreover, you understand that ukraine is, as it were, a separate story. they also pleased everyone in a row with those who prayed, and therefore, who will go where now. it 's not that there it is in general now like this, it’s like a reserve here are idiots with stings. yes, but it's okay, but it's not okay. here, for example, the pentagon is quite an interesting phrase. then i heard that the pentagon is saying that the united states is ready to consider the possibility of supplying ukraine with longer-range weapons, and here i have a question for you as a specialist. what is this about? what is longer range?

what kind of weapons to use, how, where and what is it fraught with? well, more yes, more range than that point o is 130 km. yes 120, well 120 yes what is, that is, more range - it means more than they have. in any case, we can talk about long-range multiple launch rocket systems, this is somewhere up to 300 km. i think it might be missiles. uh, well, which e hit at a distance of up to 400 km - these are anti-ship missiles, the neptune of which is british american. yes, it is, well, somewhere in the order of more than 100 km. that is, these are quite serious weapons that you will have to work with, but the most important thing is also satellite, which information is streaming online and we wonder how they popped up the american satellite to the rammstein base american base. this is to the question that they may be on the

verge of failures. but it's kind of a very long and complicated step you wanted to add something to the feed, because yes, yes, they are actually talking about you. uh, talking about what you say step is inevitable. he said colleagues, didn't he? 2.200 tanks destroyed 200-2.500. no matter how much it is necessary to put, the weapon of the old is not old. they are not they will cover everything that we beat out and beat out in ukraine, you know, it’s impossible. so i don’t want to offend you and i don’t want to offend anyone, but, as it were, standing in a studio in moscow, uh, knocking out. uh, nato tanks supplied in new and new quantities to the ukrainian army. it's like a very easy story. but remember, like in my favorite movie. only old men go into battle when he arrives from a mission and runs up to him. eh, a mechanic and say there, like, drag the paint, draw, it means an asterisk, he says, like ask what two he says two here one until you fill up the guy. and yes, we will look for everything there. listen to all this, serious things work very well. but this is not such a

scale when he said a step away from failure. i mean failure er, in that they no no, they denied that they were involved in this. and the breakthrough is that now there is evidence of this, because if nato is involved in this, then the dialogue takes on a nuclear connotation about a nuclear connotation. and when we talk about what we will prove, we will present and of course, we will prove and we will present it all this is all fine. but here's how to get over it. this. here are obviously them. well, this shaft of help and participation has been uncovered, because look. here's more distance. but the conversations have already gone so murky, but the talk that ukraine is still saying that the pentagon is too complicated for them s400 then the question arises. if they talk about it in the pentagon. so there is some idea of ​​​​a theoretical passage 400. i really don’t know where the s400 could come from, but i have something here that interests me from

the point of view of the nature and prospects of our confrontation. this word, as it were, is a nuclear component; it has already arisen here. considering that we have now learned a lot about the state of minds during these month and a half. eh, more precisely, about the lack of minds. many in this territory are already talking about more distant systems, passage 400, and so on and so forth. i'm interested to hear from you, as from an international specialist. sooner or later, such systems will put them in idiots anyway , there are enough idiots here ready for any provocation, and from here they will also pay. here you go from here, so that alexey alekseevich does not offend. yes , now the question arises from the point of view. i’m just interested in nato’s international law so that they don’t say there, no matter how they participate, they kind of help a country that, mind you, is not officially at war, and we don’t officially see a war with it. well , as it were, they just supply her with weapons. and so, if any of these longer-range systems

is some kind of idiot, well, they flew to belgorod . in taganrog, something like that near taganrog flew in, flew in now the question is, if some weapon system supplied by them by the americans or nato will be used. well, as it were, not within the framework here, but somehow further, does this mean the fact that nato is involved in the conflict of the side, for example, which set it up, or is it all like that. here, as if muddy incomprehensible rules, the statement of nato sources that long-range systems can be delivered. this is a very dangerous statement. this is the beginning of the third world war. it is the transformation of a mediated conflict into a conflict direct. uh-huh and, well, it doesn’t get more dangerous, probably another thing is that, in my opinion, it’s premature to say that nato suffered something there, but suffered no losses, even image ones in my opinion. losses. they didn't take much

. they same with the outset said, that for 2 weeks. uh, the russian army will move forward very quickly. so they insured themselves on this score. here, in my opinion, here is the position expressed by vlad shurygin, calmly balanced from the scene, a sober assessment. she's more appropriate situations, and it sets in a more correct way, that is, to see that everything is going as it should, the russian army is advancing, but at the same time, to realize that the enemy is serious and the enemy is not this, but the enemy is different and one more, important thought . he had expressed that, well, take the couch experts. and there. and this must be done. you have to show, you have to tell. alexei and i have been to syria more than once during the terrorist operation. and well, probably both voices can say that this is very, very important, with different eyes you look at events differently

you tell it all in a different way, you understand, it's true and yet. i want to steal from you your feelings, after all, these talks about the possibility of delivery. uh, longer-range systems, and so on and so forth, this is still in the performance of the pentagon, for the time being, some such element of the show to raise the spirit. these, then, here are the galloping e, the big top of this bloody one, or do you think that they have such plans, in principle, there are much more serious information stuffing that negotiations are underway with turkey even about the s-400. although this would already be a violation of all bilateral and international agreements. now information stuffing. on this account, there were also related to such stuffing. it has to be done with all seriousness. nato is not going to quickly, uh, end this conflict. they are preparing to play long every time. uh, it's moving on to a whole new stage and a new stage, and here we've started

a statement there. uh, nato secretary general, even i am not so much afraid of his words that this is a long conflict, because this is already said it scares me more, what does he say? we we are certainly something new. this is already something new and there are talks that this is already something new, because he says, we are talking about the fact that this is for a long time and in general the feeling that this is becoming more and more global. this is very important. and here, some time ago , every time we said, well, there is the third world war, not the third world war. it seems to me in a political sense, she already quite suits herself . the program time will tell, we continue to work live and live, we continue to discuss that the international or, if you like , the global context within which we have been perceiving the special

military operation in ukraine for more than a week is that this, of course, is a confrontation between us and the american- centric west with co strange nato but of course, at the head of all this stands united, the united states with its interests in one way or another, which somewhere coincide with european ones, somewhere contradict. and in this sense, to the question of their purposes. we say they want it to be a long time, they are ready to go on quite dangerous stories with supplies here, weapons and so on, and we wonder. what is their plan? well, you always need to understand what the enemy's plan is. well, here is the assistant to the president of the united states, shroud is safe with us . well, it seems to me, here is some understanding of their plan , please. we are going to do everything possible to help ukraine win this war and achieve success and it is the president of ukraine zelensky and the democratically elected government ukraine will be determined what this success is and that means we must continue to supply them with weapons provide military support and at the same time

put strong economic pressure on russia we want to see a free and independent ukraine a weakened and isolated russia and a stronger more united more determined west we believe that all three of these goals are achievable and we will do our best. and actually here, going to advertising. i said that in the political sense of the word the third world war, in already in a sense, because sullivan basically says what's what. we are like a center with our own interests. we want this country and everyone who tries to join it, that means to weaken or isolate, and all the rest of you must unite and rally. he speaks around the west and there are a lot of these signals for everyone. here you have, for example, blinkin foreign minister. uh, this same head of the us state department come on, the minister of foreign affairs, they have nothing to do with people. ah yeah mean, uh who talks about

that calls on all countries not to buy russian weapons. this, in general, is also a part, as if there are many such examples of isolation, but we clearly understand that the americans are now forcing the whole world to line up, or on the other side. and they are either on the side where we are well hinting at all the ensuing consequences. and in general, in this sense, it is such a global, or rather, becoming more and more global confrontation phantom pain paxoamericano. yes , i'm surprised that now it's already anthony blenkin it appeared that jake sullivan did not zigzag at the end of all this, these are all maxims, because it is very similar to what hitler and his companions said in the thirties with exactly these words precisely in relation to the corresponding country of the soviet union uh, the usa actually , having drawn the third reich into themselves, they are now turning into this very fourth reich, they are, in fact, producing nazism in a completely natural way for themselves

, squeezing out the proxies that we are now dealing with in ukraine, but, squeezing out of ourselves igil, an organization banned in russia. al-qaeda and so on. that is, in principle, all these 30 years. we watched, uh, the fire that or nazism suffered by the united states of america, births in agony, births in agony. yes. uh, and uh, this is an illusion, a phantom illusion that, and america will take the lead. well, let him be glasaxon or there they are , as they say, the developed world of the civilized world of the civilized world, yes, and all other countries bow before them. but we've been through this before. uh, many many times in the twentieth century this is not happened. remember, here in this studio we talked about the fact that there is no hitler in the west, i am changing my point of view. there is a collective hitler that is, uh, so peculiar, like that's quite in fashion. now there are networks. there are structures. uh no, personified the depersonalization of hitler

it happened and each of these jake sullivan joe biden anthony b. linkin and so on. they keep a piece of hitler in themselves, as you know, here are the relics, so they consider themselves an avatar of hitler, and now they actually speak what they say what they cocked in the oral way, all this indicates that they are the heirs of nazi germany and this can no longer be hidden. ugh actually. eh yes. that's interesting, you said, uh, more precisely, uh, interesting, you formulated it, which indeed many ideas have. that's even when we talked about nazism. i read some time ago, it means that there is only one marketer, this is an indicator of how ukrainians wash their heads, it means they have some kind of marketer there, she, as it were, writes to young people. she says, they tell you that we have nazism, but wait for it. i read it to you verbatim, but wait, hitler died a long time ago. so they took communion, that is, roughly speaking, this is the idea that if a person, uh, it means he does

n’t wear it, respectively, these mustaches don’t wear them in such a voice, which means, uh, a bandage with a swastika, then, like some kind of nazism ? what kind of hitler what did you alexey alekseevich tell you about, and in this sense it is very interesting that when we are dealing here. by this collective fourth reich, and after all , also to say about it and by this, indeed a collective hitler who, of course, does not shout, does not wear an armband, does not wear a swastika, but in fact , according to statements, he claims the same thing. we must understand how much in today's world of the 21st century, this collective hitler has ways to bend most or most of the collective world for himself. in principle, i agree a few days ago, and i called europe just referring to, what were the names of some demon- possessed ones at one time? fedor, here i called the demon-

possessed europe. russophobia, turning into real russian in flirting with bandera, that is, collaborators of the second world war. it's all right. everything. it's me, though, i can't. eh, and today it sounded again, otherwise we are from your lips a world war. third world war. there is no third world war now, then it will not happen. tomorrow, nevertheless, this affects people, but always the struggle for the internationalization of different global forces resembles a war, but is isolated until it happens on its own. actually war, therefore vitaliy tovich can happen, because everyone understands that as soon as it happens. here in this hot manifestation there will be no one and nothing for a second. i thought i was speaking from my position. third world war. and

in the way that absolutely most people understand it, there is every chance that it has not started. e that it will not start, and the second thing i would like to say about all this concentration. here, i took it. forces to ignore, yes, the current iv but the third reich. what ended with the destruction of the decay said that lenka is alone. alexey now a second. here it is further along the new steel against the soviet union and laying down to create it all like that, but he was destroyed. this one will also fall apart in the same way, therefore, in the words of all these wonderful arno-saxon other figures, you need to notice, and propaganda from the real, and the real one says directly, this is not some kind of democratic ukrainian victory at the end of the dinner. victory is an absurdity, real rallying. west here is a crumbling river, well,

already rally. how to rally the challenge even more hatred for russia a. how to cause even more hatred of russia is not easy to prolong. this is an operation for this war on the territory that was previously called. ukraine will not last any decades, and there is absurdity again , the hundred years war, or something, it will be thirty years is ridiculous. it's still much simpler, like a military operation, but there is still to put these uh, ss and become. well, that's what they want to put for what it's done, but to support this one, and if you inspire him, although his strength is depleted, but the main thing is, really yes, madmen, if you install such a system, they will shoot at russia, which is what we are talking about, but if they use a rocket at russia, god forbid, and cause accidental damage, especially in people's lives, then, firstly, the hope of the russian society to rebel

against the war and, well, in the consequences against the regime against putin. that's what the second russian is for. it seems to me that russian society in this case, if you are indignant, then against the fact that we are going to stop in lvov. you are yours do not pass off thoughts as their thoughts. they have been saying all their lives that it is necessary to overthrow putin, causing outrage, so that prices in russia will rise and tomorrow they will demolish the cream of putin's mausoleum e. this is all the kremlin towers and the luzhniki stadium from the fact that this does not happen. this means that they do not know such a goal, and secondly, if this happens, then naturally. russia will be forced to deliver a more powerful blow to the armed forces of ukraine in the current territories. what blow i don't know it depends on the change of provocation, then you will say. see what kind of russia it hits the european state. ukraine missiles. those are the same for what?