of course good. alexander mikhailovich, please take a look. is it that i think that these organizations can be used as a cover for our legal residents? listen to paul here fee from day to day waiting for the arrest in the next bud. so stay away from me. do you think i'm contagious? take a look please.

please take a look, it is important for me to know your opinion. mine yours as an experienced employee? urgent meeting at the people's commissar you look please, and then we will discuss.

come back last time we didn't work out how should get to know. i decided to fix it. have a seat. korotkov how is the fighting mood ready for work? so you work for us every day for the service. go for real work. which means it's not real. what kind of suit do you have, nice little tie outfits, just like from the picture? how did you become a traitor or

a german spy? who where and when recruited you? the gates of you all worked well. think you're scouts heroes? no, you are traitors to them. why did they cover the enemy of the people here platov exactly about that pavel anatolyevich is a dude to the people, i do n’t know how in his work. i'm used to being guided by facts. you haven't done enough. you deliberately find against the decision of the management. everyone can be so wrong. even older comrades that's how and who are you

comrade fitin to say such things? i am an employee of the foreign department appointed to this post to defend the motherland. as the motherland put you in this post, it will remove you. hire all traitors, you and enemy agents will be highlighted in iron. happy new year mikhalych thanks grish happy new year you why so early? we kind of agreed on a tree. for what? what invited not scared? but how different sasha like everyone listen

to me from 400 and a half hundred employees of the foreign department 275 or pressed and that i should believe that each of them is a traitor and a spy every second. sasha, here are our two with you. which of us is the enemy today fired me. what will not need to be done? this is helplessness. and you do not wait, you act, take it and write, i am not to blame for anything. please restore me. i want to work and do good for my country. and at all times come, let's go help. go-go.

intelligence reports that germany will attack us next year. and intelligence conveys the name of one misinformation. yes, the body of intelligence and years have heaped up. ezhov or restore mine now. you will save him soon. you will look at the world through the eyes of beria, and so he placed his people everywhere. new broom and what if there is nothing to put as the head of intelligence? anyone, yes, anyone, the main thing is not to put him on time

for a couple of months to change. you will always have time. korotkov deputy head of the first department for germany i serve the soviet union deputy head of the scientific and technical intelligence department i serve the soviet union deputy head of the political intelligence department i serve the soviet union it's all free. well, pavel

mikhailovich rejoiced for friends and colleagues, big positions, more responsibility, comrade people's commissar, golden words, comrade fitness of today, you and the new intelligence leaders justify the trust placed in you. do not forget that he is higher in this post over the past year and a half . thank you for your trust. congratulations on

appointment. how bad everything is worse than the vodyonic residency. we have one employee, and there is a strange one, where there is no one to work. what about the sources, almost all the old sources are lost? to resume work, we need a new one, for this we must first install rubber bands, and this is at least a year seriously working. a vicious circle of battle that we have no more than a couple of months, comrades. we urgently send both old and new employees beyond the cordon to re-establish contact with our most valuable sources, but above installed. the main thing is that you believe them.

why are you following me? my wife is american, we are going to washington soon and that you are ready to provide your materials to the americans? at the end of august you will go to the residents, show yourself in berlin, and there you will change the fitin , after its first pass. i will justify your trust, laurel better. good evening on the air

is a big game today, russian foreign minister sergei lavrov officially announced that russia is starting the next phase of a military special operation in ukraine and in this regard, the west, which is approaching the ukrainian conflict, how the proxy war against russia is becoming more and more frenzied today, united states president joe biden held a video conference on support for ukraine and containment of russia, and it was attended by the leaders of canada great britain france germany italy japan poland and romania, as well as the heads of the european commission and the european council and the general secretary who joined them. discussed. naturally, the supply of increasingly heavy weapons for ukraine, all new sanctions against russia, and so on. and this policy the collective west today was very correctly described by the minister of defense of russia sergey shoigu and according to which the growing volume of deliveries of foreign weapons to na

demonstrates the intention of the west to provoke the kiev regime to fight to the last ukrainian and the results of today's negotiations of western leaders fully confirm this conclusion of sergey kuzhugetovich shoigu, for example, kassler scholz of germany said that the victory of russia in ukraine cannot be allowed, and moreover, the peace that moscow wants to achieve in ukraine is unacceptable british prime minister boris johnson said that he generally considers a diplomatic settlement of the conflict in ukraine unlikely, that is, the course is obviously taken to torpedo any peace agreement of any negotiations on politics, a diplomatic settlement, and indeed, as shoigu said, war to the last ukrainian on a tee in vsetsefovich , but in the united states and in europe they cannot but understand that ukraine will win in this uh military military military conflict. it can't, but no matter how much

were not loaded with weapons. it won't change. the overall balance of forces ukraine is doomed to a military defeat, but nevertheless, weapons are being pumped up, which are becoming more and more heavy and impactful. well , firstly, it seems to me very cynical and cruel. yes, but this is how they drag out the war, but what are they trying to achieve. here. uh, what is the purpose of this policy you know, i'm sorry for years of referencing some of my recent publications hmm in the last decade. here in the fourteenth year. when i wrote about ukraine from america, i was just watching i immediately understood the situation and called the struggle for ukraine this struggle for a new world geopolitics. that is, they already then made a decision, which later. by the way, in the eighteenth year, i already formalized

that in america they set a course for the scrapping of russia, again, not because we were interfering with them, but they decided that now it’s inevitable that a clash with china needs to be dealt with russia faster, because according to them russia’s opinion, uh, it’s easier to deal with russia so that later russia doesn’t interfere, because russia, with its nuclear missile weapons, has huge resources and territory and so on and so for them. uh, apparently, by the way, this is very interesting when biden was vice president, they were afraid to put lethal weapons and were afraid of a big conflict, because then american strategies believed that ukraine would not withstand and would be broken very quickly, and therefore russia would be drawn in like this exhausting, exhausting war

will be impossible. i was just on our program, i think, a few months ago i said what happened. why are they now pushing ukraine to war? do they really want a proxy war and apparently they have pumped up so much in these 8 years that they have such calculations . here, uh, as experience shows, the motivation in ukraine for the supply of weapons is continuous in large quantities, an insane amount of uh, well, in general, weapons and armament of ammunition and so on really create an atmosphere. uh, to solve your fundamental and main question, and the main question is - it is with the help of this war that you will stabilize the situation in russia no, the regime and, in general, turn it into russia into such a country that we already knew, we experienced it and with disgust we recall this time in the nineties

, when we were under external tutelage, we lost our subjectivity. we have not been actors in world politics at all, this cannot be, but they are still trying. uh, make the most of this opportunity. that's right, and lavrov said and shoigu said, and everyone is already talking about this and american commentators are more sober. and they say it's moral. this is cynical. you really want to destroy ukraine to the last ukrainian. and this unacceptable, but alas. unfortunately, so far, that washington was ruled by others. well, i would say that it is also largely pointless, but because the weakening of russia is, after all, an intermediate goal , let's say so, yes. the main goal of the united states is the restoration of global leadership or the creation of conditions for, uh, global restoration, i would say not restoration, it seems to them that they

should save, because china has not yet taken away this status of a global leader and the first country in this world. uh, here they are trying on the distant approaches to prevent this. this is an intermediate stage for them, but here are some in the united states, as you rightly said, the most strategic and, well, sober-minded analysts believe that the united states has already lost this fight. yes, and as an example. i will quote from an article by stephen walt stephen walt is a professor at harvard university at the belfer center, and this university is one of the most respected american realist scholars on international security issues, and article he just published. in foreign policy magazine, listen to the war in ukraine is an important event, but not because the outcome will have a significant impact on the

global balance of power or the legal environment that states have created and sometimes adhered to . rather, it is important because this event marks it. the end of the brief unipolar moment when the united states was the only true, superpower in the world. it also heralds a return to the models of world politics that were temporarily suppressed for a short era of undeniable superiority of the united states oh, and i will add that in the same article, stephen wald quite rightly claims that the destruction that we are seeing today in ukraine and the scale of civilian deaths. it simply pales in comparison with what happened in iraq and afghanistan where the united states fought, the american professor stephen wald writes about this, and since, in his opinion, the united states has already, but lost more. for global hegemony, he recommends, uh, the united states to accept being the leader.

well, at least half the world is not the whole world, but the half world of the collective west and adapt to the new situation. be it bipolarity, be it, be it a lot of polarity andrey andreevich and , firstly, will the united states listen to the opinion of people like steven wolf, how promising, how influential this point of view is, and the second question. if they don't listen, yes, in the meantime , apparently, because we observe they don't listen. that's what we always say. uh, very much that the current conflict is a scramble for new ones. world order. this is a conflict that will largely determine the place of both the united states and russia in this new emerging world order. if that's the case then it's not russia not the united states that can't afford to lose and will really fight to the last. including the united states, yes, for which these are issues of global hegemony and global leadership. and if so, what

measures do you think the united states can take after the russian victory in ukraine when the russian victory becomes absolutely irrefutable and obvious? i believe that his opinion will be ignored, but cannot but be perceived by the rational part of the american establishment, and in publications and in conversations that are still taking place, it is clear that americans talk about what is happening not only from the point of view of their global dominance, but also from point of view of the image of damage, which is an obvious defeat. maybe they need to understand that the united states would not have lost in a conflict with mexico. so russia will not lose in the conflict with ukraine in due to the fact that logistics routes are the proximity of our production centers. uh, a long land border allows us

to dictate the course of military operations on our terms. still, for us, this is a more existential issue, as if, how mexico is a more existential issue for the united states, the balance of interests of the united states and russia in relation to ukraine. of course, different for russia is a vital interest for the united states, this is a secondary interest, and they are quite early. maybe already in november last december, we made conscious decisions for ourselves not to get involved. directly into this crisis by pushing russia out of combat engagements with our armed forces, which could lead to the risk of a global conflict using nuclear weapons. that is, this is the limit of escalation. why, uh, i mean, the united states can do anything but , uh, except directly. you have clashes with russia using any other kinetic weapons, which does not exclude the truth of their such shadow hybrid involvement training of the armed forces direction. it's already full of weapons. and this is indeed being done on an

unprecedented scale. uh, and they could not have been predicted just a few months ago, but in the end, the overall balance of interests, vital for russia, is secondary to the united states, making this game a relatively uncomplicated two-way ukraine for the united states is now more of a resource that they would like to sell at a higher price, exhausting russia's resources and ultimately making this victory for us more expensive, but the question is more about time than the result, and it is strange that the authorities in kiev do not realize that in fact. they are now being used they are being used as foreign policy instruments of american strategy. such excessive self-criticism and sacrifice is somewhat reminiscent of fidel castro's line in the course. caribbean missile crisis, which, referring to nikita khrushchev, urged him to start a nuclear war. he said, uh, comrade nikita, if in the name of the victory of the world cause of communism, it is necessary to sacrifice lives

cubans. we are ready to take this step, uh, but i'm not sure he asked the cubans. uh, when i expressed this opinion about khrushchev well, it seems to me that, uh , the political wisdom, uh, of the biden administration, it is, judging by what they are doing, it is still inferior to political wisdom. nikita sergeevich khrushchev, who did not, yes, sacrifice the lives of cubans. well, in addition to the united states and ukraine , very large-scale military assistance is provided by the european union, and all the european participants in today's meeting with biden. uh, talking about the need to supply heavy weapons and weapons to ukraine in addition today. seems absolutely remarkable yes eh. i would even say, and surprising uh, the statement was made by the representative of the foreign service of the european union

, peterson, i can not help quoting more weapons does not mean more war. yes, what did you buy it for? for what he sold, a and volosyanovich. well , firstly, it seems to me that this already smacks of some kind of orulovsky. e newspeak. yes, uh, here, a similar formulation of the question, but uh, if we are serious, then uh the european union and its policies has changed a lot lately. yes, on many issues the european union is even trying to run ahead of the united states and is catching up. and maybe even wants to overtake, the united states, including in the supply of arms. but in your opinion, this is not dangerous for the european union itself, because it refuses the basic principles that were laid at the basis of european integration, pacifism, not to supply weapons to conflict zones. we see the rearmament of germany yes, despite the fact that the disarmament of germany

again, european integration was at the heart of it, what can all this lead to? we have been saying for a long time that the european union occupies a very significant part of the world map as an economic entity, but an insignificant political entity, and many believed that this political entity should grow to the size of an economic entity against the backdrop of this crisis. we are seeing something completely different. we see that europe is shrinking as an economic entity. it is losing its economic independence. although she was not absolute, but it still existed europe. the united states was dragged into such a spiral of sanctions, which hits europe first of all, and europe is becoming more and more tied to, uh, the united states. and if they go

further down that road, there will be, well, actually. industrialization may be part of the european industry will move to america, just the industrialist will have nowhere to go. they will go for the cheaper one. uh, gas for cheaper energy for a more competitive environment. but, probably, we should invite them to us, too, to move, if europe has decided. eh, your achievements in the field of industry, just centenarians yes, in a few centuries since the industrial revolution, it will turn off, but maybe someone will want to come to us, but he will want to move, but boredom at six, how an economic subject kills europe something is most important now. as you rightly pointed out. i would even say that these are not principles. it is some kind of internal nature that the league themed them in general. like as a self subject they kill then

the only thing is why are they important in terms of world history? this is, ah, a unique experience of ending centuries of wars on the european continent through the philosophical concepts of political constructions and the political will that makes them come true, of course, all this is done in hothouse conditions after the second world war under the american military uh military umbrella, but that however it was done. and now we see that under the american military umbrella, europe was first created as an experiment, this european unique in human history. uh, philosophical, but the concept, and now it's exactly the same under the american instead of getting out from under the american umbrella and existing independently. she's under the american umbrella. simply, a is shrinking, therefore europe and europe

as a unique subject disappears on the world political map in every sense of the economic poly . which contradict the basics. here is the fundamental principle of the european union, and one of such decisions is certainly. e even posing the question of joining the european union. ukraine yes, well, well, it's just blowing up. uh, the european union as an integration entity, where uh? everybody. uh, how would uh the rules of action have to work for everyone else, and where there is a transfer of uh, sovereignty and so on and so forth, just the european union, it turns into something fundamental. e different and, a. we need to draw from this. of course, conclusions are also very important. yes, i think they do, nevertheless, one of the other directions of the west's policy of the

collective west to contain russia, in addition to arms supplies to ukraine, are sanctions . adema said that a new us package of sanctions against russia is being prepared and that it will target, first of all, the russian military-industrial complex. a very important caveat must be made here. and the thing is the fact that the united states imposed sanctions against the russian military-industrial complex, and almost total ones back in 2014, and now we are not talking about primary new sanctions against russian military-industrial complex enterprises that are part of rostec. there, uh, and so on, we are talking about blocking russia's military-technical cooperation with third countries, and not by chance. madame adegemote said the united

states will try to cut off supplies that complete production chains. that is, this is a. we are talking about the imposition of sanctions against india against turkey against algeria sudan and other countries, and from which china and russia are of course yes, and which have the most developed military-technical cooperation with russia vladimir alekseevich and how are these countries? this is how turkey, for example, will react to such steps by the united states, well, firstly, it must be said that our president noted that russia withstood the unprecedented pressure of sanctions in the future, unequivocally, despite the fact that it’s not just us, as he said our place. she took and we will find a new balance of forces of new interaction with the countries of the east, and it is obvious that this will be extremely. not just considering that we have to rebuild all the chains, both economic, political and, most importantly, mental in terms of our interaction with various people.