the united states will try to cut off the supplies that complete the production chains. that is, we are talking about the fact that sanctions will be imposed against india against turkey against algeria , sudan and other countries, and from which china and russia are of course yes, and which, with russia, have the most developed military-technical cooperation vladimir alekseevich and what about such countries? this is how turkey, for example, will react to such steps of the united states, well, firstly, it must be said that our president noted that russia withstood the unprecedented pressure of sanctions in the future, unequivocally, despite the fact that it is not just us with a hefty one, as our minister said. she took and we will find a new balance of forces of new interaction with the countries of the east, and it is obvious that this will be extremely. not just given that we have to rebuild all the chains, both economic, political and, most importantly, mental in terms of our interaction with strange moment, but

it is just as obvious that the unipolar moment was very short. eh, that's very correct. quotes held by our american colleagues, the unipolar moment ended with another issue. to what extent is this understood? uh, our western colleagues that it is over. e, one gets the feeling that it is not, because interest is, after all, a conscious need, and awareness is exactly what the west lacks. and in this regard, rational behavior begins to limp, and the rational behavior of the european union in the united states regarding russia is absent ; important interesting, but for the united states is absolutely secondary. but sometimes we can imagine much worse. yes, when we imagine that it is for life. she is an important interest. although it is not such, that is, in itself an illusion, and those built in the west can be much more terrible than itself. realities as

such, as for our interaction with the non-west, it is obvious here that there is a lot of things that are already laid down in the matrix of our foreign policy, which is obvious that on over the past years, we have been building a very complicated relationship with our turkish partners. e this turkish stream. i am there at the kuyu station and there are many other joint projects that we are implementing, in the end, the s400, which we supply to turkey, which turkey takes, despite the unprecedented pressure from the west, of course, turkey is a very difficult partner. we know him very well, but we differ in our position on ukraine and we know the complex issues related to its pressure on the chursky factor on the national factor a and its position in the south caucasus are known to us in central asia, but in exactly the same way we must perfectly understand and move away from realistic positions. what's the tour today. it

does not fully take the side of the anglo-saxon world and does not impose these same sanctions. why? because turkey is different, and because turkey proceeds from the fact that the junyaboshten world is more than five more than five members of the security council. now, if you like, today turkey is such a revisionist state in relation to the entire system of international relations. yes, but in this case it is should be seen as a plus rather than a minus. why? because turkey is showing independence and it is possible to speak with it as a sovereign state in this new complex world of polycentrism, well, of course, not only turkey, but also india and our other partners will not refuse military-technical cooperation with russia today sergey lavrov announced that that russia can provide india with any means of weapons that india only requests, and in the foreseeable future, russian vietnamese military exercises will take place, and so on. we will continue while discussing the fundamental

problems of world politics in a few moments that is, he accidentally drowned in a suicide case. what difference does it make this book kill him a real historical figure his autobiography will be a world publishing event about the illegal use of british special forces to capture four suspected al-qaeda terrorists in pakistan and then turn them over to the cia killer. name at least one lang decision in 10 years as prime minister that would not be in the interests of the united states piersnan. i never took orders from anyone , everything i did i did because i thought it was right even supporting illegal kidnappings to torture me from this sentimental brad june mcgregor he will retire here, having a

father and russia and will tell you to this black court. yes , everyone would go. film novel polanski phantom may 1st on first i have always been an optimist real this is what we live in, we are optimistic about the future, so that it does not bring the end. pentalgin is the number one remedy for the pain of spasm and inflammation with periodic female headaches and other types of pain pentalgin will do without pain in a savings banquet, everyone only says in the village at a discount, order.

profits at uralsib bank became more profitable income up to 23% per annum on the balance. issue a debit card profit on uralsib.ru. sleep peacefully sleep deeply sleep long sleep as if you were again 10 velson helps you fall asleep naturally and sleep soundly like in childhood. this is a dream . this is a walson. in business, plans are sometimes frustrated, but we do not lose heart, but turn them into new ones. opportunities. this is our strength the fsb bank for business was bought in the late nineties. you then already

searched for the second time, we buy and check the history of the car with a pro car. this is already the fifth author 25 years old, we do not stand still the magnificent four from rostelecom has become even more profitable adjust the speed of the internet. control the number of minutes. choose packages of interactive tv and online cinema and pay only for what you really use rostelecom technology bank opportunities at my service this spring grow your universe together. again at all windowsills of the country when acute pain makes you climb the wall, staff in a large red package rushes to your aid charged against pain vtb team are looking for advertising that will help you get

a free vtb multicard right in front of you easy to pay for transfers without commission return up to 200% cashback from partners and that's it succeed. what do you want? treat your taste buds. you can not wait for the courier, but order a 20% discount on the first order, do not forbid yourself to dream point bank for entrepreneurs and

enterprises of the infection is conducive to strengthening vessels for a bright holiday. not only did she find the apartment of her dreams, she completed all the necessary documents for the purchase. and now she has become the owner of an apartment in a nine-story building near the park, because the apartment is now being bought on m2.ru. in addition to the united states, the european union expects to carry out new sanctions against russia, but it is already clear that it will be very, very difficult for it to do this, and there has been a serious split within the european union on the issue of the sixth package of

anti-russian sanctions and in particular. uh, turn on it has an oil embargo, and today paris, e, announced that france is ready to support the oil embargo, but against russia well, that's understandable. why, because by virtue of the french nuclear power industry, france actually imports russian energy resources very minimally, but immediately said, uh, the minister of foreign affairs of hungary that this country will in no way support any european union restrictions on imports, but russian oil and russian gas. that is, even the discussion of the sixth package of sanctions is obtained. strengthens internal split in the european union, but the question is actually even broader. namely, that the current sanctions policy of the european union, the already imposed sanctions, are very painful for the lives of ordinary european citizens and some western

media, by the way, french, and they already write that riots are possible in europe. listen to the west related to the military operation in ukraine quickly turn into a nightmare for people. after they cannot heat their homes, the purchasing power of their money will plummet. everywhere riots will begin a shortage of basic foodstuffs will cause deep crises that will resemble the arab revolution of 2011, which began with an increase in wheat prices, the cost of food will rise sharply due to a global shortage of grains , sunflower oil and fertilizers vasily georgievich on how realistic is this prospect? and how long will european citizens endure the current situation, after all, and it's not just about the fact that the europeans themselves have to pay more. and for and energy for food speech. after all, it is still being said that an increase in world prices

will lead to a monstrous wave of migration to european countries, and it is precisely the countries from africa that they will withstand all this in this regard. what is the logic? let's take european politics. well, while there is resistance to our american e and the american doctrine of refusing russian gas in europe, we probably talk about riots, until we can only talk about the prospect of riots only about what can, e, it’s even possible to get closer to us very quickly, and here we have a very important thought was voiced today that the united states is no longer the center of the world, but the center of part of the world. we are absolutely correct, but if you look at it from an economic point of view, it turns out that if it is not the center of the world, then a and in this sphere of influence there should be a periphery and here the european union becomes a periphery from an economic point of view it becomes a periphery, it no longer part of the system's core world, because the system is not. this one, like the old one. here is its form, where there was a west as a core, but there is a separate west and in the west there is a center in the form

united states and europe is a periphery, it should provide resources to the united states, and in this sense, to the united states, right now resisting us. preventing us e in dedazifikatsii ukraine and the goal of a certain goal has already been achieved. they were able to force the european union. eh, to recognize this position of the periphery, to go for tough sanctions with russia that worsen the financial situation and not just european citizens, but lower the level of european economies. and this is likely to continue for a long time. and at the same time completely submit to american interests. well, consume more american resources and, in general, carry out american commands. uh, there's another important interesting point here. it concerns why in the united states, then, in this scheme, the long resistance of the kiev regime, why not immediately abandon it? and the answer, apparently, is that they really want to wear us out and in order for us to approach the negotiations, pretty

exhausted. well, as a state, yes, having spent a lot of resources and could not claim any role in the european process , this new one was not in any way encroached upon. no liberation slogans were applied to the periphery, and the united states could control this process, as far as migrants are concerned, about which, you said, americans are not very afraid of migrants. that is, if hunger drives a large number of people from the maghreb to the european union, then this will dilute the mass, because the real resistance to this policy of subjugation of the united states can come from , uh, politically more mature. naturally yes european citizens french citizens german citizens of other national states. they represent strength, but if they are drowned in a mass in the masses of migrants, split, and at the same time add here more social politics that will fragment this society, then you can. yes, yes, bring local riots, but to the loss, but

try to prevent the loss of american control in europe. here, in fact, what is it aimed at now, and the american strategy is here and what are the economic interests? what you are saying actually confirms our thesis, uh, which we discussed before the break that we are witnessing the beginning of the end of europe, at least the europe of the european union as we have known it for the last 30-40 and above . and for years, however, and today, uh, the united states tried to present u an initiative that looked, or at least to the united states, presented it as an initiative aimed at strengthening peace, but unexpectedly returned from media oblivion. and kamala harris, vice president of the united states, announced that washington is imposing a unilateral moratorium on anti-satellite weapons testing, and made it clear that

the united states now expects similar steps from other countries. well, it’s clear that, first of all, we mean russia and china, which are accused to the greatest extent by the united states, and in the production of anti-satellite weapons and this initiative, e, the united states immediately reacted in moscow and in particular the deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia sergei ryabkov, who is just responsible for both arms control and relations with the united states . washington three very interesting and correct questions. listen what about our well-known proposal, a moratorium on the deployment of medium-range missile systems, is the united states ready to return in a positive way to consider it, is it ready to commit itself not to deploy such systems? wherever in response to our moratorium, does the current moratorium that the corresponding development

of anti-satellite systems is completely and completely stopped and that the united states refuses to develop them altogether. i would like to remind you of russia's proposal to work out a treaty together with china, rather than being the first to place weapons in space . can you answer the questions posed by sergei alekseevich, ryabkov, is the united states ready for now? it is clear that now there will be no negotiations. and that's after the completion of the military phase, and the ukrainian conflict. are they ready for a dialogue on the inf, and are they ready for a dialogue on non-deployment? weapons in space americans have long been proceeding not because of the practice of the mature stage of the cold war, when the soviet union and the united states jointly agreed to create multilayer regimes to limit the reduction of offensive weapons, realizing that their excess on the planet

could lead to the death of mankind as a result technical technological incident, and over the past decades, the americans have consistently dismantled e times, in fact, taken apart. e legacy of the cold war in terms of multilateral regimes bilateral regimes with russia in the field of strategic offensive weapons and their current steps and i recall that before that there was a refusal to test one of the missiles in the pacific americans in the early stages. here the military phases of the ukrainian crisis have announced that they are postponing this test. now this moratorium has been temporarily imposed, this does not mean that they have awakened willingness to discuss with us. ask questions of a strategic nature - this rather signals that they are not considering steps for a military escalation of the current ukrainian crisis. they do not send signals to russia that they are ready to raise rates. on the contrary, they say this is a step that is generally

aimed at 10th collation, and they should correctly consider in kiev that, in general, kiev is now playing its own game in this game, and not at the expense of others, and i think the americans are trying to avoid a situation that would mirror one of the episodes again the caribbean missile crisis, when the long -scheduled us nuclear test took place exactly on those 13 days when this crisis developed and when the american president, in horror, called his military and began to ask, uh. what is? who ordered to bring these nuclear tests? he was told that these were planned e, the exercises were scheduled tests six months ago, which means they were aimed, and it was precisely at this e, the calendar period that occurred in the soviet union, of course, they considered these tests as a signal of us readiness for escalation. further escalation of the crisis, but there was no such intention of the americans, so a specific step needs to be interpreted. like the desire

in the united states to take a step back from the possible abyss that its ukrainian authorities are pushing. let's get more armed personally. participate in these hostilities on our territory, and how bilateral russian-american relations will develop in the future, including in the area of ​​negotiations, e . it will be possible to speak when we get out of the acute phase of the crisis and move on to the phase of negotiations. and i think that it won't be slow, uh, to come and negotiations on the structure of european security, which are mainly. we will fight, of course, not with the europeans, but with the united states. america absolutely. i would add two more to your theses . e. first, the united states is visible. they want to regain the image, and the moral authority of the image of a fighter for peace, but in conditions when, in fact, very many now, eh? pointing finger at

the united states as instigators and warmonger in ukraine yes and here they are, as it were, giving such a counterargument. what are we looking at here, but we are giving up part of the arms race, and secondly, and the united states is trying to secure a unilateral military advantage for itself, but because it is trying to ban anti-satellite weapons. they do not want to prohibit the deployment of weapons in space aimed at objects on earth and if this regime is approved in any way - this will ensure the united states. a very serious strategic advantage. and, of course, this cannot be allowed, but i agree that we are the united states. apparently we will be forced to discuss issues of european security at the next stage of the development of the situation after the end of the military phase, and the ukrainian conflict. and not least

because of the planned entry into nato of sweden and finland, which are increasingly. e, become visible, a already made decision. and we perfectly understand that if this happens, then a russian nato border, its length will approximately double a and. a. today, uh, deputy chairman of the russian security council, dmitry medvedev, said that in this situation, russia, i quote, needs to be prepared even for aggressive actions from nato. yes, if sweden and finland join the alliance and the united states is very actively contributing to this, a here is an active expert discussion within the united states and a political discussion within the united states of what nato expansion by sweden finland what could be the consequences for the

united states unfortunately not, and yet another example of strategic myopia and just about this, and today patrick bukkin, a very famous american political figure, wrote an adviser to presidents richard nixon gerald, ford and ronald reagan. listen today, we are not only leading an alliance of 30 countries, but we are also trying to include two more members. one of them has an 837-mile border with russia, but how much longer do we we'll try our luck in helsinki and stockholm understandable benefit from the commitment of the us and nato to start a war for finland or sweden. but what is the use in our country of the usa to be forced to go to war with the state with the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world and for some quarrel in the baltic sea or in the gulf of finland that does not concern us, well patrick

buchanan, he is a paleo conservative . and this is a very specific group of schools of thought within the republican party. andronik hereditary. first, how big is the influence paleo conservatives, and in the american establishment today and second. is it at least possible to have a serious discussion? they contain the united states. and the consequences associated with the likely entry of sweden and finland into nato are the consequences for american security. what buchanan is talking about i think that big discussions are hardly possible today in american reality. he himself is, of course, the greatest intellectual. many times, including in our program, i recalled his book, will the united states survive until 2025, yes, and. well, and much more death. of the west, we even had a russian translation in this book, e he is a realist and that's all his work, by the way,

i must say that his influence is directly very strong, almost everything that trump did is, as if he acted on the basis of this book, he will live, the forest is completely 2025. he said why we feed these europeans there. they are richer than us even on us why do we feed and in general support and with our money we keep there in south korea, we need a contingent of japanese all at all, because we have nothing plus from this, of course he had nightmare visions. they actually, and there is no one who has written so deeply and anxiously about the future of the united states that there is absolutely no future. she literally another 10-20 years and he will not be. maybe that's why it should be said that he is respected. he is known once he was a co-host of crossfire on sienne. it was a long time ago e in the

nineties at the beginning of the nineties, and i used to visit this one a lot. oh, on myself too. well, very old, but enough to influence, i would say, so in narrow circles, so this discussion will not be, but i wanted to would just uh hmm some. actually, let me tell you about finland and sweden, i would not dramatize their inclusion. actually, on the contrary, it will not be in favor of these countries, but simply harm, because, you know, i have been doing a lot of finnishization. back in the seventies, not only that, i wrote in 1989 that we need to abandon doctrine. brezhnev, but not just to refuse, and eastern europe was finnishized for this,

though. we had to maintain a strong authoritarian government. but this, well, we failed to do this. but then, by the way, very many in the west wrote that finlandization is when you take the best of two worlds. they took a cheap one from us. uh, electricity energy gas oil and so on. we did not interfere in their internal affairs, although there are 300 parties, there are 400 ideologies. where do you want? ride the only thing is a request, foreign policy. eh, in general, lead with caution. well, we don't need to get annoyed, and in general, they say so in the den, where, in general, well, a normal animal is resting. here is the first, second. i will tell you. we actually have a border with the other scandinavian side, norway, norway , yes, but as far as i know, i did not know that we would

touch on this topic today. i would take a special look, but as far as i remember, because all the same, these issues have to be discussed. the entry of norway was stipulated in those soviet times that there are certain types of weapons on the territory of norway, and if i'm not mistaken nuclear weapons, there and so on, they should not be stockpiled or located, that is, because really, well, norway is actually. well, as they say americans next, well, this is actually in our yard. yes, and therefore it all depends on on what conditions they join and plus, when there was no such tension, by the way, and people who were generally skeptical about nato often said that an increase in the number of members was necessary, this is not an acquisition, but just a burden. we will

continue to discuss the vicissitudes of world politics in a few moments. easter of christ live broadcast of services from the cathedral of christ the savior april 23 on saturday at the first big it is important for a technological bank to stay face to face with a person for 3 minutes in two clicks on one call in order to justify your trust to support you, really, issuing loans every day, sovcombank is closer to people. in the sbermarket, everyone is just talking about the benefits at the sbermarket milk house of the village with a 29% discount from the sbermarket meter. order.

anxiety bank afobazol helps to cope with anxiety and insomnia afobazon 4 weeks for the most pronounced effect. svetlana now knows for sure there is a park in the city center sergey vitalievich wanted a new one, ivanov square